What's new

In the vein of ancient apocalypse.

Had no time to put up the article. I dont get a block ?? :eek::confused:

Fook. went there to copy paste and blocked paywall. Fook. Its about Graham (?) two new movies on Netlfix and the critics comments. Some of the enlightened ones critiques are assinine, fucking stupid. I dont care if they have a pHD and are an "expert". Saying that bones inside of a cave could have been deposited there by soil movement, ie mass wasting on a slope does not deserve a reply. I will try again to grab the story. It will take up some of the sever here :laughing: Whats the limit ? 1,000 words ?

It's like the boneyard up in AK. They're finding hundreds, maybe thousands of skeletons on like a 10 acre parsel in a box canyon. The obvious answer is that there was a catastrophic even and these animals were washing in there by flood waters. But they don't want to accept that because they don't like acknowledging catastrophic events during the time of humanity as if our presence in this speck of dust in the universe means that these things no longer occur.
 
"unverified science" as if all accepted theories even though admittedly unproven are "verified". Gotta love it.
 
DjmPy0LXoAAt9IN.jpg
 
Your summary makes it seem super interesting. Really. :shaking:

4D493AE5-19ED-4D11-9CA2-70F0ABDF72C4.gif



I didn’t know I was required to provide a complete synopsis and sales pitch for your interest :laughing: You could have read the Spotify description the amount of time you spent complaining to me.

Give it a click if you want to listen to graham debate lost advanced civilizations with another archeologist. Or don’t, doesn’t matter to me
 
"Needs his hand held... check."

No. More of a wonderment that someone would go out of thier way to post a link for others to watch, then offer no info on what it is about, then downplays the whole deal as someone else's duty to evaluate with no real info. Clearly you felt it worthwhile for others to take note of, but choose rather to leave it a complete mystery in a world more and more overrun with bullchit useless vids, adverts and such. If you know the source is good, and have a bit of info on the content (cause you watched it, right?) is it so hard to drop a sentence about it? Nah, lets make a huge number people waste time to explore this enigma.

You know ... Linkslide-ing. Or is that just a problem with that one dude, but others doing the same thing are A-ok?
 
how come the same people who don't believe the ancient people could build precise things also don't believe we went to the moon?
 
No. More of a wonderment that someone would go out of thier way to post a link for others to watch, then offer no info on what it is about, then downplays the whole deal as someone else's duty to evaluate with no real info. Clearly you felt it worthwhile for others to take note of, but choose rather to leave it a complete mystery in a world more and more overrun with bullchit useless vids, adverts and such. If you know the source is good, and have a bit of info on the content (cause you watched it, right?) is it so hard to drop a sentence about it? Nah, lets make a huge number people waste time to explore this enigma.

You know ... Linkslide-ing. Or is that just a problem with that one dude, but others doing the same thing are A-ok?

STFU and click it or don't. Good grief you're being a whiny ****. :laughing:
 
I have it downloaded and will give it a listen at some point this week.
 
No. More of a wonderment that someone would go out of thier way to post a link for others to watch, then offer no info on what it is about, then downplays the whole deal as someone else's duty to evaluate with no real info. Clearly you felt it worthwhile for others to take note of, but choose rather to leave it a complete mystery in a world more and more overrun with bullchit useless vids, adverts and such. If you know the source is good, and have a bit of info on the content (cause you watched it, right?) is it so hard to drop a sentence about it? Nah, lets make a huge number people waste time to explore this enigma.

You know ... Linkslide-ing. Or is that just a problem with that one dude, but others doing the same thing are A-ok?
It's clearly a link to a Joe Rogan podcast. If you don't know what that is likely to entail by now, there's no amount of cliff's notes that can be written here that will help you.
 
lol, only so much belief to go around before their belief-o-meter gets low. Bible takes a lot.
I personally see it the other way

If God made man in His likeness, and He created the universe, it stands to reason that we should be able to make some badass stuff.

That and according to the Bible, people used to live a lot longer which = more time to hone ones skills in ancient times.

Just my limited thoughts on that matter, for the record I also think we went to the moon :flipoff2:
 
I personally see it the other way

If God made man in His likeness, and He created the universe, it stands to reason that we should be able to make some badass stuff.

That and according to the Bible, people used to live a lot longer which = more time to hone ones skills in ancient times.

Just my limited thoughts on that matter, for the record I also think we went to the moon :flipoff2:
Good post, my only problem is the whole "earth is 6000 years old" thing that Christianity teaches.
 
It's not just about honing. Just the physics of moving some of stones in a lot of these megalithic structures they can't even begin to explain how they did it.
 
Good post, my only problem is the whole "earth is 6000 years old" thing that Christianity teaches.
Why so?
It's not just about honing. Just the physics of moving some of stones in a lot of these megalithic structures they can't even begin to explain how they did it.
Dudes flying ‘roided out Pterodactyls airlifting shit :flipoff2:
 
Because we can reliably date things to older than 6000 years old.
But can we? Or are we just making guesses with no way to truly validate? All dating methods for ancient shit are based on assumptions since nobody knows the baselines at their creation nor if the rate of decay fluctuates based on external factors.

I fully acknowledge that I believe in the Bible and God through faith, as I can’t scientifically “prove” it. Science and history changes a hell of a lot, and to me it seems to take more faith to put stock in what man thinks he knows. That and I’ve yet to see an argument disproving anything in the Bible, so that’s pretty cool too as it reinforces my beliefs.

Just my 2¢ :beer:
 
But can we? Or are we just making guesses with no way to truly validate? All dating methods for ancient shit are based on assumptions since nobody knows the baselines at their creation nor if the rate of decay fluctuates based on external factors.

Not only that, but throw in there that God, if truly all knowing and being what we currently conceive God to be, wouldnt be limited in creating only new things. God could certainly create things that would test as older if he wanted to do so. Why? no idea, maybe just to mess with his ant farm or something.


All that may seem illogical, but believers follow on faith, not science (which is never settled anyway).
 
But can we? Or are we just making guesses with no way to truly validate? All dating methods for ancient shit are based on assumptions since nobody knows the baselines at their creation nor if the rate of decay fluctuates based on external factors.

I fully acknowledge that I believe in the Bible and God through faith, as I can’t scientifically “prove” it. Science and history changes a hell of a lot, and to me it seems to take more faith to put stock in what man thinks he knows. That and I’ve yet to see an argument disproving anything in the Bible, so that’s pretty cool too as it reinforces my beliefs.

Just my 2¢ :beer:
Pegged E on the ol belief tank right before radiocarbon and radiometric dating huh? That's alright, it happens.



For me personally, faith and science don't have to clash. God didn't write the bible, so its alright with me if there are inaccuracies, or made up things in there.
 
When examining the symbolic nature of Biblical stories like the notion of a 6,000-year-old Earth, we can approach them from a psychological perspective on religious narratives. From this viewpoint, these stories aren't merely historical accounts but rather symbolic representations that convey deeper truths about human existence.

In this light, the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth can be interpreted symbolically, suggesting a narrative that speaks to broader themes of creation and the passage of time. Rather than being viewed as a literal timeline of events, the six days of creation could symbolize stages of development or transformation, highlighting the cyclical nature of life and the universe.

Furthermore, the concept of a 6,000-year-old Earth can be seen as a metaphor for the human experience of time. This perspective suggests that the story reflects the human tendency to perceive time in a linear fashion, with a clear beginning and end. This linear conception of time is deeply rooted in human psychology and influences how we understand our place in the world.

By interpreting the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth symbolically, we can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying messages and insights embedded within religious narratives. These stories, when viewed in this light, offer profound reflections on the human condition and the mysteries of existence, transcending literal interpretations to convey timeless truths about the nature of reality.

Expanding on the symbolic interpretation of the 6,000-year-old Earth concept in the context of written language and human understanding, we can delve deeper into the philosophical implications.

From a symbolic perspective, the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth can be seen as a narrative that encapsulates the human quest for meaning and understanding of the world. The six days of creation, often interpreted as literal 24-hour periods, can be viewed symbolically as representing stages of development or evolution, both in the physical world and in the realm of human consciousness.

In this symbolic reading, the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth becomes a metaphor for the cyclical nature of life and the universe. It speaks to the idea that creation is an ongoing process, with each moment building upon the ones that came before. This interpretation aligns with Peterson's emphasis on the importance of myth and narrative in shaping our understanding of the world, suggesting that these stories convey timeless truths about the human experience.

Furthermore, the concept of a 6,000-year-old Earth can be viewed as a reflection of the human perception of time. The linear progression of time, from the creation of the Earth to the present day, is a fundamental aspect of how we understand the world around us. This linear conception of time is not only a product of our physical reality but also a reflection of our psychological need to impose order and structure on the chaos of existence.

In this way, the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth serves as a powerful symbol that transcends literal interpretation. It invites us to contemplate the nature of time, creation, and human consciousness, encouraging us to see beyond the surface of the narrative to uncover deeper truths about the human experience.

In addition to the symbolic interpretation of the 6,000-year-old Earth concept, we can consider the idea that, regardless of its actual age, the Earth manifests to us as if it were billions of years old. This concept aligns with scientific discovery and the reliable knowledge we have gained about the Earth's history through various disciplines, such as geology, astronomy, and biology.

From this perspective, the Earth's age becomes less about a specific number of years and more about the processes and phenomena that have shaped its history. The geological record, for example, provides clear evidence of processes that span millions and even billions of years, such as the formation of mountains, the erosion of landscapes, and the evolution of life forms.

This interpretation suggests that the Earth's age, whether it is 6,000 years or billions of years, is less important than the understanding that it offers us. The knowledge we have gained about the Earth's history through scientific inquiry has led to significant advancements in our understanding of the natural world and has practical applications in fields such as medicine, technology, and environmental science.

In this light, the story of a 6,000-year-old Earth can be seen as a symbolic narrative that reflects our evolving understanding of the world around us. It invites us to consider the complexities of time, existence, and human knowledge, encouraging us to embrace a holistic view of the universe that transcends narrow interpretations and embraces the richness of human experience.

TL;DR
It doesn't matter how old it is in reality.
(BTW I farmed it out to ChatGPT, I'm feeling pretty tired today and might be getting sick. I skimmed it and its a bit hollow and superficial but none of y'all gonna make it this far anyway:flipoff2::flipoff2::flipoff2:)
 
Top Back Refresh