What's new
By:
Filters

Vaccine FAILURE, on every level.

east_beast said:
Really? The very first sentence:

A study by researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital reveals that the incidence of early onset cancers — including breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, and pancreas — has dramatically increased around the world, with the rise beginning around 1990.
Click to expand...

A good conspiridiot doesn't let facts get in the way of his views.
 
east_beast said:
Really? The very first sentence:

A study by researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital reveals that the incidence of early onset cancers — including breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, and pancreas — has dramatically increased around the world, with the rise beginning around 1990.
Click to expand...
Might wanna go dig a little deeper there bud. You and the twit are being owned by your conformation bias.

Deaths dropped from 1990-2019. Then a random spike. You and the twit are a special breed:lmao:
 
east_beast said:
Vaccine related injuries and deaths are not zero. But trying to latch onto every young healthy adult that does post-vax is as desperate as all the articles latching onto every healthy young 19 year old that died of COVID. When there's 300+ million folks, you're going to be able to find examples to fit whatever narrative you're pushing.
Click to expand...
They marked everything up as a rona death
 
surpip said:
I bought books and apps for course work for both my kids during the lockdown, and started reading with them for 30-40 min a night.

Daughter in 4th grade is testing at and 8th grade level, son in 3rd is testing at 6.5-7th grade.
Click to expand...

Schools are made for the slowest idiot in the class. It has no future if it stays like this. It's a disaster for kids. They just slowly die on the inside...
 
FleshEater said:
They tried to separate me from my 120lbs. rott when I took her. Even in her old age they couldn't budge her. I got to go into each appointment for both my dogs.

Especially after I informed them if I wasn’t with the husky he could potentially take their face off. :laughing:
Click to expand...
Around here, the vets are pretty much the only ones still playing covid. Every vet is the sit in your car until we come get your dog mentality. They found out how easy it was to not have owners in waiting rooms and just continued with the practice. It's bullshit and I'm just not doing it.
 
ev13wt said:
Schools are made for the slowest idiot in the class. It has no future if it stays like this. It's a disaster for kids. They just slowly die on the inside...
Click to expand...
please kill yourself you idiot fuck.
 
east_beast said:
I just don't see any attempt to practice any intellectual honesty. A whole lot of cherry picking and trying to force fit square pegs into round holes. It's American social and political discourse in nutshell. Develop an ideology, cherry pick your evidence, ignore anything to the contrary, defend ad nauseam no matter what. The internet just poured lighter fluid on that fire.
Click to expand...

one could interpret this a "I don't want to see anything that I don't agree with... and therefore, I will claim anything as cherry picking and square peg/round hole"
 
rockota said:
one could interpret this a "I don't want to see anything that I don't agree with... and therefore, I will claim anything as cherry picking and square peg/round hole"
Click to expand...
All I care about is data. I don't give a rat's ass about anecdotal cases, assumptions, etc. Show me data.

I don't have a firm opinion either way. I'm open to being swayed. I'm just not swayed by bullshit.
 
east_beast said:
All I care about is data. I don't give a rat's ass about anecdotal cases, assumptions, etc. Show me data.

I don't have a firm opinion either way. I'm open to being swayed. I'm just not swayed by bullshit.
Click to expand...

how are you determining the difference between the two highlighted?
Cause so far, it seems like you are claiming anything contrary the "narrative" as the last sentence.
 
It's just a link concerning increased cancer complications amongst the under 50 crowd who's common denominator is hard work, drinking, smoking and sitting on that sedentary ass. Oh wait.

45% of those studied are intestinal cancers due to consumption of true crap. Highly processed foods, coca cola, overly sugared foods, hot dogs et al.

Where's the very high increase of plasticizers in packaging, genetically modified foods, cloned meats etc.
 
east_beast said:
Where are you seeing this? It isn't in the link your provided.
Click to expand...
4E59E1A6-AA69-4846-A954-DD7FC08CC730.jpeg
 
abcnews.go.com

Nearly 2 million cases of cancer likely to be diagnosed in 2022: Report

Nearly two million cases of cancer are expected to be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2022, according to a new report from the American Cancer Society published Wednesday.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

But I’m sure it’s all a coincidence and it’s because people are eating worse than they were the year prior. Listening to all the pathetic excuses is laughable at best.
 
Rockbuggy84 said:
4E59E1A6-AA69-4846-A954-DD7FC08CC730.jpeg
Click to expand...
What's the difference between '19 and '21 and virtually the same spike between '09 and '11?

I'm just not seeing any smoking gun here and overall that looks like a fairly steady progression upward when averaged out.
 
rockota said:
how are you determining the difference between the two highlighted?
Cause so far, it seems like you are claiming anything contrary the "narrative" as the last sentence.
Click to expand...
Data is data. Anecdotes are anecdotes. All the COVID fearmongerers were clinging to every 19 year old that died of COVID and all the vax is death crew cling to everyone who does after being vaxxed.

Any narrative you want to cling to, you're going to be able to find cases to try to fit to the narrative. That's why you have to tune out the anecdotes. The devil is always in the details and the details are the data.

I always take any info with a heavy grain of salt when it's very obvious that someone has started with a conclusions and then worked backwards from the conclusion to "prove" it.
 
Dead Pool said:
Around here, the vets are pretty much the only ones still playing covid. Every vet is the sit in your car until we come get your dog mentality. They found out how easy it was to not have owners in waiting rooms and just continued with the practice. It's bullshit and I'm just not doing it.
Click to expand...
The ones around here aren’t playing it thankfully. Even had one say fuck the rules. If your putting you friend down of course we will let your whole family in there with puppers. Still sucked but that told me I found my new vet. Most of the vets in my area are also AG vets so that may make a difference.
 
Rockbuggy84 said:
abcnews.go.com

Nearly 2 million cases of cancer likely to be diagnosed in 2022: Report

Nearly two million cases of cancer are expected to be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2022, according to a new report from the American Cancer Society published Wednesday.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

But I’m sure it’s all a coincidence and it’s because people are eating worse than they were the year prior. Listening to all the pathetic excuses is laughable at best.
Click to expand...
Yup. Nobody listened to the oncologists that were screaming about 6 weeks into 2 weeks to flatten the curve. Hey we have seen a massively significant drop in people coming in for cancer screenings. This is going to be very bad and take a decade or more to be fully seen.

They were crazy people that were only worried about their paychecks.
 
east_beast said:
Data is data. Anecdotes are anecdotes. All the COVID fearmongerers were clinging to every 19 year old that died of COVID and all the vax is death crew cling to everyone who does after being vaxxed.

Any narrative you want to cling to, you're going to be able to find cases to try to fit to the narrative. That's why you have to tune out the anecdotes. The devil is always in the details and the details are the data.

I always take any info with a heavy grain of salt when it's very obvious that someone has started with a conclusions and then worked backwards from the conclusion to "prove" it.
Click to expand...

you're claiming to want data but then accusing anyone who uses data and comes to a different conclusion as clinging.... Then if they show proof/evidence, you double down on it.

So do you really want data or no?
 
east_beast said:
What's the difference between '19 and '21 and virtually the same spike between '09 and '11?

I'm just not seeing any smoking gun here and overall that looks like a fairly steady progression upward when averaged out.
Click to expand...
So now the obvious spike is normal. Got it.

Lets be honest here, your mind was made up a long time ago. The covid scam and vaccines have more easily verifiable inconsistencies than you can count, yet you’ll sit here and say that there are none and it’s all just conformation bias.
 
rockota said:
you're claiming to want data but then accusing anyone who uses data and comes to a different conclusion as clinging.... Then if they show proof/evidence, you double down on it.

So do you really want data or no?
Click to expand...
Of course he doesn’t, because it goes against his religion.

Fuck, the experts that originally pushed that vaccines as 100% safe and effective are now saying that they never made those claims. That should tell even the dumbest of fucks on the planet that something is severely wrong.
 
rockota said:
you're claiming to want data but then accusing anyone who uses data and comes to a different conclusion as clinging.... Then if they show proof/evidence, you double down on it.

So do you really want data or no?
Click to expand...

Rockbuggy84 said:
So now the obvious spike is normal. Got it.

Lets be honest here, your mind was made up a long time ago. The covid scam and vaccines have more easily verifiable inconsistencies than you can count, yet you’ll sit here and say that there are none and it’s all just conformation bias.
Click to expand...
Gary V.2
 
Thefishguy77 said:
Yup. Nobody listened to the oncologists that were screaming about 6 weeks into 2 weeks to flatten the curve. Hey we have seen a massively significant drop in people coming in for cancer screenings. This is going to be very bad and take a decade or more to be fully seen.

They were crazy people that were only worried about their paychecks.
Click to expand...
How do you drive up covid numbers to feed the narrative? Have people with cancer and life threatening illnesses sit and home for months on end without treatment. When they die, call it covid to drive fear.

Nah, that would never happen.
 
rockota said:
you're claiming to want data but then accusing anyone who uses data and comes to a different conclusion as clinging.... Then if they show proof/evidence, you double down on it.

So do you really want data or no?
Click to expand...
What proof are you referring to?
Rockbuggy84 said:
So now the obvious spike is normal. Got it.

Lets be honest here, your mind was made up a long time ago. The covid scam and vaccines have more easily verifiable inconsistencies than you can count, yet you’ll sit here and say that there are none and it’s all just conformation
Click to expand...
Who is dodging questions now? Again, what is the difference between the two spikes? You post this as "proof" and yet there's a virtually identical spike a decade prior when there was no COVID or widespread MRNA vax use. Why is that?
 
east_beast said:
What proof are you referring to?

Who is dodging questions now? Again, what is the difference between the two spikes? You post this as "proof" and yet there's a virtually identical spike a decade prior when there was no COVID or widespread MRNA vax use. Why is that?
Click to expand...
It's all coincidence. But the big experiment is far from over. :flipoff2:
 
east_beast said:
What proof are you referring to?

Who is dodging questions now? Again, what is the difference between the two spikes? You post this as "proof" and yet there's a virtually identical spike a decade prior when there was no COVID or widespread MRNA vax use. Why is that?
Click to expand...
Dodging what questions? It’s all just coincidences right.

You will find an excuse for anything and everything that goes against your religion, no matter how ridiculous.

How many times have the people pushing the vaccine, been caught blatantly lying to you?
 
ProjectTwin said:
There are also reports that kids are having developmental issues due to going to school and interacting with the world and not seeing the mouth or facial cues of the person speaking.

Then there's how babies rely on facial recognition and seeing the mouth to develop speech.

www.psychologytoday.com

The Impact of Masks on Social and Emotional Development

Many parents and caregivers are concerned about the impact of wearing masks on social-emotional development. Are these concerns supported by research and what can do about it?
www.psychologytoday.com www.psychologytoday.com
Click to expand...
Body language (of which facial expressions are a HUGE, HUGE part) is 55% of communication.

We know that someone is being sarcastic because of their facial expressions and tonality (which is 38% of communication, yes, the actual words we use is only 7%); which is why without the happy-flip-off-guy emoji sarcasm online is taken seriously.

I would bet, that in the future, for this generation that is being mentally damaged from these mask mandates, Body Language will be greatly reduced to probably less than 30%.

Meanwhile, current adults are miscommunicating and raising division and tensions since a big part of what we subconsciously rely on for communication is being hidden by the mask.
 
east_beast said:
What proof are you referring to?
Click to expand...

i guess I should ask you to define "proof" before asking questions about it. Because I'm certain your definition is nuanced...

So how do you define:
Data
Information
Evidence
Proof

?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh