We're not even gonna touch the whole "Toyotaa people vs Nissan people" factor here?
And Honda. And Nissan. And Mazda. And Volvo. And Mitsu/Chrysler, and AMC. And Subaru (though I'm not sure that's a fair comparison because boxor vs I4)
At best the complaints you're gonna get from those families of engines are random tensioners that don't last long on the belt ones and floppy decks that don't like racecar treatment on the open deck ones.
I'm sure there's a couple crap engines in the mix (I'm not very familiar with what Nissan and Mazda were up to around that time) but you don't see people simping them like you do with the 22RE
Pretty much everyone had good solid ~2L 4-bangers around that time. The exceptions are generally "cutting edge" shit like DOHC designs that wound up being not quite right and flops in practice and shit like the 22RE where an otherwise unremarkable design was fitted with some dumb achillies heel.
They aren't around anymore because the whole cars were built to a price point and fell apart around the engines and even if they didn't they eventually wound up in the hands of some woman or honorary woman who ignored some leak or some shit until it was too late, and that's if the shitty 3spd auto didn't fuck off first. The only shit left from that era is mostly mini trucks, sports cars and the occasional grandma car that stayed well kept long enough to get over the hump.
This is tangental though. If you compare a 22RE to the equivalent GM (to pick one example, nothing against the others) offering the GM wins every day.
Belts are almost always faster and easier than chains assuming the engines are installed in comparable platforms.