What's new
By:
Filters

Debate prep

east_beast said:
Bragging about your vote total in a loss? Weird flex, but okay.
Click to expand...

Most votes by a Republican in history and generally in fair elections the incumbent doesnt pick up votes, win down ballot, win all the bell indicators and still lose
 
east_beast said:
Literally anything that isn't glowing about Trump brings you running like a bat signal. :laughing:

I hate Trump so much that I'M VOTING FOR HIM. That's the part you can't deal with. Voting for him isn't good enough for you. You have to be a sycophant and constant apologist. There can be no criticism of the orange god.
Click to expand...


So you can’t cite it… ok. I’ll give you a pass.

Do you sincerely believe that it’s unpossible to dislike 45 as much as you do? The people you call dick riders have criticized 45 often… but you can’t seem to handle anything other than “orange man bad!”

Why? Is it possible that your “ima pluggin my nose and voting for him” mantra is t quite as… interesting as you think it is? You really think that makes you more honorable than 1/2 the population who actually like him as a candidate? Are you the only pragmatic person out there?

Or is your disdains for your fellow citizens who support 45 that thick that you simply can’t handle anyone whose opinions differ?
 
east_beast said:
Bragging about your vote total in a loss? Weird flex, but okay.
Click to expand...

you're obtuse or a troll.

you say Trumps antics turn off voters. explain how he gained 11 million votes.


you can't because your statement is false. which makes your premise calling those guys dick riders crumble.
 
Animalmother said:
Most votes by a Republican in history and generally in fair elections the incumbent doesnt pick up votes, win down ballot, win all the bell indicators and still lose
Click to expand...
I think y'all underestimate how much Trump motivates voter turnout. A lot of folks will crawl through broken glass to vote for him and a lot of folks will crawl through broken glass to vote against him. A lot of these folks on both sides would just be sitting at home without Trump on the ballot.
 
east_beast said:
I think y'all underestimate how much Trump motivates voter turnout. A lot of folks will crawl through broken glass to vote for him and a lot of folks will crawl through broken glass to vote against him. A lot of these folks on both sides would just be sitting at home without Trump on the ballot.
Click to expand...

Are you channeling Gary and arse? Cause your confidence in your opinion about 160m voters is… incredible.
 
rockota said:
So you can’t cite it… ok. I’ll give you a pass.

Do you sincerely believe that it’s unpossible to dislike 45 as much as you do? The people you call dick riders have criticized 45 often… but you can’t seem to handle anything other than “orange man bad!”

Why? Is it possible that your “ima pluggin my nose and voting for him” mantra is t quite as… interesting as you think it is? You really think that makes you more honorable than 1/2 the population who actually like him as a candidate? Are you the only pragmatic person out there?

Or is your disdains for your fellow citizens who support 45 that thick that you simply can’t handle anyone whose opinions differ?
Click to expand...
I'm judging by how you act. You come running at the slightest hint of a non-glowing post about Trump and I can't recall you ever saying anything not glowing about him.

No, I don't discount that a lot of folks can disagree with me and that a lot of folks love the guy. If you would actually read you'd already know that.

Haven't quite a few people in here talked about how there are probably a lot of folks out there who are voting for Trump but won't admit it? Why do you think that is?
 
rockota said:
Are you channeling Gary and arse? Cause your confidence in your opinion about 160m voters is… incredible.
Click to expand...
I'm not opposed to being convinced the election was stolen, I just haven't seen any proof other than anecdotal stretches. The amount of voter fraud is obviously not zero and I'm all for tightening the voting process to try to reduce it. But a widespread coordinated steal of the vote? I mean, the Dems just aren't that smart. When they steal elections it's in the wide ass open like when they were forced to argue in court that they rigged the 2016 primary against Bernie and how they just flat out refused to have a primary this year then inserted Kamala because that's why they wanted and they were afraid she couldn't win even a rigged primary
 
east_beast said:
I'm judging by how you act. You come running at the slightest hint of a non-glowing post about Trump and I can't recall you ever saying anything not glowing about him.

No, I don't discount that a lot of folks can disagree with me and that a lot of folks love the guy. If you would actually read you'd already know that.

Haven't quite a few people in here talked about how there are probably a lot of folks out there who are voting for Trump but won't admit it? Why do you think that is?
Click to expand...

Hahaha…. I appreciate your marriage to your position. It’s impressive. Especially when the people who complain about have been plenty critical of 45. But you can’t seem to handle that.

It is also quite ironic that you complain anyone defending anything about 45’s tenure. The irony is that you haven’t made it a day w/o complaining about 45 or his supporters. So feel free to judge me on how I act…. That’s your prerogative. But it’s also possible you’re being judged on how you act.
 
Provience said:
And a lame impossible campaign promise.

It's as dumb as no tax on tips

Cash was always tax free....until...real answer is abolish min wage and wreck income taxes. Oh well, it's just as likely
Click to expand...

Problem with not tax on tips is that 77k pages of tax code contradict that campaign promise and will result in a shitload of lawsuits.

Parents, appropriately, will “tip” their children $1m, and the IRS will throw them in jail for tax fraud.
 
rockota said:
Hahaha…. I appreciate your marriage to your position. It’s impressive. Especially when the people who complain about have been plenty critical of 45. But you can’t seem to handle that.

It is also quite ironic that you complain anyone defending anything about 45’s tenure. The irony is that you haven’t made it a day w/o complaining about 45 or his supporters. So feel free to judge me on how I act…. That’s your prerogative. But it’s also possible you’re being judged on how you act.
Click to expand...
You're usually the one that engages with me first. Just saying. Others are generally involved in conversation then you come rushing in all triggered like.

I'd love for you to point out your past criticisms of Trump. I've missed them.
 
east_beast said:
I'm not opposed to being convinced the election was stolen, I just haven't seen any proof other than anecdotal stretches. The amount of voter fraud is obviously not zero and I'm all for tightening the voting process to try to reduce it. But a widespread coordinated steal of the vote? I mean, the Dems just aren't that smart. When they steal elections it's in the wide ass open like when they were forced to argue in court that they rigged the 2016 primary against Bernie and how they just flat out refused to have a primary this year then inserted Kamala because that's why they wanted and they were afraid she couldn't win even a rigged primary
Click to expand...
Forrest for the trees and all that.
 
east_beast said:
You're usually the one that engages with me first. Just saying. Others are generally involved in conversation then you come rushing in all triggered like.

I'd love for you to point out your past criticisms of Trump. I've missed them.
Click to expand...

Are you usually the one who comes out with “Trump sucks and anyone who disagrees is a dick rider!!!!” Perhaps?

That might generate a response.

If you can’t cite a “Trump is perfect” post or any criticisms, that just shows you have not actually read anything I’ve posted.
 
You are aware there is no perfect candidate ever but these are our choices, pick who ever serves your interests better or stay home.

It's that simple, so you can whine like Gary who votes for a turd every time.
 
Captain Call said:
Forrest for the trees and all that.
Click to expand...
I mean, when you're the one making the accusations the burden of proof is on you. That's just the way it works.

Are the Dems above doing it? Hell no. I just don't think they're smart enough to pull it off.
 
east_beast said:
I'm not opposed to being convinced the election was stolen, I just haven't seen any proof other than anecdotal stretches. The amount of voter fraud is obviously not zero and I'm all for tightening the voting process to try to reduce it. But a widespread coordinated steal of the vote? I mean, the Dems just aren't that smart. When they steal elections it's in the wide ass open like when they were forced to argue in court that they rigged the 2016 primary against Bernie and how they just flat out refused to have a primary this year then inserted Kamala because that's why they wanted and they were afraid she couldn't win even a rigged primary
Click to expand...

The rigging alone is 1000 percent indisputable so no reason to even go all in on the stolen angle.

The irregularities deserve investigation of which in large was prevented from happening.

Its easy to say show me the proof when the proof was not aloud to be presented in court.
 
east_beast said:
I mean, when you're the one making the accusations the burden of proof is on you. That's just the way it works.

Are the Dems above doing it? Hell no. I just don't think they're smart enough to pull it off.
Click to expand...
There's as much or more "proof" of the 1 you're sticking with here versus the other 2 examples you cited. Just sayin.
 
Texas97 said:
you're obtuse or a troll.

you say Trumps antics turn off voters. explain how he gained 11 million votes.


you can't because your statement is false. which makes your premise calling those guys dick riders crumble.
Click to expand...

he may be both obtuse AND a troll!

then again, the opponent could pick up 25 million votes who were turned off by trump's antics while trump did not turn off 11 million enough to not vote for him as the effort to get all eligible voters to vote was successful. That is how you could 'gain' 11 million votes but lose votes because the other side gained at a greater rate.
 
east_beast said:
Here's 10 pages of you slurping nuts.

irate4x4.com

Search results for query: Trump

irate4x4.com irate4x4.com

You call me deranged when I say I don't like the guy and a lot of his supporters border on idolatry but I'm voting for him anyway. Meanwhile you can't tolerate anything to be said that isn't glowing about the guy.
Click to expand...

Gotcha….

You win. You’re smarter and better judge of character…. And better reader.

You win.

Edit: just for giggles. Can you cite me calling you deranged, please?

And…
Did you read any of the posts you cited? :lmao:
 
Texas97 said:
you're obtuse or a troll.

you say Trumps antics turn off voters. explain how he gained 11 million votes.


you can't because your statement is false. which makes your premise calling those guys dick riders crumble.
Click to expand...
I did. The guy drives the hell out of voter turnout on both sides. You can only see or only choose to see one side of that voter turnout. A bunch of libs in the other side are just as baffled as you because they can only see or only choose to see the other side of that voter turnout.
 
east_beast said:
The Dems literally admitted to rigging their primary against Bernie in court.
Click to expand...
Okay, the other one now. Do that one.





Look, I'm not a Trump fan boy by any stretch. I just know numbers...and that shit didn't add up in 2020. Too many "coincidences"
 
Captain Call said:
Okay, the other one now. Do that one.
Click to expand...

They literally said Biden was their candidate. They didn't have any primary debates. They straight up cancelled the primary in every state they could get away with it. All the stuff about them wanting Kamala was my own conjecture but the rest? That's just facts.
 
east_beast said:
They literally said Biden was their candidate. They didn't have any primary debates. They straight up cancelled the primary in every state they could get away with it. All the stuff about them wanting Kamala was my own conjecture but the rest? That's just facts.
Click to expand...
No, no, no....where they "cheated"



Come on, you can do it. :flipoff2:
 
Captain Call said:
No, no, no....where they "cheated"



Come on, you can do it. :flipoff2:
Click to expand...
What do you mean? I was talking about them rigging the primary against Bernie and not having a legit primary this year even though their voters were asking for exactly that
 
east_beast said:
I did. The guy drives the hell out of voter turnout on both sides. You can only see or only choose to see one side of that voter turnout. A bunch of libs in the other side are just as baffled as you because they can only see or only choose to see the other side of that voter turnout.
Click to expand...

every political candidate would gladly "lose" 5 million votes to gain ten million votes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh