What's new
By:
Filters

Bud Light partners with trans activist Dylan Mulvaney for March Madness

MuntCuffin said:
Are you comfortable not only supporting, but profiting off a company that supports the destruction of objective morality and the poisoning of minds? Not talking alcohol, but the woke mind virus.
Click to expand...


You are taking the same position as those demanding ESG…. Just from the other side of the coin.
 
Elwenil said:
Twitter...

Disney is also caught a lot of shit and has booted their CEO and brought the old one back.

Movies in general are a decent barometer. Most of the extreme ones tank badly.
Click to expand...

Disney stock down almost 50% from 21, a lot of parents canceled them because of their woke bullshit.

Anheuser-Busch will pay a price, my guess is next quarters sales performance will tell the tale of wokeness.
 
MuntCuffin said:
Sure, banks as a practice endure. But the institutions beholden to a federal reserve feeding the fat mouths of the elites?


That shit is temporal. Brick and mortar crumbles as ones and zeroes become corrupted.

Its odd reading this after the silicon Valley Bank collapse.
Click to expand...
Plenty of individual banks will fail, sure. That's why it's a gamble, that I can stay ahead of the ones left standing
 
rockota said:
I didn’t say you were demanding anything. Please read again.
Click to expand...
You said I was taking the same position, just in the opposite side as those demanding esg.

I guess in my mind, its not the idea being floated about egg thats reprehensible, it's the demanding. Demands and ultimatums are not keystones of a free republic. These why I ask what demands I am making. Just pointing outcomes from a cause and effect relationship. You keep playing with fire and sooner or later you'll get burnt. Me pointing out that we are going to get burnt, and that you support getting burnt by feeding the fire with used motor oil, doesn't really put me on a "side". I cannot command the fire nor can I control it. If you wish to paint me as a side due to me affirming that there is, in fact, a fire; consuming our society from the inside out, then that's your pergoative. Putting on blinders and ignoring the elephant in the room has never worked for societies in the past. Rome is burning, and you can bring a bucket of water or a bucket of gas. That choice is yours.
 
MuntCuffin said:
Its your contention that you can purchase stock without financially supporting a company?

What kind of mental gymnastics does that take?
Click to expand...

Outside of an IPO, how is buying a stock supporting a company? You can admit that a company will still be profitable and take advantage of that, despite you personally not supporting their decisions/actions/product.
 
Ok, They've done gone too far this time. :mad3:
Screenshot_20230409-154734.png
 
MuntCuffin said:
Its your contention that you can purchase stock without financially supporting a company?

What kind of mental gymnastics does that take?
Click to expand...
If he believes AB stock will go do he can short the stock. Short sellers are not looked upon favorably by the corporate world

So you can bet against a company without owning their stock. You do have to buy stock to cover the short but you don’t own it.

Last I looked there has not been a marked increase in short positions on AB. Any boycott of Bud Kight would not show until earnings post quarter two
 
Norm said:
Anheuser-Busch will pay a price, my guess is next quarters sales performance will tell the tale of wokeness.
Click to expand...
I doubt it. Their distribution channel is contracted way in advance. If and only if enough folks stop buying at the retail level eventually things will soften. But it takes quite a while.
 
Landslide said:
Report Reveals the Alarming Reason Why Bud Light and Nike are Shoving "Transgender" Dylan Mulvaney in America's Face
Click to expand...
I hope that was written by AI.

The New York Post exclusively revealed that The Human Rights Campaign, the forefront of the leftist LGBTQ mafia, is utilizing a social credit score to force companies like Nike and Anheuser-Busch to either advance their poisonous agenda.
Click to expand...
...or what?

In addition, the HRC publicly threatens organizations every year by sending a list of demands in person over what they want displayed in public.
Click to expand...

In person? By courier instead of email?
A list of demands over what they want displayed? Was this Google translated from Nigerian?
 
MuntCuffin said:
so money over morals?
Click to expand...

You is dumb. And out of touch with reality.


There are hundreds of companies that people here collectively do not or would not support. There are also hundreds of companies that will still be successful despite IBB's lack of support for them. Recognizing that simple fact and making a financial decision that profits off it is hardly immoral.

What if I thought AB was going to fail? Would it some how be better if I shorted it and profited that way?


Hell, while you're up on that horse, why don't you post up your 401k holdings so we can see if you're truly being moral with all of your investments.
 
bgaidan said:
Outside of an IPO, how is buying a stock supporting a company? You can admit that a company will still be profitable and take advantage of that, despite you personally not supporting their decisions/actions/product.
Click to expand...

[Sidebar]

Companies will issue more stock to raise capital as needed. So if you see A-B issue couple thousand more stocks then they are trying to raise capital. The benefit of this vs. private/bank investment is they don't have to pay interest on their new capital influx. There are caveats to make sure someone doesn't get 25% (I think its 25% or 20%, I forget) of total company assets because then they can start swinging dick at your company. Also "investor relations" is important and if all the investors get together they can have a collective big enough dick to swing if they get pissed off. Especially if your stock is a dividend stock (aka you pay out a check every year to share holders). If you are a growth stock (no dividends) then you can kinda do whatever.

[/Sidebar]

I have been seeing on social media about how distributors are not selling bud light anymore and this is gonna start hurting them. I'm not sure if this is gonna be temporary or if we'll forget. Overall it is fixing to be nice-sit-outside-with-bourbon weather so that is fine.
 
I can't even keep track of the companies that hate me and are working against this country's interests anymore, I guess I should just assume all of them? Even if a particular brand is not actively supporting LBGTOMGWTFBBQ stuff, or BLM, or socialism (but I repeat myself) there is a good chance that they are part of some conglomerate that does.

It's all so tiresome.
 
bgaidan said:
You is dumb. And out of touch with reality.


There are hundreds of companies that people here collectively do not or would not support. There are also hundreds of companies that will still be successful despite IBB's lack of support for them. Recognizing that simple fact and making a financial decision that profits off it is hardly immoral.

What if I thought AB was going to fail? Would it some how be better if I shorted it and profited that way?


Hell, while you're up on that horse, why don't you post up your 401k holdings so we can see if you're truly being moral with all of your investments.
Click to expand...
I've been called worse by better.

If you are comfortable drawing profit from the woke, those that profit off a mindset of subjugation, that's your prerogative.

I don't have a 401k. I made a bit of money off Facebook and snapchat....rough 40ish% roi...then I watched the social dilemma, and really explored the nefarious doings of social media. Sold everything and purchased more durable goods and parked some at Bunge, Ingredion, and Kinross Gold Corp. If you can show me where any of those companies support wokist tripe or any other immoral practice, ill sell it today. I refuse to profit off a company that sees me as an enemy. If you see that as riding a high horse, go right ahead. Can't control what you think. Dont want to. Unlike those that you invest in, that want trannies telling your kids storybooks and want to push subjectivist self-deterministic paganism on the masses which just induces more chaos into society. Guess there's money to be made in the downfall of society, iffn money is that damn important to ya. But yo, I'm dumb, right? Why would you even waste your time debating the merits of this topic with an intellectually defunct person? Aint got nothing better to do with your time other than arguing with retards? Says more about you than it does me, sweetcheeks.
 
MuntCuffin said:
I've been called worse by better.

If you are comfortable drawing profit from the woke, those that profit off a mindset of subjugation, that's your prerogative.

I don't have a 401k. I made a bit of money off Facebook and snapchat....rough 40ish% roi...then I watched the social dilemma, and really explored the nefarious doings of social media. Sold everything and purchased more durable goods and parked some at Bunge, Ingredion, and Kinross Gold Corp. If you can show me where any of those companies support wokist tripe or any other immoral practice, ill sell it today. I refuse to profit off a company that sees me as an enemy. If you see that as riding a high horse, go right ahead. Can't control what you think. Dont want to. Unlike those that you invest in, that want trannies telling your kids storybooks and want to push subjectivist self-deterministic paganism on the masses which just induces more chaos into society. Guess there's money to be made in the downfall of society, iffn money is that damn important to ya. But yo, I'm dumb, right? Why would you even waste your time debating the merits of this topic with an intellectually defunct person? Aint got nothing better to do with your time other than arguing with retards? Says more about you than it does me, sweetcheeks.
Click to expand...

Yet you still can't even articulate how owning stock in a company is supporting them.
But wait, you owned stock in facebook and snapchat? So you've contributed to the damage they've done but your own logic and admission? How dare you?!

Once again, is it ok to short a company because you think they're going to fail from their wokeness?
 
bgaidan said:
Yet you still can't even articulate how owning stock in a company is supporting them.
But wait, you owned stock in facebook and snapchat? So you've contributed to the damage they've done but your own logic and admission? How dare you?!

Once again, is it ok to short a company because you think they're going to fail from their wokeness?
Click to expand...
Right, I did own them. Then I sold them. Not because I thought performance was going to go south. It certainly didn't. I would have hit 100% roi had i waited. But money ain't that important to me. Certainly not more important that morals. Wasnt comfortable holding the stock, thus i got rid of it.

Why are you asking me whats ok? I am not your conscience. Why are you seeking investment advice from someone you deem as intellectually subpar?

If you are fine making money off of those that seek your destruction, well, thats your decision and you are free to make it. Fiat fun bucks just ain't that important to me. Like piss in the wind, shit is temporal. You do you, homeboy.

If everyone refused to hold a companies stock, what happens to the price? And the company? Say....polaroid.

What happens when everyone wants to own a stock? And the company?
Say...Tesla.
 
MuntCuffin said:
Right, I did own them. Then I sold them. Not because I thought performance was going to go south. It certainly didn't. I would have hit 100% roi had i waited. But money ain't that important to me. Certainly not more important that morals. Wasnt comfortable holding the stock, thus i got rid of it.

Why are you asking me whats ok? I am not your conscience. Why are you seeking investment advice from someone you deem as intellectually subpar?

If you are fine making money off of those that seek your destruction, well, thats your decision and you are free to make it. Fiat fun bucks just ain't that important to me. Like piss in the wind, shit is temporal. You do you, homeboy.

If everyone refused to hold a companies stock, what happens to the price? And the company? Say....polaroid.

What happens when everyone wants to own a stock? And the company?
Say...Tesla.
Click to expand...
So the money you made....after you realized how immoral those companies were....you gave it back, right? Or are you comfortable that you not only supported, but profited off companies that support the destruction of objective morality and the poisoning of minds? Not talking alcohol, but the woke mind virus? As long as you took your profits and ran after you became enlightened.

You clearly have the moral high ground over everyone here. Just want to make sure I understand the rules.
 
MuntCuffin said:
I've been called worse by better.

If you are comfortable drawing profit from the woke, those that profit off a mindset of subjugation, that's your prerogative.
Click to expand...

you still don't get that you're pushing ESG, but just from your own view of the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh