the guy has $0 regular income, why are people surprised he pays near $0 'income tax'
Mad because they haven't figured out how to do it, or are to poor to do it. Or both?
the guy has $0 regular income, why are people surprised he pays near $0 'income tax'
Oh, just like me. Yet, I'm not the standing President. :rolleyes:
A lot of orange snowflakes defending a tax dodger in this thread.
I don't need a safe space.
More respectable members of this forum have brought to my attention that name-calling is immature and unproductive (like I didn't know already).
Fighting fire with fire is frowned upon. So I will refrain from such immature and petulant behavior.
Carry on.
(not hiding behind a username)
Oh, just like me. Yet, I'm not the standing President. :rolleyes:
fwiw, i don't pay taxes either, so i can't really fault him. probably going to change over the next few years, but in retirement i also plan to not own a thing, have it all in the business name and earn 0$ over taxable amount for myself
(which has nothing to do with trump or obama or taxes or whatever)
But how will shaniqua and her 12 kids eat if no one pays taxes? Think of the children
You guys are arguing about this more than you should because everyone is assuming that a left-leaning or right-leaning person posting here is a political nut swinger for their side. Yeah, there are a few rabid Trump fans on this board, but that's not the majority. There are also a few people here that dangle off the nuts of the liberal media as well, but it's silly to assume that just because someone doesn't like the way Trump has conducted himself in office means they can't notice some media bullshit when they see it.
I see the following as very had to dispute, however:
Trump has not done a bad job in office, we were all riding high until COVID hit.
Trump's ethics are questionable, but so are many other politicians.
Trump's rhetoric is often combative and inflammatory.
Trump's tax returns are most likely on par with any other extremely wealthy person doing their due diligence to ensure they give the least amount of money possible to the government.
So this is the nothing burger hill the Dems have been trying to die on for 4 years? It damn near killed that guy Maddow, he was obsessed
Kind of like Obama and his birth certificate.
Kind of like Obama and his birth certificate.
he donates 100% of his salary, he signed off all his business when he took office, you can do that if you want as well?
also, the funny thing is that his NAME has always been the logo, the brand, the corp. Trump the man doesn't own towers and jets, TRUMP (inc) owns all that shit always has been that way.
So this is the nothing burger hill the Dems have been trying to die on for 4 years? It damn near killed that guy Maddow, he was obsessed
fwiw, i don't pay taxes either, so i can't really fault him. probably going to change over the next few years, but in retirement i also plan to not own a thing, have it all in the business name and earn 0$ over taxable amount for myself
(which has nothing to do with trump or obama or taxes or whatever)
Especially if you use the "sales" of the books to launder money you obtained in a shady sort of way. Its easy to burn piles of books and claim mega sales. Who is going to dispute it?
He wasn't liked enough, nor a good enough writer to have sold that many books. Nobody gave a fuck in 1995, why suddenly when he became a shitty president? Dude sure didn't make me want to go out and buy anything he wrote. Hell, he had the economy so fucked up, who could even afford books?
Think about it....
Regurge of a 2016 story by same outlet. Why are they still calling for a release of tax returns, if supposedly they have tax returns?. They probably gathered enough information from other people to make it sound legit, and enough to bother Trump slightly. But what does it matter? Especially after you have The Bernie posting what is paid by companies worth BILLIONS and pay less. Bernie technically downplayed Trumps tax history without even realizing it.
Oh you still pay taxes, on food gas shit you buy at Walmart etc etc.
no, you aren't right at all. the dangerous part of Trump's finances is that he FREQUENTLY ties his OWN fortune into keepting the INC afloat. That is what the concern was from the republican led senaate committee.. go look it up. His debt structure would actually keep him from getting a security clearance if he wasn't an elected official, he would be too easy to turn or take advantage of... that has always been the concern.
Dear Mr. Michealcumguzzler,
Kindly go fuck yourself. Please and thank you.
Respectable enough for you? Retard.
Scraped this shit off the BBC; sort of like scraping dog shit off your shoe.
Speaking on NBC, Ms Pelosi said the report showed that "this president appears to have over $400m in debt".
"To whom? Different countries? What is the leverage they have?" she asked, adding: "So for me, this is a national security question."
"The fact that you could have a sitting president who owes hundreds of millions of dollars that he's personally guaranteed to lenders, and we don't know who these lenders are," she said, and suggested that Mr Trump may be indebted to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54332956:stirthepot:
It pains me to agree with that idiot Pelosi but she's not wrong that this could pose a potential problem. Security clearance checks look for leverage exactly like that for normal folks.
I could agree.
But... people should at least then demand full transparency for all elected officials