What's new
By:
Filters

In the vein of ancient apocalypse.

Splib said:
The Younger Dryas is a relatively new theory to me, and I have tried to stay abreast of some pre history.
Click to expand...

The Younger-Dryas is really important to the discussion, especially when you start talking about Gobekli Tepe.

We have all been taught that Sumer Mesopotamia was the cradle of civilization. Yet Gobekli Tepe pretty much discounts that.


Then there's the man with the bag..... Whats in the Bag????

Whether it be in Sumer or Gobekli Tepe or many other megalithic sites, the man with a handbag is there:


The-handbag-of-the-Gods.jpeg


South America on the Left, Sumer on the Right.


Gobekli-Tepe-hanbag.jpeg


Same handbag at Gobekli Tepe?


Gobekli-Tepe.jpeg



Why would this be repeated so often?

whatsinthebag.jpg
 
I find it funny that there's some that won't believe there's secrets we've lost to time.

The burning of the libraries of Alexandria, and the church trying their damnedest to erase anything not related to them, should be clues that we've lost most ancient history.



At this point the evidence of a massive nuclear war on Mars and that we're all just a bunch of idiots descended from aliens that are sent from a ship on autopilot is perfectly plausible.

Fuck, look at stuck. Preety much proves we've devolved into idiots :flipoff2::lmao:
 
blakes said:
they somehow built a form, I think out of granite.

what the fucking video. at least skim through it. :flipoff2:

it kinda makes sense to me
Click to expand...
So a granite form is easier to handle? Especially since the blocks are not all the same size. And wouldn't a pour adhere to the one below?

Do some critical thinking, mon.
 
plym49.2 said:
So a granite form is easier to handle? Especially since the blocks are not all the same size. And wouldn't a pour adhere to the one below?

Do some critical thinking, mon.
Click to expand...
ya

I've always kinda thought it was aliens. The Bible says it was Egyptians so...who was it?


giphy.gif
 
blakes said:
ya

I've always kinda thought it was aliens. The Bible says it was Egyptians so...who was it?


giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Part of the arrogance of modern man is that if something was hard, or, worse, really really hard, that ancient man could not have done it.
 
plym49.2 said:
Part of the arrogance of modern man is that if something was hard, or, worse, really really hard, that ancient man could not have done it.
Click to expand...
I"m not saying that at all.

There is a middle aged dude on youtube who made a few videos of him lifting super big rocks using fulcrum like a seesaw. It's been a while since I've seen it, so don't remember exactly, but he did it. Alone.
 
blakes said:
I"m not saying that at all.

There is a middle aged dude on youtube who made a few videos of him lifting super big rocks using fulcrum like a seesaw. It's been a while since I've seen it, so don't remember exactly, but he did it. Alone.
Click to expand...
I know you were not saying that. It's just a general observation.

I've seen that dude, too. Another way is to use the pyramid you are building as its own ramp. Erect in a circle.

In reality, they would have had various ways to do it with the materials and manpower on hand.
 
Tech Tim said:
That has been suggested many times over the years.
Click to expand...

I am not going to watch a 3 Hr "movie". The quarries where some of the limestone blocks were cut are well documented. They literally know where the blocks were sourced. Same with Basalt and other materials. Does the movie state these blocks were " poured" ?? The main structural blocks, the ones making up the core and bulk of the mass of the great pyramid are limestone. It seems counter productive to take limestone, quarry it, crush it, then powder it, then make a pourable slurry to make a block essentially the same as the original material. Natural limestone is predominatly calcium carbonate Ca CO3. Oceanic precipittae and mineralogic aragonite in its original form at time of composition. Time, pressure and heat reorient the elements to form Calcium Carbonate. It will not solidify by itself at ambient earth surface conditions of pressure and temperature into hard rock. It has to be buried and subjected to pressure. Portland cement contains CaCO3 but has CaCl and other additives. Does the movie detail any chemical composition, or explore the possible provenance of the Pyramid limestone ? It is not remotely possible to me to melt an ultra mafic mineral source and whip out a batch of basalt and pour it into blocks. Never been done to my knowledge. Of the top of my head, common basalt is liquid at about 1,100 centigrade.

Convince me to watch the movie :flipoff2:
 
Splib said:
Convince me to watch the movie :flipoff2:
Click to expand...

Tech Tim said:
Why convince you? I didn't watch it either.... :laughing:

Just saying that the concrete-ish idea has been suggested many times over the years.
Click to expand...
Maybe I don't know enough about dirt/rock science, but shouldn't it be really easy to prove or disprove that the blocks were cast rather than the naturally formed and then quarried rock?


Like, wouldn't the composition of the blocks give it away pretty quickly if a sample were taken?
 
Tim and Randy, that is exactly what I am alluding to. Maybe I'll get around to skimming through to see what the movie says about obvious basic questions about the science behind some of their explanations.
 
User Deleted said:
These shmucks can't even get the ice age right either. I don't trust what any PHD says about shit anymore. I will stick with common sense / reality. Modern masons admit they can't cut stones that fit as tight as some of these places.

Some dude posted a cartoon video on the other site that tried to explain a lot of this shit away. Like energy vortexes, mekavas, period of darkness, awakening etc.. Had some very interesting and valid points and I will listen to any half-assed theory. Not saying I will believe it but I will listen.
Click to expand...

Who was this ? Sez Dorothy in Oz.
 
I recognize the second one, no google used, as Assyrian, no more than 1,500 BC. Right or no ? :lmao::lmao::lmao:
Art History class, 1975

the-handbag-of-the-gods-jpeg.640136
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh