It is, but the response misses everything by a large margin. It is glaring so I will point this out. Our well meaning friend has drifted off course and many of you have followed. Bonanza originally was arguing that Musk is not validated to audit as his decisins at managing Twitter have brought negative results. It has been shown that Twitter valuation is nebulus and impossible to truly define. The changes Musk made at X were to open it up, and remove at least 80% of the unproductive employees. And he argues THAT has brought down the value of enterprise. And the response to that is that Twitter was grossly overvalued. But the entire argument misses the subject, can Musk run an effort to audit the .gov. It misses it entirely. Twitter sacking and valuation has no relevance to Musk finding, hiring and using qualified and motivated people to audit the morass. The comments that he is a buffoon are irrelevant to the subject entirely. The last 5 pages are an interesting discussion but mostly only marginally relevant. What has Musk done and accomplished ? Put men in orbit, built a micro car company into a world wide business valued at more than GM ? Why F-around arguing about about Twitter except to corrrect the innacuracies ? So what ? And all the evalaution of Musk as a man, his values and morals ? So What ?
I ask him simply - do you think Musk is is capable and qualifed as an outside business man to establish and direct a Federal audit ? If not, why ? If not, who then ? Another swamp creature. Let's hear it.