YotaAtieToo
Thick skull
Ever run one of them shovels?
Yes
And yes I understand a good operator shouldn't be slamming logs into shit, but not all operators are good,
Ever run one of them shovels?
Mighty impressive what they've been able to pull off to this point.I've been watching these guys for a while now. I remember when they laid a pair of frame rails on saw horses and began building a truck. That truck is now road legal, licensed and hauling logs. I would say that is pretty good for some loggers, drivers, and mechanics on a dirt floor in a tarp quancit in BC.
These guys are the real deal and even took on government corruption in the process. They also have the guys from DeBoss Garage doing the pickup retrofit.
Essentially what a hybrid car does for the last near three decades. Sure a Prius is a locomotive but the principals are the same.
Geoff is the OG EV and to me the only cool one. All others are posers...
But here is the problem, if it burns diesel fuel you aren't getting out of the emissions issue. So unless you are a locomotive, cargo ship, or the US military...you still need to comply with regs. Which means you are at the next of Tier 4 final. Ie. F'd in the A.
Although if the gen is only running to charge or provide lots of power then the DPF may actually work quite well.
Not sure what everyone's deal with "copying". Well no shit, none of this is new and was probably made and sold en-mass in the early 1900's. But none of them were building a logging truck application then where they?Obviously they are copying off Top Gear's Geoff lol. I'm not into electric vehicles in general but this always seemed like the obvious answer to me because of the locomotive and mining truck use. Need good power to get heavy weight moving then the requirements drop considerably so you are only using part of the power. With a pure diesel truck if you need 500hp to get up 1 hill then 100hp to keep it moving on flat ground your only choice is to get a 500hp engine and deal with the efficiency of that 500hp engine all of the time, with the hybrid you can use the 500hp electric motor and battery power to get over that 1 hill then just drop the power down to the 100hp and once batteries are low fire up the say 200hp genset and recharge while moving. I know its not a perfect world and there are losses so forgive the fantasy math.
If you ever saw the Top Gear Geoff vehicle in question I think you would figure out that I'm joking. May even joked about Fisker stealing their technology since most hybrids use both the gas\diesel engine and electric motor(s) to move the vehicle where their Geoff was pure electric vehicle recharged by a simple generator while moving after they couldnnt find places to plug it in and had terrible range. The Fisker Karma was one of the first automotive hybrids to use the same idea that I know of but like we have all said locomotive and large equipment have used the technology forever. I think BMW actually did something similar with their little I3 where it had an optional range extender which is just a fancy way to say on board generator.Not sure what everyone's deal with "copying". Well no shit, none of this is new and was probably made and sold en-mass in the early 1900's. But none of them were building a logging truck application then where they?
You guys literally just proved my point
thank you for explaining pretty much every video EM had put out to the internetObviously they are copying off Top Gear's Geoff lol. I'm not into electric vehicles in general but this always seemed like the obvious answer to me because of the locomotive and mining truck use. Need good power to get heavy weight moving then the requirements drop considerably so you are only using part of the power. With a pure diesel truck if you need 500hp to get up 1 hill then 100hp to keep it moving on flat ground your only choice is to get a 500hp engine and deal with the efficiency of that 500hp engine all of the time, with the hybrid you can use the 500hp electric motor and battery power to get over that 1 hill then just drop the power down to the 100hp and once batteries are low fire up the say 200hp genset and recharge while moving. I know its not a perfect world and there are losses so forgive the fantasy math.
What is the difference between this log truck and your Tesla with a generator in the trunk running only when you need it via the plug in cord?Essentially what a hybrid car does for the last near three decades. Sure a Prius is a locomotive but the principals are the same.
Geoff is the OG EV and to me the only cool one. All others are posers...
But here is the problem, if it burns diesel fuel you aren't getting out of the emissions issue. So unless you are a locomotive, cargo ship, or the US military...you still need to comply with regs. Which means you are at the next of Tier 4 final. Ie. F'd in the A.
Although if the gen is only running to charge or provide lots of power then the DPF may actually work quite well.
The way I see it unibody shit is finally "good enough" for pickups. Shit started with the Ridgeline and is growing down market with the Maverick and Santa Cruz and up-market with the Cybertruck.I mean the maverick and sante cruze are both nearly small pickups, kinda borderline since they are unibody with an attached bed like a brat or baja was.
Log truck running a diesel genset doesn't side skirt the issue. It is using a diesel engine still that has all the issues with being under Tier 4 regulations. This isn't going to be some magic bullet. It still is going to have the issues all the OTR trucks have with emission compliance but now have even more complexity added to it.What is the difference between this log truck and your Tesla with a generator in the trunk running only when you need it via the plug in cord?
Log truck running a diesel genset doesn't side skirt the issue. It is using a diesel engine still that has all the issues with being under Tier 4 regulations. This isn't going to be some magic bullet. It still is going to have the issues all the OTR trucks have with emission compliance but now have even more complexity added to it.
Also what size gen do you think you need to charge an EV in a usable amount of speed? I think you may want to do some more reading before making a statement like that. A "portable" generator that would fit in the trunk of a car would literally take days to charge a Tesla. There is no free lunch in any of this.
I agree any constant load engine application will work better with what we have going on. Having said that I've had new gens with 100-200 run hours plugged right up due to issues. I get it, they have to run under load in order to work. They simply don't. It's a bastard systems and a band aid.
Maybe any new architecture designs, like brand new engines coming to market, may become better. But my bet is all that would be lost because so much of it would be made overseas to the lowest quality spec to make it as cheap as possible.
Ok so a portable 10kw gen is a V twin 500cc-ish sized unit which requires two people to lift. It's not exactly portable. Probably isn't going to last long running at full load but even if it did it would take 7-10 hours to charge a car if the car was not driving. I don't care enough to look it up but I'd want to know how much fuel it takes to do that and get what 200-250 miles range on that charge.
I have a Generac 10kw and I despise having to move that thing around. Yeah the fuel economy isn't great. If you are burning it in a generator which isn't exactly super efficient anyway, especially an air cooled 3600 RPM unit. Then converting from AC to DC then back through whatever it does for the motor control lots of losses in between even just from heat.
I think we have just hit peak combustion engine. I actually think we hit it pretty hard back in the 90s/2000s. Sure there have been advanced in power output but reliability and durability is not what it used to be.
EVs probably would have been better machines back then if the battery technology was better. Just based on the fact that cars were simpler. Like if Chevy built an EV1 but with lithium chemistry.
Now everything is bloated because the consumer demands that the car massage your back and jerk you off as you drive around looking at your 23 cameras.
So back to efficiency...
I'll also remind everyone that cars like the Honda CRX or CVCC or Insight have equal or greater fuel economy then what is shit out these days. So where is the progress?
I think anything in the Kei size is going to be 50+mpg territory.
Check out Robot Cantina. He has some cool swaps like a Kubota 3 cylinder in a Saturn, Predator V twin in some euro car. He has some good engineering and testing but is definitely a good ol boy. Kinda fun watching off projects like those come together.
Essentially what a hybrid car does for the last near three decades. Sure a Prius is a locomotive but the principals are the same.
Geoff is the OG EV and to me the only cool one. All others are posers...
But here is the problem, if it burns diesel fuel you aren't getting out of the emissions issue. So unless you are a locomotive, cargo ship, or the US military...you still need to comply with regs. Which means you are at the next of Tier 4 final. Ie. F'd in the A.
Although if the gen is only running to charge or provide lots of power then the DPF may actually work quite well.
They're working with Scania to get one of their new engines, Tier 4 final with no DPF. They figured out how to get a clean burn without the filter.
3cyl geo metro is still the king as far as I know, some people say over 60mpg
I've always wanted to see what a metro 3cyl or early tdi would do in something that has a ton of engineering into aero. Sure the pruis gets good fuel economy, but how much of that is the planet saving batteries and how much of that is a shit load of resources spent on making it aero dynamic?
I need to put the effort in to make a real YouTube channel, as shit like that would be fun if I'm getting paid to do it. regular gen 2 prius vs tdi prius vs 1.0 metro prius.