just wait till they add that all sub contractors and supply chain need it as well.
Subs are already part of it, but it stops short of ordinary parts suppliers.
just wait till they add that all sub contractors and supply chain need it as well.
In n Out Burger gave them theWhat would happen, if you were a high level company guy who has to fire people, and you decide you will not fire your workers that are not vaxxed?
If the company took a stand against any "suggestions" from the government, I wonder what their potential damage could be. A fine?
I would hope that if I was a big shot somewhere, that I'd be willing to at least look at what I'm faced with if I was to choose to defy their orders and refuse to fire my employees. We need to see this.
Subs are already part of it, but it stops short of ordinary parts suppliers.
What would happen, if you were a high level company guy who has to fire people, and you decide you will not fire your workers that are not vaxxed?
If the company took a stand against any "suggestions" from the government, I wonder what their potential damage could be. A fine?
I would hope that if I was a big shot somewhere, that I'd be willing to at least look at what I'm faced with if I was to choose to defy their orders and refuse to fire my employees. We need to see this.
not at this point - but if my machine shop was running on supplying widgets to a government contractor then they could flow it down on their own accord (prior to the gov't doing it). Then it's my choice to give up my cash cow. I see both of those cases possible.so if rugger has a machine shop making housings for his nogs, they are part of the mandate?
so if rugger has a machine shop making housings for his nogs, they are part of the mandate?
Interesting.not at this point - but if my machine shop was running on supplying widgets to a government contractor then they could flow it down on their own accord (prior to the gov't doing it). Then it's my choice to give up my cash cow. I see both of those cases possible.
not at this point - but if my machine shop was running on supplying widgets to a government contractor then they could flow it down on their own accord (prior to the gov't doing it). Then it's my choice to give up my cash cow. I see both of those cases possible.
Interesting.
I was about to post this before reading rugger's post:
Yes- at least how my employer interprets the guidance. If the nogs were engineered/designed/developed/produced for under a federal contract, yes. If the nogs are a COTS/consumer item the company produces without federal funding, no.
That's way under the real numbers, more like 15%. There's a shitload of people who were eligible for retirement that didn't want the Jab that just retired in 10/18.The local news in Spokane is reporting that 6% of WA state employees have been let go/walked for refusing to get vaccinated.
J&J is closer to an old school vaccine.Novavax is the old school one right?
Beloved California burger chain In-N-Out is firing back against San Francisco’s vaccine mandate. The company blasted the city after the Department of Public Health temporarily shut down its Fisherman’s Wharf location on Oct. 14. for not checking customers’ vaccine cards. It’s the only San Francisco restaurant that’s been closed for violating the indoor vaccinate mandate, the health department said.
Despite multiple warnings, In-N-Out employees continued to let customers into the restaurant without verifying their vaccination status since at least late September. (The city’s indoor vaccine mandate for businesses, including restaurants, went into effect on Aug. 20.) In-N-Out acknowledged the enforcement violation, calling San Francisco’s indoor vaccination requirement “intrusive, improper, and offensive” governmental “overreach.”
“We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government,” In-N-Out’s Chief Legal and Business Officer Arnie Wensinger said in a statement. “It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant associates to segregate customers into those who may be served and those who may not, whether based on the documentation they carry, or any other reason.”
The temporary closure of the 333 Jefferson St. outpost, the only In-N-Out in San Francisco, was first reported by local TV station KRON.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Monica-Gandhi-is-S-F-s-most-controversial-16538324.php
The Department of Public Health said it asked In-N-Out to correct the violations multiple times since late September, after a complaint was filed with the city’s 311 service center line. After an initial visit on Sept. 24, health inspectors returned on Oct. 6 and found that the In-N-Out was still not enforcing the vaccine mandate. The Public Health Department said it “attempted multiple times to bring the business into compliance with the health order” before shutting In-N-Out down Thursday, Oct. 14.
“The business was instructed to cease all operations on site immediately because of the threat it poses to public health,” the Department of Public Health said in a statement.
In-N-Out had posted required signage about the city’s vaccine requirement, but employees were not enforcing it, Wensinger confirmed. The restaurant has since reopened but is no longer offering indoor dining.
This is the most brazen example of a San Francisco restaurant pushing back against the indoor vaccine check. But mask mandates and other coronavirus requirements have been a flash point for restaurants throughout the pandemic, including some Bay Area owners that made headlines for defying public health orders. In Mendocino, a now-closed cafe went viral for charging customers who wear face coverings a fee.
In-N-Out did not immediately respond to a question about what the company’s opposition to vaccine checks means for locations in Contra Costa County or Los Angeles, both of which require proof of vaccination for indoor dining. The chain doesn’t have any restaurants in Berkeley, the only other Bay Area city with an indoor vaccine mandate.
Elena Kadvany is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @ekadvany
J&J is closer to an old school vaccine.
Novavax is interesting and uses an engineered virus to infect moth cells, mutating them into a new type of cell with lots of covid spike-like proteins on it. They blend those cells up, extract the custom spike-ish proteins, and slap those on a synthetic cell membrane kind of like what they use to hold mRNA in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
Just say no. What if all .gov contractors told the .gov no? It's the American way Land of the free, home of the brave.Wife works for a .gov contractor.
She found out today she Hass till 11/3 to get her first dose or she will be out of a job.
Nogs means something real different to me, I have no idea what it means how it is being used here.Interesting.
I was about to post this before reading rugger's post:
Yes- at least how my employer interprets the guidance. If the nogs were engineered/designed/developed/produced for under a federal contract, yes. If the nogs are a COTS/consumer item the company produces without federal funding, no.
He means "nods"Nogs means something real different to me, I have no idea what it means how it is being used here.
He means "nods"
Colloquially referred to as "nods"night optic goggles . . . .
As long as they keep teleportation experiments out of it we should be OK, probably.Already saw that Jeff Goldbloom Movie.... doesn't end well.
just wait till they add that all sub contractors and supply chain need it as well.
Good for in -n out
God bless In n Out. I've been saying this the whole time, with masks and all. "We are not the police."We refuse to become the vaccination police
I just got the email from my company that employees need to comply since we are a federal contractor. Since the notice came out so late, there is not much time for personnel to get the Moderna Vax based on the time tables.