What's new

WATCH LIVE: Hearing to decide if Fulton DA Fani Willis will be disqualified from Trump case

Spencer Cornelia went after her the other day


The chicago news station ended up in my algorithm because VPN one day, i've been following the near daily news stories about the new fucked up thing that lady is doing.

I don't know how they haven't removed her from office yet.
 
I cracked up at the "I have money at my house" line.

Zero credibility. That case is over.
Remember back in '05 during Hurricane Katrina, there was a black LA politician that personally accompanied a National Guard 6X6 go to his house and remove/load an upright fridge/freezer onto said 6X6?

It was caught on camera.

It turns out he had $90,000 wrapped in aluminum foil bricks hidden in it's freezer.:laughing::homer::shaking:

 
I know the answer, but why do those who scream the loudest about the "seperation of Church and State" are the first ones
to run to a church and preach to us?

Fani Willis appears to suggest she’s under divine protection in church sermon just days after heated court hearing​

by Jason Cohen

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis appeared to suggest in a sermon Saturday that God is protecting her from “weapons” that have “formed” against her, adding that they will not “prosper.”

Willis’ sermon follows a Thursday and Friday hearing on whether she should be disqualified from her election interference case against former President Donald Trump. Willis allegedly gained financial benefits from appointing special prosecutor Nathan Wade to the case, but they both testified that their relationship commenced after the appointment and that she always reimbursed him in cash for their vacations and outings.

“Let me tell you something that I’ve learned very, very recently ’cause you may need this lesson as well,” Willis said. “People keep sending me scriptures and I appreciate those scriptures … the scripture they keep sending me is ‘no weapon formed against you shall prosper.’ I need y’all to hear me though. They did not say the weapons would not form. And that’s the part I didn’t hear until recently. Just because they won’t prosper, it doesn’t mean that they won’t form. Even if you feel like everything you are doing in your life is the right thing and you’re making mistakes all along the way but you are trying. You should not think that those weapons will not form.”





Anna Cross, representing the Fulton County district attorney’s office, decided not to call Willis to testify Friday as planned after the district attorney was combative on the witness stand towards questions from defense attorneys Thursday. She even erupted into an outburst at one point that caused Judge Scott McAfee to call for a break.

“The other lesson that I’ve learned in this three years is God ordains those weapons, He puts those weapons in your life to form against you,” she added. “And if you really understand him you become in your maturity to understand he does it for a reason, and it’s to grow you and it’s to make you stronger and it is to prepare you … this is a really hard job I’m trying to do and I am an imperfect human being but I can literally can feel the people who loves me’s prayers.”


She then requested the congregation pray for her and thanked it for the “Black History Achievement Award” she received.
 
Correct; she threw him under the bus in order to destroy his testimony/credibility.
She inadvertently may have very well opened the door/the Pandora's Box/the can of worms on his commos with the DA and prosecutor.

The lawyer podcasts I was watching were all saying/yelling, ''What does she (the state) have to gain from this?!!":lmao::eek:
I wasn't sure who each attorney was from the parts I watched on Friday. And I was completely baffled on how someone on the state's side would have gone down that path of questioning.
 
I wasn't sure who each attorney was from the parts I watched on Friday. And I was completely baffled on how someone on the state's side would have gone down that path of questioning.
Same here; there was/is:
1) State attorneys
2) Trump attorneys
3) Witness attorneys

Early on there was the tall/amazon/blonde/big boobs Trump attorney that asked longwinded/lousy questions.
Made Trump's side look weak.

But then; when the witness attorney and male Trump attorney got up, Trump's side kicked utter ass!

The podcast lawyers I follow all said the state completely backstabbed him/threw him under the bus/sacrificed his ass.:eek:
 
If he'd pay his legal bills he'd probably be able to hire better legal representation. Justing saying.
I seem to recall law firms threatening to fire attorneys if they worked with Trump or the Trump campaign.

I also recall the lawyers that won the landmark descision in the New york rifle and pistol association v. Bruen case being fired from their law firm for not withdrawing the case.
 

Cellphone Data May Just Cook Fani Willis and Nathan Wade's Goose About Start of Relationship​


By Nick Arama | 6:19 PM on February 23, 2024

The evidence was already not looking good for Fulton County DA Fani Willis and her story about when her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade began. There was prior testimony from her former good friend Robin Yeartie that the relationship began in 2019, before what both Wade and Willis told the Court. That was bad enough.

Advertisement
The defense, including former President Donald Trump, is arguing that the two and the DA's office should be disqualified from the case because of the relationship. The couple was forced to admit there was a romance, but both claimed it began in 2022 -- after Wade had been hired in Nov. 2021.


Read More:

WATCH: Fani Willis Freaks Out During Her Testimony, Starts Screaming 'You Lied!' at Defense Attorney

Trouble for Willis at Hearing: Wade Testifies, Friend Reveals Relationship Started Earlier Than Claimed


Now there's more evidence that just may cook Willis and Wade's goose on the issue and earn them a lot of trouble. The Trump team revealed in a filing with the Court that they have cellphone data they obtained from AT&T pursuant to a subpoena. According to the data in the filing, Wade appeared to have made at least 35 visits to the Hapeville neighborhood where Fani Willis was living before the district attorney hired him.

Trump’s lawyers relied on data collected from Wade’s cellphone and cellphone tower transmissions which they said tracked his movements. It could contradict Wade’s testimony last week in which he said he had visited Willis at her condo in Hapeville no more than 10 times before he was hired in November 2021. It also indicates Wade twice arrived in the area late at night and left early the next morning in the months before Willis and Wade said their relationship became romantic early in 2022.
Both Wade and Willis testified last week that they did not spend the night together at the Hapeville condo.
Advertisement
Check the timing and when he's in the area.

On one occasion, on Sept. 11, 2021, Wade’s phone left the Doraville area and arrived in the vicinity of Willis’ Hapeville address at 10:45 p.m. The phone remained there until 3:28 a.m. and could later be seen arriving in East Cobb at 4:05 a.m., shortly before Wade sent a text to Willis, the affidavit said.
Similarly, Wade’s phone left the East Cobb area the night of Nov. 29, 2021, after receiving an 11:32 p.m. call from Willis, the affidavit said. It arrived in Hapeville at 12:43 a.m. and remained there until 4:55 a.m., the affidavit added.
Then there's the number of calls and texts. There was an affidavit from investigator Charles Mittelstadt.

The affidavit says Willis and Wade called each other more than 2,000 times during the first 11 months of 2021 and exchanged just less than 10,000 text messages.
That was all during the time they claimed they weren't having a romantic relationship.

Two thousand phone calls and almost 10,000 text messages? That's an incredible amount of communication.

This has to up the likelihood that they get disqualified. As the Atlanta Journal-Constitution notes, this also could also bring them lots of trouble. If it's determined that they lied under oath, it could constitute perjury and their careers could be in jeopardy.
 

“The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other businesses are located,” Fani Willis said in a motion reviewed by this reporter.





Records are good enough for J6 but not good enough for 2000 Mules or to prove a perjuring Democrat.....

Double standard anyone??
 

“The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other businesses are located,” Fani Willis said in a motion reviewed by this reporter.





Records are good enough for J6 but not good enough for 2000 Mules or to prove a perjuring Democrat.....

Double standard anyone??
"Some animals are more equal than others"
 

“The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other businesses are located,” Fani Willis said in a motion reviewed by this reporter.





Records are good enough for J6 but not good enough for 2000 Mules or to prove a perjuring Democrat.....

Double standard anyone??
Doesn't help that as a DA, her office has been paying the same cell tracking company for evidence since 2017.
 

“The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other businesses are located,” Fani Willis said in a motion reviewed by this reporter.

Records are good enough for J6 but not good enough for 2000 Mules or to prove a perjuring Democrat.....

Double standard anyone??
The only valid point her response makes is the sneak attack/bombshell approach Trump's team made with the info.

Judging from last week's testimony Trump's team already had the private investigator's report.
But they didn't disclose it to the prosecutor's team as they should have.

It will be interesting how the judge rules on this.
 
I don't think the defense has the same discovery requirements as the prosecution so they can bring in evidence whenever they want, as long as the judge signs agrees it is of value to the defense.
 
I don't think the defense has the same discovery requirements as the prosecution so they can bring in evidence whenever they want, as long as the judge signs agrees it is of value to the defense.
Both parties have to disclose stuff they want to present to the court.
So that the opposing party have time to go over said stuff.

Also either parties can argue before the court as to whether or not they want to allow it, so the judge can make a decision.
 
Both parties have to disclose stuff they want to present to the court.
So that the opposing party have time to go over said stuff.

Also either parties can argue before the court as to whether or not they want to allow it, so the judge can make a decision.

I think you're accurate unless it is considered rebuttal evidence. I'm not sure if that is what they are using the private investigators report for, but maybe.

In the context of rebuttal experts, Rule 26 (a) (2) (D) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the evidence to be admitted if it “is intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter,” and must be disclosed 30 days after the other party’s disclosure.

 
I don't think the defense has the same discovery requirements as the prosecution so they can bring in evidence whenever they want, as long as the judge signs agrees it is of value to the defense.
I'm listening to a lawyer podcast/YT right now who is going over Trump team's response to the Fani response.

He's of the opinion the said response to the response is more for the court of public opinion rather than if the judge will rule in it's favor.
 
I think you're accurate unless it is considered rebuttal evidence. I'm not sure if that is what they are using the private investigators report for, but maybe.

In the context of rebuttal experts, Rule 26 (a) (2) (D) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows the evidence to be admitted if it “is intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter,” and must be disclosed 30 days after the other party’s disclosure.

I was literally starting to type about rebuttal evidence when the little white bar appeared and I see you hit it.

It is to rebut the testimony given that the romance was started during XX/XXXX, rather than the months/years earlier which the cell records show they were having late-night rendezvous.
 
I know the answer, but why do those who scream the loudest about the "seperation of Church and State" are the first ones
to run to a church and preach to us?

Fani Willis appears to suggest she’s under divine protection in church sermon just days after heated court hearing​

by Jason Cohen

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis appeared to suggest in a sermon Saturday that God is protecting her from “weapons” that have “formed” against her, adding that they will not “prosper.”

Willis’ sermon follows a Thursday and Friday hearing on whether she should be disqualified from her election interference case against former President Donald Trump. Willis allegedly gained financial benefits from appointing special prosecutor Nathan Wade to the case, but they both testified that their relationship commenced after the appointment and that she always reimbursed him in cash for their vacations and outings.

“Let me tell you something that I’ve learned very, very recently ’cause you may need this lesson as well,” Willis said. “People keep sending me scriptures and I appreciate those scriptures … the scripture they keep sending me is ‘no weapon formed against you shall prosper.’ I need y’all to hear me though. They did not say the weapons would not form. And that’s the part I didn’t hear until recently. Just because they won’t prosper, it doesn’t mean that they won’t form. Even if you feel like everything you are doing in your life is the right thing and you’re making mistakes all along the way but you are trying. You should not think that those weapons will not form.”





Anna Cross, representing the Fulton County district attorney’s office, decided not to call Willis to testify Friday as planned after the district attorney was combative on the witness stand towards questions from defense attorneys Thursday. She even erupted into an outburst at one point that caused Judge Scott McAfee to call for a break.

“The other lesson that I’ve learned in this three years is God ordains those weapons, He puts those weapons in your life to form against you,” she added. “And if you really understand him you become in your maturity to understand he does it for a reason, and it’s to grow you and it’s to make you stronger and it is to prepare you … this is a really hard job I’m trying to do and I am an imperfect human being but I can literally can feel the people who loves me’s prayers.”


She then requested the congregation pray for her and thanked it for the “Black History Achievement Award” she received.
So she's a fucking minister now?
 
Top Back Refresh