What's new
By:
Filters

Guy answers door in Arizona - shot dead by cops in 5 seconds. Oh he's white...

evernoob said:
4 IPAs in 2 hours gives 0.15 BAC on a 190lb man.

News will say: "...almost TWICE the legal limit!"




https://globalrph.com/medcalcs/blood...-intoxication/

Calcs I used:

190lbs
.65 (% of body that can absorb alc, male, that's not just lean mass so it doesn't mean he is 35% fat.)
2 hours
12 oz
4 drinks
7% ABV
_____
=0.15 BAC

.15 is definitely beyond driving territory but by no means drunk and belligerent.
Click to expand...

The bac calculator, which only goes to 5.8% beer, says 0.075% bac after 4 drinks over 2 hrs.

Screenshot_20200830-184413_Samsung Internet.jpg


Screenshot_20200830-184419_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Rooney77 said:
I agree
Click to expand...

So do I.

Man was in his own home minding his business enjoying some beers.

Is the neighbor that called in the fake complaint being charged with anything, like filing a false police report or something more serious? In my eyes that fuckstick should be charged with accessory to murder.
 
SLOWPOKE693 said:
So do I.

Man was in his own home minding his business enjoying some beers.

Is the neighbor that called in the fake complaint being charged with anything, like filing a false police report or something more serious? In my eyes that fuckstick should be charged with accessory to murder.
Click to expand...

They didn't file a police report.

There are laws about abusing the 911 system, especially relevant after the 'swatting' epidemic. Some of the penalties have been accelerated recently and they were already quite severe including felony.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting



Why the case was not pursued under that is beyond me.

I would suggest it's like rape. They typically don't pursue false rape accusers because #metoo, #believewomen, and at the base level, sane, reasonable people don't want to deter women from filing rape reports. So men suffer.

This is the basis of my bitch all along. The lowest rung on the legal ladder is a straight, white, gentile, fully-abled, male, law-abiding citizen. They are given the least amount of bias in the legal code, which constitutes bias against.

This has come about because straight, white, gentile, fully-abled, male, law-abiding citizens have a code about 'toughing it out' and 'sucking it up' and 'shrugging it off' and 'keep your nose to the grindstone' and 'mind your p's and q's' which has allowed this all to come about.

That's the ethos here.

If you're doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.
 
Last edited:
Johann said:
Thanks, that was what I thought I remembered and what I use as a metric while drinking. Though I usually average a slower beers per hour ratio... ;) :beer:
Click to expand...

Rooney77 said:
The bac calculator, which only goes to 5.8% beer, says 0.075% bac after 4 drinks over 2 hrs.
Click to expand...

Minor detail:

I edited my post b/c I calculated for 4 beer, but in my quoted calcs, I have 5 beers. It's 4. 4 IPAs.

I don't make distinctions between calculators, the most this guy could have been 'drunk' is 4 IPAs in 2 hours. That's a lazy Sunday afternoon of drinking for most mature men who drink.
 
crisbee1 said:
He was drunk in public with a loaded firearm the moment he crossed the apartment door's threshold.
Click to expand...

He would never had to have answered his door or crossed his threshold if the fuckstick neighbor hadn't called the police and filed a false complaint.
 
so there was a state highway patrol man that crashed into another vehicle and killed the occupants while speeding and not on an emergency call.

initil blood work came back that he was drunk.
outrage ensues.
then the coroner says " well the body produces alcohol as it decomposes, so depending on when the blood was drawn, it will show someone being drunk that didn't drink."

so when was dudes blood drawn?

A highway patrolman who crashed into a pickup last month, killing himself and two others, had not been drinking even though an autopsy showed alcohol in his system, officials said Tuesday.

An analysis conducted by the Federal Aviation Administration on trooper Joshua Risner found he did not drink any alcohol at least 16 hours before his death, the State Highway Patrol said in a statement.

The finding contradicts an earlier post-crash autopsy that found Risner's blood-alcohol level was 0.08 percent, the level at which a person is considered drunk under Ohio law.

"This test tells us that alcohol got into his system post-mortem, after death," patrol Col. Paul McClellan said.
The Gallia County coroner, Dr. Daniel Whitely, said it was possible the alcohol formed during decomposition during a 60-hour gap before the autopsy was conducted.

He said he believes Risner was probably not drinking before the accident, although he called the science behind the FAA test hazy.

"I don't feel that I could strongly say that he didn't, but I surely don't feel that we could strongly say that he did, either," said Dr. Daniel Whitely.

The FAA test, which is usually conducted on dead pilots, was performed at the request of the patrol and the coroner in southeast Ohio's Gallia County, where the accident happened.
Click to expand...
 
Arps said:
Interesting. Never knew that before.
Click to expand...

I'm going to bet that the families ability to call the FAA to do special things is also far less than the ohio state highway patrols as well.

but I trust that the local government will do the right thing.....
 
evernoob said:
Minor detail:

I edited my post b/c I calculated for 4 beer, but in my quoted calcs, I have 5 beers. It's 4. 4 IPAs.

I don't make distinctions between calculators, the most this guy could have been 'drunk' is 4 IPAs in 2 hours. That's a lazy Sunday afternoon of drinking for most mature men who drink.
Click to expand...

The style of beer is not necessarily indicative of the strength. There are strong ipa's and weak ipa's. Being an ipa does not mean it has a high abv.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh