What's new
By:
Filters

The Kamala thread.

SLOWPOKE693 said:
WY wifes liberal family from New England posting shit like this on FB cracks me up. Nothing like admitting you are a fucking dumbass on the internet for everybody to see......

Screenshot_20240807-134422_Samsung Internet.jpg



Where do they even come up with this shit? :shaking:
Click to expand...
I want to stab both those types of people, so accurate I guess??:lmao:
 
BigBurt said:
Honestly it’s getting depressing listening to this election cycle.
Click to expand...

And we thought Mumbles vs Trump was bad.

How can someone so completely brain dead (not from dementia) become candidate for the most important job in the world?

Have we really sunk this low? Obviously, but holy shit, Kamala freaking Harris as prez? My dog is 100x smarter than she is.
 
redstate.com

NEW: The Tim Walz Stolen Valor Scandal Just Got Much Worse Following Bombshell Report

redstate.com redstate.com

NEW: The Tim Walz Stolen Valor Scandal Just Got Much Worse Following Bombshell Report​


By Bonchie | 3:05 PM on August 07, 2024
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
63a20d35-aa7c-484a-83f9-1c9852b6de13-1052x615.jpg
AP Photo/Matt Rourke
As RedState reported, newly-minted vice presidential candidate Tim Walz is facing a growing scandal surrounding his military service. While Walz did serve in the Minnesota National Guard, it has come to light that he bailed on his unit in the face of being deployed to Iraq, receiving a demotion in the process.


READ: A Tale of Two Veterans, What the Service of Walz and Vance Tell Us About the Men

Walz's moment of truth came when his unit was ordered to deploy to Iraq. As Matt Funicello details, Walz had his enlistment cut short by asking for an early retirement. In the process, he violated his pledge to complete a training course and was administratively reduced to one rank.
Where Vance was the ultimate volunteer, choosing a service he knew would result in deployment to Iraq, Walz approached his enlistment to get benefits and improve his chances for professional advancement. When Vance was ordered to Iraq, he went. When Walz, the senior noncommissioned officer in his battalion, was ordered to Iraq, he quit and left his men high and dry.
Click to expand...
Men who served with Walz are already coming forward to express their discontent with his decision to skip out on the deployment. Here's just one example.


While Walz's sudden decision to leave his men high and dry so he could go pursue a political career was bad enough, I wouldn't have described it as a scandal. That developed later when a video of the Minnesota governor emerged showing him stealing valor by claiming to have gone to war. Ironically, it was posted by the official Kamala Harris campaign account on social media.





WALZ: I'll take my kick in the butt from the NRA. I spent 25 years in the Army and I hunt. And I gave the money back. And I'll tell you what I have been doing. I’ve been voting for common sense legislation that protects the Second Amendment, but we can do background checks. We can research the impacts of gun violence. We can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, are only carried in war.
Click to expand...
The immediate response from Harris-Walz supporters was to claim that was just a slip of the tongue. According to them, he was speaking off the cuff and was simply trying to refer to his general military service, not necessarily claiming to have gone to war (despite him saying just that).

Perhaps that excuse may have flown if that was the end of it. That's not the end of it, though. A bombshell report from Jordan Schachtel dropped on Wednesday afternoon has blown this scandal wide open.



Green discusses a 2004 visit from former President George W. Bush to Gov. Walz’s hometown, in which a protesting Walz (who was still serving in the military) told the reporter about him supposedly demanding to speak to the then commander in chief.
“Walz thought for a moment and asked the Bush staffers if they really wanted to arrest a command sergeant major who'd just returned from fighting the war on terrorism,” Green writes.
Click to expand...
As Schatchel notes in his piece, the first mention of Walz going to Iraq could have just been Joshua Green, the reporter who did the profile, making an assumption. That would be unusual given the editorial standards at play at such an outlet, but it is at least possible that Walz himself didn't tell Green that he served in Iraq.

That second mention, though? That one isn't explained away by assuming an overzealous reporter just got out over his skis. Green is clearly describing what Walz told him regarding his supposed denial of entry to a George W. Bush rally in 2004 (that claim also appears to be largely made up, but that's another story). There is no other logical explanation.

Further, Green, who now works for Bloomberg is still under the impression that Walz served in Iraq, making the same claim on the day the governor was made Harris' running mate. Again, the way this reads doesn't seem like a professional reporter just making an assumption. Green appears to have been told this by Walz himself.

To this day, Green remains under the false impression that Walz served and fought in the war. In a piece for Bloomberg on Tuesday, he wrote that Walz served “in Iraq as part of Operation Enduring Freedom.”
In marketing Walz as a veteran upstart politician, he created a false construct that involved heroism in the war in terror, when in reality, Tim Walz never fought in a war or anywhere near a war.
Click to expand...

This scandal isn't going away, and from what I'm hearing, this is just the beginning of the revelations regarding Walz's career. I don't know if the Harris campaign didn't bother to vet him or if they were just this arrogant, but there's a lot more to come.
 
bigun said:
redstate.com

NEW: The Tim Walz Stolen Valor Scandal Just Got Much Worse Following Bombshell Report

redstate.com redstate.com

NEW: The Tim Walz Stolen Valor Scandal Just Got Much Worse Following Bombshell Report​


By Bonchie | 3:05 PM on August 07, 2024
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
63a20d35-aa7c-484a-83f9-1c9852b6de13-1052x615.jpg
AP Photo/Matt Rourke
As RedState reported, newly-minted vice presidential candidate Tim Walz is facing a growing scandal surrounding his military service. While Walz did serve in the Minnesota National Guard, it has come to light that he bailed on his unit in the face of being deployed to Iraq, receiving a demotion in the process.


READ: A Tale of Two Veterans, What the Service of Walz and Vance Tell Us About the Men


Men who served with Walz are already coming forward to express their discontent with his decision to skip out on the deployment. Here's just one example.


While Walz's sudden decision to leave his men high and dry so he could go pursue a political career was bad enough, I wouldn't have described it as a scandal. That developed later when a video of the Minnesota governor emerged showing him stealing valor by claiming to have gone to war. Ironically, it was posted by the official Kamala Harris campaign account on social media.






The immediate response from Harris-Walz supporters was to claim that was just a slip of the tongue. According to them, he was speaking off the cuff and was simply trying to refer to his general military service, not necessarily claiming to have gone to war (despite him saying just that).

Perhaps that excuse may have flown if that was the end of it. That's not the end of it, though. A bombshell report from Jordan Schachtel dropped on Wednesday afternoon has blown this scandal wide open.




As Schatchel notes in his piece, the first mention of Walz going to Iraq could have just been Joshua Green, the reporter who did the profile, making an assumption. That would be unusual given the editorial standards at play at such an outlet, but it is at least possible that Walz himself didn't tell Green that he served in Iraq.

That second mention, though? That one isn't explained away by assuming an overzealous reporter just got out over his skis. Green is clearly describing what Walz told him regarding his supposed denial of entry to a George W. Bush rally in 2004 (that claim also appears to be largely made up, but that's another story). There is no other logical explanation.

Further, Green, who now works for Bloomberg is still under the impression that Walz served in Iraq, making the same claim on the day the governor was made Harris' running mate. Again, the way this reads doesn't seem like a professional reporter just making an assumption. Green appears to have been told this by Walz himself.



This scandal isn't going away, and from what I'm hearing, this is just the beginning of the revelations regarding Walz's career. I don't know if the Harris campaign didn't bother to vet him or if they were just this arrogant, but there's a lot more to come.
Click to expand...


Typical Dem/politician.
 
JD Mark said:
And we thought Mumbles vs Trump was bad.

How can someone so completely brain dead (not from dementia) become candidate for the most important job in the world?

Have we really sunk this low? Obviously, but holy shit, Kamala freaking Harris as prez? My dog is 100x smarter than she is.
Click to expand...
We’ve really sunk that low I think. Identity politics at the peak. The peak before irreversible change. Tampering with the fundamentals that built this imperfect but great country.

She was the type of prosecutor/DA you’d see as the villain in a 1990s Batman movie. Batman would be in an industrial factory fighting to free those black inmates making license plates. He’d step out from the shadows behind some steam driven press right as she cackles with the governor about revealing this plan.

You wouldn’t want your kid taking a deal from her or to go against her in traffic court. How anyone can vote for her and think they’re part of some resistance is beyond me. They’ve further twisted something that was already twisted beyond recognition.
 
JD Mark said:
And we thought Mumbles vs Trump was bad.

How can someone so completely brain dead (not from dementia) become candidate for the most important job in the world?

Have we really sunk this low? Obviously, but holy shit, Kamala freaking Harris as prez? My dog is 100x smarter than she is.
Click to expand...

Selected for race and gender, bypassed the primaries she couldn't win, yet when she's installed it will be touted as an example of a determined woman breaking the glass ceiling.
 
bigun said:
This scandal isn't going away, and from what I'm hearing, this is just the beginning of the revelations regarding Walz's career. I don't know if the Harris campaign didn't bother to vet him or if they were just this arrogant, but there's a lot more to come.
Click to expand...
He was probably their only option.
 

Tim Walz brings ag experience to the ticket​

Despite rural roots, many Minnesota farmers slam governor’s record.
josh-baethge-374x374.jpg
Joshua Baethge, Policy editor
August 6, 2024
4 Min Read
Getty_Walz_1800x1012_Stephen_Maturen_Stringer.jpg

Getty Images/Stephen Maturen/Stringer

Kamala Harris could have picked a famous astronaut to be her running mate. Many suggested she go with a popular governor from a critical swing state. Instead, she chose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to join her ticket.
Unlike the other three major party contenders for president and vice president, Walz has a history in agriculture policy making. Before running for governor, he represented a southern Minnesota district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2007 to 2019. During his 12 years in office, he served on the House Agriculture Committee and helped craft three farm bills.
As governor, Walz has fought to legalize E15 sales year-round. He supports expanding agriculture trade markets but has also been critical of some free trade agreements.
Like Harris, Walz opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal drafted by President Obama. Donald Trump nixed that deal when he came into office.
Walz supports initiatives to bring new people into farming. During a June speech at a Pine Island, Minnesota farm, he touted the state’s efforts to help. Those efforts include Minnesota’s beginning farmer tax credit, beginning farmer loan program and down payment assistance grants.
“Minnesota is built on agriculture,” Walz said in his July 18 address. “We rely on our farmers to feed our families and drive the economy and it is vital that we support our farmers and create opportunities for new folks to enter the occupation, especially amid difficult times.”
Minnesota Farm Bureau President Dan Glessing says Walz is very familiar with the needs of agriculture. He praised the governor for being willing to listen to the Bureau’s concerns and making staff available.
“At the end of the day, we’re not going to agree on every policy, but the fact that he listens and hears you out is all I can ask for,” Glessing says.
Minnesota Farmers Union President Gary Wertish echoed those sentiments. He says Walz is a champion of agriculture who really understands its importance to Minnesota.
Wertish praised the governor for helping pass a $10 million state grain indemnity fund and pushing to expand the biofuel industry.
“Whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, I think it’s good to have somebody with experience in agriculture on the ticket,” Wertish says. “Agriculture seems to get avoided, but here we have somebody that’s worked hand-in-hand with farmers in Minnesota and has a deep understanding.”

Will Walz help Harris?​

Democrats see Walz as the rare Democrat who can make inroads with rural voters. In 2006 he defeated six-term Republican Gil Gutknecht to win a largely rural southern Minnesota district.
Before running for office, he served in the Army National Guard. He also worked as a high school social studies teacher and football coach in Mankato. That team won the state title in 1989.
On social media, the 60-year-old father of two has gained a national following for his folksy, good-natured posts. Still, many rural Minnesotans don’t view him positively.
Southeast Minnesota farmer Clifton Feltis says he won’t be supporting his governor. He believes Walz’s policies have been bad for farmers. More importantly, he says the governor did a poor job handling civil unrest in Minneapolis following the George Floyd shooting in 2020.
“I love my country. I can’t let some politician burn it down,” he says.
That doesn’t necessarily mean he will be supporting former President Trump. Feltis is undecided on how he will vote. He’s interested in hearing more from independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Fellow Minnesota farmer Dwayne Strei calls Walz a “Minneapolis guy” who has very little support from rural voters. Strei also criticized the way Walz handled the aftermath of the George Floyd shooting in 2020.
“He basically threw down officers under the bus,” Strei says. “He surrendered the police precinct that they could have easily protected. He just surrendered it, and they burned it to the ground, and there was never any accountability.”
Strei says he will be voting Trump in the upcoming election because he supports his “fair trade” policies and efforts to confront China.
Southern Minnesota farmer Glenn Frederickson has nothing good to say about Walz or Donald Trump. He’s sick of both major party candidates.
“What I’ve done for the last several elections is write-in a third-party candidate, whether that’s Mickey Mouse, or someone that gets my interest.”
 
45acp said:
Won't get shit for help? Aren't we already giving them a jillion dollars a year?
Click to expand...
I'm prob wrong, but i thought/hears our dollars of support for them paled in comparison to Ukraine as of late.

I guess it depends if we'd rather war with Iran or Russia.
 
Rerock said:
And we'll have noots on the ground in Ukraine by Easter. Israel won't get shit for help because Jews.
Click to expand...
They are a majority of our politicians and Kamala husband's Jewish, don't worry you will get your wish and American blood will be spilled for them soon as well.
 
Michael Schellenberger had an article yesterday that ripped Waltz pretty good and especially from a liberal (who I happen to really like reading!!).

Main points were the "mostly peaceful" riot reaction, COVID tip lines to people to turn in neighbors for not masking, etc., and his overwhelming support of trans bullshit with kids including drugs and surgeries.
 
Slander said:
They are a majority of our politicians and Kamala husband's Jewish, don't worry you will get your wish and American blood will be spilled for them soon as well.
Click to expand...
With all the wokeness, does our military still/even have the grit to fuck shit up anymore?
 
According to the media, Democratic Presidential candidate Kamala Harris made an excellent choice in selecting Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her vice presidential running mate. Walz bridges the gap between the Democratic Party’s progressive base and the moderates that Harris and Walz need to win over to maintain control over the White House, they say. And Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, the other front-runner, was too divisive on Israel, they add, and risked overshadowing Harris.
But three major controversies threaten Walz’s image as a moderate. Walz waited three days before asking for the deployment of the National Guard after Black Lives Matter protests turned into fiery riots that destroyed hundreds of businesses. Walz created a “snitch line” through which thousands of Minnesotans reported their neighbors, co-workers, and police officers to the government for things like not wearing masks while outdoors. And Walz doubled down last year on letting doctors and surgeons give drugs to and operate on children and adolescents confused about their gender at a time when Britain and much of Europe are banning them.
s%2Fe6338606-f088-4279-9ebf-f770897ff076_1912x1056.jpg

Gov. Tim Walz (center) watched Minneapolis burn for three days before calling for the National Guard;
Harris’ political advisors might note that Walz ultimately brought rioting under control and that deploying the National Guard was a difficult decision aimed at balancing the need for security with the rights of peaceful protesters. While the “snitch line” for COVID-19 violations was controversial, Harris’ team could frame it as a necessary measure during an unprecedented public health crisis and stress that those actions were part of a broader strategy to keep Minnesotans safe. And they might note that Walz’s gender policies ensure medical decisions are made with thorough support and parental involvement and align with established medical guidelines.
But the more anyone looks at these three decisive cases, the worse it looks for Walz. Walz’s delayed deployment of the National Guard against BLM riots led to destruction and chaos, showing his failure to act decisively when it mattered most, undermining his commitment to protect both public safety and civil liberties. The “snitch line” for COVID-19 violations was a massive overreach of government power inconsistent with the American way and more similar to the kind of tip lines common under Communist regimes. And Walz not only supports irreversible medical treatments for minors without long-term studies on their effects, at a time when other countries are moving to restrict such practices, he last year advertised Minnesota as a state that would expand gender procedures to people from out of state.
In truth, Walz's failure to stop the BLM riots, the Covid Snitch line, and the growing gender medical mistreatment scandal could significantly hurt Harris with swing moderate voters in key battleground states, where Donald Trump’s campaign is already depicting her as part of the radical Left. Most Americans want the National Guard called out to prevent violence and looting. While Democrats generally supported stringent COVID-19 measures, many independent swing voters viewed them as invasive and excessive. And significantly more voters oppose allowing doctors and medical professionals to give drugs and perform surgeries on minors.
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro would have been a significantly stronger vice-presidential pick for Harris. He has proven able to win over moderate and independent voters in a critical swing state, which could be pivotal in this election. And, unlike Tim Walz, Shapiro does not carry nearly as much controversial baggage associated with delayed National Guard deployment during the BLM protests, the implementation of a COVID-19 snitch line, or such extreme gender medicine policies.
Given that Walz’s controversies could hurt Harris with moderates, why did she pick him as her running mate? And why, if Walz is so progressive, has he done things that have undermined progressive, liberal, and Democratic value of caring for the vulnerable?

​

 

The Nice Guy In The Longhouse
​

s%2F2d9681fd-3a8c-40cd-bc6c-6094fd276c40_1447x1055.jpg

Alan Alda and Richard Dreyfuss (Getty)
Media reports suggest that Harris chose Walz over Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro for multiple reasons. Harris’ selection of Walz could help turn out younger and more progressive voters, similar to how Barack Obama won in 2008. Harris and Walz could lean into progressive policies on reproductive rights and climate change that appeal to younger voters while not triggering Gen Z’s anger at Democrats like Shapiro, who progressives view as too pro-Israel.
There are reports that Harris saw Shapiro’s strong political presence and popularity as a threat to her spotlight, fearing he might overshadow her within the administration. “Two sources confirm on background the deciding factor in the VP’s choice was what Sen Fetterman said publicly: concerns Shapiro’s his own personal ambitions would cause him to upstage/override Harris,” reported Fox news’ Jacqui Heinrich. As such, Harris’s choice of Walz over Shapiro may reflect Harris’ own narcissism and insecurity that she would be overshadowed.
Walz’s role in all three controversies appears to stem from the widespread feeling among Democrats and progressives that they are comparatively more kind and compassionate than Republicans. Walz didn’t call out the National Guard because he, like other Democratic policymakers, was under pressure from BLM and progressives not to, because the George Floyd killing had, rightly in their view, enraged a population that wanted revenge.
At one point after the riots, Walz sounded like he was endorsing a threat from protesters. “Communities have been demanding change,” said Walz. “They've demanded that it wasn't enough. And they very clearly stated if the systemic changes that need to be made, aren't made, that things would repeat themselves.”
Walz appears to have allowed the Covid snitch line because overly aggressive public health officials insisted to him that it was needed to protect people, and he went along with it.
And Walz allowed gender medical mistreatment because trans activists convinced him that some people are born into the wrong bodies, that drugs and surgery can change a person’s sex, and that the people demanding such treatments are genuinely concerned with the best interests of children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults.
Walz reflects a particular kind of progressive view of masculinity and manliness that is, in large measure, a reaction to the generation before them, which had celebrated rugged individualism, like John Wayne, but who Baby Boomers felt suffered from “toxic masculinity” in the form of too little compassion, tolerance, and understanding. The “nice guy” generation of Baby Boomers, of whom Walz at the age of 60 is one, is epitomized by Alan Alda and Richard Dreyfuss.
Some amount of progressive nice guyism is a great thing. Walz should be applauded for his program of universal free school meals, worker protections for poultry processing facilities, removing limits on breaks for breastfeeding workers, free public college tuition for families earning less than $80,000 a year, and creating a standards board for nursing homes to improve conditions.
Where nice guyism falls down is in not critically questioning the claims made by people categorized as victims. “We know that these [trans-identified people] are communities that are always under risk,” Walz told PBS. “We know they have some of the highest suicide rates, attacks of hate crimes, against them.”
If Walz had done an independent investigation, he would have found that there is no evidence that societal discrimination is responsible for the problems trans-identified people face. Researchers do not know if higher rates of violence against trans people are real or an artifact of higher rates of reporting. Nor do they know if higher reported violence stems from being trans or for some other reason. And had Walz independently investigated the suicide claim, rather than rely on trans activists, he might have found that many researchers believe higher rates of suicide from trans are from an underlying psychiatric disorder, not societal discrimination.
During the ceremony in which Walz signed the gender bill into law, it was striking to see Walz’s lieutenant governor wearing a “Protect Trans Kids” t-shirt, which is famous for having a menacing-looking knife on it.
 
ges%2Ff369d1e8-5d26-4879-ab5f-3be73b9a725d_743x846.jpg

For Democratic and progressive men of the Baby Boom and subsequent generations, men should default to greater compassion and leniency for people defined as victims, whether black people or trans-identified people. Since Covid restrictions were framed as protecting the entire public’s health, the demands of progressives and Democrats became tyrannical, resulting in censorship, lockdowns, and snitch lines.
There is a narcissism in the “nice guy” progressive Democrats like Walz. It’s not enough for progressives like them to do the right, kind, and compassionate thing; they want to be recognized for their virtue. This attitude pervades both ordinary progressive Democratic voters as well as their elected officials. The result is that Democrats like Walz often don’t just accept radical left demands like holding back the National Guard, creating snitch lines, and medicalizing gender confusion; they demand such things. Walz, for example, claimed his state should be a “national model” on so-called gender medicine.
Nice guyism is part of what some have called the progressive feminist “Longhouse,” which First Things described as a “large communal hall, serving as the social focal point for many cultures and peoples throughout the world that were typically more sedentary and agrarian…. The most important feature of the Longhouse, and why it makes such a resonant (and controversial) symbol of our current circumstances, is the ubiquitous rule of the Den Mother.”
This is not a criticism of women or even feminism, some versions of which do not advocate that men uncritically adopt more feminine styles and approaches. “More than anything,” writes the author known as L0m3z for First Things, “the Longhouse refers to the remarkable overcorrection of the last two generations toward social norms centering feminine needs and feminine methods for controlling, directing, and modeling behavior.” The author notes that this shift of norms among the professional-managerial class that runs government agencies, corporations, universities, schools, NGOs, and other societal institutions.
Why has Walz done things that have undermined the progressive, liberal, and Democratic values of caring for the vulnerable? There is smugness: Walz, like other progressives, is firmly convinced of the moral rightness of his side’s position, and thus frequently expresses contempt for people who disagree with his controversial policies. But there is also nice guyism, the self-perception among many progressive men that their first priority is to be kind and deferential to the “den mothers” in the professional-managerial longhouse rather than questioning of them and protective of the community.

For Stronger Leaders
​

s%2Fa1521942-a29a-4d5f-9c78-4bdc98a5ea8c_1131x1527.jpg

Nice guyism is today hegemonic among Democratic and other Left leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who emphasize empathy, inclusivity, and consensus-building which in practical terms has meant giving into radical Left demands on race, censorship, and gender. Due to its emphasis on empathy and avoiding confrontation, progressive nice guyism of the kind embodied by Walz, Starmer, Newsom, and Trudeau leads to more crime, more restrictions on personal freedom, and mistreatment at the hands of predatory medical professionals.
It all creates an opening for Trump and Vance. Republicans can argue that Walz’s hesitation to deploy the National Guard in response to the BLM riots demonstrated weak leadership. They can criticize the COVID-19 snitch line as government overreach. And they can denounce his gender policies as reckless and out of step with the changing scientific consensus in Europe. The sum of these criticisms would be to define Walz as either too extreme and or too weak to stand up to the radical Left.
Consider Walz’s statements after the riot when he supported reducing consequences for committing crimes, ostensibly as a way to be nice to communities of color. “Communities need to be heard,” Walz said. “They're demanding that these changes be made. They told us last year. Change cash bail. Change how you do traffic stops. It didn't happen and look what we got.”
And it’s not just moderates. Democrats, liberals, and progressives who have as core values protecting vulnerable populations, ensuring public safety, and maintaining personal privacy and autonomy may also be upset when they learn about Walz’s record. After all, the National Guard was needed to stop riots to protect the communities most affected by the violence and destruction, which are often marginalized and economically vulnerable neighborhoods. Avoiding COVID-19 snitch lines respects individual privacy and promotes community trust without fostering a culture of surveillance. And disallowing “gender-affirming care” for minors aligns with the precautionary principle, ensuring decisions about irreversible treatments are made with full maturity and informed consent.
In the end, Kamala Harris did not make an excellent choice in selecting Walz as her running mate. Walz doesn’t bridge the gap between the Democratic Party’s progressive base and moderates; he expands it. What’s more, he exposes the problems with nice guy progressivism and the compassion-first approach to governing.
 
Thatg9659 said:
Yesterday I read comments from too many Blue morons rambling on about how her VP pic doesn’t matter. It’s just the vice president they’re voting for Kamala the first woman president not this old guy from the Midwest.

But somehow, Trump’s vice president pic is the absolute worst worst pick ever and it’s going to completely flush his whole campaign down the toilet.

Just once can they not be complete hypocrites, or not forget what they said a minute ago?
Click to expand...
I dunno, I kinda like their gushing about how terrible vance is
everything "negative" I've heard about him has only made him more endearing
 
What if they had a Tampon Tim day in every public school in Minnesota where kids literally grabbed every pad and tampon in the boys bathrooms and flushed them down the toilets causing sewage backups and forcing the schools to have to shut down due to health and safety reasons. And they kept repeating this process until they are removed from the boys bathrooms. Could you imagine the plumbing bills and damages and chaos this could create. It would be rather hysterical and comical to be. And as a disclaimer I’m all for girls having access to this stuff in the appropriate bathrooms free of charge. But not in those for boys. I think boys should be boys in this case. And create a real shit show for the state. Might be enough to crush the campaign.
 
[486] said:
I dunno, I kinda like their gushing about how terrible vance is
everything "negative" I've heard about him has only made him more endearing
Click to expand...

He’s got a couch fetish!

His wife clarified he wasn’t picking on women who couldn’t have children that were trying, just those that chose not to have children, but cats instead.

He totally fucks couches man!

Never mind, the drunk driving, blm lovin lockdown tyrant, oh he’s just a sweet old midwestern version of Bernie, Midwest Bern we love him. He’s just great so wholesome and down to earth. Just look at this picture of him fishing ain’t nothing more American than fishing

IMG_9067.jpeg
 
Tooheysmax said:
What if they had a Tampon Tim day in every public school in Minnesota where kids literally grabbed every pad and tampon in the boys bathrooms and flushed them down the toilets causing sewage backups and forcing the schools to have to shut down due to health and safety reasons. And they kept repeating this process until they are removed from the boys bathrooms. Could you imagine the plumbing bills and damages and chaos this could create. It would be rather hysterical and comical to be. And as a disclaimer I’m all for girls having access to this stuff in the appropriate bathrooms free of charge. But not in those for boys. I think boys should be boys in this case. And create a real shit show for the state. Might be enough to crush the campaign.
Click to expand...


while they don't have cameras in the bathrooms, they surely have cameras watching the bathroom doors
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh