"“Science based chemical time measurements” can never be proven correct cause no baseline measurements were taken at the beginning, but they have been proven incorrect on many occasions with fresh lava rocks that we saw molten still dating way older than they are…But hey, trust the science (tm) amirite?"
You know there are at least 4 geologic dating methods I can recount off the top of my head. All part of accepted and widely used earth science for DECADES. No one ever said they were PROVEN to be entirely correct. But they are used every day by thousands of people and they get good results using them. I think if you had any basic classical science education, say a first semester chemistry class, you might modify your belief to be more inclusive. Atoms and subatomic particles do not lie or cheat. They dont care. They exist and can be detected, quantitated and measured. Not taking a dig at you but attempting to get you to open your mind a little. If you believe in the atom bomb, you believe in radiometric dating. Tell me you do not believe in the atomic explosion over Hiroshima.
You know there are at least 4 geologic dating methods I can recount off the top of my head. All part of accepted and widely used earth science for DECADES. No one ever said they were PROVEN to be entirely correct. But they are used every day by thousands of people and they get good results using them. I think if you had any basic classical science education, say a first semester chemistry class, you might modify your belief to be more inclusive. Atoms and subatomic particles do not lie or cheat. They dont care. They exist and can be detected, quantitated and measured. Not taking a dig at you but attempting to get you to open your mind a little. If you believe in the atom bomb, you believe in radiometric dating. Tell me you do not believe in the atomic explosion over Hiroshima.