What's new

GM promises the end of their gasoline vehicles in 20 years

ToughBowtieTruck

Nothing like owning the same truck twice.
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Member Number
2583
Messages
214
Loc
Michigan
https://www.freep.com/story/money/ca...es/4290489001/

General Motors "aspires" to have all of its global new light-duty vehicles, including full-size pickups and SUVs, be zero emission by 2035. It also targets 2040 for its global products and plants to be carbon neutral.
GM made the announcements Thursday, stopping short of saying all of its vehicles will be zero emissions, which means either battery-electric or hydrogen fuel cell propulsion.


Carbon neutral means that all vehicles and plants will be zero emissions and GM will buy carbon credits to offset those that are not.
" 'Aspire' is a great word because it helps us work toward our vision," said Dane Parker, GM's chief sustainability officer. "We're taking action to have our vehicles be zero emissions by 2035. This is going to take the effort of a lot of people and a lot of governments to get there. So we have a vision, we have a plan and we're taking action today to get there."

Parker said GM's global plan for zero-emission vehicles includes heavy-duty pickups by 2040. Put simply. Parker said, “By 2040, 100% of our portfolio will be fully electric and that’s the vision we’re setting out.”
Parker said GM also signed the Business Ambition Pledge for 1.5-degree Celsius, which is a call by a global coalition of United Nation agencies, business and industry leaders to protect the environment.


“General Motors is joining governments and companies around the globe working to establish a safer, greener and better world,” said GM CEO Mary Barra in a statement. “We encourage others to follow suit.”
'Extraordinary step forward'

GM will offer zero-emissions vehicles across a range of prices and it is working with all its stakeholders, including suppliers and the Environmental Defense Fund, to build charging infrastructure and promote consumer acceptance.
Parker said this path will not eliminate jobs.
“We plan on using the resources we have and allocating them in a way that supports our EV future and bringing the high-paying jobs we have today into the future,” Parker said.
Also, GM foresees today's gas stations converting to tomorrow's charging stations. Already in other countries, gas stations are being repurposed to public fast-charging points, and "that's a trend that I would see growing," Parker said.


The Environmental Defense Fund calls GM's move an "extraordinary step forward."
"GM is making it crystal clear that taking action to eliminate pollution from all new light-duty vehicles by 2035 is an essential element of any automaker’s business plan," said Fred Krupp, Fund president, in a statement.
But one industry observer said this is not solely a sustainability play. It's a savvy business move.


"The future of mobility is electric. Tesla set the pace but others are getting into the game," said Andrew Hoffman, professor of sustainable enterprise at University of Michigan's Ross School of Business. "Ford has notably made a serious play in electrics, VW had a false start. GM has to be in this to be viable going forward."
Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Dearborn) said GM's announcement signals that the auto industry is committed to tackling the global climate crisis.


"We have had discussions for months with the auto industry, labor unions, and the environmental community on concrete actions like this that must be taken to reach carbon neutrality,” Dingell said. “I will continue to engage with all stakeholders to create an electric vehicle infrastructure to support these efforts and help our domestic auto industry compete globally.”
A greener world

About 200 countries have signed the 2015 Paris Agreement, which the U.S. rejoined on President Joe Biden’s first day in office. It sets a collective goal to limit global warming to below 2-degrees Celsius, preferably 1.5-degree Celsius, compared with preindustrial levels, to mitigate climate change damage.


To meet that goal, the world must reduce the net impact of carbon emissions from all human activities to zero by 2050, Barra said.
"As one of the world’s largest automakers, General Motors seeks to lead our industry and our world toward those goals," Barra said. "For General Motors, our most significant carbon impact comes from tailpipe emissions of the vehicles that we sell — in our case, it’s 75%. That is why it is so important that we accelerate toward a future in which every vehicle we sell is a zero-emissions vehicle."


Barra told Wall Street late last year that GM will offer 30 new all-electric vehicles globally by 2025, that means 40% of the company’s U.S. models offered would be EVs.
More:GM to bring 30 new electric vehicles to market in next 5 years
GM's investment in electric

GM is also working to cut emissions from its global manufacturing plants. It is investing $27 billion in electric and autonomous vehicles by 2025, up from the $20 billion GM had planned to invest before the pandemic.
This investment will pay to further develop GM’s Ultium battery technology, which will underpin its new electric vehicles.
Also, it covers updating GM factories such as Factory ZERO in Detroit and Hamtramck where GM is planning to build at least five electric vehicles in the future, the first being the 2022 GMC Hummer EV pickup due out later this year.

Also, GM is retooling its Spring Hill Manufacturing in Tennessee to build electric vehicles from globally sourced parts.
GM is investing in new factories too such as Ultium Cells LLC near its former assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio. GM sold the Lordstown plant to electric pickup maker Lordstown Motors, which will launch the Endurance pickup later this year.
Beyond environmentally friendly cars and factories, GM plans for 100% of its electric vehicle batteries to be reused as other forms of energy storage. The Ultium system, for example, is designed to be repairable, so “we don’t intend for any of our batteries to be disposable," Parker said.


GM said more than half of its capital spending and product development team will be devoted to electric and electric-autonomous vehicle programs.
While GM said it plans "to offer an EV for every customer, from crossovers and SUVs to trucks and sedans," it will continue to increase fuel efficiency of its traditional internal combustion cars with technology such as Stop/Start, better aerodynamics, smaller, boosted engines, more efficient transmissions and other vehicle improvements including weight reduction and lower rolling resistance tires.


Using renewable energy

To address emissions from its own operations, GM said it will source 100% renewable energy to power its U.S. sites by 2030 and global sites by 2035, which represents a five-year acceleration of the company’s previously announced global goal.
To account for the expected remaining carbon emissions, GM expects to invest in carbon credits or offsets, it said.
GM said it will assess these "offset solutions" in the coming years, adding that "offsets must be used sparingly."
GM has worked with some of its largest suppliers to create a sustainability council to share best practices. GM is also collaborating with suppliers to set targets for the supply chain to reduce emissions and use more sustainable materials.

It is also important that electricity generated to charge EVs comes from renewable sources like wind and solar, so GM has worked with utilities and developers to support investments in renewable energy near GM facilities via power purchase agreements and green tariffs.
Finally, GM partnered with EVgo last year to add more than 2,700 new fast chargers by the end of 2025, to help accelerate consumer electric vehicle adoption. The new fast chargers will be powered by 100% renewable energy.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile in 20 years Dodge will stillbe stuffing hellcat motors in minivans

I fawkin' hope so.

if the "sema rule" holds out for some truth that small volume car manufacturers can bring vehicles to market without following all the federal requirements the large volume dudes so, then we could be set up for a bit of a quality resurgence in automotive diversity brands.
 
I just skimmed the wall-o-text so maybe I missed it...

Zero emission doesn't = "promising the end of gasoline vehicles" .
 
Well all their gasoline vehicles are heeps of shit, soooooo.... k.

:lmao:

Zero emission doesn't = "promising the end of gasoline vehicles" .

DEI, like EGR but on 'roids:
50884658428_db2b8b956c_w.jpg



:flipoff2:
 
No one cares. Sad shit. Thanks and arrivederci' to the UAW. That's ciao to you Tony :homer:
 
The demise of the IC engine is inevitable. We have IC engines now because that is where our industrialization and our ingenuity took us - at the time. Let's say somehow electric vehicles had been developed and refined to a very efficient state of operation before we figured out that we could refine oil into fuels. Would the opposite of the current scenario be happening? ie, would we be running around in our electric vehicles trying to develop IC technology to replace it? I doubt it. Electric makes so much more sense on so many levels, as long as performance is on par.
The IC industry grew to be the standard because that is all we could come up with at the time.
I love my IC engines - all the way from the .049 glow fuel up to the 7.3 diesel but I also realize that I love them because they are what I grew up with. If I never had them, I wouldn't miss them and I would not be wanting them either - instead I would be loving my electric motors from the old school brushed can motors that could barely muster up enough torque to turn their own shaft, up to the megagigawatt brushless motors powering my sports car that can pull a 40' reefer loaded with 20,000 lbs.
From a business standpoint, I have to give props to the GM execs for looking at the future and choosing a path that most likely will keep them in business - because sticking to a business model that makes money selling IC vehicles will not keep them in business.
 
The demise of the IC engine is inevitable. We have IC engines now because that is where our industrialization and our ingenuity took us - at the time. Let's say somehow electric vehicles had been developed and refined to a very efficient state of operation before we figured out that we could refine oil into fuels. Would the opposite of the current scenario be happening? ie, would we be running around in our electric vehicles trying to develop IC technology to replace it? I doubt it. Electric makes so much more sense on so many levels, as long as performance is on par.
The IC industry grew to be the standard because that is all we could come up with at the time.
I love my IC engines - all the way from the .049 glow fuel up to the 7.3 diesel but I also realize that I love them because they are what I grew up with. If I never had them, I wouldn't miss them and I would not be wanting them either - instead I would be loving my electric motors from the old school brushed can motors that could barely muster up enough torque to turn their own shaft, up to the megagigawatt brushless motors powering my sports car that can pull a 40' reefer loaded with 20,000 lbs.
From a business standpoint, I have to give props to the GM execs for looking at the future and choosing a path that most likely will keep them in business - because sticking to a business model that makes money selling IC vehicles will not keep them in business.

Word vomit.

IC engines have reigned king in the transportation world because of the energy and cost densities of petroleum products.
 
When people spout off shit like this, I have to wonder if they have any clue how their electricity is made. Hint: Shit needs to burn to make it.

Well not all of it...solar, wind, geothermal (Screwy), hydro, etc.. But that being said, there's no free lunch, all of the global warming folks are glossing over the fact that when you use a device to absorb the solar energy, some of which would otherwise be reflected, you're going to get a net energy gain, ie BTU's or calories or joules or however you want to measure it. Not to mention the battery issue has to be solved so that the energy density can come up to the level of current IC usage.
 
Well not all of it...solar, wind, geothermal (Screwy), hydro, etc.. But that being said, there's no free lunch, all of the global warming folks are glossing over the fact that when you use a device to absorb the solar energy, some of which would otherwise be reflected, you're going to get a net energy gain, ie BTU's or calories or joules or however you want to measure it. Not to mention the battery issue has to be solved so that the energy density can come up to the level of current IC usage.

All true. But the vast majority of electricity still comes from coal and nat gas. Hell, I love this planet as much as anyone and do everything I can to keep it clean. I do however disagree with people that think that Americans burning gasoline is doing anything to warm the planet. Maybe, just maybe other countries with huge populations and no real environmental laws are having an effect. But the fact is the planet is always either heating or cooling and it is usually the Sun that controls this.
 
I promised myself not to buy a new GM vehicle about 15 years ago, so no biggie. (No others really either but especially GM and any Delphi product)
 
Well not all of it...solar, wind, geothermal (Screwy), hydro, etc.. But that being said, there's no free lunch, all of the global warming folks are glossing over the fact that when you use a device to absorb the solar energy, some of which would otherwise be reflected, you're going to get a net energy gain, ie BTU's or calories or joules or however you want to measure it.
I *think* solar panels reflect more light than the general landscape. They're only about 20% efficient. Quite a bit of the remainder of the light is reflected.
Not to mention the battery issue has to be solved so that the energy density can come up to the level of current IC usage.
It's basically solved at this point. Between the state of the art in batteries (which is improving rapidly), fast charging, and expanding charge networks, range is mostly a non-issue going forward. Personally I could do most of the driving I do now without ever having to charge away from home. And I love my road trips A LOT.
 
Top Back Refresh