What's new

Future of KOH 4400 chassis/car development?

I was assuming they'd take it home and prep it for you to race at the next race.


My understanding is a significant amount of TSCO and Brenthel's revenue is prep and support of race trucks. The trucks live at their shops.
Been to Geiser. 90% of their shop was race prep on their builds. Each truck had it's own bay and mechanic(s).
 
So none of you guys would innovate if you had an opportunity to field a decent budget U4 car at KOH, just run what everyone else is running. I see how it is :flipoff2:
Innovation and racing something different is how Levi ended up across the pond for his newest 4400 racer. Basically said that Campbell cars were great but he needed to one up the competition instead of being on par with the competition.
 
Innovation and racing something different is how Levi ended up across the pond for his newest 4400 racer. Basically said that Campbell cars were great but he needed to one up the competition instead of being on par with the competition.

Unless you do something different from the next guy how can you be any better than the next guy running the exact same stuff? I'll bet that what is tried and true now and winning races won't even be able to grab a top 5 in 5yrs. You either innovate or get left behind.
 
no one wants to be a pharr …

Meh Pharr just needed more time, now he has it.

I just want a bomber with an LV3 and portals. I don’t really care if I come in last place.

That would be sweet and unique. But considering the chassis already fits a V8, why opt for the V6?

Innovation and racing something different is how Levi ended up across the pond for his newest 4400 racer. Basically said that Campbell cars were great but he needed to one up the competition instead of being on par with the competition.

Yeah see, that's awesome. What's that saying again, if you want to be as fast as everyone else, do what they do. If you want to be faster, do something different. But if the "future of KOH 4400 chassis car development" is just running everything that people already do, I guess we're just done innovating :grinpimp:
 
Unless you do something different from the next guy how can you be any better than the next guy running the exact same stuff? I'll bet that what is tried and true now and winning races won't even be able to grab a top 5 in 5yrs. You either innovate or get left behind.
That was basically his thinking as well.
 
If you want to be as fast as everyone else, do what they do. If you want to be faster, do something different. But if the "future of KOH 4400 chassis car development" is just running everything that people already do, I guess we're just done innovating.

This thread has gone off the rails already so many times... :lmao:

Guess we need to start all over and design three cars: One that is no expenses spared...because innovation, one that is innovative, but done on a budget and one that is like all the others, but somehow somebody will be the best driver KOH has ever seen.
 
I hate to say it but guys like Miller and Slawson will end up way behind the 8 ball if they don't start doing something different. SFA 4400 cars are not going to be competitive much longer.

BUT... and there is always a big butt.... Miller and Slawson both build good cars, know how to prep and know how to drive and will be waiting for the day that all the top IFS cars break out and they'll scoop in for the win.


1707870353355.png
 
BUT... and there is always a big butt.... Miller and Slawson both build good cars, know how to prep and know how to drive and will be waiting for the day that all the top IFS cars break out and they'll scoop in for the win.


1707870353355.png


I wouldn't even show up to a race if I knew the only chance I had at winning was if the fast cars all broke. I race to win, not to be an also ran and I'm sure both of those guys feel the same way.
 
I wouldn't even show up to a race if I knew the only chance I had at winning was if the fast cars all broke. I race to win, not to be an also ran and I'm sure both of those guys feel the same way.

Miller placed what 5th this year? I remember them talking about how he has less power than most as well as a solid axle car. I'd have like to see Bylers run, they push those cars pretty hard. Given the circumstances though very understandable why they didn't. I don't think you can count Miller out but I think head to head the SA cars need a real good day vs. a few mistakes made racing a state of the art IFS car. It's hard to outrace technology unless it fails.
 
Coyote that revs to 9000 rpm. For the drone footage on the short course. Lets be honest we're only racing to look and sound awesome

As crew chief and wiring guy for (what I think was) the first 4400 at KOH with a hot Coyote motor, from 2012-2015 and occasionally beyond, I can tell you how awesome it is when the car leaves the pits at WOT and everyone around turns to look wondering 'WTF is in that thing?'. JR4X knows what I mean :grinpimp:

After we got a few bugs worked out, got it tuned, and on the dyno...we all had that same reaction, WTF did we build here :laughing:

Then that engine got dropped into the well-known bright blue and wood-paneled Jeepster build, and between that and the SHO V6 in my own buggy, we made some good engine noises out at EJS 2016 as well.

The race car got a truck Coyote with a big fat blower on top, and that sounded awesome as well, but was never quite as cool IMO. It raced a few seasons like that and is now getting a built 7.3, should be back on the track next year.

All that to say, I agree, and would absolutely go that same route again vs anything GM.
 
This thread has gone off the rails already so many times... :lmao:

Guess we need to start all over and design three cars: One that is no expenses spared...because innovation, one that is innovative, but done on a budget and one that is like all the others, but somehow somebody will be the best driver KOH has ever seen.

Haha yep yep. I will say I do appreciate both the unlimited budget innovation, and the budget minded innovation, I do think there are plenty of innovations that won't necessarily ramp the cost exponentially like others.

Less weight, more centered, and possibly more clearance for a portal axle to swing it up in front of the crank pulley

Solid reasoning, makes sense.

As crew chief and wiring guy for (what I think was) the first 4400 at KOH with a hot Coyote motor, from 2012-2015 and occasionally beyond, I can tell you how awesome it is when the car leaves the pits at WOT and everyone around turns to look wondering 'WTF is in that thing?'. JR4X knows what I mean :grinpimp:

After we got a few bugs worked out, got it tuned, and on the dyno...we all had that same reaction, WTF did we build here :laughing:

Then that engine got dropped into the well-known bright blue and wood-paneled Jeepster build, and between that and the SHO V6 in my own buggy, we made some good engine noises out at EJS 2016 as well.

The race car got a truck Coyote with a big fat blower on top, and that sounded awesome as well, but was never quite as cool IMO. It raced a few seasons like that and is now getting a built 7.3, should be back on the track next year.

All that to say, I agree, and would absolutely go that same route again vs anything GM.

Was that the LII car, where he cambered the front axle? I seem to vaguely recall that thing being ford powered, but don't recall the specifics
 
Was that the LII car, where he cambered the front axle? I seem to vaguely recall that thing being ford powered, but don't recall the specifics

Yes, and yes. I never drove it besides just moving it around in the pits, because (as I mentioned somewhere before) I couldn't physically drive it, Tim is a big dude and my feet were a good 6" away from the pedals with even just the lap belt on. Which did make the wiring a little easier to access though...

The cambered solid front axle was a fun experiment, and by all measure was a noticable improvement. I'm curious if anyone else has really messed with that idea. Between that and swapping the front diff from a spool to an aggressive LSD (Wavetrac if I remember right), that version of the car with the NA Coyote definitely had the most consistent success and Tim loved how it handled. He overalled several races at our local track (Line Mountain, home turf for Erik Miller and the Blylers).

I'd definitely be interested to know if anyone else is playing with solid axle camber. The same idea is part of what led me to go TTB iny buggy, more tire contact patch during cornering.


1707878847758.png

FB_IMG_1707878704953.jpg

FB_IMG_1707878457939.jpg

FB_IMG_1707878129795.jpg
 
Yes, and yes. I never drove it besides just moving it around in the pits, because (as I mentioned somewhere before) I couldn't physically drive it, Tim is a big dude and my feet were a good 6" away from the pedals with even just the lap belt on. Which did make the wiring a little easier to access though...

The cambered solid front axle was a fun experiment, and by all measure was a noticable improvement. I'm curious if anyone else has really messed with that idea. Between that and swapping the front diff from a spool to an aggressive LSD (Wavetrac if I remember right), that version of the car with the NA Coyote definitely had the most consistent success and Tim loved how it handled. He overalled several races at our local track (Line Mountain, home turf for Erik Miller and the Blylers).

I'd definitely be interested to know if anyone else is playing with solid axle camber. The same idea is part of what led me to go TTB iny buggy, more tire contact patch during cornering.

Fawk yeah, epic. I completely think the cambered solid axle has merit for racing. It doesn't count because I sold it before finishing, but I believed in the idea enough to build camber into the front axle on my 4800/4400 buggy about 10 years ago because of that rig. Absolutely an innovator, and I'm surprised it hasn't become more common too.

I added like 1.5 degrees IIRC, with a little fixture I made to use an alignment bar.

IMG_0221.jpg


IMG_0729.jpg
 
So none of you guys would innovate if you had an opportunity to field a decent budget U4 car at KOH, just run what everyone else is running. I see how it is :flipoff2:

unfortunately a mil isnt enough to innovate at this point in the game and its a 2-3yr process to be reliable enough to be competitive.

if i only got a mil and still got a day job then im buying something fun and peeling out. if i got $10mil then its a different discussion.


levi going to europe to get a rock racer was one of the dumbest things ever.
 
Fawk yeah, epic. I completely think the cambered solid axle has merit for racing. It doesn't count because I sold it before finishing, but I believed in the idea enough to build camber into the front axle on my 4800/4400 buggy about 10 years ago because of that rig. Absolutely an innovator, and I'm surprised it hasn't become more common too.

I added like 1.5 degrees IIRC, with a little fixture I made to use an alignment bar.

IMG_0221.jpg


IMG_0729.jpg

Ah yeah, I remember that thing...did it ever get finished?

We did around 3 degrees at each side, it wasn't really all that scientific, basically just a pie cut, ratchet strap to pull the kerf back, and weld it back up. Just had to make sure to keep it in line with the U joints.

Edit: if you zoom in on the right side, you can see the cut opened up through the lower knuckle brace. We did it on the existing axle housing just to try it, he later built a new front axle to more exact specs, but still kept the camber in it. Not sure if he kept it the same or went more/less, but it's in there.
FB_IMG_1707880096026.jpg
 
Last edited:
I finish welded and painted the chassis, but sold it as a roller. It went to a friend, though I haven't checked in for a while. I think it's on the backburner like it was for me

were you the one who was in the hospital dying but still modeling a huge cantilever setup or am i thinking of someone else?
 
Top Back Refresh