What's new

Ford Maverick

I think I have it mostly figured out. Trailer wiring won't work, since It'll also be turn/brake
I used a tekonsha electronic combiner in my kraut wagon to tap into the brake lights for my trailer.
Also turn\brake. Worked fine, didn't upset the cars electronics.
 
I used a tekonsha electronic combiner in my kraut wagon to tap into the brake lights for my trailer.
Also turn\brake. Worked fine, didn't upset the cars electronics.
That's what I'm leaning towards. They make a plug and play harness.
The brake pedal switch has two pink/white wire on one pin. Looks like they are the brake lights. But the wires also look pretty small.
 
That's what I'm leaning towards. They make a plug and play harness.
The brake pedal switch has two pink/white wire on one pin. Looks like they are the brake lights. But the wires also look pretty small.
I'd nearly guarantee those just tell a rear electronic module to turn on the brake lights.

Alternatively you could go with the third brake light option and run it to a relay that's more convenient to wire the topper into.
I'd bet that there's a rear electronic module that runs everything in the back half of the car and that's where I'd be looking for power.
But I don't know and I've never taken apart a maverick.
But that's pretty common these days.
 
I used a tekonsha electronic combiner in my kraut wagon to tap into the brake lights for my trailer.
Also turn\brake. Worked fine, didn't upset the cars electronics.
Tell me more about this^. I just looked for combiners on Tekonsha’s website and didn’t find anything. I installed a headache rack on my SD and tapped into the trailer plug wiring like B&W says in the directions and now my truck always thinks I have a trailer hooked up and I get various warnings
 
Rangers aren’t “really” F-150 money. Yeah you can get a 2wd XL V6 F-150 for low 40’s but it’s not a truck anyone really wants save for municipalities. The same money gets you a XLT FX4 ranger with some goodies. Heated seats. NAV, rear locker etc.....Its smaller, but can still do truck stuff. Shit they can tow 7k and the payload is the same as an F-150.

Have you been in a new XL F150? I drive one every day and have many in my fleet. Pretty damn nice trucks. With fleet pricing, my cost for an F150 is essentially the same as a Ranger. Deals change all the time, but when I was comparing they were very close. The Maverick was significantly cheaper. Like $10k cheaper.

Also, pulling 7klbs in an enclosed trailer with a ranger where I drive would be a death sentence. Tail wagging the dog all day. Others may be comfortable doing it, but I sure wouldn't be.
 
There are different XL’s. The carpeted ones with cloth seats aren’t bad at all. The true “irrigator specials” as we call them here (vinyl and rubber floor) are pretty minimalist which is fine if you’re gonna thrash it. Once you hit XL “STX” the price heads north quickly.
 
Have you been in a new XL F150? I drive one every day and have many in my fleet. Pretty damn nice trucks. With fleet pricing, my cost for an F150 is essentially the same as a Ranger. Deals change all the time, but when I was comparing they were very close. The Maverick was significantly cheaper. Like $10k cheaper.

Also, pulling 7klbs in an enclosed trailer with a ranger where I drive would be a death sentence. Tail wagging the dog all day. Others may be comfortable doing it, but I sure wouldn't be.

I pull a similar load occasionally with an excursion. I damn sure don’t wish it was a Ranger.
 
Also, pulling 7klbs in an enclosed trailer with a ranger where I drive would be a death sentence. Tail wagging the dog all day. Others may be comfortable doing it, but I sure wouldn't be.
You need more tongue weight if shit is wagging.
I pull a similar load occasionally with an excursion. I damn sure don’t wish it was a Ranger.
I'd want more axle shaft diameter for the dumb low range shit you'll wind up doing but I think a Ranger would be fine.

Fucking baffles me that nobody blinks when a won-ton is towing 4x its weight but a smaller vehicle towing double gets everyone clutching their pearls.
 
You need more tongue weight if shit is wagging.

I'd want more axle shaft diameter for the dumb low range shit you'll wind up doing but I think a Ranger would be fine.

Fucking baffles me that nobody blinks when a won-ton is towing 4x its weight but a smaller vehicle towing double gets everyone clutching their pearls.

It's all about stability. I have hauled big stupid loads with old 22re toyotas and short wheelbase jeeps and I have hauled big stupid loads with long wheelbase dually diesel trucks. The longer the wheelbase and the heavier the tow rig, the more stable the combo is, especially up and down mountain passes with 50+ mph cross winds when time is money. Some may feel good hauling a large heavy trailer with a Ranger in these circumstances, but I sure don't.

The topic becomes an even bigger deal when I am purchasing vehicles for employees to haul trailers with. I didn't buy the Maverick in my fleet with the intention of hauling trailers with it, or the Colorados and half tons in my fleet for that matter. That's what I have Super Duties for. Just because one can do something doesn’t mean they should.

Maybe we are just on different ends of the spectrum on this topic.
 
There are different XL’s. The carpeted ones with cloth seats aren’t bad at all. The true “irrigator specials” as we call them here (vinyl and rubber floor) are pretty minimalist which is fine if you’re gonna thrash it. Once you hit XL “STX” the price heads north quickly.

The one I drive everyday and the ones I buy for my fleet have vinyl floors and no special STX type packages. I do opt for cloth seats, but the vinyl is the same price when I spec them out. They still have equivalent, or in some cases better, interior features than my 2011 XLT F250. They are pretty damn nice trucks for base model trucks and I have no real complaints after putting 100k+ miles down in the latest iteration of the F150 XL.
 
It's all about stability. I have hauled big stupid loads with old 22re toyotas and short wheelbase jeeps and I have hauled big stupid loads with long wheelbase dually diesel trucks. The longer the wheelbase and the heavier the tow rig, the more stable the combo is, especially up and down mountain passes with 50+ mph cross winds when time is money. Some may feel good hauling a large heavy trailer with a Ranger in these circumstances, but I sure don't.

The topic becomes an even bigger deal when I am purchasing vehicles for employees to haul trailers with. I didn't buy the Maverick in my fleet with the intention of hauling trailers with it, or the Colorados and half tons in my fleet for that matter. That's what I have Super Duties for. Just because one can do something doesn’t mean they should.

Maybe we are just on different ends of the spectrum on this topic.
You are on different ends. He's speaking from a personal perspective, you're speaking from the business perspective.

Personally, I would (and have) haul(ed) BDLs with 22REs, but I would never entrust an employee to do the same.
 
The one I drive everyday and the ones I buy for my fleet have vinyl floors and no special STX type packages. I do opt for cloth seats, but the vinyl is the same price when I spec them out. They still have equivalent, or in some cases better, interior features than my 2011 XLT F250. They are pretty damn nice trucks for base model trucks and I have no real complaints after putting 100k+ miles down in the latest iteration of the F150 XL.
I've driven a 92 custom (base) f250 for close to 10 years now with vinyl floors. I would pay extra to get that over carpet.
New base model trucks sure don't seem that basic
 
You need more tongue weight if shit is wagging.

I'd want more axle shaft diameter for the dumb low range shit you'll wind up doing but I think a Ranger would be fine.

Fucking baffles me that nobody blinks when a won-ton is towing 4x its weight but a smaller vehicle towing double gets everyone clutching their pearls.

Because when you haul that much with a 1 ton, you're usually carrying a lot of the wieght.

When I grossed 36k in my dually the truck was just shy of half that. Same thing in my work F550 pulling a bumper pull with a 13k mini ex grossing about the same.

It's going to be hard to accomplish that kind of distribution with a little truck.
 
You are on different ends. He's speaking from a personal perspective, you're speaking from the business perspective.
Yeah I figured that out. Was gonna take a dig at his employees but since the carpetbagging ditch digger showed up to illustrate exactly the sort of employee behavior that necessitates fat safety margins I'm glad I didn't. :laughing:
 
Last edited:
Guys using them for a business what vehicles are they replacing? Looking at replacing a connect that is our parts runner. How big of a sheet good and how long of a stick can you get in one of these?

Our connect that is used to gopher parts gets 18ish. If I can double or triple with the hybrid that it should pay for itself in gas savings within 3 years.
 
I think one problem we overlook is that small trailers typically don’t have brakes. Towing with a Maverick at max weight with a single axle trailer without brakes is different than towing with a Ranger of F250 at max because those trailers should (yeah I know, btdt) have brakes and tandem axles which makes a world of difference.
 
Guys using them for a business what vehicles are they replacing? Looking at replacing a connect that is our parts runner. How big of a sheet good and how long of a stick can you get in one of these?

Our connect that is used to gopher parts gets 18ish. If I can double or triple with the hybrid that it should pay for itself in gas savings within 3 years.

I was running the Ram C/V (commercial minivan), which got replaced with the Promaster City. The Promaster City was a pile of shit, so I quit buying those. I then went to Chevy Colorados (extended cab w/6ft bed, 6ft is good for our tools and material, shorter means putting it on the roof). When Chevy came out with the new Colorado and I couldn't get a 6ft bed anymore, I decided to try the Maverick. I figured I would try a smaller bed with a bigger cab (Maverick) that gets similar fuel mileage to the old C/Vs, has AWD and is less than $30K. We'll see how it works out. I think it has about 4000 miles on it so far. If it doesn't work out, I'll be looking for a small truck with ext cab with 6ft bed or putting everyone into an F150. For me, the Maverick is going to either be a golden ticket or an experimental failure, haha.
 
I was running the Ram C/V (commercial minivan), which got replaced with the Promaster City. The Promaster City was a pile of shit, so I quit buying those. I then went to Chevy Colorados (extended cab w/6ft bed, 6ft is good for our tools and material, shorter means putting it on the roof). When Chevy came out with the new Colorado and I couldn't get a 6ft bed anymore, I decided to try the Maverick. I figured I would try a smaller bed with a bigger cab (Maverick) that gets similar fuel mileage to the old C/Vs, has AWD and is less than $30K. We'll see how it works out. I think it has about 4000 miles on it so far. If it doesn't work out, I'll be looking for a small truck with ext cab with 6ft bed or putting everyone into an F150. For me, the Maverick is going to either be a golden ticket or an experimental failure, haha.
I believe you can get a Tacoma SR extra cab with a 6 foot bed.
 
I believe you can get a Tacoma SR extra cab with a 6 foot bed.

There are other options, but for the price point, I figured I would try a Maverick.

Speaking Toyota specifically, Toyota fleet discounts are usually nil. Discounts change all the time, though, so who knows. My next one might be a Tacoma.
 
With care you can stack several 4x8 sheets of ply or even carry 10-ft sticks. Just not piles of either. See my earlier post (s).


Kwik Pik from Reddit -
Note the canted tailgate on factory fittings.
Yeah, from business perspective, if ya have tards employees, a given over time, they can and will find a way to toss a sheet into a following motorhome grill, radiator and windshield. :eek:


1719517261102.png
 
With care you can stack several 4x8 sheets of ply or even carry 10-ft sticks. Just not piles of either. See my earlier post (s).


Kwik Pik from Reddit -
Note the canted tailgate on factory fittings.
Yeah, from business perspective, if ya have tards employees, a given over time, they can and will find a way to toss a sheet into a following motorhome grill, radiator and windshield. :eek:


1719517261102.png
Wait, the tailgate doesnt fold down flat :lmao:
 
Picked up the Maverick we ordered a year ago. XL with 2.0l, AWD & 4k tow. Wife added some stuff this week (tonneau cover and tint).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5433.jpg
    IMG_5433.jpg
    168.5 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
First impressions?
First impression is that I got what I paid for. Cheap mini truck/crossover SUV. Quicker than I thought it would be. Wife says it feels like you're driving a car. I wish it had power mirrors, power tailgate, and auto dimming mirror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
Top Back Refresh