What's new

Trump will have Elon audit the entire federal government

But despite being so good at that, his clownish behavior off the clock indicates he's a back room kind of guy.
Would you mind sharing some examples of Musk's clownish behaviour? I know about him smoking weed with Joe Rogan, but that's really the only thing that comes to mind. What did I forget about?
 
Would you mind sharing some examples of Musk's clownish behaviour? I know about him smoking weed with Joe Rogan, but that's really the only thing that comes to mind. What did I forget about?
It would be easier to point out someone else's clownish post's in this thread, I mean jesus christ he's like a scorned bitch. :lmao:
 
Would you mind sharing some examples of Musk's clownish behaviour? I know about him smoking weed with Joe Rogan, but that's really the only thing that comes to mind. What did I forget about?
Boosting Pizzagate theories
Suggesting Biden is ushering in immigrants to become voters
Strange posts seemingly endorsing high status males in power

Having 10 children is usually a tell-tale sign of mental illness, but then the wierdo names he assigns to some (X Æ A-12.), and the discarding of others as "dead to him" from the "woke mind virus".

These eccentricities have combined to repel advertisers from his platform, customers from buying his cars, and from people simply taking him seriously. I don't like how he treats his employees as garbage to be tossed at any given moment. I recall him trying to be a hero in that cave incident in Thailand, then only contributing by calling the one guy a pedo. His views on the Ukraine war are badly misguided, which is especially disappointing after he began by providing critical starlinks to Ukraine.

Overall, his is a world in which he is the main character. His lack of empathy is concerning, and his extreme wealth appears to have the exact effect one would expect. I don't think he's evil, but I don't want to hitch the American horse to his cart. Let him play with his toys and be rich. I'm much more comfortable with his decision making policies as long as they have no effect on me.
 
Boosting Pizzagate theories
Suggesting Biden is ushering in immigrants to become voters
Strange posts seemingly endorsing high status males in power

Having 10 children is usually a tell-tale sign of mental illness, but then the wierdo names he assigns to some (X Æ A-12.), and the discarding of others as "dead to him" from the "woke mind virus".

These eccentricities have combined to repel advertisers from his platform, customers from buying his cars, and from people simply taking him seriously. I don't like how he treats his employees as garbage to be tossed at any given moment. I recall him trying to be a hero in that cave incident in Thailand, then only contributing by calling the one guy a pedo. His views on the Ukraine war are badly misguided, which is especially disappointing after he began by providing critical starlinks to Ukraine.

Overall, his is a world in which he is the main character. His lack of empathy is concerning, and his extreme wealth appears to have the exact effect one would expect. I don't think he's evil, but I don't want to hitch the American horse to his cart. Let him play with his toys and be rich. I'm much more comfortable with his decision making policies as long as they have no effect on me.
That's a well written reponse. I don't share your opinions about some of it, but you did answer my question and provide examples and I appreciate that.
:beer:
 
That's a well written reponse. I don't share your opinions about some of it, but you did answer my question and provide examples and I appreciate that.
:beer:
:beer:

Totally fair. Also your sig made me laugh. :grinpimp:
 
I actually don't doubt this. :dustin:

Like I said, gimme the red pen and I'll go to town. Starting with:

Transgender programs in Pakistan
TSA
IRS
CIA
ATF
FBI
Aid to foreign countries hostile to US Interests
etc
etc

1725658684543.png
Well as long as Elon and Trump aren't involved, right?
 
Having 10 children is usually a tell-tale sign of mental illness
:laughing:
Tell me what you really think of those crazy religious families with 12 or more.

Not sure how many I'd have if I won lotto and could afford a few maids and nannies and college for all kids.
Probably not 10, but certainly more than 3.
 
Boosting Pizzagate theories
Suggesting Biden is ushering in immigrants to become voters
Strange posts seemingly endorsing high status males in power

Having 10 children is usually a tell-tale sign of mental illness, but then the wierdo names he assigns to some (X Æ A-12.), and the discarding of others as "dead to him" from the "woke mind virus".

These eccentricities have combined to repel advertisers from his platform, customers from buying his cars, and from people simply taking him seriously. I don't like how he treats his employees as garbage to be tossed at any given moment. I recall him trying to be a hero in that cave incident in Thailand, then only contributing by calling the one guy a pedo. His views on the Ukraine war are badly misguided, which is especially disappointing after he began by providing critical starlinks to Ukraine.

Overall, his is a world in which he is the main character. His lack of empathy is concerning, and his extreme wealth appears to have the exact effect one would expect. I don't think he's evil, but I don't want to hitch the American horse to his cart. Let him play with his toys and be rich. I'm much more comfortable with his decision making policies as long as they have no effect on me.
I had heard the term "pizzagate" before today but had no idea what it meant til I read the link you posted. In that link that says Musk was insanely accusing media folks of having something to do with this pizzagate, it says right in it that one of those journalists was arrested this month for child porn. Doesn't exactly sound like he's crazy to me, but as I said I don't know the whole story.
Biden ushering in migrants to become voters.. well he is. Alot of places will give a drivers license to an immigrant, illegal or not, and automatically register them to vote at the same time. I've seen a few articles saying as much lately the last few months.
As to him endorsing high status males.. no idea, but I clicked your link and it looks more to me like he said that men who don't think they are women, or not soy boys, or not all hysterical like women, should probably have more say, and I can't argue with that. I'm not saying anyone is "lesser than" as far as voting, but if the average american is a dumb fuck, just remember that to make that dumb fuck average there are alot dumber than him/her/it
:flipoff2:
As to Elon and how he is losing advertisers and all, I think it's awesome that he's got enough "fuck you " money to not give a shit if you love or hate him. He seems to me to be for free speech, advancing the human race by going into space more efficiently than government ever dreamed of, and shitty looking electric cars.
I don't know his views on Ukraine but fuck Ukraine. They impeached Trump for calling Ukraine once about Biden shady dealings there and then Biden wins and everyone forgot that part and we just keep sending them money. Fuck Ukraine. If they want to be free then do it on their dime. Not mine :flipoff2:
 
That's a well written reponse. I don't share your opinions about some of it, but you did answer my question and provide examples and I appreciate that.
:beer:

It is, but the response misses everything by a large margin. It is glaring so I will point this out. Our well meaning friend has drifted off course and many of you have followed. Bonanza originally was arguing that Musk is not validated to audit as his decisins at managing Twitter have brought negative results. It has been shown that Twitter valuation is nebulus and impossible to truly define. The changes Musk made at X were to open it up, and remove at least 80% of the unproductive employees. And he argues THAT has brought down the value of enterprise. And the response to that is that Twitter was grossly overvalued. But the entire argument misses the subject, can Musk run an effort to audit the .gov. It misses it entirely. Twitter sacking and valuation has no relevance to Musk finding, hiring and using qualified and motivated people to audit the morass. The comments that he is a buffoon are irrelevant to the subject entirely. The last 5 pages are an interesting discussion but mostly only marginally relevant. What has Musk done and accomplished ? Put men in orbit, built a micro car company into a world wide business valued at more than GM ? Why F-around arguing about about Twitter except to corrrect the innacuracies ? So what ? And all the evalaution of Musk as a man, his values and morals ? So What ?

I ask him simply - do you think Musk is is capable and qualifed as an outside business man to establish and direct a Federal audit ? If not, why ? If not, who then ? Another swamp creature. Let's hear it. :flipoff2::flipoff2::flipoff2:
 
It is, but the response misses everything by a large margin. It is glaring so I will point this out. Our well meaning friend has drifted off course and many of you have followed. Bonanza originally was arguing that Musk is not validated to audit as his decisins at managing Twitter have brought negative results. It has been shown that Twitter valuation is nebulus and impossible to truly define. The changes Musk made at X were to open it up, and remove at least 80% of the unproductive employees. And he argues THAT has brought down the value of enterprise. And the response to that is that Twitter was grossly overvalued. But the entire argument misses the subject, can Musk run an effort to audit the .gov. It misses it entirely. Twitter sacking and valuation has no relevance to Musk finding, hiring and using qualified and motivated people to audit the morass. The comments that he is a buffoon are irrelevant to the subject entirely. The last 5 pages are an interesting discussion but mostly only marginally relevant. What has Musk done and accomplished ? Put men in orbit, built a micro car company into a world wide business valued at more than GM ? Why F-around arguing about about Twitter except to corrrect the innacuracies ? So what ? And all the evalaution of Musk as a man, his values and morals ? So What ?

I ask him simply - do you think Musk is is capable and qualifed as an outside business man to establish and direct a Federal audit ? If not, why ? If not, who then ? Another swamp creature. Let's hear it. :flipoff2::flipoff2::flipoff2:

And I'd also like to hear an answer to my question in post 97 of this thread.


.
 
What’s really funny, is that so many people will be up in arms over Elon leading the edit, but they’re perfectly fine with the federal reserve bank not being federal, and never being audited. :homer:
 
I will have to check with my Democrat voting friend if he finds amusement in the thought. I thas to be of some interest to virtually anyone. :ghost:
 
I'm much more comfortable with his decision making policies as long as they have no effect on me.
that's the problem at the root of government in its current coercive-monopoly-state form
voting means nothing, you're still bound to its whims and it continues to grow despite clear negative demand for any of its services

if anything, voting for the nominal leader only gives them extra rope to hang you with, since they can do so with the blessings of their own conscience.
 
Pizzagate was made up and hyped by the media to discredit and shut down conversation and people asking questions about pedo rings. Their goal was to make it all about this pizza joint, sensationalize it, and then prove its bullshit. They could then point to all the idiots, conspiracy theorists, and far right extremists poking their noses around asking inconvenient questions dealing with pedo rings and child trafficking and shut those conversations down.

Well then all the Epstein Island shit broke and now its common knowledge that elite pedo rings are out there.

Pizzagoat was the hoax. If you’re still using Pizzagate as evidence someone is pushing false claims then you are a media puppet and hate free speech.
 
I hear this npc-speak a lot lately

putting someone else before yourself is suicidal
but I guess suicide is being promoted in the lefty circles in all but name
That is why Bonanza is ok with continuing Ukraine imho. He is too old to be actually sent to die there if we continue to push it. Seems like that fight as a whole is popular with people who will never have to fight it.
 
That is why Bonanza is ok with continuing Ukraine imho. He is too old to be actually sent to die there if we continue to push it. Seems like that fight as a whole is popular with people who will never have to fight it.

The elites have already came out and said there’s too many resources in Ukraine to let Russia have it. So no matter what, we’ll be involved until a resolution.

Their “resources” I believe are both physical and non-physical, meaning corrupt. That country has a history of corruption and our politicians love hiding that shit off shore where freedom of speech isn’t a thing.
 
Pizzagate was made up and hyped by the media to discredit and shut down conversation and people asking questions about pedo rings. Their goal was to make it all about this pizza joint, sensationalize it, and then prove its bullshit. They could then point to all the idiots, conspiracy theorists, and far right extremists poking their noses around asking inconvenient questions dealing with pedo rings and child trafficking and shut those conversations down.

Well then all the Epstein Island shit broke and now its common knowledge that elite pedo rings are out there.

Pizzagoat was the hoax. If you’re still using Pizzagate as evidence someone is pushing false claims then you are a media puppet and hate free speech.

Never heard of Pizzagate. :confused: Anyways, your analysis is great and makes complete sense. :usa:
 

The rest of your statement may or may not be legitimate but as to your list here is not very convincing.

The first link starts with “Elon Musk continued to boost a debunked conspiracy theory”. It seems to me that’s the way the media refers to every conspiracy theory before it is proven correct. The word debunked means proven wrong. Pizzagate hasn’t been proven wrong, it just hasn’t been proven correct. The last line of the article says pizzagate is code for “elites doing bad things to kids”. I would agree with this and it has been proven.

The second theory has not been proven, but it certainly has not been disproven. It is fact, that the Dems are ushering immigrants in. Whether it’s for voters or out and out distraction of our country, (to make way for one world government) I’m not sure.

The third theory is very interesting. You can’t deny some of the observations are true. I don’t know how the “high status males” would be picked, but that doesn’t completely discredit the theory.

In all of these cases, I definitely don’t see discussing them to be “clownish”. Could you come up with better examples?
 
Pizzagate was made up and hyped by the media to discredit and shut down conversation and people asking questions about pedo rings. Their goal was to make it all about this pizza joint, sensationalize it, and then prove its bullshit. They could then point to all the idiots, conspiracy theorists, and far right extremists poking their noses around asking inconvenient questions dealing with pedo rings and child trafficking and shut those conversations down.

Well then all the Epstein Island shit broke and now its common knowledge that elite pedo rings are out there.

Pizzagoat was the hoax. If you’re still using Pizzagate as evidence someone is pushing false claims then you are a media puppet and hate free speech.

Very similar media fuckery with the covid vaxx. Anyone who said a single thing not positive was immediately labeled an anti-vaxxer. Even though probably 95% of the people that don't want MRNA injection are not anti-vaxxers.

If I get a rusty nail through my foot, I'll go get a tetanus shot

If I get mauled by a crazed possum, I'll go get rabies shots

I don't want anything mrna based OMG HE'S AN ANTI-VAXXER HE'S ONE OF THE CRAZIES
 
Never heard of Pizzagate. :confused: Anyways, your analysis is great and makes complete sense. :usa:
The rest of your statement may or may not be legitimate but as to your list here is not very convincing.

The first link starts with “Elon Musk continued to boost a debunked conspiracy theory”. It seems to me that’s the way the media refers to every conspiracy theory before it is proven correct. The word debunked means proven wrong. Pizzagate hasn’t been proven wrong, it just hasn’t been proven correct. The last line of the article says pizzagate is code for “elites doing bad things to kids”. I would agree with this and it has been proven.

The second theory has not been proven, but it certainly has not been disproven. It is fact, that the Dems are ushering immigrants in. Whether it’s for voters or out and out distraction of our country, (to make way for one world government) I’m not sure.

The third theory is very interesting. You can’t deny some of the observations are true. I don’t know how the “high status males” would be picked, but that doesn’t completely discredit the theory.

In all of these cases, I definitely don’t see discussing them to be “clownish”. Could you come up with better examples?

Pretty sure Pizzagate started on 4chan. They used "Cheese Pizza" or "CP" for "Child P..." (let's not have IBB show up in a search for that) and somehow it turned in to a basement of a pizza restaurant in New York where the elites diddled kids. It's also pretty obvious that 4chan is fully infiltrated by feds, not a surprise that it could be steered in a way to make is just a whacky conspiracy theory. Of course, that was all being discredited at the exact same time the Epstein story was gaining traction so, you know, conspiracies and whatnot.
 
that's the problem at the root of government in its current coercive-monopoly-state form
voting means nothing, you're still bound to its whims and it continues to grow despite clear negative demand for any of its services

if anything, voting for the nominal leader only gives them extra rope to hang you with, since they can do so with the blessings of their own conscience.
Back when we had kings and whatnot the scope of government was limited because there was one identifiable person and one group of people to behead to force change, if their cronies didn't force them out first so as to keep their heads.

By dividing responsibility with the citizenry it creates a veneer of legitimacy and divides responsibility so thinly you can't behead them all. Say nothing of the fact that voters will fight and die for a government the way no overtly subjugated people will.

Look at 3rd world dictatorships. They all have token parliaments and legislatures and whatnot and are nominally elected because they find this veneer of legitimacy useful.
 
Been saying this for years…
And it isn't a bad thing. We have let the "good guys" run things for a long time and look at how that has gone. Might be time to give the villians a chance:flipoff2:. Something something Thanos was right or whatever:flipoff2:
 
Top Back Refresh