What's new

Libertarians- “keep getting your 3% every four years”

Its obvious from this thread that even libertarians cant agree what a libertarian is. Long standing problem among the party. Yes some want open borders, some are for transing the kids. Its a mixed bag of nuts. I said before, give them some ground on the drug issue and you win 90 percent over.

Also noticed people acknowledging that their party is being hijacked. Hijacking a party seems alot more feasible than breaking through on a 3rd party candidate. Trump did it. Thats why its the MAGA republican party now. The time to get your guy in is in the Republican primary.

Fully enjoying this thread so far. Its the equivalent of vegans threatening the world they wont eat meat.
 
Oh there's a few things I agree with him on... but the fact is he's just an old school liberal democrat. And while he's currently dismayed with the woke swallowing his team, he still has hope the level headed Carter loving boomers will take it back soon and everything will go back to normal.
He's a funny one. Having done a couple dozen live shows with him, the audience was typically younger than Boomer, I dunno about his TV audience, but lots of nodding in the audience when he'd come up with some truth they paid to hear. The only time I laughed was when he came out drunk and wouldn't hold the microphone up to his mouth, so I turned off his stage monitors, (old audio-asshole trick), and eventually after some people in the audience told him to speak up, he started rolling around on the floor by the wedges and pulling on the cables like he was fixing them.
 
They need to just suck it the fuck up and run Dave Smith and get him in every debate so I can at least sit back and enjoy watching him just fucking destroy these idiot politicians simply by actually knowing shit and being able to formulate a coherent thought.
As awesome as that would be, I see why he wouldn't do it.
 
This is the perfect candidate for the libertarian party. A mentally ill person that doesn’t have a grasp on reality. :lmao::lmao:

Was gonna say “let the butthurt flow” but based on your candidate, that’s a compliment :lmao:
 
Last edited:
Trump, or Oliver? Your comment isn’t clear.
IMG_9858.jpeg
 
I voted for Jorgensen last election just to try to keep us in the 3%. She is my idea of the intelligent life left in this country. But being real. She’s white. She’s a she. She’s a libertarian. She’s got no chance in this world

Every county I’ve ever lived in will still go red this next election. And the state they are in will go blue because of the liberal fags in the densely populated cities.

This is why I think states should split their electoral college votes.

Cities out number entire states in every single state.
 
I thought that was the whole point of the LP, do what you want and leave others alone? And the open border support was a given.

Not for the vast majority of the LP
 
Libertarians- “if you support Trump or Biden, you openly support everything they stand for. You can’t pick an choose. You voted for them, own it”

Libertarians when their candidate is a child transitioning supporter and literally a cock sucker-“I don’t stand for everything they stand for, just um, you know, um, the stuff that aligns with my beliefs. You can’t hold me accountable for all the other stuff”
 
I’m a libertarian in the sense that I just want to be left the hell alone, and not legislated and taxed to death.

I don’t like Trump as a person, but I do support the majority of his polices and voted for him, will again. It’s absurd that him vs Biden is “the best we can come up with.” :shaking:

This nutjob being the LP candidate is actually a good thing IMO, split the liberal vote up instead. Would be worse if someone like Vivek was the pick and a bunch of conservatives voted for him.


The game is “give me $ so I can stop the other side from taking your rights away.” That’s all it is. Most people are best served by and want to be left alone to make their own decisions, but it’s hard to fund raise based on “doing nothing”.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea why he thought he was going to be walking into a welcoming environment.

He just threw a rally in Brooklyn, I dont think he was worried. Plus I know its easy to circle jerk with the media over some boos for Trump but there were also plenty of cheers at that rally if you watch more than the 30 second clip. So to say it was a hostile environment is bs.
 
Didnt you just throw your hat in the ring for Oliver in the border thread? :laughing:
So far I don’t have an issue with anything I’ve seen him say.

I couldn’t care less if he’s gay. I agree vaccine mandates are bad. Vaccines aren’t. Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients.

And, I haven’t seen any specific mention (not that I e looked real hard) but I’m guessing his opinion of “transitioning” is it’s a decision between patient and doctor (and potentially their patents) because, as mentioned in the last paragraph… Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients. Government shouldn’t be involved.
 
So far I don’t have an issue with anything I’ve seen him say.

I couldn’t care less if he’s gay. I agree vaccine mandates are bad. Vaccines aren’t. Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients.

And, I haven’t seen any specific mention (not that I e looked real hard) but I’m guessing his opinion of “transitioning” is it’s a decision between patient and doctor (and potentially their patents) because, as mentioned in the last paragraph… Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients. Government shouldn’t be involved.

This a prime example of why the Libertarian party is fucktarded and useless. None of them have the balls to stand up and say "transing kids is wrong and we do not support that." Because they have no moral code in which to base their political beliefs.
 
So far I don’t have an issue with anything I’ve seen him say.

I couldn’t care less if he’s gay. I agree vaccine mandates are bad. Vaccines aren’t. Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients.

And, I haven’t seen any specific mention (not that I e looked real hard) but I’m guessing his opinion of “transitioning” is it’s a decision between patient and doctor (and potentially their patents) because, as mentioned in the last paragraph… Medical procedures should be between doctors and their patients. Government shouldn’t be involved.

He is in favor of medically transitioning children. He takes a pro-hamas position in the Israel/hamas war. He wants to further open the border. But you are ok with all that i am sure.
 
Top Back Refresh