What's new
By:
Filters

Debate prep

Roc Doc said:
Maybe you know. If Trump loses his appeals and or fails to get the charges moved to Fed court, before innaugation day, does Vance get the big chair?

He won re-election in a landslide, but that didn't work out so well for him.
Click to expand...
From everything I've read Trump would become POTUS even in jail. I have ZERO idea how that would work with him in a jail cell. It does seem to depend on who you talk to as there seems to be no consensus on this. IMO it'd end up at SCOTUS.

As for Nixon, the election happened before the truth about how deeply Nixon was involved became known. I lived through that whole sorry
mess as a young adult while in the Navy.
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
From everything I've read Trump would become POTUS even in jail. I have ZERO idea how that would work with him in a jail cell. It does seem to depend on who you talk to as there seems to be no consensus on this. IMO it'd end up at SCOTUS.

As for Nixon, the election happened before the truth about how deeply Nixon was involved became known. I lived through that whole sorry
mess as a young adult while in the Navy.
Click to expand...

That's all I've heard as well, nothing definate.

I was at Boy Scout camp when Nixon resigned.
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
From everything I've read Trump would become POTUS even in jail. I have ZERO idea how that would work with him in a jail cell. It does seem to depend on who you talk to as there seems to be no consensus on this. IMO it'd end up at SCOTUS.

As for Nixon, the election happened before the truth about how deeply Nixon was involved became known. I lived through that whole sorry
mess as a young adult while in the Navy.
Click to expand...
200 copy 3.gif
 
I was listening to a libertarian podcast. One of the speakers said that the debate does not matter that much. In election terms, the seven weeks to the election are an eternity.

Trump's assassination attempt was exactly seven weeks ago, and it seems like it was a decade ago.
 
Last edited:
Roc Doc said:
So did you enjoy the debate?
Click to expand...
Earlier in this thread I mentioned I have a life and a job and I would be in bed since I have a early start ( 1 am )so to answer your question nope.

I did see clips today though.
 
FJC11 said:
Earlier in this thread I mentioned I have a life and a job and I would be in bed since I have a early start ( 1 am )so to answer your question nope.

I did see clips today though.
Click to expand...
So from the clips how do you think DJT did?
 
americanwirenews.com

Audio earrings get viral bump after debate as rumors spread of secret earpiece disguised as jewelry · American Wire News

Following the September 10 presidential debate, rumors swirled about one candidate's potential use of a secret earpiece.
americanwirenews.com americanwirenews.com

Audio earrings get viral bump after debate as rumors spread of secret earpiece disguised as jewelry​

September 12, 2024 | Sierra Marlee | Print Article

Following the September 10 presidential debate, rumors swirled about one candidate’s potential use of a secret earpiece disguised as jewelry.
Vice President Kamala Harris was accused of smuggling Nova H1 Audio earrings onto the debate stage, allegedly using them to receive answers from her handlers. The rumor quickly found footing on X where users pointed out there were some similarities between the two pieces of jewelry.

Kamala Harris had an interesting choice of earrings for the debate against President Trump.
Credit: @TTAVOfficial pic.twitter.com/akPqoNJNjT
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) September 11, 2024
Click to expand...

But fact-checks and X’s own Community Notes system claim that this is not the case.
sg-comm-note-earring.jpg
(Screengrab: X)
Instead, it is believed that Harris was wearing the South Sea Pearl Earrings in gold from Tiffany & Co. These earrings are reportedly no longer available for online purchase but do have an $800 sibling from the Tiffany Hardware collection called the Double Pearl Hinged Earrings in Sterling Silver.
Most notably, it appears the H1 Audio earrings are not currently available for purchase on the Icebach Sound website, and a Kickstarter campaign to raise money for the product was last updated in May 2023. It’s also no longer possible to donate to the campaign, as you had to donate in 2021 to receive the offers.

Malte Iversen, the managing director at Icebach Sound, responded to the furor over their product in a Wednesday statement to Just the News.
“We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it. To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of colour is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colours,” he joked, mocking former President Donald Trump.
“Currently, we are unfortunately out of stock and also busy preparing a lawsuit against a big Chinese tech company breaching our patents. We are talking to investors in order to ramp up operations accordingly and are confident that we will ship again very soon.”

 
bigun said:
americanwirenews.com

Audio earrings get viral bump after debate as rumors spread of secret earpiece disguised as jewelry · American Wire News

Following the September 10 presidential debate, rumors swirled about one candidate's potential use of a secret earpiece.
americanwirenews.com americanwirenews.com

Audio earrings get viral bump after debate as rumors spread of secret earpiece disguised as jewelry​

September 12, 2024 | Sierra Marlee | Print Article

Following the September 10 presidential debate, rumors swirled about one candidate’s potential use of a secret earpiece disguised as jewelry.
Vice President Kamala Harris was accused of smuggling Nova H1 Audio earrings onto the debate stage, allegedly using them to receive answers from her handlers. The rumor quickly found footing on X where users pointed out there were some similarities between the two pieces of jewelry.



But fact-checks and X’s own Community Notes system claim that this is not the case.
sg-comm-note-earring.jpg
(Screengrab: X)
Instead, it is believed that Harris was wearing the South Sea Pearl Earrings in gold from Tiffany & Co. These earrings are reportedly no longer available for online purchase but do have an $800 sibling from the Tiffany Hardware collection called the Double Pearl Hinged Earrings in Sterling Silver.
Most notably, it appears the H1 Audio earrings are not currently available for purchase on the Icebach Sound website, and a Kickstarter campaign to raise money for the product was last updated in May 2023. It’s also no longer possible to donate to the campaign, as you had to donate in 2021 to receive the offers.

Malte Iversen, the managing director at Icebach Sound, responded to the furor over their product in a Wednesday statement to Just the News.
“We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it. To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of colour is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colours,” he joked, mocking former President Donald Trump.
“Currently, we are unfortunately out of stock and also busy preparing a lawsuit against a big Chinese tech company breaching our patents. We are talking to investors in order to ramp up operations accordingly and are confident that we will ship again very soon.”

Click to expand...
tmp.gif
 
Why is there some kind of earpiece conspiracy after every debate? Can you imagine being up on stage and receiving instructions without looking like a lunatic? Even the people who use earpieces like security and news anchors are totally unnatural when someone is talking in their ear.

Kamala was better prepared and more focused for the debate, her moderator allies covered for her when she evaded the question and attacked Trump on her behalf. Most of the questions themselves were biased against Trump, some were actually tough on Kamala or would have been if the moderators had followed through (Or if Trump himself had called her out).

Trump performed slightly worse than usual, he nailed some questions, barely skated through some, but he took the bait from both the moderators and Kamala and went down rabbit holes. He missed so many opportunities, Kamala left herself wide open a dozen times for career ending takedowns but Trump was not poised to strike.

Someone talking in Kamala's ear would not have changed a damn thing. I like Trump's policies, I'm voting for him for what that matters in my state, but this earpiece shit is "Cringe" as the zoomers say.
 
MigGunslinger said:
Why is there some kind of earpiece conspiracy after every debate? Can you imagine being up on stage and receiving instructions without looking like a lunatic? Even the people who use earpieces like security and news anchors are totally unnatural when someone is talking in their ear.

Kamala was better prepared and more focused for the debate, her moderator allies covered for her when she evaded the question and attacked Trump on her behalf. Most of the questions themselves were biased against Trump, some were actually tough on Kamala or would have been if the moderators had followed through (Or if Trump himself had called her out).

Trump performed slightly worse than usual, he nailed some questions, barely skated through some, but he took the bait from both the moderators and Kamala and went down rabbit holes. He missed so many opportunities, Kamala left herself wide open a dozen times for career ending takedowns but Trump was not poised to strike.

Someone talking in Kamala's ear would not have changed a damn thing. I like Trump's policies, I'm voting for him for what that matters in my state, but this earpiece shit is "Cringe" as the zoomers say.
Click to expand...
because movies.
 
MigGunslinger said:
Why is there some kind of earpiece conspiracy after every debate? Can you imagine being up on stage and receiving instructions without looking like a lunatic? Even the people who use earpieces like security and news anchors are totally unnatural when someone is talking in their ear.

Kamala was better prepared and more focused for the debate, her moderator allies covered for her when she evaded the question and attacked Trump on her behalf. Most of the questions themselves were biased against Trump, some were actually tough on Kamala or would have been if the moderators had followed through (Or if Trump himself had called her out).

Trump performed slightly worse than usual, he nailed some questions, barely skated through some, but he took the bait from both the moderators and Kamala and went down rabbit holes. He missed so many opportunities, Kamala left herself wide open a dozen times for career ending takedowns but Trump was not poised to strike.

Someone talking in Kamala's ear would not have changed a damn thing. I like Trump's policies, I'm voting for him for what that matters in my state, but this earpiece shit is "Cringe" as the zoomers say.
Click to expand...

Instead of saying "Do you all remember what life was life in 2019? Was that better than it is now? If yes, vote for me. If not, vote for my opponent", what happened was:

1726152411722.png
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh