What's new

MCI 102-C3 coach to RV - Chassis/Suspension

arse_sidewards said,
JNHEscher said:
? Got a link? There's been nothing but some junky Rockwell stuff around me.​
Nothing in particular, just seems like I see a part-out a month or so on the Boston C-list so if you wrote a search for all the New England C-lists you might find something. I'll keep my eyes open.
 
Apologies for the rudimentary depiction. I do not yet have any of the dimensions for the aforementioned transfer cases so I had to guess. I'm sure it doesn't display well on the thread. Pretty sure all who are commenting about the driveline will still make out what's going on. I colored the center differentials green. Optional drive shafts are red. Everything else should be self-explanatory. The only reason I have three t-cases drawn in scenarios 1 and 2 is because of the center diff between front and rear. The extra is having double reduction and double high range. Not that I need it, but who wouldn't do a double-take when I tell them my bus has doublers?

#1 Three driven axles. Drive shaft from trans (in red) could go to rear case input and pass through. Still want the center diff between front and rear and I suppose I could chop down the center t-case to use just the diff. Otherwise connect trans to center t-case.

#2 Just drive two axles with one center t-case or say screw it and run all three with a tandem. The rear axle center lines are roughly four feet apart. With steer axles in the rear at full lock, the tires would be pretty close to traveling the same arc. Could probably live with the tire scrub between the rear axles without a center diff. Might be iffy with super singles.

#3 I'm telling you, if I have to buy a two-pack of wide AT4000's, I will not hesitate to mount both axles and run it like that Bovmani. That said, same setup as #1 and a center diff between the front axles would be a must. Can't let the steering get wacky.

At the moment, I'm a little unsure about using the PTO. Every t-case I up pull that lists torque specs shows that their PTO has less than 10% of the input capacity. Probably something that can be worked around.

So that's the stuff I lay in bed and dream about. Bash it, add to it, etc.

815.jpg
 
Mr. Mindless said,

PTOs are typically a side mounted little dog gear. Not something that could be worked around.

4' sounds like real tight spacing to cram a case between. Seems to me that using passthrough diffs that are in highway service every single day, proven tech, with high horsepower high gross ratings, is really the way to go. I'd drop the rear steer idea and keep 6x6 on the table before I started cramming extra transfer cases in tight spaces.

Run it just like drawing #2 with interaxle diff lock and diff lockers in the rear axles. Extra claptrap is what you don't need in the boonies.
 
jd8420 said,

I thing the easiest and cheapest way to get what yo are trying to accomplish would be to just set your axles and transfer case up the same way as any front engine 6X6 is set up and try to find a v-drive like are in boats that is heavy duty enough. That ways you could use the common wide 6.83 geared Axletech 4000's. For the middle axle you could take a pass through AT4000 and cut the ends off and graft on the steering knuckles from a front axle. The V-drive could be set up with whatever overdrive ratio that you need and be used with the rear engine. The transfer cases like the AT T600 T800 and MH MVG1600 send most of the power to the rear axles. The way you have it in your diagram would send most of the power to the front axle.
 
Mr. Mindless said:
PTOs are typically a side mounted little dog gear. Not something that could be worked around.

4' sounds like real tight spacing to cram a case between. Seems to me that using passthrough diffs that are in highway service every single day, proven tech, with high horsepower high gross ratings, is really the way to go. I'd drop the rear steer idea and keep 6x6 on the table before I started cramming extra transfer cases in tight spaces.

Run it just like drawing #2 with interaxle diff lock and diff lockers in the rear axles. Extra claptrap is what you don't need in the boonies.​

The t-cases I've been looking at have the PTO on the opposite side of the input so it passes straight through/couples directly in line with the input shaft. Simpler design, I guess.

Still wishful thinking that I'll end up with some ISAS axles. The centers would get hard mounted and have about 20" between the pinion flanges. 13.8" pinion flange standoff on the AT4000. Don't have the standoff measurement for the AT5000ISAS handy. Pretty much impossible with rigid axles because the intershafts wouldn't fit at all so tandem axles would be they way to go.

[486] said:
or even just 4x4, omitting the rearmost axle (set up as a drop-axle)​

Got that as a possibility on #2. Drive two axles and keep the rearmost as a tag.

jd8420 said:
I thing the easiest and cheapest way to get what yo are trying to accomplish would be to just set your axles and transfer case up the same way as any front engine 6X6 is set up and try to find a v-drive like are in boats that is heavy duty enough. That ways you could use the common wide 6.83 geared Axletech 4000's. For the middle axle you could take a pass through AT4000 and cut the ends off and graft on the steering knuckles from a front axle. The V-drive could be set up with whatever overdrive ratio that you need and be used with the rear engine. The transfer cases like the AT T600 T800 and MH MVG1600 send most of the power to the rear axles. The way you have it in your diagram would send most of the power to the front axle.​

I keep thinking about the grafting. Couple snags, though. The tandem axles don't show a final ratio that matches the wide or narrows. Really close, which has been done on several vehicles, but makes me go hmmm. The other is that I don't really have a place to jig the axle for welding on the inner C's. I'd have to hand this all to a machine shop to make a custom bar, weld the housing and shorten the axle shafts. $$$$ in Colorado. This has me thinking I should hold out for some TAK-4's because they're already equipped with steering and pass-through diffs. Gear ratios could be the only major downside to those.

One thing that made the T800 shine was the 50/50 split option. This caught my eye right away because I know my entire setup is facing backwards in relation to every other vehicle that these t-cases were designed for. But again, like the AT4500's, I'm thinking the T800 with my specified options is nowhere to be found in the states. Leo said he's still waiting on a response about a manual. He did send me the form to fill out so they can specify a suitable t-case for my vehicle. Doubt the price is affordable, but that might at least give me a part number.
 
jd8420 said,

Just to give you an idea of what new Axletech stuff cost, my axles has the government receipt and it was a little over $35,000 each.

I have a pass through AT4000 and I am pretty sure it is 6.83 geared. I will see if I can tell when I get home. I will at least get you a part # to look up.
 
jd8420 said:
Just to give you an idea of what new Axletech stuff cost, my axles has the government receipt and it was a little over $35,000 each.

I have a pass through AT4000 and I am pretty sure it is 6.83 geared. I will see if I can tell when I get home. I will at least get you a part # to look up.​
Yeah, I've been seeing the original price tags on a lot of the auction parts. Holy shit does the government blow some money on military stuff.

I could get by with the narrow 5.64 ratio and swap some narrow ratios into the wide axles. Not sure what I'd do on the tandems unless the pinions and carriers are a direct swap.
 
Links to the AxleTech carrier manuals. The first is what comes up under the 4000 rigid, but the carrier housing looks like a 5000 (concentric bolt pattern). The other two links show the two different tandem axle carrier configurations. Exploded views of carriers is on page 17 of each manual. Zoom in and you see that the pinion gear on all three shows the splines to drive the helical gear for the pass-through yoke. All ring and pinion parts appear to be identical, suggesting that the narrow 5.64 ratio pinion and carrier could be swapped into the tandem.

https://www.axletech.com/at-admin/re...uals/svi-1.pdf
https://www.axletech.com/at-admin/re...als/svi-2d.pdf
https://www.axletech.com/at-admin/re...als/svi-2a.pdf


Edit: Freakin' hallelujah. Conversing with jd8420 about this and I spot what looks like a four-pinion differential on the input shaft. Page 19, part 26, split-torque differential. I spent this whole time thinking that the tandem pass-through shaft locked the tandem and rear axles together like a transfer case does when you engage 4HI. This totally negates the need for three t-cases. I feel stupid, but at the same time, nobody else ever pointed this out lol.
 
As of earlier today, I have officially scoured every website for TAK-4 info that had any, collected every picture available, and made a solid assumption of everything about them that I can. Think I'll ask Leo at AxleTech if he's allowed to share a few things about them since OshKosh, AxleTech and Rockwell are all pretty much under Meritor. I would like to know a few dimensions and gear ratios so I can finish up a comparison between those and AxleTech stuff.
 
Leo at AxleTech is in need of a model number or picture of an ID tag from a T800 transfer case. Somebody at the French facility got back to him and said that they are surprised anyone here would have a T800. More or less confirms that the T800 never made it to U.S. soil, or at the very least, in any hands outside of a military only facility here.
I asked him about the Oshkosh TAK-4 and gave him one of the model numbers from a govplanet auction that had a unit with the rear output and outboard Rzeppa cv's since those are pretty much a drop-in solution with everything I need. Lacking disc brakes, but it's whatever.
Edit: No access. I'll have to snatch up the next unit and start a thread with all the specs.
 
bdkw1 said:
I have a T600, it's eeeewwwuge! The 800 must be massive. You sure you can't get by with a 600?​

Maybe. T600 horsepower and torque capacities are a bit under the stock output of engine and gear ratio multiplication. Might hold up as long as I keep it easy on the throttle, but they seem to hold up fine in every mud truck they get used in.

Kinda needed the T800 0.8:1 overdrive in order to run any of the military axles unless I can figure out if there's any kind of overdrive box I can add on. I'm going to call Pierce Manufacturing to see if I can get some info on the TAK-4. As far as I can tell, Pierce is/was the original designer and manufacturer of the TAK-4 that was originally intended for military use only, then they applied them to their firetrucks like the Arrow XT with disc brakes.
 
Grendel said,

I have TAK 4 and a Axletech 600 here.

The 600 is more than enough, severely under rated, both tq and weight.

If not a 600, why not a Mack?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Mack-Truck-...torefresh=true

He paid 5.00 for that from Gov Liquidation... it's from behind a 600hp Detroit at 80K + lbs

OD is easy, Brownie box after your trans.

What info do you need?

Should just buy an MTVR for the suspension/axles and sell me the rest. :flipoff2:
 
Grendel said:
I have TAK 4 and a Axletech 600 here.

The 600 is more than enough, severely under rated, both tq and weight.

If not a 600, why not a Mack?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Mack-Truck-...torefresh=true

He paid 5.00 for that from Gov Liquidation... it's from behind a 600hp Detroit at 80K + lbs

OD is easy, Brownie box after your trans.

What info do you need?

Should just buy an MTVR for the suspension/axles and sell me the rest. :flipoff2:
You have a TAK-4?! OD Green with rear output? Any chance you've opened it up to peek at the gears? I need to know gear ratios, if it has a center diff, WMS to WMS and maybe the height of the differential cradle.

Another vote for T600. Swaying that way.

I'll look up the Mack t-case.
 
Grendel said,
JNHEscher said:
You have a TAK-4?! OD Green with rear output? Any chance you've opened it up to peek at the gears? I need to know gear ratios, if it has a center diff, WMS to WMS and maybe the height of the differential cradle.

Another vote for T600. Swaying that way.

I'll look up the Mack t-case.​
Yeah, I have TAK4 in a MTVR M23. it's currently in CA, but I can have someone get the details. It will be here shortly.

I should have said that the Axletech T600 is here. Along with a set of "fast" AT4K's

826.jpg
827.jpg
 
Grendel said:
Yeah, I have TAK4 in a MTVR M23. it's currently in CA, but I can have someone get the details. It will be here shortly.

I should have said that the Axletech T600 is here. Along with a set of "fast" AT4K's​
TAK-4 on all three positions? From what I've seen, the TAK-4 is set up just like the AT5000ISAS. Every unit is built as a double wishbone steering suspension and the rears have the inner tie rod ends bolted to the diff cradle to keep the knuckles locked straight.
 
bdkw1 said,
Grendel said:
I should have said that the Axletech T600 is here.​
Where do I get the U-joint flange deals for that?

Also, if you need to clock it over, going to the P-side with the front output should be doable. This will put the pump on the bottom side. You can them drill a new pickup hole into the oil passage and plug the original one.

Or so it looks like from the drawings I have. I have yet to open it up.:homer:
 
Grendel said,
JNHEscher said:
TAK-4 on all three positions? From what I've seen, the TAK-4 is set up just like the AT5000ISAS. Every unit is built as a double wishbone steering suspension and the rears have the inner tie rod ends bolted to the diff cradle to keep the knuckles locked straight.​
They're independent in all locations.

https://oshkoshdefense.com/wp-conten...SS_6-13-11.pdf
 
Grendel said,
bdkw1 said:
Where do I get the U-joint flange deals for that?

Also, if you need to clock it over, going to the P-side with the front output should be doable. This will put the pump on the bottom side. You can them drill a new pickup hole into the oil passage and plug the original one.

Or so it looks like from the drawings I have. I have yet to open it up.:homer:


https://westerncanadianrockwell.ca/c...riveline-parts
 
Assuming 81" track width at installed height, that should give me a bit of play to work with that fits within the 102" width limit. Leading rear axle would be the only unit with a rear output connecting to the trailing rear axle, correct? Curious if you can get a pic of the ID tag off each one. I'll start compiling the specs with model numbers like I have with AxleTech stuff so I know what the specs are of auction units.
 
Grendel said,
JNHEscher said:
Assuming 81" track width at installed height, that should give me a bit of play to work with that fits within the 102" width limit. Leading rear axle would be the only unit with a rear output connecting to the trailing rear axle, correct? Curious if you can get a pic of the ID tag off each one. I'll start compiling the specs with model numbers like I have with AxleTech stuff so I know what the specs are of auction units.​
Correct, intermediate axle is pass through.

They are AWD, too. Selectable lockers.


I think MTVR is different than MRAP independents, but don't quote me on it.

Edit to add - Notice the wheel balancers?
 
Grendel said:
Correct, intermediate axle is pass through.

They are AWD, too. Selectable lockers.


I think MTVR is different than LMTV independents, but don't quote me on it.

Edit to add - Notice the wheel balancers?​
Adding govplanet pics for some clarification for anyone wondering. The Desert Tan units have all had the output blocked off and the OD Green units have it included.

I'm almost sure these all have the center differential. Seem stupid not to. No parts explosion to prove it, yet. Haven't seen anyone dismantle one, either.

I kept looking at the wheels. Fluid balancers?

830.jpg
831.jpg
 
Grendel said,
JNHEscher said:
Adding govplanet pics for some clarification for anyone wondering. The Desert Tan units have all had the output blocked off and the OD Green units have it included.

I'm almost sure these all have the center differential. Seem stupid not to. No parts explosion to prove it, yet. Haven't seen anyone dismantle one, either.

I kept looking at the wheels. Fluid balancers?​
Like I said, I think MTVR (green) is different from an MRAP (tan) - I brain farted on the LMTV to MRAP.

MRAPS are available in both 4wd and 6wd variants. My AT4K's are from a Cougar MRAP, that was converted to full TAK-4.

I think all LMTV/HMTV are solid axle.

yes, fluid balancers.
 
I'm thinking the TAK-4 on the MTVR is too wide as well. 17.2" tire width with outer sidewalls that look about flush with the nose of the planetary carrier and 81" track width bring the WMS-WMS to 98.2". Just about the same width as the AT5000ISAS. Or am I off?

Either way, TAK-4's on auction are too cheap to pass up and I would have fun playing with independent suspension. Just have to find out their gear ratios.
 
Grendel said,

Have you talked to Pierce about different hubs for TAK-4?

Check out some of the firetrucks with it.

They put it in MRAPs, Pierce Fire trucks, MTVR's and even some HMMWV's.
 
Grendel said:
Have you talked to Pierce about different hubs for TAK-4?

Check out some of the firetrucks with it.

They put it in MRAPs, Pierce Fire trucks, MTVR's and even some HMMWV's.​
Called and left a message with the tech department. Don't know if little ol' me is going to hear back, but I'll email them by tomorrow. Their automated call system did say that they are also Oshkosh, so maybe they can give me the few answers I'm after with the model numbers from govplanet.

I browsed eBay for Pierce firetrucks last week. Only a quarter mil for a used truck with TAK-4. Wonder if I can get the opportunity to slide under a truck at a station. I still have to stop by to check out that HEMTT, too.


Edit: Hey, I heard back. Really nice guy, too. So Oshkosh designed the TAK-4 for defense purposes. In 1996, Oshkosh bought Pierce Manufacturing. In 2000, Pierce wanted to design their own IFS version based off the TAK-4. Here's maintenance stuff that I'm digging through - http://pierceparts.com/ If the CAD view depictions are accurate, I can count the planetary gear teeth.
At the site, sign in a guest, drop down "technical support" > "Publications" > "Service Manuals". It's not everything, but is far more than I had before. Also found out that the disc brakes were only for the Pierce IFS, but I have picture that shows drive axle assemblies with each. That makes me think that the disc brake wheel hubs will fit onto the drum brake hub spindles. I could be wrong.

834.jpg
 
Grendel said:
Glad I could help.

I am mocking up AT4K air disks on the front of my MTVR when I get it home
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7
Pics and/or thread? I would very much like to see it happen. I messaged Oshkosh Corporation about decoding the TAK-4 gear ratios and have not yet gotten a response. Waiting on the next unit to pop up on auction, for the time being.
 
Grendel said,
JNHEscher said:
Pics and/or thread? I would very much like to see it happen. I messaged Oshkosh Corporation about decoding the TAK-4 gear ratios and have not yet gotten a response. Waiting on the next unit to pop up on auction, for the time being.​
Maybe, when the time comes.
 
Top Back Refresh