ev13wt
EvilTwit since 2005
...
The divide, man...it keeps every separated, because if we were united, we'd be unstoppable. They all know that.
This sums it up for me. So much truth.
...
The divide, man...it keeps every separated, because if we were united, we'd be unstoppable. They all know that.
This sums it up for me. So much truth.
How can we unite with you? You believe in actual Pothead conspiracy theories. You're clearly intelligent enough, but your mind is weak. It's not even that we disagree about things: You are an actual soft-headed, gullible, dipshit Conspiracy Theorist.
You know why you're like that? It's because you don't have a religion or don't have the religious territory mapped out in your mind. Intelligent people cannot afford to just say "Welp, I don't practice a religion" if they're atheist or not. Your mind will construct mythos whether you want it to or not.
You clearly don't have a handle on that, it's probably because of weed. Maybe you don't smoke weed though, so your intellectual development is stunted.
Either way, you don't have viable and legitimate opinions, because you live in La La Land. Or, whatever online persona you are creating does, in which case maybe you are sorted, but your persona sure isn't.
Kierkegaard stated that a belief in anything beyond the Absurd requires an irrational but perhaps necessary religious "leap" into the intangible and empirically unprovable (now commonly referred to as a "leap of faith"). However, Camus regarded this solution, and others, as "philosophical suicide".
How can a persona be sorted without actual answers to life? Do I just take a random existing lie and run with it?
I can't accept Darwinism, Atheism or any current religion. They all point to similar things, similar thoughts. I started there and I have my own opinion about this universe.
I do not reject God. I do think that God had ZERO to do with this entire universe or it's order, rules and stuff.
Are you sorted? How long? Until your deathbed thoughts?
Tell me which conspiracy I believe in. Serious question. Being for a third party instead of "black and white" is a conspiracy theory?
I don't remember your conspiracy theories. A couple weeks ago you were talking about some cock-a-mamey thing like you did on the old board.
As for 'atheism', I'd agree that 90% of it is bunk. But the overall facts are pretty clear and getting clearer every day: whether seeded from outer space or started here on Earth, humans ultimately came from a lightning-struck mud puddle. This happened for the same reason stars exist: because stars and Life both increase the rate of Entropy. Entropy is the underlying law of the universe, and determines that if you put $10 of gas in your car, you might as well light $6 of it on fire, because that's exactly what's going to happen to your gasoline, it's getting turned into heat.
There are well-established works on atheism. 95% of atheists don't look at them, they're just resentful, arrogant, ignorant, or some other practicing form of human character flaw.
I am accusing you of this. Being sloppy and wishy-washy. Don't get me wrong, all Creativity stems from a disordered mind. I'm saying that on certain issues: relgion, politics, etc, you don't have to be Orthodox to do some required formal investigation.
Being specific is not Orthodoxy. And you don't have to be 'firm' or 'non-vaciallating' either, I also claim to be open to new ideas, and have a well-established magisteria that I won't even claim to be sure of. Any human that claims sureness in any of these matters is obviously not credible, and you've said as much.
I'm saying that you are susceptible to odd thoughts, and that you consider this to be a good thing, likelyl because you grew up in cucked Germany and now inhabit a fantasy enclave called San Francisco.
You've read The Selfish Gene, right? I'd also recommend a few others in terms of atheism, none of them 'the 4 books' written about ten years ago by hitchens, dawkins, harris, and dennett, except for Dennett's 'Breaking the Spell'.
Yes that was a tangent but I figured I'd run it down.
I cannot accept that the magisteria of science and religion do not overlap. They must overlap. One of the reasons I started searching for a different, a "part" explanation if you will.
The fact that Atheism exists is the fact I look at. It exists very widely as a nihilistic explanation. As do various other explanations. They all try to explain life in an all encompassing way.
Atheism and God must coexist in the actual explaination of this universe.
The reason I am what you call wishy washy and sloppy is that if my current theory is somewhat close, it means: we can do whatever we want with nature, and killing a human is "nothing of importance" biologically and theologically, only within this reality. As in:don't off the next Einstein, and take care of nature until you can create nature. This danger of misinterpretation (Make all animals and plants your own, like in the Bible) is stopping me from writing a formal paper.
Also, my e-persona does not face physical (reality) consequences when trying out thoughts and ideas and bouncing them off of actual humans.
Weed has nothing to do with it. Odd thoughts are being non-conform. I do see it as a benefit when thinking about this stuff.
Geoforming other planets... You need a intelligent desgin / creator type mind to even think of this stuff? It's something we humans have.