gozuki
Webwheeler
If it doesn't say in stock, beware that Summit relies on extensive drop ships from their vendors
My favorite fab guy told me to measure from known side to side points... like body mounts, spring hangers, shackle hangers, etc. Then tack weld the frame mounts to a piece of steel to square them up. Then put that assembly up to the frame and measure from the known side to side points.When setting up an '05+ FRONT axle under my Bronco; HOW WOULD I:
1) Square axle to frame?
i do the same and then i use some solid rod to align my brackets through the mount holes like i did on these shackle mountsMy favorite fab guy told me to measure from known side to side points... like body mounts, spring hangers, shackle hangers, etc. Then tack weld the frame mounts to a piece of steel to square them up. Then put that assembly up to the frame and measure from the known side to side points.
I agree with this. You have to have the caster right or it will suck to drive on the street. The stock Superduty doesn't have enough caster in my opinion. I'm not sure how they drive, but they may benifit from the long wheel base.If you're not going to cut and turn the knuckles to get good caster and pinion angles, then don't even worry about the pinion angle. Caster is way more important. If the lower driveshaft u joint binds, then you can look at other options, but I suspect it will be fine with the radius arms.
nOOB questions:
a) What is usually the pinion angle on said front axle?
b) What is usually the caster angle on said front axle?
c) With the 6" lift will I have to compromise greatly with the caster and pinion angle?
d) How bad would it be on steering if I set the caster to 0* in order to have a more proper pinion angle?
e) How bad would it be on steering if I set the caster to -1* in order to have a more proper pinion angle?
f) Where on said axle could I use as a reference point when setting/determining caster?
CDA455, I tried to look at my thread and find the numbers, but it was too hard. Going just by memory, I can tell you I went to the dealer and the stock radius arms are dead horizontal on a SD truck. I believe this gives them 3 degrees of caster. I always forget whether it's negative or positive, but if you lower the radious arms at the back, the caster gets more better. Obviously, that's not what you want to do. So you need to slot the holes or weld something to achieve this. I found my project drove like shit with 3 degrees. Now I have it like 7-8 degrees and it feels good. You may not have as much issue as me if you don't have full hydro. As far as a measure point, when the to mount holes are straight vertical, you have 3degrees of good caster.
I haven't seen answered... is there a 40 spline locking hub available? I've been searching with zero results. I'm not sure I saw even a 35 spline aftermarket hub like Yukon. Is the only option broaching a stock 35 spline?
Also, what is the difference between a 2017+ knuckle and a 2012.5 to 16? Weaver fab is showing they are different but it isn't clear if it is same "brakes" with aluminum knuckles. If it is aluminum knuckles, what is the weight saving?
I'm starting to shop for a front axle and the cost difference between 05-08, 09-12, 13-16, and 17+ are within striking distance of each other depending on the drive(+/- 100 miles).
I thought it was 47 spline or something equally big that just went straight to the hub... I've found flanges for 40 spline and they appear to have a small gear going from 40 to ~32 spline hub.IIRC; the 40 spline fits straight into the outer hub, thereby needing only a cover.
Yes; the '17+ are YUGE'R (bigger)!
IIRC; the 40 spline fits straight into the outer hub, thereby needing only a cover.
I thought it was 47 spline or something equally big that just went straight to the hub... I've found flanges for 40 spline and they appear to have a small gear going from 40 to ~32 spline hub.
Is the 17 bigger? Looking at Weaver's photo, they just looked to have an odd casting to them when compared to earlier.
What are the pros/cons of the various steering options out there? Stock vs weld-on vs machined top.
Aside from being low, is there any weakness to the stock setup? Is the pass side double set up weak?
Weld-on seems like a good compromise between cost and height. Assuming a competent welder does it, any concerns?
Machined top seems to prove that every inch costs. Is there any concerns about the concentrated force at the top of the knuckle? I think it was kingpin knuckles that had issues with the leverage at the top(infrequent but happened)
Here is an example of a weld-on(not sure if Barnes or not, I stole picture):
Here is example of machined top(Weaver, etc, picture shows Reid knuckle but the machine concept):
Good point on adding vs removing material. The only issue with Reid is the ~$400 a side without arms.i know reid high steer knuckles are cast with extra material to help with strength
compared to machining a stock knuckle where you only take away material
I trust the guy who I'd have do the welding.i would do high steer like hydrodynamic did it if i didnt want to machine it with weaver
i will weld to cast steel but i dont want to rely on it 100%
Dust Buggy
Many of you know me from the HydroDynamic Buggy. Around Thanksgiving 2017 we had some family over and we took the buggy out for some night runs around the ranch. One of the last runs was with my three boys, the 4 and 6 year old sitting in the passenger seat and the 2 year old sitting with me...irate4x4.com
doesnt matter how good of a welder he is, welding cast steel isnt idealI trust the guy who I'd have do the welding.
Agreed, I've seen bunches of pictures of welded arms ripped off the knuckle.doesnt matter how good of a welder he is, welding cast steel isnt ideal
This is my thought, but if I do it again, I will do something along the lines of Hydro Dinamics.Seen some pics of a failed weld on kit that was ties into the OEM arm.
I'm not a fan of them, I'd rather do a machined arm.
Snowracer posted a 99-04 superduty weld on kit that failed at the old place, very high abuse on a heavy rig but still failedDoes anyone have evidence of a weld on kit that utilizes a large bolt to tie into the oem steering arm failing?
I am building an axle and I need high steer and need / want to use GM 1 ton tie rod ends. I am not finding many options other than Reid or Weaver.
I am considering building my own weld on arms that tie into the oem arms and use tie rod ends.
The picture you linked is of the first gen that I scraped. It was up to show the difference. It was was all laser cut plate, looked cool, but the geometry was a little off and the wheel clearance wasn't great. I made a gen 2 with simple flat bar and only two laser cut tabs. The gen 2 would be easy for anyone to make in their garage. Substitute the laser cut tabs for flat bar or notch some premade link tabs to fit. I also decided the lower stock ear was useless for the high steer attachment so I cut it off and sanded the knuckle flat to clean up the looks. The centerline of the ball joints to steering rod end is 5.5" for 45* of angle using a 8" cylinder.Good point on adding vs removing material. The only issue with Reid is the ~$400 a side without arms.
I trust the guy who I'd have do the welding.
Here is HYDRODYNAMIC version of high steer:
That is way beyond my capability
Snowracer posted a 99-04 superduty weld on kit that failed at the old place, very high abuse on a heavy rig but still failed
its not quite and apples to apples comparison, but it made me go with the reid knuckles for my plans (big heavy full cab rig), if i was going wih a lighter rig i would have gone a different route
actually i still have the stock knuckles that i might setup with high steer as trail spares, or to sell 🤷
from the welfare duty thread
for me one of the great things about how hydrodynamic did it is that i can do it that way at home myself without having to custom order or send them off to be machined, i like being able to do things myself at home.That is way beyond my capability