Tiha
Red Skull Member
LOL yep, my bad. I should have googled it first.I think that was Strobel...
CS Lewis was a pretty sharp man though.
Lee Strobel
LOL yep, my bad. I should have googled it first.I think that was Strobel...
CS Lewis was a pretty sharp man though.
He followed up with "A Case for the Creator". I'd recommend it if you haven't read it.LOL yep, my bad. I should have googled it first.
Lee Strobel
I think that was Strobel...
CS Lewis was a pretty sharp man though.
Not a good answer or one at all.Romans 1:20, KJV: "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:"
Every person is given enough information.
I have seen some beautiful places in this world and they alone would tell me there is a God and he created this for me.
How soNot a good answer or one at all.
In the book of Acts, Paul is talking to believers in the Greek deities on Mars Hill and he tells them:I have a question, I have wondered about it a ton.
Pick any pre-christian exposed culture. Mayans, Aztek, or the thousands of un-named thus now unknown tribal cultures.
Many of them lived for thousands of years with no exposure to christ or the concept. Those people? lived and died for hundreds of years with no exposure? What the hell about them? damned? Free pass to heaven? Or does their religion apply selectively to them?
There have been more than Lee Strobel that have set out to "disprove" the Bible and became Christians because of what they learned.It's too bad people don't spend nearly as much time trying to prove the bible as they do trying to disprove it.
Huh. I didn't know C.S. Lewis wrote a book by that title as well. I will add that to my list. I just ordered a couple of books on "Books of Enoch" (the text of the Enoch books as well as commentary), as I think it may shed some light on what is going on with the "Cabal" (Mystery Babylon).Amazon.com
www.amazon.com
I might just order it and give it a read
Thanks for thatIn the book of Acts, Paul is talking to believers in the Greek deities on Mars Hill and he tells them:
"So Paul stood in the midst of the Areopagus and said, “Men of Athens, I see that you are very religious in all respects. For while I was passing through and examining the objects of your worship, I also found an altar with this inscription, ‘TO AN UNKNOWN GOD.’ Therefore, what you worship in ignorance, this I proclaim to you. The God who made the world and everything that is in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made by hands; nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, that they would seek God, if perhaps they might feel around for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us;" - Acts 17:22-27 (NASB)
We may not understand the how, but essentially what Paul is saying is that everyone on earth, during every time on earth were put where they were for them to have the best chance they have of coming to know God. If an individual person was raised by penguins on Antarctica, then for whatever reason that is the best chance that person has of knowing God. We may not understand it, we also may not like it, but it is possible that these people that "lived for hundreds of years with no exposure" may never have come to God no matter what their "appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation" were.
Couple that with the verses Tiha quoted about the knowledge of God being inherent in every man; hence why even the most isolated indigenous people have a "god" or "gods".
I do not blindly accept anything. There is actually lots of 3rd party accounts of stories in the bible. Pretty easy to verify if you go look for it.In other words, I have not put blind faith in the concept that God does not exist, and am not willing to accept, on blind faith, that He does exist.
so a question to the believers - Considering that there is zero tangible proof of the stories of the bible, how can you blindly accept that this is the word of God? What makes it easier for you to believe that story, than to believe that the whole universe is billions of years old and all that exists today simply evolved over eons?
The questions you are asking him makes it sound like you don't think he believes in God or any sort of afterlife. Sounds more like he's questioning the accuracy of the bible instead.I do not blindly accept anything. There is actually lots of 3rd party accounts of stories in the bible. Pretty easy to verify if you go look for it.
I understand you don't want to blindly follow. Neither did I.
So are you perfectly content with your life? You feel complete? Missing nothing?
Or do you ever stop and feel like there has to be more to it?
You are okay with just dying and it all being over?
Just trying to establish a foundation for discussion. Everyone believes in something.The questions you are asking him makes it sound like you don't think he believes in God or any sort of afterlife. Sounds more like he's questioning the accuracy of the bible instead.
I do not blindly accept anything. There is actually lots of 3rd party accounts of stories in the bible. Pretty easy to verify if you go look for it.
I understand you don't want to blindly follow. Neither did I.
So are you perfectly content with your life? You feel complete? Missing nothing? Absolutely
Or do you ever stop and feel like there has to be more to it? Never
You are okay with just dying and it all being over? Absolutely
Actually, this is not true at all.Considering that there is zero tangible proof of the stories of the bible
I'll be glad to answer that.
I don't believe a single word in the bible, its a book written and re written by man, with all of mans influence.
I don't think you need god to have morals, principals, know the difference between right and wrong or anything else like that.
I think humans have a need to lean on something, anything to help them cope. I think thats what religion does, nothing wrong with that at all if it helps you.
I believe this earth is much older than we claim to know, I think we are just the latest version of life on this rock
Thanks.I am happy for you that you are content with this life. You are certainly one of a very few.
Where do you think morals come from? Just whatever is socially acceptable?
There is lots of evidence of great floods both here and in the old world, some in roughly biblical times, but that doesn't prove that it was THE flood that covered the whole Earth. The residents of the biblical world would not have known how big the world was, only that their immediate area flooded. The Tigris and Euphrates flooded on a regular basis and if the flood was big enough it would have seemed like the whole world was flooded, even though they had no idea of what that actually meant. Shit, the horizon on a flat sea is under 3 miles from the beach for an average height human. There are other stories of great floods in other religions which makes sense as it would have been a condition people would have no control of, so it stands to reason they'd assign it some sort of divine causation. The whole story is a bunch of hooey.Actually, this is not true at all.
I have an entire seminar's worth of material showing evidence the Flood happened. Dr. Brown has an entire book on his Hydroplate Theory explaining the evidence of the flood and how the Hydroplate Theory was developed based on this evidence.
That is partially true. I see your point. Sure the people, such as if Noah would not know if the world was covered and even if it was local they would view it as a world ending event, but then Noah did not write the biblical account.There is lots of evidence of great floods both here and in the old world, some in roughly biblical times, but that doesn't prove that it was THE flood that covered the whole Earth. The residents of the biblical world would not have known how big the world was, only that their immediate area flooded. The Tigris and Euphrates flooded on a regular basis and if the flood was big enough it would have seemed like the whole world was flooded, even though they had no idea of what that actually meant. Shit, the horizon on a flat sea is under 3 miles from the beach for an average height human. There are other stories of great floods in other religions which makes sense as it would have been a condition people would have no control of, so it stands to reason they'd assign it some sort of divine causation. The whole story is a bunch of hooey.
And that's why there is a similar story in the Quran.That is partially true. I see your point. Sure the people, such as if Noah would not know if the world was covered and even if it was local they would view it as a world ending event, but then Noah did not write the biblical account.
It was actually written by moses. Who was raised in Pharaoh's house. Extremely well educated. Spoke directly with God. God knew how big the world was and how much of it was covered.
So we are back to believing the biblical account or not, but it is also far easier to prove the existence and validity of moses than Noah.
Yes moses and Jesus are both mentioned in the quran, so is the flood. So why doubt it happened as described?And that's why there is a similar story in the Quran.
I don't know how you can say that you are not following the God storyline blindly. There is no proof or evidence of any sort of God's existence. 3rd party accounts are not very solid evidence.I do not blindly accept anything. There is actually lots of 3rd party accounts of stories in the bible. Pretty easy to verify if you go look for it.
I understand you don't want to blindly follow. Neither did I.
So are you perfectly content with your life? You feel complete? Missing nothing?
Or do you ever stop and feel like there has to be more to it?
You are okay with just dying and it all being over?
Well the Quran wasn't written till well after the Bible, and it's based on Old Testament scriptures, and it was a good story, so it made it into the Quran. They came up with the flying horse on their own.Yes moses and Jesus are both mentioned in the quran, so is the flood. So why doubt it happened as described?
Actually that is a good paraphrase - In a universe of such splendor and magnificence, I am having a hard time understanding what the bible brings to the party. If there truly is a God, that is as powerful as He is made out to be then why the smoke and mirrors, the pomp and ceremony, the speaking in riddles, the arbitrary rules?The questions you are asking him makes it sound like you don't think he believes in God or any sort of afterlife. Sounds more like he's questioning the accuracy of the bible instead.
That is awesome, great post.I don't know how you can say that you are not following the God storyline blindly. There is no proof or evidence of any sort of God's existence. 3rd party accounts are not very solid evidence.
Remember, I honestly say that I do not blindly follow the storyline that there is no God either. It would be easy for me to quote scientists and their research that explains carbon dating, the origin of the universe, evolution, biology, etc but I cannot accept those as evidence because to me they are annecdotal. I am not an astronomer or biologist, or geologist or any other kind of ologist so I am not in a position to endorse or refute their work. On the one hand there are the scientists, and on the other hand there is the bible and religion.
I think about the simple process of looking at my hand and commanding my fingers to close and they do. Truly this is nothing short of miraculous and easily falls into a supreme being storyline that created and controls all of it. But that storyline does not include Adam and Eve, Noah, Ten Commandments, Moses, etc, etc.
To answer the questions you posed back to me.
I am very content in my life. I have what is probably a rare ability to sort the things I can control from those that I can't and to absolutely not worry about them. Life is too short
I am ok with just dying and it being over. Again, deal with the things you can deal with and don't worry about those you can't. Being dead is something I can't change so I don't worry about it. and much like believers achieve peace of mind by believing they will be accepted into heaven, I achieve peace of mind by believing it is all over at death - no thoughts, no pain, no pleasure....simply nothing. Two vastly different beliefs that accomplish the same result during life.
But your second question - oh man! Yes, absolutely I feel there has to be more to it and I will sit in the dark staring at the night sky for hours contemplating what I see as the ultimate paradox. We exist in a universe that implies it is infinite. Oh sure, we believe that there is a known universe, but if that is correct then there is something beyond the edge of the universe and that goes on to it's end, then there is something else, etc, etc. Yet from my (rather limited) understanding of the matter, this is impossible. yet here we are. This isn't a 'worry' scenario for me - it is almost a hobby, trying to come up with reasonable scenarios that make this all possible and the existence of a god is one of those scenarios but not in the biblical sense
When I was young, if I had been introduced to a religion that was not so rigid on ceremony and old books, but rather more focused on scientifically solving that paradox - I would be pope by now
It was easy for me to paraphrase because I feel the same way.Actually that is a good paraphrase - In a universe of such splendor and magnificence, I am having a hard time understanding what the bible brings to the party. If there truly is a God, that is as powerful as He is made out to be then why the smoke and mirrors, the pomp and ceremony, the speaking in riddles, the arbitrary rules?
But as far as afterlife.,.....yeah....nah. Dirt and bugs.
When one historical text agrees with another, is it a "rip off" or do both texts gain credibility?So what about most of the stories in the bible being complete rip-offs from The Epic of Gilgamesh which is dated thousands of years earlier?
The Bible was scribed by about 40 "authors" over 1500 years - 2000 years, starting with Job around 2000 BC, Moses around 1440 BC and ending with Paul and John in the 1st century AD. Not "a handful of spiritual leaders in the 1st century AD".the bible was written by a handful of spiritual leaders in the first century AD