realsquash
Well-known member
Good ol' Electro Motive.
Yup, and most of them were 2-strokes :)
Good ol' Electro Motive.
And they will also fly.
It won't be but a minute before all those truck driving jobs are gone.
You're not paying attention, at all. The energy density issue isn't even close to that simple. Raw density is a lot less than gasoline, but the vastly higher efficiency of battery/inverter/motor vs an ICE brings batteries much closer to parity than you imply. The real issues are range, charge time, and charger availability, and those issues are evaporating rapidly. Comparing an electric car to a moped only demonstrates how out of touch your thinking is. Go take a look at the specs on the latest Tesla Model S refresh. That "moped" would smoke an actual GSXR.
Eco issues with battery manufacturing is definately a problem. Which is also improving rapidly.
love me the sound of a nice engine, but would be a cool experience to walk through a city with no sounds. Those living next to freeways should be loving this...from a noise perspective.
I *think* solar panels reflect more light than the general landscape. They're only about 20% efficient. Quite a bit of the remainder of the light is reflected.
It's basically solved at this point. Between the state of the art in batteries (which is improving rapidly), fast charging, and expanding charge networks, range is mostly a non-issue going forward. Personally I could do most of the driving I do now without ever having to charge away from home. And I love my road trips A LOT.
In what way can someone do what they currently do in a car, with mass transit? That's just laughable on its face.
You're not paying attention, at all. The energy density issue isn't even close to that simple. Raw density is a lot less than gasoline, but the vastly higher efficiency of battery/inverter/motor vs an ICE brings batteries much closer to parity than you imply. The real issues are range, charge time, and charger availability, and those issues are evaporating rapidly. Comparing an electric car to a moped only demonstrates how out of touch your thinking is. Go take a look at the specs on the latest Tesla Model S refresh. That "moped" would smoke an actual GSXR.
Eco issues with battery manufacturing is definately a problem. Which is also improving rapidly.
Batteries are not improving rapidly. You suffer from the Moore's Law Fallacy. Most technology is not exponential, it is linear. As is Material Science, it's linear. Computing power is getting linear.
If batteries are improving so rapidly, then why does the 23-year-old Toyota Prius have the same capabilities as 23 years ago? It's because batteries have not improved. Elon Musk built an entire factory to produce LiIon 18650s. There is no 'room for improvement' built into Teslas. ALL of the 'improvement' is in UX and other electronics, mostly making people believe that their Tesla is at a lower charge than it is, so that when they come out and it's 10F+ colder in the morning, they don't see the dismal reality: Batteries simply give out. All of them, without exception, and they always will.
The performance of electrically powered things was never in doubt. Electrically powered battleships are over a century old. The most powerful locomotives in the world are electric, but all of the ones that cross the Continental Divide are diesel. That's because diesel has around 110,000 BTU of thermal energy per gallon, whether it's 25,000 feet and -25F, or sea level at seventy degrees. And barring invasion by microbes, diesel will always have that 110k. You can leave a diesel locomotive unattended on a siderail for a long time, and go out with a donkey and start it up and immediately begin pulling freight. No battery powered anything will ever, ever be able to do that. Batteries require constant conditioning, which is a UX issue on Teslas and goes on behind the scenes.
Battery manufacturing produces waste, what is 'improving' is accountability in how that waste is handled. How is battery manufacturing becoming less wasteful? They improved the process to eliminate the need to leach lithium out of ore, then process it into battery filling, then apply it to a battery? Are they using biodegradeable reagents or something?
No, they are not. Please prove me wrong. The chemical process to put battery shit into batteries is the same today as it was 50 years ago.
Priuses haven't improved in 23 years because batteries have not (markedly) improved in 23 years.
Technological progress is mostly linear except for some brief interludes like the actual Industrial Revolution and Moore's Law. Just about everybody today has to think counterintuitively (I do) to understand the rate of tech progress.
Tesla started in 2003 and there is no appreciable difference between the original Tesla battery and the newest ones shipping.
Miraculous technological progress (!!!!!!) is always just around the corner.... just a few more years and you won't have to babysit your schnazzy bauble while strenuously claiming to scientifically-literate people that it's JUST ABOUT to get great!
Batteries have not improved and they are not improving, and the World's Smartest and Greediest Men bet billions of dollars on building a decades-service factory based on that premise. The owner of the company that keeps telling you your Tesla will just right quick turn into a non-umbilical cord albatross think that. They put their money there. On the very solid idea that batteries are not improving and will not.
Do you understand that? The Gigafactory proves that not even Elon Musk thinks batteries are going anywhere. /discussion
Yet, I'm seeing Tesla, Volts, European E cars, even the Prius is looking sexy, EVERY FUCKING WHERE! dipshit
Yet, I'm seeing Tesla, Volts, European E cars, even the Prius is looking sexy, EVERY FUCKING WHERE! dipshit
The least expensive Tesla and GM (cough) vehicles have a range of over 260 miles, easily. And they have no more than 5 years of tech into them. You will be, you have been left in the dust. Japan pre-empted California in requiring all electric vehicles earlier this year. Where have you been ?
What fantasy land do you live in? Thinking the only noise pollution in a city is from an engine running.
260 miles when new. A 5 year old battery won’t do that.
it also won’t get you far here in Texas.
I don’t care about Japan.
like I said remove subsidies and see what happens. Force companies to be competitive and sell a product people want not one they are forced to buy.
Did you guys complain when the last buggy was being built also?
love me the sound of a nice engine, but would be a cool experience to walk through a city with no sounds. Those living next to freeways should be loving this...from a noise perspective.
260 miles when new. A 5 year old battery won’t do that.
Batteries are not improving rapidly. You suffer from the Moore's Law Fallacy. Most technology is not exponential, it is linear. As is Material Science, it's linear. Computing power is getting linear.
If batteries are improving so rapidly, then why does the 23-year-old Toyota Prius have the same capabilities as 23 years ago? It's because batteries have not improved. Elon Musk built an entire factory to produce LiIon 18650s. There is no 'room for improvement' built into Teslas. ALL of the 'improvement' is in UX and other electronics, mostly making people believe that their Tesla is at a lower charge than it is, so that when they come out and it's 10F+ colder in the morning, they don't see the dismal reality: Batteries simply give out. All of them, without exception, and they always will.
The performance of electrically powered things was never in doubt. Electrically powered battleships are over a century old. The most powerful locomotives in the world are electric, but all of the ones that cross the Continental Divide are diesel. That's because diesel has around 110,000 BTU of thermal energy per gallon, whether it's 25,000 feet and -25F, or sea level at seventy degrees. And barring invasion by microbes, diesel will always have that 110k. You can leave a diesel locomotive unattended on a siderail for a long time, and go out with a donkey and start it up and immediately begin pulling freight. No battery powered anything will ever, ever be able to do that. Batteries require constant conditioning, which is a UX issue on Teslas and goes on behind the scenes.
Battery manufacturing produces waste, what is 'improving' is accountability in how that waste is handled. How is battery manufacturing becoming less wasteful? They improved the process to eliminate the need to leach lithium out of ore, then process it into battery filling, then apply it to a battery? Are they using biodegradeable reagents or something?
No, they are not. Please prove me wrong. The chemical process to put battery shit into batteries is the same today as it was 50 years ago.
Priuses haven't improved in 23 years because batteries have not (markedly) improved in 23 years.
Technological progress is mostly linear except for some brief interludes like the actual Industrial Revolution and Moore's Law. Just about everybody today has to think counterintuitively (I do) to understand the rate of tech progress.
Tesla started in 2003 and there is no appreciable difference between the original Tesla battery and the newest ones shipping.
Miraculous technological progress (!!!!!!) is always just around the corner.... just a few more years and you won't have to babysit your schnazzy bauble while strenuously claiming to scientifically-literate people that it's JUST ABOUT to get great!
Batteries have not improved and they are not improving, and the World's Smartest and Greediest Men bet billions of dollars on building a decades-service factory based on that premise. The owner of the company that keeps telling you your Tesla will just right quick turn into a non-umbilical cord albatross think that. They put their money there. On the very solid idea that batteries are not improving and will not.
Do you understand that? The Gigafactory proves that not even Elon Musk thinks batteries are going anywhere. /discussion
Or “sports mode” . It’s my understanding that some models have performance mode, and it sucks the battery dry in short order.Or when it's cold, or hot. Or with the A/C on , the heater on, the headlights on, going uphill, going >80mph, and on and on.....
Yet, I'm seeing Tesla, Volts, European E cars, even the Prius is looking sexy, EVERY FUCKING WHERE! dipshit
I agree and disagree.The only noise you hear from the freeway is the tires. You don't hear the engine. I live 1.5 miles from the interstate where the speed limit is 75. I don't usually hear traffic but when the wind blows just right or a semi has a flat tire I can hear the howl/thump.
I think you really like thinking you are smart. I have rarely seen so much error and ego in a single post here, and that is saying a lot. Maybe you need to go to the Tesla Factory or the Giga plant all stupid drunk and shout at them instead of the 18 yo college dorm co-eds.
Battery Managment tecnology is changing rapidly, I forget the current rates, but look how fast Tesla can "Superchange" a battery now.Batteries are not improving rapidly. You suffer from the Moore's Law Fallacy. Most technology is not exponential, it is linear. As is Material Science, it's linear. Computing power is getting linear.
If batteries are improving so rapidly, then why does the 23-year-old Toyota Prius have the same capabilities as 23 years ago? It's because batteries have not improved. Elon Musk built an entire factory to produce LiIon 18650s. There is no 'room for improvement' built into Teslas. ALL of the 'improvement' is in UX and other electronics, mostly making people believe that their Tesla is at a lower charge than it is, so that when they come out and it's 10F+ colder in the morning, they don't see the dismal reality: Batteries simply give out. All of them, without exception, and they always will.
You can leave a diesel locomotive unattended on a siderail for a long time, and go out with a donkey and start it up and immediately begin pulling freight. No battery powered anything will ever, ever be able to do that. Batteries require constant conditioning, which is a UX issue on Teslas and goes on behind the scenes.
Battery Managment tecnology is changing rapidly, I forget the current rates, but look how fast Tesla can "Superchange" a battery now.
Which parts do you dispute?
Which parts do you dispute?
When completed, the building will have the largest footprint in the world and second largest volume.[SUP][17][/SUP]
The most powerful locomotives in the world are electric, but all of the ones that cross the Continental Divide are diesel. That's because diesel has around 110,000 BTU of thermal energy per gallon, whether it's 25,000 feet and -25F, or sea level at seventy degrees. And barring invasion by microbes, diesel will always have that 110k. You can leave a diesel locomotive unattended on a siderail for a long time, and go out with a donkey and start it up and immediately begin pulling freight.
Or when it's cold, or hot. Or with the A/C on , the heater on, the headlights on, going uphill, going >80mph, and on and on.....
Quality assurance has also been a major sticking point, going so far as to see Musk sleeping on the assembly line floor personally inspecting cars as they leave the factory. Those extraordinary measures to ensure customer satisfaction, however, have largely not worked. Customers have experienced misaligned body panels, incomplete hardware, malfunctioning operating systems, and even some pieces of the car’s exterior not being properly attached. Service, as such, has become backlogged while parts are ordered and fixes for common lineup components devised; i.e. the company’s infotainment screen and its non-automotive-grade design.
...
The first volley was launched after a late-night tweet by the charismatic, yet often childish, Musk stating he was thinking about taking the company private and implying that he had secured funding to do so. Tesla’s stock price rose, as did the company’s valuation. Yet, the following morning’s news revealed Musk, in fact, had not secured anything. The SEC took issue and levied a charge against Musk and against Tesla that it was attempting to inflate the stock’s worth.
The SEC agreed to settle with Musk and Tesla for a cool $20 million each as well as a series of mandates both must follow in the future.
...
Tesla’s Musk caused further issues when in search of cost-cutting methods, he made the announcement that the company would be closing a number of Tesla stores around the world. This came as a shock to many in the company’s executive team and its board, as well as those employees directly affected by the mass closures, as none had been informed prior to Musk’s Twitter announcement. However, the storm of Elon’s making would be made far worse as the company was still responsible for over $1.6 billion in rent for the retail space and breach of contract. Musk later walked back his comments.
...
Inefficiencies and waste led to Musk admitting that the company’s Hail-Mary $35,000 Model 3—the car that Musk promised would start the electric revolution for average consumers—cost the company $38,000 just to produce. As such, in the last six months to a year, Tesla has hemorrhaged cash.
...
“It is important to bear in mind that we lost $700 million in the first quarter this year, which is over $200 million per month. Investors nonetheless were supportive of our efforts and agreed to give us $2.4 billion (our net proceeds) to show that we can be financially sustainable. That is a lot of money, but actually only gives us approximately ten months at the first-quarter burn rate to achieve breakeven.” -[Musk]
i'm not going to claim to be a train expert here, but i've been around them a little. My wifes family has made their living repairing them.
They're all diesel/electric. No batteries.
The diesel engine makes electricity via a generator. The train then sends this to the electric motors on/in the axles.
dynamic braking has giant resistors and fans on the top of the train to basically waste that energy as heat. They also have mechanical brakes, but only use them in emergencies i believe.