Winchested
IH Scout SSII
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2020
- Member Number
- 2128
- Messages
- 1,250
Its a Honda. Very much like the old falcon based ranchero.Those things are not worthy. Looks like a Taurus chassis with a "truck" body on it......
Its a Honda. Very much like the old falcon based ranchero.Those things are not worthy. Looks like a Taurus chassis with a "truck" body on it......
Once they trickle down they will be great shibox beaters.Those things are not worthy. Looks like a Taurus chassis with a "truck" body on it......
Drool for the new arms and please weigh the new suspension parts (arms, portals, etc) just for fun.
Tom can’t remember his last name. But no, the speakers are coming outGonna keep the speakers? Who was that team that raced KOH that always had the speakers jamming out?
I went to work and while I was gone the Bronco exploded. 1,000 pounds flew off in every direction. This will be the last weight we get on it for a while. Once the tires come off it’ll be a while before next weigh in. There’s still a lot left to remove too.
I'm thinking lots of that could be lightened?
I’ll let you know when we know. We’re just keeping tabs as we go, that’s only a vague data point for funsies just because we can.But how much of that weight do you have to put back on to be legal? It's not like you can just slap a cage in it and race like that. Fenders, hood, quarters and the tail gate gotta be a few pounds...
John WebbWho was that team that raced KOH that always had the speakers jamming out?
If I had a set of scales like that, I’d weigh everything for fun too! Will drop a good bit of weight by losing the windshield too.I’ll let you know when we know. We’re just keeping tabs as we go, that’s only a vague data point for funsies just because we can.
We weighed the dash. No pics but just the dash was 70 pounds and the HVAC is completely separatedWeigh the box of fasteners
Maybe its just me, but I am pretty impressed with the beef and clearance of the front clip. I feel like they could have used stamped sheet, like everything else, and had it lighter, and good enough, but I would think it might actually be adding some structural rigidity when bolted to the frame.
There is zero chance anyone involved in designing that said "hey, we're 90% of the way to metal already, let's add a tubular section, some real bolts to hold it on and reap the rigidity and strength benefits" and if they had the other dozen idiots in the room would have shot it down with dumb "hurr durr, steel, what is this, the 1970s?" type responses.
Plus, as much as we would hate to admit it, 90+% of these trucks will be used by soccer mom's who have no idea what all the gadgets and do-dad's are.You have no idea how any of this shit works.
They're building a car, not an offroad buggy.
There are rules and regulations to follow. Crash test (including against pedestrians. Bean counters to please. Style design constraints etc.
I've worked in professional BigCo engineering departments. I know exactly how this works.You have no idea how any of this shit works.
They're building a car, not an offroad buggy.
The US doesn't do pedestrian crash test requirements (although I think the NHTSA does do ratings). Are they selling this in Europe? Do they think anti-car lefty swine will be a core buyer demographic? Those are the only two reasons to have a "collapseable" plastic and fiberglass core support on something that could otherwise benefit from the structure.Crash test (including against pedestrians).
Hence why the engineers just ship plastic bullshit. That's easier than fighting tooth and nail for some marginal improvement.Bean counters to please. Style design constraints etc.
I'm glad those are the on;y 2 reasons you see. Your world must be very simple.The US doesn't do pedestrian crash test requirements (although I think the NHTSA does do ratings). Are they selling this in Europe? Do they think anti-car lefty swine will be a core buyer demographic? Those are the only two reasons to have a "collapseable" plastic and fiberglass core support on something that could benefit from the structure.
The coffee machine being full is a higher priority than listening to engineers. Why TF would I fight tooth and nails for something that is better when corporate sends me fuck yous on the daily coming from the product team (marketing) ?Hence why the engineers just ship plastic bullshit. That's easier than fighting tooth and nail for some marginal improvement.
You know what I meant.I'm glad those are the on;y 2 reasons you see. Your world must be very simple.
Completely agree. Hence why "hey if we talk the X team into doing Y we could add so much more Z to the finished product" is something that only dumbasses straight out of college do. Experienced dumbasses just figure out ways to make the product worse while making their KPIs better.The coffee machine being full is a higher priority than listening to engineers. Why TF would I fight tooth and nails for something that is better when corporate sends me fuck yous on the daily coming from the product team (marketing) ?
Hence why this vehicle doesn't have one despite it probably being both more performant in the ways they care about than the plastic abomination it does happen to have.Cool. Then I promise you that nobody in their right mind is gonna ask for a tubular front end if they want to stay employed.
What the F are you talking about? It does have tubular front structure heavily attached to the frame with a cast aluminum core support. I don’t know what you think you’re seeing but there is 0 plastic in these two picturesHence why this vehicle doesn't have one despite it probably being both more performant in the ways they care about than the plastic abomination it does happen to have.
I thought that core support was just greyish black glass fiber reinforced plastic.Everything in yellow is steel, the gray is aluminum and the frame is pretty stout.