Never ran Yukon’s with 800 ft lb of torque and 40’s, can’t personally compare. I’m not convinced that 300M is better than 4340.
The rest of the story. Pre running, Bender Alley, we got hung up, dad bumps it and the drivers side (short side) inner lets go with no noise. John Currie helps get us out and we go back to pit and put our spare in. Spare inner is an RCV 4340 that we’ve had for forever. Race the EMC on 37’s with one 4340 one 300M, no issues finish 6th in class. 4400 race on 40’s Bender Alley again. Kevin gets hung up gets horsey with it and the long side 300M lets go taking out the locker and seal housing. 4340 shaft fully intact.
Supposedly 300M is stronger but 4340 can take way more degrees of deflection and return to normal.
Define "bump" please.
As you know, harder isn't always stronger. Its all about the usage and selecting the correct material for that usage. I would think a material with more give (4340) would be preferred for axle shaft material in the endurance rock bashing game. I would rather twist an axle shaft/splines during the event and have to replace it at the next race prep than to have the "strongest" shafts on the planet that snap instead of flex when overloaded.
Do you guys plan on going back to or at least trying 4340 shafts after learning what you did?
Edit: 800ft lbs of torque is . I bet that car is a blast to drive!
Last edited: