• Last Call Guest on these Group Buy Deal Items from Baja Designs
  • We're moving data around, images may be off/on over the next few hours. Nothing is lost aaand no ... Nothing will Change Fo2

6L80/90 Tech Thread

06h3

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Messages
2,365
Loc
SW Idaho
Since a few have asked for 6l80/90 tech on my personal build thread I’ll start here. The 6l80/90 is a clutch to clutch trans which is different from the predecessors.

More gears = more betters in my opinion….to a degree

1st gear - 4.03
2nd gear - 2.36
3rd gear - 1.53
4th gear - 1.15
5th gear - 0.85
6th gear - 0.67
Reverse - 3.06

Most 4 speed transmissions are in the 2.4X-2.8X range. The 4l60 is considered to have a very deep 1st gear for a 4 speed and it’s 3.06, this is much deeper than that. This will allow you to get away with less low range or less gear in the diff or just have very low gearing

Years - late 2005 (2006 model year, only in cars) to present day.

They really became common place in all GM vehicles by 2008. They have kind of been phased out by the 8/10 speed in the SUVs and trucks over the past few years but are still used present day in vans.

Tuning: there is so much to unlock with them. I personally haven’t done this but I was told you can assign each gate to whatever you want since it’s all electronic. So you can assign 1st gear next to reverse like a RMVB all from a computer.

I can state that I have personally tuned mine to start in any gear when in Manual mode. If I want a 3rd gear double low launch, I can do that from a stop. To do that for a 4l60/80/th35/th400 you usually have to open the pan and install a manual valve body.

Weak links, I hear the Torque converters in the early ones are not great. I have read that DOD (displacement on demand) made it worse, when the engine turns off to 4cylinder mode it shutters and shakes the TQ converter apart. Who knows, it’s all hearsay, I don’t have much personal experience on TC failing on the 6l80.

6l80 GVWR is 8600 lbs, GCWR is 14,000 lbs
6L90 GVWR is 15000 lbs GCWR is 21,000 lbs.
4l60E GVWR is 8600 lbs GCWR is 15,500 lbs.
4L80E GVWR is 16,500 lbs GCWR is 22,000 lbs.

I found this interesting, the GCWR is less in an 6l80 compared to a 4l60 but the 4l60 is the butt of all jokes for failure. The rated input torque on a 4l60 is significantly lower too. Just found this info interesting.

6l80 and 4l60 are basically the same length. I swapped mine in and literally had to oblong the transmission mount bolt holes and it dropped in. I’d say it’s within 1/2in. No driveshaft mods needed.

The 6L90E is 35mm longer (about 1.4in) and the case is bigger.

I am copying and pasting this from gearstar. I think they took this info from GMauthority, I’ve seen this comparison word for word on a few sites.


6L80 vs 6L90 Differences​

To know the differences between the 6L80 vs 6L90, it is expedient to check out each of these transmission units.

6L80 Transmission

The 6L80 transmissions heralded significant changes in the overall design of automatic transmissions fabricated by General Motors. All previous automatic transmissions by GM were based on hydraulic controls. These transmissions continually received electrical elements the more they modernized. But the 6L80 transmission was developed from the ground up as an electric-over-hydraulic transmission, complete with microprocessor control. The manufacture of the 6L80 began in 2005 and was released in most GM vehicles in the model year of 2006. The transmission lasted until 2016, available in 6L80 vs 6L90 versions.

6L90 Transmission

GM introduced a stronger variant of the 6L80 transmission within a year, known as the 6L90 transmission, RPO code MYD. This version of the automatic transmission is 1-3/8 inches longer than its predecessor, the 6L80, with approximately 25 percent of the internal components of the new transmission differing from the old variant. In other words, the 6L90 Transmission is a heavy-duty version of the 6L80 six-speed automatic. Engine torque rating increases to a minimal degree, but the output torque rating of this transmission jumps up by almost 220 feet per pound to 885 feet per pound.

In addition, the 6L90 transmission comes with a reinforced input gearset with two extra pinion gears, i.e., 6 in total, and a strengthened output gearset that utilized wider gears than its predecessor. The flexibility of the 6L90 transmission extends to the clutches as the latter has an additional clutch plate in every clutch than the 6L80 for heavy-duty applications. However, a 6L90 version lacks the additional clutch plate that can match application requirements where appropriate. The 6L90 transmission differed from its predecessor’s long-standing GM 32 spline specification output shaft to efficiently handle the significantly increased output torque capacity.

Instead, it went for a large diameter of 29 splines for most truck applications. But some HD trucks and 2WD van versions had a 36 spline. This is why it is essential to be mindful of your output shaft version before you proceed with any adaptation. As mentioned earlier, the 6L90 transmission shares up to 75 percent of its components with its 6L80 counterpart. However, the case of the 6L80 transmission is 35mm longer than the case of the 6L80 transmission. Moreover, the 6L90 transmission case accommodates additional fasteners between the transfer case and the transmission for enhanced driveline vibration/noise performance.


They just mention the longer case but I’m told the case is a little harder to fit overall but that’s hearsay of a guy who’s done a 6l80 and 90 swap in the same make and model before.

I’d love to hear what kind of mileage you have gotten on your 6l80/90 even if it was in your daily driver. Each person I personally talk to I hear 220-250k miles on the 6l90. 150-200k on the 6l80.
 
Weak links, I hear the Torque converters in the early ones are not great. I have read that DOD (displacement on demand) made it worse, when the engine turns off to 4cylinder mode it shutters and shakes the TQ converter apart. Who knows, it’s all hearsay, I don’t have much personal experience on TC failing on the 6l80.
It's not DOD.
It's Lockup PWM in 3 to 6th.

Get it tuned for full lockup in 5th and 6th only and you're good.
 
So you were able to make full use of all 7 detents?

PRND uses up 4
1 gets used to go into manual mode
That leaves 2 detents .........

You were able to assign them?
 
I have yet to run one, but I'm a big believer in these.

It seems obvious, but some don't realize that a 6l80/90 with a stock 2.7 tcase will be lower than a th400 or 4l80e with a 4:1 tcase. Seems some guys who don't need a super crawl are happy with just running a 205.

I really want this trans in my rig, but would like to see more tech on adapting it to different engines and running a stand alone controller first.
 
So you were able to make full use of all 7 detents?

PRND uses up 4
1 gets used to go into manual mode
That leaves 2 detents .........

You were able to assign them?
I ended up just using 5 detents. PRNDM. I am contemplating using the 2 after M for 2 and 4th as like a fail safe of some sort. You can probably limp around on 2 and 4th
 
And you said you have more driveshaft clearance than the Alpha 4L60E?

Still noodling a D300 on the back of one.
 
Would be nice to slam the shifter all the way back to start in 2nd

Could accomplish that in manual mode with tap shift. Just put it in 2nd gear.


I have yet to run one, but I'm a big believer in these.

It seems obvious, but some don't realize that a 6l80/90 with a stock 2.7 tcase will be lower than a th400 or 4l80e with a 4:1 tcase. Seems some guys who don't need a super crawl are happy with just running a 205.

I really want this trans in my rig, but would like to see more tech on adapting it to different engines and running a stand alone controller first.

What engine do you want in front of it? Still GM or something else?
 
Could accomplish that in manual mode with tap shift. Just put it in 2nd gear.

Ya, but for us impatient folk, just slamming the shifter all the way back would be better :laughing:

What engine do you want in front of it? Still GM or something else?

Currently a 22re :homer:

There is 22re to th400 adapters that should work, just requires a high dollar torque converter....

I'd like to swap to a k24 later. There is a better adapter for this that uses common gm tc's.

Just would hate to do all the work and coar to have it not work very well.
 
Ya, but for us impatient folk, just slamming the shifter all the way back would be better :laughing:



Currently a 22re :homer:

There is 22re to th400 adapters that should work, just requires a high dollar torque converter....

I'd like to swap to a k24 later. There is a better adapter for this that uses common gm tc's.

Just would hate to do all the work and coar to have it not work very well.


Without a GM ECU in the mix, it's going to take something like the PCS 2650 to run that trans standalone.

 
Anyone know who this might be? Maybe a member here?

Capture.JPG
 
Really trying to figure out how that's possible. Lol
I think its the difference between an old school trans and the newer clutch to clutch style automatics. The newer trans don't seem to have all the accumulator BS that the old ones had. Also, while the 6l80 is narrower, it is substantially deeper, especially at the rear of the trans pan, which makes fitting it into buggy things a bit more difficult.
 
I've got my LS/6l90 sitting on the shop floor if you want any measurements from it.

Pretty sure the only difference between the 80 and 90 is in the length.

Edit:
The pans are not the same. 90 is longer by the same amount that the case is longer. 1 3/8".

90 pan on top, 80 pan for a G8 on bottom.

2023-09-30 15.47.18.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think its the difference between an old school trans and the newer clutch to clutch style automatics. The newer trans don't seem to have all the accumulator BS that the old ones had. Also, while the 6l80 is narrower, it is substantially deeper, especially at the rear of the trans pan, which makes fitting it into buggy things a bit more difficult.

The pan also runs the entire length of the trans.

2023-09-30 15.21.08.jpg


It's also the widest part of the trans. You can see it peaking out at the bottom.

2023-09-30 15.23.21.jpg


Spare pan I have says 11 5/8" at widest point right where the dip stick comes down.

2023-09-30 15.33.39.jpg
 
I'm surprised that the tech specs say nothing about the TCM located in the pan. The jump from the 4L60/4L80 is pretty big on two fronts.

Like mentioned the clutch to clutch shifting requires a lot of precision since each shift is more then just one clutch or brake turning on or off hence the need for a more robust computer.

Two, the engine controller send all the data through a CAN network to the TCM. So integrating a 6L80 into something that didn't originally mate to one is not as easy/cheap.
 
There's one thing I'm going to eventually try on my 6l90 and it's something I read an article about years ago that was done on a older turbo400 automatic. In the article they hooked up an accumulator to the pressure port on the case. Think Accusump.

I have an Accusump set up for the engine so why not the trans too.

The oil pickup in my 90 is in rear of the lowered sump area in the pan, which puts it in the canter of the pan overall. I'm not sure where the pickup is in a t400.
Now, I've only read a couple times about anyone having an issue with the pickup running dry with the nose or ass end looking at the sky, so it seems that it's very uncommon.

But in the article I read, they were able to open the valve and bump start the vehicle. I think that would be nice to have in the ol' tool bag.

I have found out that the max psi seen at the pressure port is very close to 300psi. A accusump from Canton or Moroso are only rated at 100 psi max. I've talked to both of them.

I did find a accumulators.com makes a 3" accumulator that could work. Damn thing is rated to 3k psi though.

Here's the pressure port on a 6l90, I'm sure the 80 is in the same spot. So it's not like there's major surgery to perform.


DSC07227.JPG
 
I'm surprised that the tech specs say nothing about the TCM located in the pan. The jump from the 4L60/4L80 is pretty big on two fronts.

Like mentioned the clutch to clutch shifting requires a lot of precision since each shift is more then just one clutch or brake turning on or off hence the need for a more robust computer.

Two, the engine controller send all the data through a CAN network to the TCM. So integrating a 6L80 into something that didn't originally mate to one is not as easy/cheap.

This solves that issue:



I believe the newer 8 and 10 speed transmissions do have the TCM outside of the trans.
 
good point on the tcm in the trans, kind of a pain in the **** if you have tcm failure.

Another thing I’ll mention is using the G8 oil pan. It’s the most shallow oil pan I have seen on a 6l80. You lose a quart or two but nice for clearance.

So far I haven’t had issues with it running dry on steep climbs but I’ll report back when I get more time on it
 
This solves that issue:



I believe the newer 8 and 10 speed transmissions do have the TCM outside of the trans.
Yeah there is a solution but you are at a grand just for the controller. That's a lot for just an interface to talk to the other controller that does all the work in the trans.

To me unless you are doing an LS swap that already came with one I see it as being cost prohibited. Then again I'm poor so maybe not 🤣

I will say I was thinking about a 6L80 on my CUCV that is a non-turbo diesel. The close ratios, low gearing, and tall overdrive would be a great match. The 4L80 I used is great but lacking in versatility. I guess you get what you pay for.
 
Anyone know who this might be? Maybe a member here?

Capture.JPG
That’s Jay Schwab.
He fixed his problem by cloning the TCM of his spare with the one that was in the car already.
And yes the TCM needed physical access.

Also the 2650tcm from PCS sucks and is hard to setup.
 
There's one thing I'm going to eventually try on my 6l90 and it's something I read an article about years ago that was done on a older turbo400 automatic. In the article they hooked up an accumulator to the pressure port on the case. Think Accusump.

I have an Accusump set up for the engine so why not the trans too.

The oil pickup in my 90 is in rear of the lowered sump area in the pan, which puts it in the canter of the pan overall. I'm not sure where the pickup is in a t400.
Now, I've only read a couple times about anyone having an issue with the pickup running dry with the nose or ass end looking at the sky, so it seems that it's very uncommon.

But in the article I read, they were able to open the valve and bump start the vehicle. I think that would be nice to have in the ol' tool bag.

I have found out that the max psi seen at the pressure port is very close to 300psi. A accusump from Canton or Moroso are only rated at 100 psi max. I've talked to both of them.

I did find a accumulators.com makes a 3" accumulator that could work. Damn thing is rated to 3k psi though.

Here's the pressure port on a 6l90, I'm sure the 80 is in the same spot. So it's not like there's major surgery to perform.


DSC07227.JPG

You could just use a remote reservoir from a shock...
 
Yeah there is a solution but you are at a grand just for the controller. That's a lot for just an interface to talk to the other controller that does all the work in the trans.

To me unless you are doing an LS swap that already came with one I see it as being cost prohibited. Then again I'm poor so maybe not 🤣

I will say I was thinking about a 6L80 on my CUCV that is a non-turbo diesel. The close ratios, low gearing, and tall overdrive would be a great match. The 4L80 I used is great but lacking in versatility. I guess you get what you pay for.

Ya, the OEM's sure do love their canbus systems.



That’s Jay Schwab.
He fixed his problem by cloning the TCM of his spare with the one that was in the car already.
And yes the TCM needed physical access.

Also the 2650tcm from PCS sucks and is hard to setup.

I mentioned the PCS 2650 because it's sold by many tuning/conversion companies. Does it suck because it's hard to set up, or because it has limitations?

You could just use a remote reservoir from a shock...

****in A, that's brilliant and simple.

Heading down another rabbit hole......
 
I can confirm a 6l80e and a 700r4 are damn near the same overall length. The 6L loses a lot of width in the pan area vs the 700r4 which will make driveshaft clearances better. I kinda wish i had used the 6L on my current buggy, but didnt want to mess with any electronics. My 700r4 RMVB doesnt have a single electrical wire connection to it, which is nice. Id mainly want the 6L for the 1st gear ratio. I really dont care about 4/5/6 gears as my crawler never sees any street time and stays in low.
 
I can confirm a 6l80e and a 700r4 are damn near the same overall length. The 6L loses a lot of width in the pan area vs the 700r4 which will make driveshaft clearances better. I kinda wish i had used the 6L on my current buggy, but didnt want to mess with any electronics. My 700r4 RMVB doesnt have a single electrical wire connection to it, which is nice. Id mainly want the 6L for the 1st gear ratio. I really dont care about 4/5/6 gears as my crawler never sees any street time and stays in low.

Seems like just a lower tcase or r&p gear would fit you better?
 
Top Back Refresh