I just realized why that picture seemed funny to me. Did you get rid of the Talon?
Ya, I like driving things, not taking them to the dealer even if they are an old gutless pos that rides like shit.I just realized why that picture seemed funny to me. Did you get rid of the Talon?
My Yamaha isn’t breaking down all the time and it’s on tire skates, pushed into the corner with the Geo parked beside it.Ya, I like driving things, not taking them to the dealer even if they are an old gutless pos that rides like shit.
What kinda sucks, is that I could be driving the talon to go get beer where I live now. Oh well.
Yes, the early trackick flywheel weighs about 10lbs more than a samurai flywheel (IIRC) and the clutch is bigger. The 16V clutches are 8.5" (the 8V uses the same flywheel, but yet a smaller diameter clutch, 7.9" for whatever reason). The samurai clutch is 7.5".Sami trans is easiest since its the only one that won't require tunnel mods. Biggest concern there would be the clutch size, is the 1st gen kick clutch any bigger than the 1.3? I know the clutch that was behind this 2.0 was much larger, basically Toyota sized if I remember right.
I vote 2.0 and auto. Do you have any fuel tanks from a 2 door kick? I’ve put some door kick tanks in samurai’s. Very little modification needed. 2Big probably has one
What are the challenges you want least to HAVE to deal with? The deal breakers? Wanting to stay with the samurai transfer case no matter what?
Could you just put a track/kick 5 speed manual with married t-case and 4.24:1 trail tough gears in it and go with the 4.88’s or 5.13’s?
Just FYI I think your math is a ways off. My green 2 door was a 1.6 8V 3 speed auto, samurai case with 1.509/4.9 gears. I put the 5.13’s from a 4 door in it and ran 30” tires on it. Horsepower was the limit to its top speed, not gearing. On flat ground I could get it up to 65 actual miles per hour at about 4900 rpm. It didn’t have enough to rev any higher than that with the wind drag and rolling resistance. If I could have stuck a 2.0 in it for more power I wouldn’t have changed the gear ratio. I would have just wanted bigger tires on it. A 4.9 case and 5.13’s in high range is the same as 7.74:1 axle gears.
I could murder whatever dildo engineer decided that listing a gear reduction in % was the way to go. And every company selling them that list the actual ratio of low range but the % of high range. Stupidest product development idea of all time.
There used to be multiple gearset manufacturers that had different high range reductions than their competitors. I used to have spread sheet with all of them listed by mfg but I lost it. Was on Zuwharie and PBB both but not finding them on search either. Now that there are only one two companies having gearsets made it doesn’t matter as much. At one time I was pretty confident that my 4.9 gears were 1.509 high range, and that the 6.4’s were 1.609. Not so confident any more.
What I am confident in is not needing overdrive. My Jeep has a legit 300 hp, 4 speed auto with over drive 5.38 gears and 39” tires. Over drive is as useless in it, as OD is in my tracker. I’ve got a 3 speed FMVB trans to go in my Jeep and ditch the od all together.
Keep in mind that a stock 4 door Track/Kick has a curb weight of about 3,100-3,200 lbs. My bone stock Samurai with no doors and no top weighed 1,980 lbs on the truck scale at work. That is a HUGE weight reduction.I feel like 1:1 high would make it a total turd, even with 5.xx. The 4 door with the same 32s was. I don't want to mess with slip yokes either. Although thats not a bad option otherwise.
I’ve got so much experience with low geared rigs and no OD I’m always shocked when people think they need it on a trail rig. It’s not like you’re going to drive it to California from Idaho. My 4.9’s are from trail-tough and are newer ones from only 5 or 6 years ago.What brand are your 4.9s?
Im fine with ~4k rpm to do 65. I didn't want 5k to do 60. Again, it's not a highway queen.
It is until you add bigger tires, winch, cage and all the camping gear, tools, parts and passengers. I've tried to be very conscious about wieght, but I still expect around 3k trail wieght. That's with 2 ~200 lb guys.Keep in mind that a stock 4 door Track/Kick has a curb weight of about 3,100-3,200 lbs. My bone stock Samurai with no doors and no top weighed 1,980 lbs on the truck scale at work. That is a HUGE weight reduction.
I've got an Excel spreadsheet that you can plug in tire size, axle gear ratio, vehicle speed, high range % reduction, and OD ratio to determine engine rpm.
I’ve got so much experience with low geared rigs and no OD I’m always shocked when people think they need it on a trail rig. It’s not like you’re going to drive it to California from Idaho. My 4.9’s are from trail-tough and are newer ones from only 5 or 6 years ago.
I’d run 6.20’s and 37’s in anything with no od no problem. Used to race the JHF 4500 car with an LS/TH400 6.20’s and 37’s. It did 107 mph at 6,700 rpm. 65 was only 4,000 ish.
Our new car has a Hero 3 speed t-case behind the TH400 and we run it in 1.4:1 most the time. 1.4 x 5.40 diff gears is 7.56:1 also 37” tires. It goes 60 at 6,000 rpm.
That’s real world not calculator numbers and lowrance GPS speedometer checking.
4th or 5th?FWIW
I'm running a Samurai 5 speed/6.4/5.29 and 35" tires and at 60mph the tach says 4200-4300.
5th gear, and an '87 trans.
Before the 5.29s I was going to try and find a newer trans with a shorter OD, but the 5.29s took care of that for me.
Oh yeah, GPS on my phone. I think my speedo reads about 10mph faster than actual at that speed.You actually using GPS for speed?
I'm pretty sure I'll need OD with the 4.88s if I want to do 65 that is.