What's new

In the vein of ancient apocalypse.

Agree the 2 don't have to clash. As for science just "guessing," I mean we have 2000 year old things from Greece and Rome etc. We can get a baseline on decay and test against stuff from all kinds of time periods in between. The more you read about the method the better you feel about not believing 6000 year old earth. How much of Genesis is oral tradition written MUCH later. I'd also say that taking a 2000 year sample, calling your dating methods perfect, then extrapolating 5,000,000 yours back and saying it with much confidence is....as shaky as a climate model that extrapolates much into the future.
 
Not only that, but throw in there that God, if truly all knowing and being what we currently conceive God to be, wouldnt be limited in creating only new things. God could certainly create things that would test as older if he wanted to do so. Why? no idea, maybe just to mess with his ant farm or something.


All that may seem illogical, but believers follow on faith, not science (which is never settled anyway).
Pretty much, that and a worldwide flood/violent plate tectonics/volcanos etc would probably be hard to replicate for data purposes. At the end of the day like you say, I take it on faith and am ok with not know for sure.

Pegged E on the ol belief tank right before radiocarbon and radiometric dating huh? That's alright, it happens.
That and evolution, aliens, and the govt is here to help :flipoff2:

I don’t believe the Bible has all the worlds answers, just the important ones and the model for how we should live and treat our world and others. It’s just a quick history on the origins of the world and the story of God’s chosen (yet very much human and fallible) bloodline that brought us a savior through Jesus. It doesn’t cover lots of stuff or other ancient civilizations in depth and thats ok cause that’s not its point.

/snip/
In addition to the symbolic interpretation of the 6,000-year-old Earth concept, we can consider the idea that, regardless of its actual age, the Earth manifests to us as if it were billions of years old. This concept aligns with scientific discovery and the reliable knowledge we have gained about the Earth's history through various disciplines, such as geology, astronomy, and biology.

From this perspective, the Earth's age becomes less about a specific number of years and more about the processes and phenomena that have shaped its history. The geological record, for example, provides clear evidence of processes that span millions and even billions of years, such as the formation of mountains, the erosion of landscapes, and the evolution of life forms.
/snip/


TL;DR
It doesn't matter how old it is in reality.
(BTW I farmed it out to ChatGPT, I'm feeling pretty tired today and might be getting sick. I skimmed it and its a bit hollow and superficial but none of y'all gonna make it this far anyway:flipoff2::flipoff2::flipoff2:)
I was gunna make a TLDR joke too :flipoff2:

totally reads like (a godless) AI though, written by people vain enough to think that they know it all with statements like “clear evidence” and “aligns with science”

It may appear as if the world is billions of years old, but if Oroville taught us anything it is erosion can happen fast as fuck boi. I nerd out a lot on geography and Ive never read a convincing argument that can disprove the global flood. I just mention that cause it’s another topic people try to minimize, call it local etc…

God may have spent ages creating the world, but that being the default assumption puts Him in a box we feel like we as mere humans can better rationalize opposed to one infinitely powerful. I dont want to believe in some bitch-ass god who can’t create the universe in a week :flipoff2:
 
Pretty much, that and a worldwide flood/violent plate tectonics/volcanos etc would probably be hard to replicate for data purposes. At the end of the day like you say, I take it on faith and am ok with not know for sure.


That and evolution, aliens, and the govt is here to help :flipoff2:

I don’t believe the Bible has all the worlds answers, just the important ones and the model for how we should live and treat our world and others. It’s just a quick history on the origins of the world and the story of God’s chosen (yet very much human and fallible) bloodline that brought us a savior through Jesus. It doesn’t cover lots of stuff or other ancient civilizations in depth and thats ok cause that’s not its point.


I was gunna make a TLDR joke too :flipoff2:

totally reads like (a godless) AI though, written by people vain enough to think that they know it all with statements like “clear evidence” and “aligns with science”

It may appear as if the world is billions of years old, but if Oroville taught us anything it is erosion can happen fast as fuck boi. I nerd out a lot on geography and Ive never read a convincing argument that can disprove the global flood. I just mention that cause it’s another topic people try to minimize, call it local etc…

God may have spent ages creating the world, but that being the default assumption puts Him in a box we feel like we as mere humans can better rationalize opposed to one infinitely powerful. I dont want to believe in some bitch-ass god who can’t create the universe in a week :flipoff2:
I think the point is, regardless of the age of the world in time as we know it, the theory that the world is billions of years old is something that we can make actionable hypotheses that are proven correct most of the time. It may not be “true“ but it’s true enough Doesn’t make any difference to us as humans whether the earth is billions of years old or God just made it appear that way?
 
I think the point is, regardless of the age of the world in time as we know it, the theory that the world is billions of years old is something that we can make actionable hypotheses that are proven correct most of the time. It may not be “true“ but it’s true enough Doesn’t make any difference to us as humans whether the earth is billions of years old or God just made it appear that way?
Age of earth? Nah I don’t feel it matters in the grand scheme of things. Though like said:
I'd also say that taking a 2000 year sample, calling your dating methods perfect, then extrapolating 5,000,000 yours back and saying it with much confidence is....as shaky as a climate model that extrapolates much into the future.


But typically a billion+ year old earth goes hand in hand with macro evolution and humans coming from apes and those I feel do matter as they directly conflict with the message of the Bible. (In addition to having no credibility)
 
Pretty much, that and a worldwide flood/violent plate tectonics/volcanos etc would probably be hard to replicate for data purposes. At the end of the day like you say, I take it on faith and am ok with not know for sure.


That and evolution, aliens, and the govt is here to help :flipoff2:

I don’t believe the Bible has all the worlds answers, just the important ones and the model for how we should live and treat our world and others. It’s just a quick history on the origins of the world and the story of God’s chosen (yet very much human and fallible) bloodline that brought us a savior through Jesus. It doesn’t cover lots of stuff or other ancient civilizations in depth and thats ok cause that’s not its point.


I was gunna make a TLDR joke too :flipoff2:

totally reads like (a godless) AI though, written by people vain enough to think that they know it all with statements like “clear evidence” and “aligns with science”

It may appear as if the world is billions of years old, but if Oroville taught us anything it is erosion can happen fast as fuck boi. I nerd out a lot on geography and Ive never read a convincing argument that can disprove the global flood. I just mention that cause it’s another topic people try to minimize, call it local etc…

God may have spent ages creating the world, but that being the default assumption puts Him in a box we feel like we as mere humans can better rationalize opposed to one infinitely powerful. I dont want to believe in some bitch-ass god who can’t create the universe in a week :flipoff2:
You mention the story of the global flood as a impossible factual event but your basing the word translated to "global", probably meant "world" as the "teller" of the story knew it. Which back then with travel what it was to many people in that area, the "world" was probably a few hundred square miles at best. Taking any of those stories literally especially when trying prove or disprove anything is foolish.
 
Age of earth? Nah I don’t feel it matters in the grand scheme of things. Though like said:



But typically a billion+ year old earth goes hand in hand with macro evolution and humans coming from apes and those I feel do matter as they directly conflict with the message of the Bible. (In addition to having no credibility)

Im not saying god isnt real or that Jesus didnt exist, or even that the basic message (be a good moral person) of the bible isnt valid, but you do realize the bible was written by uneducated (by todays standard) people, and translated and retranslated by people with their own agendas, right? What makes your version of religous fables any more valid than the quran or the old testament? For that matter since you mention the bible's message, I assume youre Christian. Why? Jesus Christ was a Jew. If you follow him why arent you? He is/was God, the holy trinity and all, all knowing and he practised Judaism. Im just curious. No self stated Christian has ever answered that. They just get mad.
 
You mention the story of the global flood as a impossible factual event but your basing the word translated to "global", probably meant "world" as the "teller" of the story knew it. Which back then with travel what it was to many people in that area, the "world" was probably a few hundred square miles at best. Taking any of those stories literally especially when trying prove or disprove anything is foolish.
1713395261756.jpeg

I see more evidence for a worldwide flood personally

Im not saying god isnt real or that Jesus didnt exist, or even that the basic message (be a good moral person) of the bible isnt valid, but you do realize the bible was written by uneducated (by todays standard) people, and translated and retranslated by people with their own agendas, right? What makes your version of religous fables any more valid than the quran or the old testament? For that matter since you mention the bible's message, I assume youre Christian. Why? Jesus Christ was a Jew. If you follow him why arent you? He is/was God, the holy trinity and all, all knowing and he practised Judaism. Im just curious. No self stated Christian has ever answered that. They just get mad.
Yes, I am a Christian

Divine inspiration > “education”. The translations today match up to the dead sea scrolls to like 97% or so? That’s astounding.
The Old Testament is part of the Bible, so I do believe it.

The difference I see it is God saving mankind vs us saving ourselves (quran, other “good deeds based religions). Judaism, the Old Testament, show us how we’re imperfect and need a savior to save us. They looked towards Jesus. The New Testament tells how Jesus was that savior by living the perfect life that we couldn’t, taking the punishment that we deserved. Its not based on anything we did, only what God has done for us.

I’m not a Jew cause I cant trace my lineage back to Israel, but if I could, I would say I was a Messianic Jew. That would be a Jew that believes Jesus was that savior instead of believing the “Messiah” has yet to come. But since I’m a “gentile” (non israeli) that makes me a Christian. Christian just means follower of Christ i.e. Jesus. Old Testament Judaism does die with Jesus though, since he was the ultimate sacrifice, there is no need for a human high priest, no need for us making sacrifices to atone for sins, etc…idk why other Christians would get mad at that personally, but we’re all imperfect (hence the whole Jesus thing)

He (Jesus) fulfilled prophecies written over thousands of years, by hella different dudes, witnessed by hella different dudes, all this from multiple cultures (though primarily Jews), no contradictions, not proven historically false, a holy text that has been preserved so amazingly over time, I already said it takes faith to believe what I do, but I happen to believe it makes a pretty good case for itself.

That’s why I believe God made the universe in 6 days as a mature entity, just as he made the first man a man, woman a woman, not babies. I think he made mankind pretty awesome and we are capable of a ton, a ton of good and a ton of bad, especially through divine guidance (or demonic). I think that pretty well explains a lot personally. Ymmv, but there’s more than meets the eye
 
1713395261756.jpeg

I see more evidence for a worldwide flood personally


Yes, I am a Christian

Divine inspiration > “education”. The translations today match up to the dead sea scrolls to like 97% or so? That’s astounding.
The Old Testament is part of the Bible, so I do believe it.

The difference I see it is God saving mankind vs us saving ourselves (quran, other “good deeds based religions). Judaism, the Old Testament, show us how we’re imperfect and need a savior to save us. They looked towards Jesus. The New Testament tells how Jesus was that savior by living the perfect life that we couldn’t, taking the punishment that we deserved. Its not based on anything we did, only what God has done for us.

I’m not a Jew cause I cant trace my lineage back to Israel, but if I could, I would say I was a Messianic Jew. That would be a Jew that believes Jesus was that savior instead of believing the “Messiah” has yet to come. But since I’m a “gentile” (non israeli) that makes me a Christian. Christian just means follower of Christ i.e. Jesus. Old Testament Judaism does die with Jesus though, since he was the ultimate sacrifice, there is no need for a human high priest, no need for us making sacrifices to atone for sins, etc…idk why other Christians would get mad at that personally, but we’re all imperfect (hence the whole Jesus thing)

He (Jesus) fulfilled prophecies written over thousands of years, by hella different dudes, witnessed by hella different dudes, all this from multiple cultures (though primarily Jews), no contradictions, not proven historically false, a holy text that has been preserved so amazingly over time, I already said it takes faith to believe what I do, but I happen to believe it makes a pretty good case for itself.

That’s why I believe God made the universe in 6 days as a mature entity, just as he made the first man a man, woman a woman, not babies. I think he made mankind pretty awesome and we are capable of a ton, a ton of good and a ton of bad, especially through divine guidance (or demonic). I think that pretty well explains a lot personally. Ymmv, but there’s more than meets the eye


Judaism (jewish) is a faith. Israeli's are from Israel and theyre not all Jews. Not to mention Israel didn't exist in Jesus's time. Seems like your whole argument of why youre not Jewish doesnt stand up.

I assume youre talking about prophecies witnessed by the same people who wrote the fables? Yeah thats hisorical proof.
 
Saw that and got it downloaded. Will listen at work Friday.

Any Rogan episode with Graham Hancock is great. I've listened to the others several times.
Good luck. Other dude is annoying as shit. I made it about 20 min in before I had to shut it off.
 
Judaism (jewish) is a faith. Israeli's are from Israel and theyre not all Jews. Not to mention Israel didn't exist in Jesus's time. Seems like your whole argument of why youre not Jewish doesnt stand up.

I assume youre talking about prophecies witnessed by the same people who wrote the fables? Yeah thats hisorical proof.
Yes, modern Judaism doesn’t believe that Jesus was the Messiah vs Messianic Jews that do. Israel is the nation/people that came from this dude Jacob, who God renamed Israel. The current nation occupies some of its historical boundaries. Some people who aren’t Jews live there, like most modern countries. Other peoples outside that one dude’s lineage aren’t Jews.

Nope, the prophecies were wrote way before with the Jews before Jesus came along. The Bible isn’t one book, its a compilation of 66 books written over thousands of years

Hey man, believe it or don’t. But I do…yall asked I just gave my 2¢
 
I will not shut it off. I'm a Brogan and will literally listen to him talk to a brick.
Same, generally, but there's some people I just can't listen to talk. They itch the autism, and not in the fun way. :laughing:

Bill Maher, Black Science Man, and that old ass AI guy from Google a few weeks ago are the top 3 off the top of my head I had to shut off after a few minutes.

Sucked about this one, always like the Hancock episodes or really any that deal with out there history shit.
 
There's no logical arguments against beliefs.
Radio active decay is unarguable science and fact. You and I can argue about it but come the end of day, or last call we will both have to acknowledge that the earth is far older than 6,000 or 6 million years old. Beliefs are just that. Kneel and bow to Mecca :barf: JK I don’t believe you.
 
Radio active decay is unarguable science and fact. You and I can argue about it but come the end of day, or last call we will both have to acknowledge that the earth is far older than 6,000 or 6 million years old. Beliefs are just that. Kneel and bow to Mecca :barf: JK I don’t believe you.
Jesus's dad made everything pre-old. Your science based chemical time measurement is accurate, the Trex is 65mil years old... its just that God pre-made it 64.98 million years ago then stuck it in the ground when he built earth in 4000 b.c. and no we don't know why... you're going to have to ask him when you get to heaven. Assuming you're saved. Just curious, have you asked Jesus to be your personal lord and savior? Because if you haven't... you're kind of going to burn in lava for eternity. Just saying. Might wanna turn your life over to Christ if you're anti-lava.
 
Listen, I don't understand the science so no one else must either. That means it's faith based so that means it's made up. But this book that says the earth is only 6000 years old is definitely true because the book says so.
 
Question for those that are more familiar: Does the Bible ever clearly state indications that the Earth is only ~6,000 years old, or have people read through the Bible, collected data points, and assembled those data points that they've found into the best meaningful timeline for how old the earth must be? Are there any specific indications in the Bible that there are no gaps or time periods that it doesn't cover?
 
Question for those that are more familiar: Does the Bible ever clearly state indications that the Earth is only ~6,000 years old, or have people read through the Bible, collected data points, and assembled those data points that they've found into the best meaningful timeline for how old the earth must be? Are there any specific indications in the Bible that there are no gaps or time periods that it doesn't cover?
It lists the genealogy leading to Jesus from the first man Adam, with ages. So people have connected the dots to come up with roughly 4000 years to Jesus and then about 2024 years from then to now.

To be fair, that is assuming that the creation week was really a week and not poetic phrasing for longer ages.
 
Jesus's dad made everything pre-old. Your science based chemical time measurement is accurate, the Trex is 65mil years old... its just that God pre-made it 64.98 million years ago then stuck it in the ground when he built earth in 4000 b.c. and no we don't know why... you're going to have to ask him when you get to heaven. Assuming you're saved. Just curious, have you asked Jesus to be your personal lord and savior? Because if you haven't... you're kind of going to burn in lava for eternity. Just saying. Might wanna turn your life over to Christ if you're anti-lava.
Fear is such a great motivator... if you are retarded.
 
Oh darn. There are some skeletons of big lizards found in the desert rocks of Mongolia and Wyoming in the museum. Pre-old stuff. Darn.
 
Jesus's dad made everything pre-old. Your science based chemical time measurement is accurate, the Trex is 65mil years old... its just that God pre-made it 64.98 million years ago then stuck it in the ground when he built earth in 4000 b.c. and no we don't know why... you're going to have to ask him when you get to heaven. Assuming you're saved. Just curious, have you asked Jesus to be your personal lord and savior? Because if you haven't... you're kind of going to burn in lava for eternity. Just saying. Might wanna turn your life over to Christ if you're anti-lava.
I know you’re joking, but the trex fossils woulda been made during the flood, not at the earth’s conception.

“Science based chemical time measurements” can never be proven correct cause no baseline measurements were taken at the beginning, but they have been proven incorrect on many occasions with fresh lava rocks that we saw molten still dating way older than they are…But hey, trust the science (tm) amirite? Cause THIS science is perfect, climate change is real, the world is billions of years old and we all evolved from sea goo (or came from aliens, but DEFINITELY not some sky daddy)

And for the Fed above, fossils are found in way more places than Wyoming and Mongolia :flipoff2:
 
Dinosaurs were around at the time of the flood? Are you telling me that man walked the Earth alongside a T-Rex.

Then, Noah should have rounded them up 2 x 2 and put them on the ark.

In the history of the Earth, most of the land was below sea level until the tectonic plats rode up over another one, lifting it above sea level.

The north east Mondack is popular with fossil hunters and this is new little hotspot in Wyoming, but I believe it’s on a private ranch
 
Last edited:
Dinosaurs were around at the time of the flood? Are you telling me that man walked the Earth alongside a T-Rex.

Then, Noah should have rounded them up 2 x 2 and put them on the ark.

In the history of the Earth, most of the land was below sea level until the tectonic plats rode up over another one, lifting it above sea level.

The north east Mondack is popular with fossil hunters and this is new little hotspot in Wyoming, but I believe it’s on a private ranch
Yes, and for a while after till the ice age did the rest of them in, that whole cold blooded thing and all. The post flood world wasn’t conducive to gigantic reptiles any more, just like the post ice age world isn’t conducive to megafauna like mammoths and short faced bears. Hence why most cultures have legends of dragons.

The ark had animals according to their “kind”, i.e. 2 dogs. Not 2 wolfs, 2 coyotes, 2 yorkies etc…so probably 2 baby meat eating raptor type dinos, not 2 velociraptors, 2 t rex, 2 spinosaurus etc.

Indeed, most of the earth is still under water. Talk about an ancient apocalypse, the flood was just that. The volcanic activity during and after the flood (check out the runaway subduction hypothesis) woulda definitely left marks on the world which I believe are observable.
 
I know you’re joking, but the trex fossils woulda been made during the flood, not at the earth’s conception.

“Science based chemical time measurements” can never be proven correct cause no baseline measurements were taken at the beginning, but they have been proven incorrect on many occasions with fresh lava rocks that we saw molten still dating way older than they are…But hey, trust the science (tm) amirite? Cause THIS science is perfect, climate change is real, the world is billions of years old and we all evolved from sea goo (or came from aliens, but DEFINITELY not some sky daddy)

And for the Fed above, fossils are found in way more places than Wyoming and Mongolia :flipoff2:
Dude, God has fast motion, slow motion all of it. He can do anything. He is like Spicoli's dads tool box.

Also, lets not forget that Jesus his own seff was a maker of crosses.

There had to be a moment when he thought, 'damn, these are strong as fuck.'
 
Dude, God has fast motion, slow motion all of it. He can do anything. He is like Spicoli's dads tool box.

Also, lets not forget that Jesus his own seff was a maker of crosses.

There had to be a moment when he thought, 'damn, these are strong as fuck.'
While I agree God CAN do anything, that doesn’t mean He does. Being outside of time is a tough concept to wrestle with for sure.

He was a carpenter, yes. But nowhere does it say he made crosses. Crosses are/were very crude and simple and did not need a skilled carpenter for their manufacture so in all reality He most likely didn’t make them.
 


Graham Hancock vs Flint Dibble. No relation to Dan, AFAIK.

I’m about halfway, it’s pretty good so far.


They've almost lost me with all bickering about reputations and Twitter posts. Very unfortunate that they can't have a genuine discussion. Makes it very unlikely that Rogan will want to get in the middle of something similar in the future.
 
Top Back Refresh