What's new
By:
Filters

Libertarians- “keep getting your 3% every four years”

gt1guy said:
When you start equating bad behavior with the actions of Hitler.
Click to expand...

TDS, here, has been overused to the point of it being meaningless.

Robert DiNero has TDS. Bill Maher has TDS. Stephen King- TDS.

Roc Doc and east beast do not have TDS. They just don't like Trump. There's a wildly huge difference.
 
45acp said:
Oh no doubt I new the 3 letters "had some corruption". I just had no idea it was pretty much the entire agency. And all of them. Entirely. From the very inception of the organization with no pockets of redeemable people left
Click to expand...
Fixed.
 
grumpy356 said:
There line between right and left isn’t a line. It’s semi-circle

And I’m going to reiterate… the libertarian ideas, is known as classical liberalism.
Click to expand...
1697582334226510.jpg
 
45acp said:
TDS, here, has been overused to the point of it being meaningless.

Robert DiNero has TDS. Bill Maher has TDS. Stephen King- TDS.

Roc Doc and east beast do not have TDS. They just don't like Trump. There's a wildly huge difference.
Click to expand...
I feel that way about the term RINO.

The people who most people call RINO… yeah they are what a Republican is.

Trump???? Trump is more a Republican In Name Only than say John Cornyn.
 
45acp said:
Ok, I've got a conspiracy theory. I admit I've pulled this out of my ass.

The L party is gonna run a woke Democrat kid flipper. The 3% vote is going to be the 0.6% vote. Maybe more, because they'll steal some D votes from the now homeless democrat crowd. But either way, what little bit they had is gone. Stick a done in it- it's fork.

Oliver is a Democrat. This makes no sense.

Our dark overlords that control the .fed have been watching Argentina. It's not going to be a quick fix, but Milei is turning it around faster than anyone dreamed. It's obvious to anyone with 3 brain cells watching this region that small government leaving its citizens the fuck alone eats progressivism alive. This isn't good. This could become a trend in the US in the near future. Better nip it in the bud right now, before it ever has a chance of gaining traction here.

So, Soros and Blackrock turn the L party into a joke by inserting Oliver. So now you have R, D, and weird D. Problem solved.
Click to expand...
If the libertarian party was a serious threat to them, it’s possible, but at 3% you’re not even a blip on the radar.
 
Thumping said:
I hear you. I'm not much of a people person and I don't really mix my words. I call it as I see and if that hair lips the pope, so be it.

However I've told my wife that I need to either try and change things or stop bitching about them "locally". So in 2 years we will have our county commission seats up for re-election and just like state and federal you have those in place that are established but fuck it, I'm throwing my hat in the ring.

I'll spend a year putting in shoe leather time instead of money into a campaign and see where it goes.
Click to expand...
Cool dealio, I hope it works out for you and you can do some good. At least stop the bad anyway.
 
rockota said:
fair enough...

though Congress should rightfully bear the blame for much of that...
Click to expand...
See, this is what libertarians can’t grab in their simple minds at all. Even if in the Unicorn rainbow fart chance a libertarian was actually voted in potus, the house and senate would be a wall they would never climb over.

Libertarians want instant gratification but not really willing to do what it’ll take to win over the people imo. I have a plan but it’s too painful for them to hear and accept period.
 
Landslide said:
See, this is what libertarians can’t grab in their simple minds at all. Even if in the Unicorn rainbow fart chance a libertarian was actually voted in potus, the house and senate would be a wall they would never climb over.

Libertarians want instant gratification but not really willing to do what it’ll take to win over the people imo. I have a plan but it’s too painful for them to hear and accept period.
Click to expand...

Come on let’s hear the plan. You’ve teased it out there a few times now.
 
45acp said:
You're one of the TDS phrase over-users... quite possibly one of the worst ones... so your opinion on any of this is even more worthless than anyone else's.

:flipoff2:
Click to expand...
I mostly call out Doc for his TDS because I believe he has it. Not as bad as crazy man Robert Denario but definitely there. While I poke a stick at him about it I really don’t give a fuck.

This is an interesting thread but even as long as it is, no one is going to change anyone’s minds in here. It is great to have conversations about this stuff tho as we really need that.
 
Wenzel said:
Yes, which do you support? As for the coercion comment, it was a snarky reminder that we all know you are anti-coercion. WE GET IT. You won't be man handled by coercion.

As I have pointed out before... here is the Oxford dictionary definition of:

lib·er·al·ism
[ˈlib(ə)rəˌlizəm]
noun
  1. willingness to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; openness to new ideas:
    "one of the basic tenets of liberalism is tolerance"
    • the holding of political views that are socially progressive and promote social welfare:
      "the borough prides itself on being a great bastion of liberalism and diversity"
    • theology
      the belief that many traditional beliefs are dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
  2. a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise:
    "representative democracy operates under the principles of classical liberalism"


  3. the doctrine of a Liberal Party or (in the UK) the Liberal Democrats:
    "working-class support for Liberalism"
Click to expand...
oh I get it, you don't understand how conceptual polysamy works

yes, there are two definitions, one is largely disused but extremely simple and direct while the newer one (the Proper Noun) is actually an antonym of the first if you root through the spinster wording they used
this creates cognative dissonance, confuses those who are only paying things a passing glance, irritates the fuck out of those trying to discuss concepts
generally destroys political discussion, which is by design since the established state actors have nothing to gain and everything to lose from an aware populace
 
MuntCuffin said:
Political parties are for fags.

There are political ideologies and political parties. They are not the same. Why would I not "turn my back" on a person I vehemently disagree with?

Do you not have an individual thought in your head or something? All your ideas are just handed down by the party.

No wonder we are steaming headlong towards 1984. Who would have thought that the Orwellian dystopia we are working on would be so gay.
Click to expand...
Yup, political parties are by their very nature collectivist. They subsume the individual, turn them into a good flock.
most people just don't understand that "collectivist" isn't left or right
 
[486] said:
oh I get it, you don't understand how conceptual polysamy works

yes, there are two definitions, one is largely disused but extremely simple and direct while the newer one (the Proper Noun) is actually an antonym of the first if you root through the spinster wording they used
this creates cognative dissonance, confuses those who are only paying things a passing glance, irritates the fuck out of those trying to discuss concepts
generally destroys political discussion, which is by design since the established state actors have nothing to gain and everything to lose from an aware populace
Click to expand...
Oh I see.... you still can't answer the question.

:laughing:

Just own it you hack. :homer:
 
[486] said:
Yup, political parties are by their very nature collectivist. They subsume the individual, turn them into a good flock.
most people just don't understand that "collectivist" isn't left or right
Click to expand...
Says the guy who belongs to his very own special group... within a group/ :laughing:

The Group:

Mind-fuck-it Anonymous.
 
Rockbuggy84 said:
Can we please stop acting like supporting having kids go through transitions as a minor is normal at all?
Click to expand...
Who is saying that on here?
I haven't seen it, but I do scroll through a lot of posts not really reading too in depth.
 
rockota said:
Said it before and will again... Since 2015, this has all been about making an example of 45 to keep other outsiders from considering a run.
Click to expand...
or possibly it's all about making their caged alternative all the more appealing to the growing majority of 'fuck the feds' voters

What we actually got outta '16-20 was pretty much just 'more of the same' but with better organic PR, since he's pissing off all the right people.
 
Wenzel said:
Your ignorance has lost it's entertainment value...:shaking:
Click to expand...
Maybe I'm confused because you answer your own question about me;
Wenzel said:
Yes, which do you support? As for the coercion comment, it was a snarky reminder that we all know you are anti-coercion. WE GET IT. You won't be man handled by coercion.
Click to expand...
Or maybe you don't understand that progressivism is coercive?
Or maybe you're one of those "organizers" who thinks that through central organization all waste will be eliminated and therefore the state will not need to force itself upon the populace, being that it is producing with greater efficiency than before

but I've never run into someone that actually thinks that, all the capital P Progressives I've talked to are more about their hatred of those who have managed their finances better and gotten ahead in life...
 
MuntCuffin said:
486 has a crush...
Click to expand...
I always do this, I figure someone I can't understand at all might just have a better answer, or a more complete viewpoint, or just sees something I hadn't considered.
Most of the time I'm just wasting my time, but I'm still an optimist in my... soul crushing nihilism view of natural order
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh