What's new

Vaccine FAILURE, on every level.


That’s going to mess with crusty’s love of the new definition
 
1658340022318.png
 
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.
 
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.

to be fair... do you trust government sources better than non-government?

I agree on the UK report/graph...
 
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.
you know you don't know what the fuck you are talking about, right?
 
I would honestly expect the vaccinated to become the main stats in infections, hospitalizations and deaths only because they pushed so hard to get as many people injected as they could. This just proves that the vaccine is not working
 
I would honestly expect the vaccinated to become the main stats in infections, hospitalizations and deaths only because they pushed so hard to get as many people injected as they could. This just proves that the vaccine is not working
Our local data definitely suggests the current variants don't give a f*ck about vaccines.
 
So where's your graph in there?
are you fucking stupid or are you trying to hide behind stupidity?

because I know when you said
You know there's no actual government source for that, right?
And I just provided you the source, that your question would not be where's the graph in the source

fucking dumbass
 
are you fucking stupid or are you trying to hide behind stupidity?

because I know when you said

And I just provided you the source, that your question would not be where's the graph in the source

fucking dumbass
How about this: Where did YOU get the graph from?
 
are you fucking stupid or are you trying to hide behind stupidity?

because I know when you said

And I just provided you the source, that your question would not be where's the graph in the source

fucking dumbass
you angry? Cause your reading sucks when you're angry..
 
are you fucking stupid or are you trying to hide behind stupidity?

because I know when you said

And I just provided you the source, that your question would not be where's the graph in the source

fucking dumbass
Neither your graph nor the purported data for it is in the link you provided. It's a bogus graph, period.
 
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.

How about this: Where did YOU get the graph from?
You might can see why I don't give a fucking rat's turd about telling you where the "graph" came from
 
You might can see why I don't give a fucking rat's turd about telling you where the "graph" came from
I definitely can see why: It doesn't fit your agenda, and you want to believe it whether it's true or not.
 
I definitely can see why: It doesn't fit your agenda, and you want to believe it whether it's true or not.
what agenda would that be?

YOU stated:
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.
I showed you a link to an "actual government source".

methinks you are the one with some agenda
 
Our local data definitely suggests the current variants don't give a f*ck about vaccines.
i have read in more than a few places (some more reliable than others) over the past few months that there are some scientists that are worried that the mRna might affect the immune systems response to other things.

Sure hope that is not right
 
my "reading sucks"?

why would I be angry and why would you think my "reading sucks"?
because any normal person can see he asked for a source of the graph... and you went pissed-off-angry-lady on him. Chill out. it was a fair and appropriate question.
 
because any normal person can see he asked for a source of the graph... and you went pissed-off-angry-lady on him. Chill out. it was a fair and appropriate question.
pardon?
are you angry? cause your reading apparently sucks
You know there's no actual government source for that, right? In fact, that's not even how canucks spell "hospitalizations". Pretty sure that's a doctored version of a UK report/graph.
 
Top Back Refresh