What's new

fark sprite Coca-Cola with a shape pick

afb680_200715.jpg
 
Are you black? Do you hate basic rights and freedoms?

If not, any donation to BLM and the authoritarian communism they wish to forcibly shove down your throat should be cause for concern.

Unless you like black things being shoved down your throat........... :eek:

Nope. I am not black but it appears that you are the one in fact that is all worked up because a private company is making an commercial and donating their private company money to a cause that they want to.

Just because I don't agree with that cause, and I don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't have the "basic rights and freedom" to do whatever the fuck they want with their voice and money.

I can choose not to buy their products if I don't agree with them. I don't agree with them so I will not buy anything that Coke sells, but honestly I already don't. I don't like anything they sell that I know of.

Are you saying that anyone that differs with your political beliefs should be banned from expressing theirs either through first hand actions, donations, or otherwise?

And youre concerned about what rights and freedoms again? :rolleyes:
 
Nope. I am not black but it appears that you are the one in fact that is all worked up because a private company is making an commercial and donating their private company money to a cause that they want to.

Just because I don't agree with that cause, and I don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't have the "basic rights and freedom" to do whatever the fuck they want with their voice and money.

I can choose not to buy their products if I don't agree with them. I don't agree with them so I will not buy anything that Coke sells, but honestly I already don't. I don't like anything they sell that I know of.

Are you saying that anyone that differs with your political beliefs should be banned from expressing theirs either through first hand actions, donations, or otherwise?

And youre concerned about what rights and freedoms again? :rolleyes:

You said "So what" and I explained why it's an issue.

You responded by saying that I'm trying to ban the expression of differing political beliefs.

:rolleyes:

Learn to read.
 
Nope. I am not black but it appears that you are the one in fact that is all worked up because a private company is making an commercial and donating their private company money to a cause that they want to.

Just because I don't agree with that cause, and I don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't have the "basic rights and freedom" to do whatever the fuck they want with their voice and money.

I can choose not to buy their products if I don't agree with them. I don't agree with them so I will not buy anything that Coke sells, but honestly I already don't. I don't like anything they sell that I know of.

Are you saying that anyone that differs with your political beliefs should be banned from expressing theirs either through first hand actions, donations, or otherwise?

And youre concerned about what rights and freedoms again? :rolleyes:

it is fine who the donate too , that i do not care....why the fark do they need to make commercial about it.....
ohhh boy look me.....i donated to blm, gay pride, what ever the cause of the week is.....
that is what i am tired of.....
fed up with that shat......
Click image for larger version  Name:	supercool-creative-agency-attention.jpg Views:	0 Size:	30.9 KB ID:	73159
 
Last edited:
I am tired of it as well.

Its the new, cool corporate thing to do though. It'll pass, like it always does.

Its to the point now where it's not meaningful and just another person or company in line to "kiss the ring".

You really think the Coca-Cola corporation shits two shits about BLM? C'mon

Its all PR
 
Meh....so what

https://www.facebook.com/philip.provience/posts/10217775752768099

i'm going to link this here, pretty sure it was inspired by a post on here, but yeah. verify the information. BLM is not a 501c3, so they use one to wash their money as tax free. as of 2016, they use a 501c3 run by a convicted avowed communist domestic terrorist. BLM spends 80-90% of their donations rec'd on salary and travel with another significant percentage going to the 501c3 they wash with.

the majority of the money that they aren't using to pay themselves is going to DNC and anti-american organizations.

it is not about black lives. it is about anti-american collectivism.
 
Nope. I am not black but it appears that you are the one in fact that is all worked up because a private company is making an commercial and donating their private company money to a cause that they want to.

Just because I don't agree with that cause, and I don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't have the "basic rights and freedom" to do whatever the fuck they want with their voice and money.

I can choose not to buy their products if I don't agree with them. I don't agree with them so I will not buy anything that Coke sells, but honestly I already don't. I don't like anything they sell that I know of.

Are you saying that anyone that differs with your political beliefs should be banned from expressing theirs either through first hand actions, donations, or otherwise?

And youre concerned about what rights and freedoms again? :rolleyes:

Actually they are a publicly traded company that is accountable to their board, investors, and regulatory oversight.
 
Last edited:
Fresca is the devil...

Sprite is tasty about 3 times a year...
 
Sprite is my go-to. After the amount of Mt Dew I was drinking along with the complications it was giving me, I settled on Sprite as a now and then soft drink.
 
My GF is Haitian/ Bahamian I shoved something into her for about an hour last night. I like to think I am pretty open minded but as for the protesting and BLM I want nothing to do with it. Ive been dating black girls aisian hispanic for past 20 years. Let me tell you the looks I have gotten over the years while in public being a redneck Jew with a Black girl it can get interesting with the judgements from blacks and non blacks. I just look them straight in the face and smile and move on with my day. Im not here to change their views and I don't hide myself so to speak.
 
No love for Mr. Pibb, diet Shasta orange, or the can of Canada dry tonic water that nobody fucking wants?
 
They are hoping people will drop the whole soda tax shit that was going around before everyone went crazy
 
Nope. I am not black but it appears that you are the one in fact that is all worked up because a private company is making an commercial and donating their private company money to a cause that they want to.

Just because I don't agree with that cause, and I don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't have the "basic rights and freedom" to do whatever the fuck they want with their voice and money.

I can choose not to buy their products if I don't agree with them. I don't agree with them so I will not buy anything that Coke sells, but honestly I already don't. I don't like anything they sell that I know of.

Are you saying that anyone that differs with your political beliefs should be banned from expressing theirs either through first hand actions, donations, or otherwise?

And youre concerned about what rights and freedoms again? :rolleyes:

No one is saying they can't do it my friend.

I'm saying that they are paying extortion money that they made from people who do not support BLM. Like working-class whites who are getting shit on from every single direction right now.

It is also a political contribution to the Democrat Party.

As long as conservatives refuse to organize and boycott, protest, and shut-down, we will still keep taking it up the ass though.

No one is saying what Coke did is illegal. We're saying we don't fucking like it.
 
Coke is still at it. "Be less white." :mad3:

EumL7vyWgAogGfQ




Coca-Cola, facing mounting backlash from conservatives online, has responded to allegations of anti-white rhetoric after an internal whistleblower leaked screenshots of diversity training materials that encourages staff to "try to be less white."

On Friday, Karlyn Borysenko, an activist who supports banning critical race theory, shared images from an internal whistleblower of the company's online racism training. The slides included tips to learners on how to be "less white, less arrogant, less certain, less defensive, less ignorant and more humble."

"In the U.S. and other Western nations, white people are socialized to feel that they are inherently superior because they are white," one of the slides read. "Research shows that by age 3 to 4, children understand that it is better to be white."

A Coca-Cola spokesperson confirmed that the course is "part of a learning plan to help build an inclusive workplace," but also noted that "the video circulating on social media is from a publicly available LinkedIn Learning series and is not a focus of our company's curriculum."
"Our Better Together global learning curriculum is part of a learning plan to help build an inclusive workplace," the spokesperson said in a statement. "It is comprised of a number of short vignettes, each a few minutes long. The training includes access to LinkedIn Learning on a variety of topics, including on diversity, equity and inclusion."

The company was referring to a YouTube video shared online by Borysenko, during which she discusses and displays screenshots from the LinkedIn training course by American best seller Robin DiAngelo.

Antiracism training has become a divisive topic in America. In response to the police killing of George Floyd, liberals and progressives ramped up efforts to address systemic racism and view such training as necessary. Proponents of critical race theory have called for white people to acknowledge the advantages of being white for a more equitable society.

On the other hand, some conservatives deny the impact of widespread institutional racism and others believe that diversity training is being weaponized against the American people. Many took to Twitter to criticize the "be less white" language used in the LinkedIn diversity training materials used by Coca-Coca.

Conservative political commentator Candace Owens railed against Coca-Cola and urged employees to file lawsuits against the company.

"If a corporate company sent around a training kit instructing black people how to 'be less black', the world would implode and lawsuits would follow. I genuinely hope these employees sue @CocaCola for blatant racism and discrimination," she tweeted.

Joshua Foxworth, who ran for the House to represent Texas' 14th Congressional District in 2020, tweeted, "If your congressman does nothing when Coca-Cola tells it's employees to 'Try to be less White' but would rush to any available mic if this was said about any other race, can it truly be said that they represent every American in their district, or just the ones the media allows."

Nigel Farage, reform UK leader and senior editor-at-large for Newsweek's "The Debate," also criticized the racism training materials. "So, to be less white means you'll be less arrogant, less ignorant—I mean, the list goes on: 'try to be less white'," he said. "The inference here is clear, isn't it? That white is bad; white means supremacist; white means you look down your noses at everybody else; white means you are guilty!"

"Try to be less black. Try to be less Asian. Try to be less Indigenous. Can we say that? No? Then why can Coca Cola tell their staff to be less white?" Twitter user @JPLuis1 wrote.

Newsweek reached out to Coca-Cola for further comment. This story will be updated with any response.
 
Top Back Refresh