What's new

Libertarians- “keep getting your 3% every four years”

That's about the extent of my opinion. They generally look dumb and reek of immediate regret, if that's more what you were looking for?

Of course, but every contract is an agreement between two parties. Are you willing to do business with a bank who has crucified fifteen fourth graders in their front lawn?

I asked specifically if you think it should be legal to give kids tattoos. A yes or no is what i was looking for.

It is illegal to crucify people in the US so i am assuming that is hyperbole. But if their CS is good and their rate is .25% better, hell yes. So would you.
 
Yes and how are they prevented?
They aren't.

In our hypothetical no-irs utopia, say Tony Tortallini decides to rough you up for protection money, how far is he going to get before arse barks at him like a terrier about 'catching a bullet'? Nowhere near as far as the IRS does.

This is getting confusing. We are generally in agreement about stuff so i am going to assume we are here and go eat dinner :flipoff2:
 
I asked specifically if you think it should be legal to give kids tattoos. A yes or no is what i was looking for.
well then "there shalt be no law concerning the application of ink to nor below the dermis"

that sufficient?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
But if their CS is good and their rate is .25% better, hell yes. So would you.
fuck dude I haven't set foot into a menards since they went all in on hypecold plandemic fearmongering

Maybe I'm just a whole lot more spiteful than you are.
 
In your doomsday wet dream of police force vs lynch mob I take the police.

Foolish to think an unchecked mob wouldnt quickly collapse into a tyrannical clusterfuck without due process.
An "unchecked mob" made up of westerners of "typical first world morals" will quickly develop some semblance of due process. The reason you never see that with ad-hoc mobs, gangs and other extralegal structures is because the kind of people who do that sort of shit in the current reality where the state will kill, imprison or impoverish you for doing so doesn't exactly select for "normal reasonable people".
 
GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT BE INVOLVED IN MEDICAL CARE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM
I'm as "anti-.gov" as anyone, but let me ask:
WHO will YOU trust to ensure Doctor's are Certified?
WHO do you go to to make sure the Plumber coming to fix your shit is "Licensed"?
WHO do you expect to fix the pothole on your street?

If it's not ".Gov", the who is it?

If .Gov was abolished and someone else was running the show,
What would THEY be?

I'll let you think about that for a minute
 
I'm as "anti-.gov" as anyone, but let me ask:
WHO will YOU trust to ensure Doctor's are Certified?
WHO do you go to to make sure the Plumber coming to fix your shit is "Licensed"?
WHO do you expect to fix the pothole on your street?

If it's not ".Gov", the who is it?

If .Gov was abolished and someone else was running the show,
What would THEY be?

I'll let you think about that for a minute
all the regulations and laws are already written by "industry partnerships"

SAE can't exist as its own independent body, and needs uncle sam giving it the nod?
Your first line was a bit of a lie.
 
I'm as "anti-.gov" as anyone, but let me ask:
WHO will YOU trust to ensure Doctor's are Certified?
WHO do you go to to make sure the Plumber coming to fix your shit is "Licensed"?
WHO do you expect to fix the pothole on your street?

If it's not ".Gov", the who is it?

If .Gov was abolished and someone else was running the show,
What would THEY be?

I'll let you think about that for a minute
486 pretty well covered it.
all the regulations and laws are already written by "industry partnerships"

SAE can't exist as its own independent body, and needs uncle sam giving it the nod?
Your first line was a bit of a lie.
 
all the regulations and laws are already written by "industry partnerships"

SAE can't exist as its own independent body, and needs uncle sam giving it the nod?
Your first line was a bit of a lie.
You're missing my point
For a Society to exist prosperisly, "someone" needs to be the "final say"

It's up to "us" to make sure that "someone" stays in their lane

Unfortunately, (obviously) that went away decades ago.

What I'm saying is, all you MFers are "Fuck .Gov", when deep down inside I would "hope" you realize that some form is necessary.

And, [486], I don't lie :mad3:
 
I'm as "anti-.gov" as anyone, but let me ask:
WHO will YOU trust to ensure Doctor's are Certified?
WHO do you go to to make sure the Plumber coming to fix your shit is "Licensed"?
WHO do you expect to fix the pothole on your street?

If it's not ".Gov", the who is it?

If .Gov was abolished and someone else was running the show,
What would THEY be?

I'll let you think about that for a minute
I can't believe an adult actually typed this. Do you honestly think the regulatory and licensing bodies in the .gov are actually the top of their field experts?
 
I can't believe an adult actually typed this. Do you honestly think the regulatory and licensing bodies in the .gov are actually the top of their field experts?
You're as responsible for them being there as anyone else, in the Grand Scheme
 
"Libertarians" are just another version of woketard virtue signaling losers that most people dont want anything to do with. So they join the libertarian club instead of the lgbtq club because theyre just not committed enough to suck a dick.
 
I can't believe an adult actually typed this. Do you honestly think the regulatory and licensing bodies in the .gov are actually the top of their field experts?
.gov people work for the gov because they cant make it in the real world not because theyre experts in their fields.
 
"Libertarians" are just another version of woketard virtue signaling losers that most people dont want anything to do with. So they join the libertarian club instead of the lgbtq club because theyre just not committed enough to suck a dick.
So like " Gary"?
 
This is getting confusing. We are generally in agreement about stuff so i am going to assume we are here and go eat dinner :flipoff2:
sorry, I'm total shit at communicating and I know you're good people, that's why I put in a lot more effort than dismissive jokes

if there's one takeaway I want to impart, it is that...

In the clown world we're currently in
isn't it reasonable to assume that those in DC would sacrifice a few children at the altar of 'the greater good' in order to erode parental rights?

Remember that homeschoolers are currently domestic terrorists.
Why wouldn't they put a bunch of money into creating enough brainwashed "trans kids" (through their horrible parents) in order to garner public support for putting children in the hands of the state and out of the hands of their parents?

We're not really talking a couple kids getting castrated here, they're just pawns in the political game. We're talking a ban on homeschooling or the state having the final say on all medical treatment (such as vaccination).
 
I'd like a medium rare rib steak, but since that's not on the menu, I'll take lima beans before the dog shit with paprika. Beats going hungry.
 
SAE can't exist as its own independent body, and needs uncle sam giving it the nod?
It's like people don't know the history of these organizations.

They were all initially standalone before they got in bed with .gov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
An "unchecked mob" made up of westerners of "typical first world morals" will quickly develop some semblance of due process. The reason you never see that with ad-hoc mobs, gangs and other extralegal structures is because the kind of people who do that sort of shit in the current reality where the state will kill, imprison or impoverish you for doing so doesn't exactly select for "normal reasonable people".
You don't think prison gangs, street gangs and cartels don't have org charts? Organizations are typically corrupt one way or the other, some within the law, some outside the law and some above the law.
 
It's like people don't know the history of these organizations.

They were all initially standalone before they got in bed with .gov.
Seat belts and air bags were things before the long dick of govt coercion. Must be amazing to think we couldn't have cool shit without it.
 
Seat belts and air bags were things before the long dick of govt coercion. Must be amazing to think we couldn't have cool shit without it.
Like the third brake light, taxi's where doing it and government mandated it like everything else these fucks impose on us.

The government is good at making things suck.
 
Like the third brake light, taxi's where doing it and government mandated it like everything else these fucks impose on us.

The government is good at making things suck.
The best is the old "We wouldn't have 700hp Hellcats for $60000 if it weren't for the EPA" like you couldn't buy 400hp shit off the floor on a high schooler's wage in the 70's.
 
Top Back Refresh