What's new
By:
Filters

Trump will have Elon audit the entire federal government

Trump and Musk can audit government agencies, but the fact is those jobs are protected by civil service laws and very powerful unions. It's difficult to fire one lazy government employee seat filler. I don't see how they would be able to conduct mass firings in the public sector. They would have to do away with the protections first.
 
BDK said:
Trump and Musk can audit government agencies, but the fact is those jobs are protected by civil service laws and very powerful unions. It's difficult to fire one lazy government employee seat filler. I don't see how they would be able to conduct mass firings in the public sector. They would have to do away with the protections first.
Click to expand...
Agree public sector unions should be immediately busted
 
Killing the slow non-worker ants isn't the real cherry but it's nice. Exposing the vermin, the bugs that crawl out when the rotten log is clawed over is the prime time show. Bears eat grubs and larvae as well as the honey high up in the tree. Feeding time :flipoff2:
 
bgaidan said:
Pretty sure Pizzagate started on 4chan. They used "Cheese Pizza" or "CP" for "Child P..." (let's not have IBB show up in a search for that) and somehow it turned in to a basement of a pizza restaurant in New York where the elites diddled kids. It's also pretty obvious that 4chan is fully infiltrated by feds, not a surprise that it could be steered in a way to make is just a whacky conspiracy theory. Of course, that was all being discredited at the exact same time the Epstein story was gaining traction so, you know, conspiracies and whatnot.
Click to expand...
Wasn’t it a big Alex Jones thing?
 
BDK said:
Trump and Musk can audit government agencies, but the fact is those jobs are protected by civil service laws and very powerful unions. It's difficult to fire one lazy government employee seat filler. I don't see how they would be able to conduct mass firings in the public sector. They would have to do away with the protections first.
Click to expand...

Vivek: if you can’t fire someone that works for you…. That means they don’t work for you.
 
rockota said:
Vivek: if you can’t fire someone that works for you…. That means they don’t work for you.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is essentially correct. A civil service employee, a public servant, does not work for his supervisor, he works for the public. A gross oversimplification but that is the essence of it. Our agency's (DOT) unspoken code was that the law and policy is meant to protect the qualified employee from rogue and retaliatory management. (example - sexual harrasment, especially male on female) It goes both ways. Hiring freeze is easier to emplace and effect. The source of new slugs, larvae, and money for salary allocation is terminated and the mass slowing dies through attrition.

Fuck I am glad I retired from that shit . .. . . . .:eek:

spell chek non-op :lmao:
 
Last edited:
Splib said:
Yes, that is essentially correct. A civil service employee, a public servant, does not work for his supervisor, he works for the public. A gross oversimplification but that is the essence of it. Our agencie's (DOT) unspoken code was that the law and policy is meant to protect the qualified employee from rogue and retaliatory management. It goes both ways. hiring freeze is easier to emplace and effect. The source of new slugs, larvae, is terminated and the mass slowing dies through attrition.

Fuck I am glad I retired from that shit . .. . . . .:eek:
Click to expand...
As the public, I should get a say in your compensation, benefits and if you get to stay employed or not. Whoops for some reason you are unionized.....
 
Slander said:
As the public, I should get a say in your compensation, benefits and if you get to stay employed or not. Whoops for some reason you are unionized.....
Click to expand...

Yah. I never saw the true merit of the union but until 2016 or 2018 the ccourts had upheld the right of the union to withdraw monies from employee paycheck if they were union of not. This was because the court reasoned that non-union employees benefitted from the efforts and monies of the union employees. So the union sought incresed salary to keep up with privye sector. In my case the private engineering firms in SF Bay Area including San Jose CA were outpaying state locensed engineers by almost 50%. So, the good engineers were leaving state service for greener pastures and the public stood to suffer through an inferior state service. The union, PECG, went to bat for the engineers in most of th engineering classifications. Thats just my explanation, not my marching tune to battle. My wife currenctly is respresnted by SEIU but she gt hersel out and I cant explain how :confused::eek::confused: Women talk shiat :laughing:

It sounds really fucking liberal but here it is - the taxpaying public does not always make the best decisions or know what the decisions really are. The State of CA government, speaking on behalf of the public and in its best interets, had histroically held the positin that the best safety critical work was not necessarily done by lowest bid contracting firms. Think seismic design in large major public structures like bridges and overpasses. But thatis a discussion for another day, and happy hour :blender:
 
[486] said:
no, it was q
who was the fedgov
Click to expand...

Did that originate on 4chan as well?


4chan-who.gif
 
Some governors will do a hiring freeze to reduce the number of state employees. Trump could get away with that, but it takes too long for attrition to do what needs to be done. The Civil service laws would need to be changed, or the agency would need to be eliminated entirely. I worked for the state for 25 years. I saw the union and civil service laws protect people who had no business being in the positions they were in. This is especially true in state law enforcement. It was the late 90's, early 2000's when I noticed there were more people getting into law enforcement for the benefits and retirement, than the work. They were not the kind of people you wanted watching your back.
 
Bonanza said:
Boosting Pizzagate theories
Suggesting Biden is ushering in immigrants to become voters
Strange posts seemingly endorsing high status males in power

Having 10 children is usually a tell-tale sign of mental illness, but then the wierdo names he assigns to some (X Æ A-12.), and the discarding of others as "dead to him" from the "woke mind virus".

These eccentricities have combined to repel advertisers from his platform, customers from buying his cars, and from people simply taking him seriously. I don't like how he treats his employees as garbage to be tossed at any given moment. I recall him trying to be a hero in that cave incident in Thailand, then only contributing by calling the one guy a pedo. His views on the Ukraine war are badly misguided, which is especially disappointing after he began by providing critical starlinks to Ukraine.

Overall, his is a world in which he is the main character. His lack of empathy is concerning, and his extreme wealth appears to have the exact effect one would expect. I don't think he's evil, but I don't want to hitch the American horse to his cart. Let him play with his toys and be rich. I'm much more comfortable with his decision making policies as long as they have no effect on me.
Click to expand...
You don't have to sell me on the guy, I all ready like him:flipoff2:

If having 10 children is a sign of mental illness, the vast majority of our ancestors would be considered mentally ill. 10 kids used to be the average. It's only in the past couple generations that the numbers have dropped. And that's only in certain society's.

By that logic most Arab men are mentally ill. I'm not sure I can dispute that though :lmao:
 
45acp said:
Very similar media fuckery with the covid vaxx. Anyone who said a single thing not positive was immediately labeled an anti-vaxxer. Even though probably 95% of the people that don't want MRNA injection are not anti-vaxxers.

If I get a rusty nail through my foot, I'll go get a tetanus shot

If I get mauled by a crazed possum, I'll go get rabies shots

I don't want anything mrna based OMG HE'S AN ANTI-VAXXER HE'S ONE OF THE CRAZIES
Click to expand...

Can confirm. My dad and that entire side of the family thinks exactly that. Essentially verbatim.
 
ApeEater said:
He pushed it enough that he had to make a public apology.
Click to expand...

Glad you stand corrected.

Yes because only things that have been properly screened and vetted by main stream news are aloud to be talked about by anyone on the interweb.
 
bdkw1 said:
You don't have to sell me on the guy, I all ready like him:flipoff2:

If having 10 children is a sign of mental illness, the vast majority of our ancestors would be considered mentally ill. 10 kids used to be the average. It's only in the past couple generations that the numbers have dropped. And that's only in certain society's.

By that logic most Arab men are mentally ill. I'm not sure I can dispute that though :lmao:
Click to expand...

Bonanza lurches left every time he hits "post reply".
 
ApeEater said:
pretty sure it was Jones.
Click to expand...

ApeEater said:
He pushed it enough that he had to make a public apology.
Click to expand...
Hey guys there is a pedo ring ran by elites world wide - STFU crazy.

Pedo ring ran by elites world wide is uncovered. - Jones must apologize for spreading misinformation:confused:

He should have to unappologize :laughing:
 
bgaidan said:
That's a weird way of saying you were wrong and don't know what you're talking about.
Click to expand...
I said it was a big Alex Jones thing. I was absolutely correct, as evidenced by his forced public apology to avoid yet another lawsuit.

You guys crack me up.
 
ApeEater said:
I said it was a big Alex Jones thing. I was absolutely correct, as evidenced by his forced public apology to avoid yet another lawsuit.

You guys crack me up.
Click to expand...

You are implying alex jones made it up. He didnt. Like most of his shit, he covers whats in the news. He is a political pundit and as crazy as it may sound to some, he offers his opinion and should be free to do so. Now that we have a nice track record of lawfare and the corporate media doing the governments dirty work its easy to see it was a convenient way to discredit jones. The real story was the emails not the pizza joint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh