What's new
By:
Filters

Libertarians- “keep getting your 3% every four years”

[486] said:
for someone to seek out power over others tells you pretty much the only thing about them that you need to know
Click to expand...
Yep. The types of people you would want in the roles don't want the roles. The types of people who want the roles are NOT the types of people you would want in the roles. It's kind of a self defeating system.
 
east_beast said:
You can't possibly be dumb enough to think these people are telling you the truth. The only ones who come close to telling the truth get trounced in primaries.
Click to expand...
I called bullshit on you and this is your lame assed response? we are done here, good day sir.
 
FJC11 said:
I called bullshit on you and this is your lame assed response? we are done here, good day sir.
Click to expand...
Keep drinking that koolaid! Grifting ass politicians rely on people like you believing in them and showing up to vote for them!
 
[486] said:
maybe I'm a snowflake but this ain't never not gonna trigger me timbers

fuckin commie :fo2:
Click to expand...
The Simpsons we're talking about the grifters well before the media. :laughing:

Don't get triggered by semantics. Pick a different word if you want. It's all the same shit. Grifters, crooks, cheats, criminals, politicians, they're practically interchangeable.
 
I'm just saying it because of how assblasted I get over popular political language. It's just a joke at this point.
 
[486] said:
what part of 'initiating coercion is always wrong' do you disagree with?

I can't think of a single situation where being the first to coerce is excusable
Click to expand...
Thats either a ridiculously phrased rhetorical question, or my main suspicion is that the point of my statement flew completely over your head.

CONTEXT is everything.

See here:
[486] said:
because the bureaucratic fuckstains you're suggesting should have power over your child are all pedophiles
Click to expand...

My response:

Wenzel said:
Hasn't that been a main stay of the Liberalism you promote?
Click to expand...


What you quoted above was my response to something else. Of course, I suspect you knew this... Try answering my first question.
 
[486] said:
I'm just saying it because of how assblasted I get over popular political language. It's just a joke at this point.
Click to expand...
You get assblasted for various reasons I am sure....

In this instance it's your sour regurgitated "define liberalism" moniker. LOL
 
By that I mean, I can't parse any kind of question out of that mess of letters and words.
If you ask a question that I can understand, then I can try to answer it for you.
 
[486] said:
By that I mean, I can't parse any kind of question out of that mess of letters and words.
If you ask a question that I can understand, then I can try to answer it for you.
Click to expand...

Holy crap, you actually ARE that dumb. :laughing:

Just making a statement of fact. No need to respond.
 
Wenzel said:
Holy crap, you actually ARE that dumb. :laughing:

Just making a statement of fact. No need to respond.
Click to expand...
you'rewinner.jpeg
 
Animalmother said:
You go girl, that will show them. :laughing:

Gaff off Trumps promises to throw the Libertarian party a bone by electing them to high level positions in his administration and pardoning their drug hero Ross Ulbricht. Not to mention actions mutually shared with conservatives like pardoning jan 6 rioters, continuing to stay out of wars, and lowering taxes. Yeah vote for the radical lefty, thats the lesser of evils presented alright….:homer:
Click to expand...
It’s because “orange man bad” he said in private “grab em by the pussy” and they got offended

I find it ironic libertarians will head left when their candidate sucks dick (literally). RFK is a leftist by any and all senses. I’ve always believed since Ross, the libertarian party is just a different shade of democrat party.
 
east_beast said:
Hell, pretty much all execs are liars. Most all of them climbed the skeletons of those they stabbed in the back to get to the top. That's been my experience anyway.
Click to expand...
Foreign countries been doing that for years to other countries too, it’s happening from the inside out here now with this current administration.
 
I’ve always said a plan on how the libertarian party can grow, but it’s too painful and too hard for libertarians to put the effort in yo make it happen. So, you lose.
 
[486] said:
was anyone else able to understand what smartypants was trying to ask?
Click to expand...
Who cares. Hes a fag that see the world in libruls! and trumpgod.

And if you disagree with trumpgod, yer one of the librul commies!
He's a douchebag to the highest degree and his opinion aint worth the shit covered corn kernel that just fell out of my ass.
 
Landslide said:
I’ve always said a plan on how the libertarian party can grow, but it’s too painful and too hard for libertarians to put the effort in yo make it happen. So, you lose.
Click to expand...
Because we've been winning with the status quo for so fuckin long, right?
Maybe you can go look for the weapons of mAss destruction next time.

Don't worry, poppa Trump will print off more fiat fun bucks to pay ya.


If people didn't have their head up their ass, the biggest selling point to libertarianism (Note the little L) would be the world around them combined with common sense.

But they swallow the shit being shoveled by the established political elite as they vote for the "lesser of two evils."

Thats like chosing between ky jelly or Vaseline to get raped in the ass.

How about ya stand up and fight against the rapist? But his wiener isn't THAT big, you'll tell yourself as you bite the pillow.

This is not an endorsement of the Libertarian party nor the clowns they endorse. If we are living in clown world, then politics is center stage in this 3 ring circus.
 
MuntCuffin said:
Because we've been winning with the status quo for so fuckin long, right?
Maybe you can go look for the weapons of mAss destruction next time.

Don't worry, poppa Trump will print off more fiat fun bucks to pay ya.


If people didn't have their head up their ass, the biggest selling point to libertarianism (Note the little L) would be the world around them combined with common sense.

But they swallow the shit being shoveled by the established political elite as they vote for the "lesser of two evils."

Thats like chosing between ky jelly or Vaseline to get raped in the ass.

How about ya stand up and fight against the rapist? But his wiener isn't THAT big, you'll tell yourself as you bite the pillow.

This is not an endorsement of the Libertarian party nor the clowns they endorse. If we are living in clown world, then politics is center stage in this 3 ring circus.
Click to expand...

We have to hear the lesser of two evils pitch again when their answer is a child grooming BLM radical….okey dokey.

wait let me recap…whats this we shit? Because if the republicans suck, and the democrats suck, and ohhh…but Im not supporting the Libertarians either. Then how are you participating other than, “Everyone is dumb but me cause Im for fweeeeedom!”
 
MuntCuffin said:
Because we've been winning with the status quo for so fuckin long, right?
Maybe you can go look for the weapons of mAss destruction next time.

Don't worry, poppa Trump will print off more fiat fun bucks to pay ya.


If people didn't have their head up their ass, the biggest selling point to libertarianism (Note the little L) would be the world around them combined with common sense.

But they swallow the shit being shoveled by the established political elite as they vote for the "lesser of two evils."

Thats like chosing between ky jelly or Vaseline to get raped in the ass.

How about ya stand up and fight against the rapist? But his wiener isn't THAT big, you'll tell yourself as you bite the pillow.

This is not an endorsement of the Libertarian party nor the clowns they endorse. If we are living in clown world, then politics is center stage in this 3 ring circus.
Click to expand...
Lashing out at me like a window licking retard won’t help your TDS at all. Its not my fault your precious party nominated a far leftist faggot.

One thing I found out about this thread, you so called libertarians are hypocrites. You say you support people to do what they want. But turn your back on your party when they nominate a rainbow warrior for a leader. :lmao:
 
Animalmother said:
We have to hear the lesser of two evils pitch again when their answer is a child grooming BLM radical….okey dokey.

wait let me recap…whats this we shit? Because if the republicans suck, and the democrats suck, and ohhh…but Im not supporting the Libertarians either. Then how are you participating other than, “Everyone is dumb but me cause Im for fweeeeedom!”
Click to expand...
1716072096872015.jpg
 
Landslide said:
One thing I found out about this thread, you so called libertarians are hypocrites. You say you support people to do what they want. But turn your back on your party when they nominate a rainbow warrior for a leader. :lmao:
Click to expand...
Please keep showing your ignorance of libertarians

Actually looking at this further, please explain how people bailing on a party that elects someone they 100% disagree with is a bad thing? Republicans should have done that like 30yrs ago when power bottom sociopaths like Lindsey Graham were elected.

Having blind allegiance to a team just because you hate the other one is livestock behavior
 
Last edited:
Stuck said:
. Fucking libertarians are so fucking stubbornly stupid theyd burn the world just to prove a point rather than bend a little and pick the slightly better choice that could win.
Click to expand...
Yes, the most debt added in a 4 year term. More gun control than Obama. Fauci, and everything that came with him. 25% tariffs on imports, but only from China, so it only resulted in inflation.

How is he considered “almost libertarian?” Or, in your words “slightly better.”


Landslide said:
Lashing out at me like a window licking retard won’t help your TDS at all. It’s not my fault your precious party nominated a far leftist faggot.

One thing I found out about this thread, you so called libertarians are hypocrites. You say you support people to do what they want. But turn your back on your party when they nominate a rainbow warrior for a leader. :lmao:
Click to expand...
I haven’t looked into the “pro hamas” claim someone made earlier, so this could change, but I’ve yet to see a reason to not vote for Oliver.
 
ApeEater said:
More gun control than Obama.
Click to expand...
what better illustrates the decreased vigilance caused by having a popular leader

continuously repeated: obammy gonna come take
result: didn't come take

apply that to growth of the state, et al
 
Animalmother said:
We have to hear the lesser of two evils pitch again when their answer is a child grooming BLM radical….okey dokey.

wait let me recap…whats this we shit? Because if the republicans suck, and the democrats suck, and ohhh…but Im not supporting the Libertarians either. Then how are you participating other than, “Everyone is dumb but me cause Im for fweeeeedom!”
Click to expand...
When you resort to having to mock people who actually do stand for individual liberties above all else you might have lost the plot.
 
[486] said:
was anyone else able to understand what smartypants was trying to ask?
Click to expand...
Apparently reading comprehension isn't your thing...

I asked in a fairly direct way about your definition of liberalism. AND, you seem to support it in many cases. Why? Without coercing anyone, please answer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh