My $0.02 on what to change...
The axle side panhard mount can't improve much, it's probably close to the shock at full flex+droop as it is. Not much to improve there. But the frame side could easily move outboard of the frame rail to gain a good 6" of panhard length. Anything will help.
The axle side upper link mount being angled back is a killer for that link length, but it looks like the panhard bar is stopping it from moving forward. What does the frame side mount look like?
As for the lowers... Getting the axle side mounts directly behind the tube will not only help rock clearance, but shorten the links and also make them flatter at ride height. And if the frame side mounts came forward it would help too. The "rule of thumb" for front 3 link is equal length links too and bottom.
But I'm probably not helping as everything looks fully welded out at this point and I'm commenting a month too late. Who determined the link lengths and suspension design?
The axle side panhard mount can't improve much, it's probably close to the shock at full flex+droop as it is. Not much to improve there. But the frame side could easily move outboard of the frame rail to gain a good 6" of panhard length. Anything will help.
The axle side upper link mount being angled back is a killer for that link length, but it looks like the panhard bar is stopping it from moving forward. What does the frame side mount look like?
As for the lowers... Getting the axle side mounts directly behind the tube will not only help rock clearance, but shorten the links and also make them flatter at ride height. And if the frame side mounts came forward it would help too. The "rule of thumb" for front 3 link is equal length links too and bottom.
But I'm probably not helping as everything looks fully welded out at this point and I'm commenting a month too late. Who determined the link lengths and suspension design?