What's new

Fresh thread on Election Fraud and Legal action

so your constitutional carry it's working well, eh? :lmao::lmao:
I'm sure we'll be one of the last to get there but you are, true to your name, a stupid fucking piece of shit to be harping on just one axis of policy like that.
 
I'm sure we'll be one of the last to get there but you are, true to your name, a stupid fucking piece of shit to be harping on just one axis of policy like that.

You’re sitting up there in your glass house throwing stones…. Nicely done!!! :lmao:
 
You’re sitting up there in your glass house throwing stones…. Nicely done!!! :lmao:
You're a fucking idiot.

I'm sitting here in a glass house telling the other guy who doesn't think he's in a glass house not to do that, if one wants to continue the metaphor.

Texans and bible thumpers are the same kind of authoritarians we got on the east coast just with different values.
 
What about a boomer Texan in a Tacoma? Wouldn't that be 3 negatives that are so negative they create a black hole? I think some scientist was talking about that on Joe Rogan a while back... millions of years ago a boomer Texan created the gulf of Mexico. If he had a Tacoma we literally wouldn't exist right now.

I guess the fact that we're all still alive is proof that this particular combination of anti-arse has never happened.

:flipoff2:
 
No self respecting Texan would drive less than a full-size truck. :flipoff2:

Give it a few weeks and I’ll be shitting on desert dwellers again.
 
You all are fortunate that HillBillydeluxe isnt here. Where'd he go anyways ? :confused:
 
IMG_2179.jpeg
IMG_2180.jpeg
 
Collapse of the untenable is the path to healing.

I don't want the nation state of 15 years ago, I want 150-200 years ago.
I am not convinced we will see this in our lifetimes.

Look at it on a micro scale. The poor leftist shitholes don't have nearly the dumbass bullshit that the rich ones do because they simply can't afford it. Places like Detroit never even adopted the absurd policies that places like SF and NYC have the funds to indulge in.

Back on the national scale, what are the odds that the richest nation state is gonna be one of the first to keel over? More likely others will fall and reform themselves and we'll just keep bleeding because we've got more blood to lose so we can afford it.
 
Look at it on a micro scale. The poor leftist shitholes don't have nearly the dumbass bullshit that the rich ones do because they simply can't afford it. Places like Detroit never even adopted the absurd policies that places like SF and NYC have the funds to indulge in.
I see a tipping point good enough to shake the shit loose being a currency collapse
 
Short of a full scale revolution like 1770’s…there is no going back to what we all knew even 15 years ago.

9/11/2001 the good times were officially over. Even apart from the attack, it's a good arbitrary marker between the good times and what we have now. Some say the 70's were the best time to be alive. I'm glad I at least got to see the 90's and even remember no internet or widespread cellular.
 
9/11/2001 the good times were officially over. Even apart from the attack, it's a good arbitrary marker between the good times and old. Some say the 70's were the best time to be alive. I'm glad I at least got to see the 90's and even remember no internet or widespread cellular.
Pfff, the 30s-50s were statist hell, the '60s and counterculture were a conservative* reaction to the growth of the state; serving only to cement the growth before and build a baseline to continue growth upon after a couple years of "acting out" on authoritarian fantasies of antiauthoritarianism

*conservative in the most basic sense; reactionary but still going along with what they're reacting against
 
"Sort of"

I don't want to die of a staph infection. Or lose my AC. Or have chicks not shaving. But yea... 200yrs ago would be pretty cool.
Technology won't really regress. State control has to.

ETA: Think about it, where does the state support technological advancement? Nowhere. Where does it shackle it? Everywhere.
Just the same as state involvement in schooling has been disastrous for education
 
Technology won't really regress. State control has to.

ETA: Think about it, where does the state support technological advancement? Nowhere. Where does it shackle it? Everywhere.
Just the same as state involvement in schooling has been disastrous for education
The state supports technological advancement (by shoveling stolen money at it) of anything that helps put people under its boot.

We wouldn't have the administrative and surveillance tech we do today if it weren't for the state spending money on all that shit so they could use it against us.
 
The state supports technological advancement (by shoveling stolen money at it) of anything that helps put people under its boot.

We wouldn't have the administrative and surveillance tech we do today if it weren't for the state spending money on all that shit so they could use it against us.
so we'd still have diffuse boards instead of integrated selfietikspace
I don't see this as a disadvantage

inb4: internet was government
information distribution has its own set of natural advantages, it'd have come along on its own just fine
 
so we'd still have diffuse boards instead of integrated selfietikspace
I don't see this as a disadvantage
I was thinking more about all the money they've pumped into getting good at eavesdropping electronically, policing brown people in the middle east (drones and shit) and reducing the rick of being a door-kicking jackboot. The markets for those products and skills would be far, far, far smaller without the .gov needing to do .gov things.
inb4: internet was government
information distribution has its own set of natural advantages, it'd have come along on its own just fine
If we just shot everyone who credited the .gov with the internet the tech industry would be a lot better but it would also be a lot smaller.
 
Not surprised your confuzed all gizim drunk with your face buried in the pillow

Sig line from member FLM in 2001 the other place. Pretty sure you know about the rest of your post.
 
Glenn Beck is claiming proof of major election fraud on his radio program. But of course, you need to "tune in later" for more details. :shaking: Not sure if he's talking about 2020 or 2024. Anyone know anything?
 
Top Back Refresh