That sounds really fawking dumb for a reactionary work load. You cannot “productivity” your way into less hours outside of a paper pushing gig. I have 78 internal combustion engine powered machines operating in the middle of nowhere that are my responsibility to keep running 24 hours a day 365 days a year. The company tasks me with 98% run time. The closest one to me is one hour away from my house the furthest is two hours away. It is a state law requirement that I see every single one of them every 7 days. If I’m lucky I only do 50 hours a week. So on a good week I have to see 1 1/2 locations an hour including travel time and fix any problems while I’m there. Parts fail, leaks develop, etc. My highest hour machine has over 140,000 hours on the original engine and my run time is 99% because of how hard I “productivity”.
The amount of hours it takes to navigate between locations changes by weather. The next location I need to go to isn’t linear because I have to respond to down units first every day, I can see run status on our automation system. Every 7th week I take a turn of being on call 24 hours a day for 7 days of 12 days in a row. Doing the hours is the job. If I walk into work next Monday (I’m on vacation this week) and find out I’m on salary for the same job scope. I’m quitting on the spot.