nahmus
Refugee from syrup
It will be interesting to see how they describe that. obviously white supremacy
That is some funny shit.Transheuser Bush
SHOCKING
Targets diversity Chief Kiera Fernandez said that it’s the role of white women to call out transgressions, and continued to single out a white employee and said that because of her race her voice carries more weight and she has a responsibility.
She runs Targets… pic.twitter.com/z6MKsx0XWZ
— Travis (@Travis_in_Flint) May 31, 2023
“You still have to do it to do this job” “This isn’t for everyone”@Target Kiera Fernandez (Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer and VP of HR) tells all of the Target employees to accept DEI or find a new place to work. pic.twitter.com/13P6FuyvmC
— Mythinformed (@MythinformedMKE) May 26, 2023
The prerequisite to working at Target is being Woke.
— Mythinformed (@MythinformedMKE) May 26, 2023
Corporations forcing a political ideology on its employees is illegal.
— Mythinformed (@MythinformedMKE) May 26, 2023
Apparently not in the US. "When AB InBev took full control of Grupo Modelo in 2013, it was obliged by US antitrust regulators to sell the Mexican company’s business in the United States to Constellation."I thought modelo was AB too?
You got proven wrong by an easily verified fact and that's your response? Good one, ass talker.OK whatever you say
I see the trend down. I deny nothing. My point was always "it's not near the 52 week low". And it may get there, but it ain't there NOW. I don't know why that upsets so many, but whatever.:grumpnumbers: That means nothing
No they certainly happen, and they'll always be written by 'industry experts' but of courseBut won't happen because .corp owns .gov.
(Video Credit: Twin Cities Business)
She went on to assert that it was the role of “white women” to call out “transgressions.”
“I think the number one thing that I would encourage white women to do is take the [DEI] learnings… and use your voice… so the woman of color in the room doesn’t always have to.”
At that point in the discussion, she singled out a white person that was present and said her voice would be given more weight in the workplace.
“Because whether it’s right or not… there are places that you and I will go where your voice will be heard differently than mine. And that is why we’re doing this work. That’s why it’s so important to have this conversation. But we also can’t ignore the systemic history that got us here and then the things that we have to do differently to remove those barriers,” Fernandez charged.
“[Target’s] tolerance for intolerance will definitely be a significant challenge to any company that’s thinking about how they build a culture. It was talking about culture like that’s so deeply woven in your strategy. It has to be,” she contended. “So it is daunting. It’s not for the faint-hearted… But it gets easier every day.”
“Given the calls for racial equity over the past year, we know that many companies are standing up or deepening their investments in their diversity and inclusion work… DE&I is not meant to rest on one individual’s shoulders,” Fernandez stated. “This work requires shared accountability and responsibility, which is why it’s so critical to create an infrastructure – a system with tools that allow you to integrate DE&I into your ecosystem in a way that truly drives your business.”
She also previously told employees in a video from June of 2021 that they should either get on board with the company’s woke agenda or leave. She was speaking with two DEI officers from 3M and Cargill and the VP of Career and Professional Development at St. Catherine University at the time.
“Not everyone is going to believe or be bought into our strategies and our priorities on this topic. They just aren’t,” Fernandez stated. “And so when we talk about leader accountability and the importance of representation and strategies and goals being integrated into someone’s responsibility like just to be really pragmatic and practical, then it becomes, ‘ok we may not be able to change your mind-shift on appreciating why this is important, but you do understand that as a part of your job responsibilities, you will lead inclusively, you will have representation on your team, you will be responsible for these behaviors, values, and expectations.’”
“And it also quite frankly puts a lot on the folks that don’t believe in this, but emphasizes that you still have to do it to be a part of this company,” she continued. “And eventually you’ll see a change in their mindset, or they may leave and, you know, that’s a part of this process too. This isn’t for everyone. But what has to be for everyone is accountability and accountability comes with transparency.”
Because it's irrelevant and you seem to think it's the end all be all.Edit: Seriously, why does me pointing out that over the last year the stock has seen much lower values make some of y'all so pissy???
Sigh. You didn't prove anything because your point was off base. The nanotrading evaluates billions of trades a second. Not every one results in a trade. Apples and oranges.You got proven wrong by an easily verified fact and that's your response? Good one, ass talker.
Your reply makes absolutely no sense. Nowhere did I pine for the good old days of tickertape and telephone calls. What I did was to highlight a capability that exists that the vast majority of investors have absolutely no knowledge of.
And this boomer helped that come about. I made a lot of money as an early employee of a middleware start up that fundamentally changed the way trading was performed as well as the dozens of subscribers that require information on every trade in sequence, with guaranteed delivery, and infinitesimal latency.
Of course there is still money to me made in the stock market by the individual investor. But stop puffing out your chest about how cool you or anyone else can be with it when there are firms that perform billions of trades each second, each contributing some incredibly small number(a decimal point and a whole lot of zeros). Each of these nano trades yields a tiny tiny sum but it all adds up quite nicely for them.
Edit: let’s revisit your admiration for a five minute window. One second is to 1 billionth of a second as one second is to 33 years. Five minutes is going back centuries.
Sigh. You didn't prove anything because your point was off base. The nanotrading evaluates billions of trades a second. Not every one results in a trade. Apples and oranges.
And the fact that some outfits have faster machines due to more efficient code and reduced SOL latency gives them an advantage over others trying the same thing. Maybe their algorithms are better also, but it's the speed that is the major differentiator.
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV just recorded its worst month since the start of the pandemic as the backlash in the US over a decision to promote its Bud Light brand with a transgender influencer rages on.
The beer maker’s US-listed shares sank 18% in May, compared with the March 2020 plunge of 24% on the heels of widespread lockdowns in an effort to stop the spread of the Covid-19 virus. Meanwhile, rivals Boston Beer Co., Molson Coors Beverage Co. and Constellation Brands Inc. have all fared better than AB InBev this month, seeing an average return of 5.4%.
I agree.Will you fags talk your faggy stock talk fagginess to another faggy thread. You're bothering the rest of us fags in the fag thread.
Nerdophobe!Will you fags take your faggy stock talk fagginess to another faggy thread. You're bothering the rest of us fags in the fag thread.
Well which is it? Are they performing billions of trades or are they just analyzing them? Apples and oranges, huh?
Oh please, with as tech-savvy as you are you know perfectly well what was meant.Well which is it? Are they performing billions of trades or are they just analyzing them? Apples and oranges, huh?