What's new

Ex-Navy Nuclear Power Officer authenticates the Biden emails.

It's called voting for the person you think is the most qualified to uphold the constitution, but that obviously never entered your mind. You'll just continue to vote for the shit sandwich that stinks marginally less shitty than the other one.


You can't see the forest for the trees. When the alternative to a shit sandwich is a sloppy diarhhea sandwich you vote for that because you like their cookbook better? Even though the cook sucks and fucks it all up? Not brilliant!


It's worst than that, he votes for whatever pile he is told to.

Oh sure and you know all and mock everything and stand for nothing.
 
You can't see the forest for the trees. When the alternative to a shit sandwich is a sloppy diarhhea sandwich you vote for that because you like their cookbook better? Even though the cook sucks and fucks it all up? Not brilliant!

Keep on voting that way and this country will keep on declining. You're the cause of our problems, NOT the solution.
 
I stand for me, you stand for whomever you are told to.

Wrong again honey. As if there is a nominal leader of a nonexistent independent party telling unaffiliated no church voters like me how to vote.

Keep on voting that way and this country will keep on declining. You're the cause of our problems, NOT the solution.

That may sound good to you but it gets you nothing, and in my :angry: opinion the choice for who will uphold the constitution the best has been proven this time.


 
You've been fucked since forever. Your style of government has been fucked over and over and over.

Only two parties? Who decides that?

Go look and report back.

What about you? You aren't fucked as well?

Two parties force a coalition before Government authority is invoked. Read a book maybe? SDCJ's problem is that he wants to feel harmony with his party, a sort of entitlement really, something our young people suffer from.

Adults make a choice about compromises, which forces other parties to compromise. Having 2 parties cleans up the mess and makes people work together. The Democrats are better at this than the Republicans right now. They can get gay-hating Blacks and LGBT to march together in the same demonstration.

That kind of coalition power makes the US 2-party system very efficient.
 
Wrong again honey. As if there is a nominal leader of a nonexistent independent party telling unaffiliated no church voters like me how to vote.



That may sound good to you but it gets you nothing, and in my :angry: opinion the choice for who will uphold the constitution the best has been proven this time.




Thanks for being THE PROBLEM.
 
Thanks for being THE PROBLEM.

Back atcha!

Muh7YYP.jpg


:flipoff2:
 
Talk about ADD, once again 2 or 3 posters dominate the subject and whine to each other. How about staying on topic. BTW, how do I find the ignore button.

what new information have you got to further the subject at hand? the mindless banter keeps the thread up so that people are potentially more keen to add relevant information when it comes around.

Welcome to 1998 :flipoff2:
 
What about you? You aren't fucked as well?

Two parties force a coalition before Government authority is invoked. Read a book maybe? SDCJ's problem is that he wants to feel harmony with his party, a sort of entitlement really, something our young people suffer from.

Adults make a choice about compromises, which forces other parties to compromise. Having 2 parties cleans up the mess and makes people work together. The Democrats are better at this than the Republicans right now. They can get gay-hating Blacks and LGBT to march together in the same demonstration.

That kind of coalition power makes the US 2-party system very efficient.

First time I see a post of yours where you're back on your heels.

And no, I'm not fucked. I eat, sleep, and shit, regardless of what goes on in peoples' heads.

My favourite quote from an old philosopher:

"What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think things are" -- Epictetus AD 55-c.135

:flipoff2:
 
Here is the reality of a 3rd party.

You need support to get the legislation you want. You have to have people in the house and senate, and you are essentially alone.

So it would be best to start with the house and senate, so you get a 3rd party candidate elected. In order to have any power beyond a single yes or no vote, he has to be on a committee, and to be on a committee you have to "caucus" with one of the 2 parties, and once you begin to caucus with the party, you are a defacto member of the party.
 
And what is a magical 3rd party candidate going to do that is any different? They will fall somewhere on the same political spectrum that everyone else is on and be facing the same issues.
 
Here is the reality of a 3rd party.

You need support to get the legislation you want. You have to have people in the house and senate, and you are essentially alone.

So it would be best to start with the house and senate, so you get a 3rd party candidate elected. In order to have any power beyond a single yes or no vote, he has to be on a committee, and to be on a committee you have to "caucus" with one of the 2 parties, and once you begin to caucus with the party, you are a defacto member of the party.

Bingo.

Bought and paid for.
 
And what is a magical 3rd party candidate going to do that is any different? They will fall somewhere on the same political spectrum that everyone else is on and be facing the same issues.

The "left" and "right" is a social construct that you've been eating and breathing all your life because that's all you know.

Or been shown.
 
The "left" and "right" is a social construct that you've been eating and breathing all your life because that's all you know.

Or been shown.

That maybe so. Whats the alternative look like?


For me out of the major issues there are no major overlaps in my values between the two parties. There are no issues the left holds that I would say my views align with to the point of causing a dilemma in picking one side or the other.

So in my case the left and the right is a natural result of people having opposite views on the same Issues. A lot of issues are for or against and the people in between have to make a decision which side they most closely identify with.
 
The other issue people don't accept is their 3rd party can maintain their values because they have no power.

The SECOND they become a viable option, politicians will adopt that party name to get elected (we can call them LINO's, Libertarian In Name Only) and in 2 to 3 cycles they will be the party. A true Libertarian, doesn't want to be a politician, so those that do will fill the void Right now, there is no draw to the party by die hard politicians because they have no power, party structure, or party money. When you have that the game changes.
 
Wow, ok. Let me break this down for simple folk like yourself:

Do I think the prez has a suspiciously chummy relationship with Putin? Yes, but he has always had a thing for the east even during the cold war.

Do I believe that "the roooskies stole our eleeeections!!!"? No.

Do I think Hillary is innocent? Fuck no.

And I really have zero idea who the fuck this Adam guy is. EDIT: why in the fuck would I give a shit about a congressman from a state I don't live in?


Just because I'm not gargling your savior's ballsack along with you doesn't mean I like his main competition.

The way you spew liberal talking points, I figured it's old Joe's ballsack in your mouth. Don't choke on it.
 
What about you? You aren't fucked as well?

Two parties force a coalition before Government authority is invoked. Read a book maybe? SDCJ's problem is that he wants to feel harmony with his party, a sort of entitlement really, something our young people suffer from.

Adults make a choice about compromises, which forces other parties to compromise. Having 2 parties cleans up the mess and makes people work together. The Democrats are better at this than the Republicans right now. They can get gay-hating Blacks and LGBT to march together in the same demonstration.

That kind of coalition power makes the US 2-party system very efficient.

You are so full of shit I don't know whether to laugh at you or cry. I believe in the constitution and I sure as fuck see that neither the Reps or Dems believe in it at all.
Once again you show your complete ignorance of a simple concept, voting for the person that you believe will best uphold COTUS.
 
First time I see a post of yours where you're back on your heels.

And no, I'm not fucked. I eat, sleep, and shit, regardless of what goes on in peoples' heads.

My favourite quote from an old philosopher:

"What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think things are" -- Epictetus AD 55-c.135

:flipoff2:

Your post is a non sequiter
 
You are so full of shit I don't know whether to laugh at you or cry. I believe in the constitution and I sure as fuck see that neither the Reps or Dems believe in it at all.
Once again you show your complete ignorance of a simple concept, voting for the person that you believe will best uphold COTUS.

I don't want a European splintered Parliamentary system with 47 parties and those Parties wasting time voting on coalitions.

If you guys paid attention to History or foreign news, you'd understand what legislative paralysis really is.

I'm sure a French Socialist in 1908 is more comfortable voting for their MP than I am voting for Donald Trump. But France couldn't assemble a Government that lasted longer than 3 weeks, the same conditions prevailed before WWII, and left them vulnerable to both wars.

If AOC and Saikat Chakrabarti were not subsumed into the Democratic Party, they could stall legislative proceedings in the House because nobody would have a Majority, and eventually that chaos would filter down into the Senate.

I mean it's not even worth explaining it if you think that you have to have a perfect candidate. The Bicameral, 2-Party system is fantastic at smoothing compromises. You just don't see it because that's all you look at.
 
Well to be pedantic he listed Lt which is O3, which is a good record for 4 years, on track for further promotion no doubt. The Navy likes to get their Officers up there to Lt pay on their first hitch so that they have an incentive to stay in.

But I'm not going to defend the guy's career further to this crowd. None of you seem particularly qualified to understand why he bothered to mention what he did, those qualifications are impressive and besides already being part of the Officer Corps he has further endorsement as being a smart guy and handling classified material. Those things count in the real world if not here.

O-3 is a Lt in the Navy, but a Captain in the Air Force, Army, and Marine Corp. To make O-3 in 4 years is a really impressive feat. Even in the quick promoting Air Force, it usually takes 8-10 years to make O-3, and often twice that in the Marine Corp. To make O-3 in the Navy in 4 years means the guy was really on his game.

Let's look at what we know:

He's being accused of collaborating with Hunter Biden as his business partner. It's a sinking ship and for him to remain credible, he's got to come clean, tell the entire truth, and retain his integrity by doing so. When he's completely investigated by the FBI and Senate Intel Committee, they will verify that he's telling the truth and he'll likely retain all of his security clearances. If he doesn't clear it up and tell the truth, he may end up under the same criminal indictments that Hunter may be facing at which point his clearances will be toast.


1. Hunter's attorney asked for the hard drive to be returned. They have the letter proving this.
2. The computer guy gave sworn statements and the FBI admitted they've had the hard drive since Dec. 2019. This is criminal on the part of the head of the FBI Chris Wray, because the information on the computer proves that Biden was the criminal all along, and the Trump impeachment was false as Trump was doing the right thing. The laptop would have exonerated Trump and ended the impeachment. Wray had to have known this and will now have to answer why he illegally held that information back.
3. Rupert Murdock and the New York Post went over all of the information and vetted it to prevent themselves from getting sued for libel if they published the material. They deemed it completely credible after pouring over the information and emails for months.
4. Tony Bobulinski, Hunter's business partner is now testifying that the data on the laptop is accurate and he has additional files and emails to prove it
5. Bevin Cooney was another business associate of Hunter and is cooling his heels in a Federal Prison. He only has a month left on his sentence. When this all went down, the Feds moved him from his easy going Club Fed prison to a hard core undisclosed maximum security prison where is reportedly in solitary confinement. They don't want him collaborating anything or getting any information out. He's locked down.
6. James Biden (Hunter's brother) may have implicated Obama's involvement in the scheme, by sending an email to associates potentially referring to Obama.
7. The Ukrainians have a laptop of one of Hunter's coworkers that backs up the information on Hunter's laptop; emails, receipts, etc. They also have all of the information about Joe withholding funds (something they falsely accused Trump of doing) until they fired the Prosecutor who was investigating his son Hunter. Joe bragged about this event on TV.
8. Financial records exist that show that Hunter took $3.5 million from the wife of the ex-Mayor of Moscow. He was traveling with his father and had a Secret Service detail at the time.
9. Hunter took upwards of $1.5 billion from a Chinese investment group with the promise that they would give him half of the equity in the fund, and Joe Biden would receive 10% off the top of any investment returns. He was traveling with his father and had a Secret Service detail at the time.
10. There are upwards of 25,000 pictures on the laptop, including a 12 minute video of Hunter engaging in sex acts with prostitutes while smoking a crack pipe. Those same prostitutes have been implicated in illegal sex trafficking.
11. There are pictures of Hunter naked in the company of a 14 year old female family member
12. There are topless pictures of that same 14 year old female family member and the FBI child porn investigating group is involved as well as the Delaware State Police
13. There are receipts from money received from Burisma, including funds and money laundering through many foreign countries in an attempt to disguise the origin of the funds
14. There is an email where Hunter is complaining about having to relinquish "half" of all funds received to "Pop" and complains to his sibling that it's the standard family arrangement.
15. Hunter was kicked out of the Navy for testing hot for cocaine
16. Hunter turned in a rental car, leaving a crack pipe that tested hot for cocaine, his dead brother's State Attorney General ID which he had allegedly been using, and a couple Secret Service business cards. They swept it under the rug and he was not prosecuted.

This is just the start of it and new information is being released every day. This is credible and verifiable information. Hunter's Attorneys and Joe Biden haven't come up with a statement other than to blame it on Russian disinformation. They don't deny the laptop exists. They are doing hard core damage control, but there is still more to come.
 
I don't want a European splintered Parliamentary system with 47 parties and those Parties wasting time voting on coalitions.

Never said that's what I wanted either. Either stop skewing what I post or STFU. We need a viable 3rd party to hold the Rs & Ds accountable.
Also, COTUS isn't set up as a parliamentary form of government. As long as almost everyone blindly votes D or R we'll remain mired in this shithole.
 
Never said that's what I wanted either. Either stop skewing what I post or STFU. We need a viable 3rd party to hold the Rs & Ds accountable.
Also, COTUS isn't set up as a parliamentary form of government. As long as almost everyone blindly votes D or R we'll remain mired in this shithole.

God, your lack of imagination is stunning. :shaking:

First, this post wasn't trying to skew you, I laid out a case that had nothing to do with you but was addressed to you.

Second, if 3rd Parties get into the legislature, then they will have to negotiate co-alitions with the 2 major Parties. As it is now that work is done under the Party system. 3rd parties add yet another layer of negotiation that is OUTSIDE.... the COTUS.

The 2 Parties do an enormous amount of work that is not addressed in the Constitution. That work is efficient and effective.

The worst system except for all other systems.
 
O-3 is a Lt in the Navy, but a Captain in the Air Force, Army, and Marine Corp. To make O-3 in 4 years is a really impressive feat. Even in the quick promoting Air Force, it usually takes 8-10 years to make O-3, and often twice that in the Marine Corp. To make O-3 in the Navy in 4 years means the guy was really on his game.

WRONG. O-3 is an essentially automatic promotion on the 1st day of the month following 4 years past commissioning. Essentially meaning that it happens unless you have DUI, sexual assault case, etc, i.e over 99% promote at 4 years. A real incompetent officer may not make it, but making O3 doesn't mean much. It's sort of like getting a D or better in high school.... yes, you had to be slightly more than totally worthless, but not very.

Promotion to O-3 may have taken 8-10 years in 1900, but that hasn't been the case for many many years.
 
God, your lack of imagination is stunning. :shaking:

First, this post wasn't trying to skew you, I laid out a case that had nothing to do with you but was addressed to you.

Second, if 3rd Parties get into the legislature, then they will have to negotiate co-alitions with the 2 major Parties. As it is now that work is done under the Party system. 3rd parties add yet another layer of negotiation that is OUTSIDE.... the COTUS.

The 2 Parties do an enormous amount of work that is not addressed in the Constitution. That work is efficient and effective.

The worst system except for all other systems.

I give up, you're completely brainwashed into believing anything the two party oligarchy feeds you. :rolleyes:
 
WRONG. O-3 is an essentially automatic promotion on the 1st day of the month following 4 years past commissioning. Essentially meaning that it happens unless you have DUI, sexual assault case, etc, i.e over 99% promote at 4 years. A real incompetent officer may not make it, but making O3 doesn't mean much. It's sort of like getting a D or better in high school.... yes, you had to be slightly more than totally worthless, but not very.

Promotion to O-3 may have taken 8-10 years in 1900, but that hasn't been the case for many many years.

I agree, which is why he could be a Lt jg. They are still addressed as Lieutenant in informal military settings, but in citation of his own military record he should have specified the jg, but not by regulation or even formal custom.

Still though this has been a huge sperg-out by yourself and others to prove me wrong, which is sad and petty. Too many bitch slappings in the wardroom? Commander? :flipoff2:

(to explain this to others, I just called him a Commander when he is actually a Lieutenant Commander, in the same way you refer to a Lieutenant Junior Grade as Lieutenant, pretty clever little backshot by me if I don't say so, well put really. You always 'refer up' if you can, which is what makes this entire tiff about 'Lieutenant' meaningless in context).

Anyway this guy's credentials are very good. He had an honorable military service in highly demanding fields.

All of this squabbling over it is nothing but autistic Neckbeard bullshit. So fuck off Neckbeards. He is absolutely correct to cite them as near top-end 4-year Officer career.
 
Top Back Refresh