Roc Doc
2A SNBI
For sure it's lots of things, just like the mental health issue.It ties into into lots of other social engineering bullshit from the Feds over the last century, but the deeper you go into that rabbit hole the more it branches.
For sure it's lots of things, just like the mental health issue.It ties into into lots of other social engineering bullshit from the Feds over the last century, but the deeper you go into that rabbit hole the more it branches.
This is a good listen. If you want skip ahead to 3:40
Thomas Sowell says that it's black culture that is holding some black people back. Looking at black kids that were born to service members in Germany after the war, there was no difference between their academic scores and other races. Why. Because no black culture. Genetics does play a factor but any race can have the genetics to be a douche bag. I think he is on to something here. I wish this guy got more main stream exposure.
The democrats have approved/voted the killing of babies if they are born alive in a botched abortion. Begging your pardon, this isn't a botched abortion, this is killing a living & breathing baby who is outside of the mother's womb......However, seeing that an unborn fetus is inherently human and is within the United States, and thus afforded the same constitutional protections that any other human is, to deprive that fetus of its life is an affront to the very founding basis of this country.
Why aren't the churches demanding a reversal and a condemnation of this vote? If our churches can't take a stand against as black and white as this one AND condone, excommunicate, rally against, campaign against any and all politicians who have voted for the killing of a newborn baby...hey pastors, priests & board of elders, if you're not on the side of a newborn baby and not up in arms/protesting against the killing of a newborn~ what the fcuk are you?Clowniest of clown world.
Too cold here,Canadians gonna Canadian.
don't be a dummy broguess everyone has just been opressing them from the beginning of time.
The democrats have approved/voted the killing of babies if they are born alive in a botched abortion. Begging your pardon, this isn't a botched abortion, this is killing a living & breathing baby who is outside of the mother's womb...
Why aren't the churches demanding a reversal and a condemnation of this vote? If our churches can't take a stand against as black and white as this one AND condone, excommunicate, rally against, campaign against any and all politicians who have voted for the killing of a newborn baby...hey pastors, priests & board of elders, if you're not on the side of a newborn baby and not up in arms/protesting against the killing of a newborn~ what the fcuk are you?
Read "Letter to the American Church" by Eric Metaxas.Why aren't the churches demanding a reversal and a condemnation of this vote? If our churches can't take a stand against as black and white as this one AND condone, excommunicate, rally against, campaign against any and all politicians who have voted for the killing of a newborn baby...hey pastors, priests & board of elders, if you're not on the side of a newborn baby and not up in arms/protesting against the killing of a newborn~ what the fcuk are you?
I do not accept that. When politics cross over into the moral, Churches have a DUTY to stand up to political powers. Tax status be damned.They would loose their tax exempt status. Plus it would be an extremely bad idea for churches to become politically active.
Church's have always been politically involved. And sorry it's got fuck all to do with morality and all about money. The Roman catholic church is one big ponze scheme. And most of the big religious organizations are set up the same.I do not accept that. When politics cross over into the moral, Churches have a DUTY to stand up to political powers. Tax status be damned.
Jesus warned us we would need a spine to follow him. The time to grow one is right fuckin now.
if it was about money, why wouldn't they hop on the pride train? Seems like that's where all the big bucks are.Church's have always been politically involved. And sorry it's got fuck all to do with morality and all about money. The Roman catholic church is one big ponze scheme. And most of the big religious organizations are set up the same.
10 of em stomped the kid, 8 in custody. Fighting over a vape pen and ear buds.
They did, wasn't it announced last week that the Vatican was going to allow trannys to be baptized and take communion?if it was about money, why wouldn't they hop on the pride train? Seems like that's where all the big bucks are.
If ya say so, bucko. :)
Actually he's right. Its one of the biggest issues I have with organized religion. It seems its all about the money these days.if it was about money, why wouldn't they hop on the pride train? Seems like that's where all the big bucks are.
If ya say so, bucko. :)
Not every church is out there for the money, but organized religion as a whole generally is. Human nature doesn't disappear inside a church.Actually he's right. Its one of the biggest issues I have with organized religion. It seems its all about the money these days.
As a child growing up in a small rural area church I didn't see that. Now maybe it was because I was a child and that wasn't anything I bothered myself with but as an adult, its hard not to see past it and alot of the hypocrisy.
But it's nothing new. Jesus himself took issue with many of the churches and the money they seemed to be after.
I had not heard that. Did some studying:They did, wasn't it announced last week that the Vatican was going to allow trannys to be baptized and take communion?
Whether deciding to baptize a person or to permit him or her to serve as a godparent, "due pastoral prudence demands that every situation be wisely pondered, in order to safeguard the sacrament of baptism and especially its reception, which is a precious good to be protected, since it is necessary for salvation," the document said.
Special care must be taken, it said, when "there are doubts about the objective moral situation in which the person finds him- or herself, or about his or her subjective dispositions toward grace."
The church teaches that when baptism is received without repentance for serious sins, it said, he or she receives the "sacramental character" but not "sanctifying grace."
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, the note said, affirms that "this configuration to Christ and to the Church, brought about by the Spirit, is indelible, it remains forever in the Christian as a positive disposition for grace, a promise and guarantee of divine protection, and as a vocation to divine worship and to the service of the Church."
Because that mark is indelible, once the person baptized without the proper disposition repents, sanctifying grace is present, it said. That possibility, it added, is why Pope Francis, in his 2013 exhortation, "The Joy of the Gospel," wrote that the church must have very serious reasons for turning someone away and must be especially hesitant before denying someone baptism.
Therefore, it said, even if there are doubts about the person's current commitment to living a fully Christian life, "one must never forget this aspect of the fidelity of the unconditional love of God, which is capable of generating even with the sinner an irrevocable covenant, always open to a development that is also unpredictable."
The church and its ministers do not simply wait for a person's conversion, though, it said, but constantly call people "to live fully all the implications of the baptism received, which must always be understood and unfolded within the entire journey of Christian initiation."
On the question of whether a transsexual can be a godparent, the document said it is possible "under certain conditions," but because the role is not a right, "pastoral prudence" is required to avoid the "danger of scandal" or confusion among the faithful.
It also cautioned that gay persons living together in a relationship like a marriage, especially if it is known in the community, probably should not serve as godparents, but can be invited to serve as witnesses to the baptism.
The dicastery repeated an affirmation that the child of a gay couple can be baptized when there is a well-founded hope that the child will be raised Catholic.
I do not deny that some out their are nothing but money chasers and I do not deny that some catholic parishes and diocese and individuals within the church have fallen prey to the false paper idol. Another good example is the prosperity gospel snakes.Actually he's right. Its one of the biggest issues I have with organized religion. It seems its all about the money these days.
As a child growing up in a small rural area church I didn't see that. Now maybe it was because I was a child and that wasn't anything I bothered myself with but as an adult, its hard not to see past it and alot of the hypocrisy.
But it's nothing new. Jesus himself took issue with many of the churches and the money they seemed to be after.
You ever look at the structure of most organized religions? It's the same as any other business.I do not deny that some out their are nothing but money chasers and I do not deny that some catholic parishes and diocese and individuals within the church have fallen prey to the false paper idol. Another good example is the prosperity gospel snakes.
Then you have others that take vows of poverty that chose to live in squalor amongst the people they serve.
There's Catholics in Nigeria being martyred for their faith by boko haram. Priests are being targeted and murdered. They doing it for the money? Doesn't seem like it to me 🤷🏼♂️. I do wonder why our church leadership is diving into the tranny mess and fellow catholics are having their heads chopped off for their beliefs...
Please don't take the defense of my faith as defense of individuals that claim to profess the same faith.
Digression, the original point being made was churches ARE in fact in it for the money. I agree that weiner choppers and zipper tits wanting to be religious is a non sequitur.I had not heard that. Did some studying:
Baptism, it appears, is yes.
Communion should still be a no. Although I'm sure you could find priests that do not take their duty to safeguard the eucharistic seriously...
Which aint really anything new. There have been priests around administering the eucharistic to divorced/remarried people without an annulment for a while.
I don't administer baptisms. Not sure how I feel about this. I don't understand why someone living contrary to objective reality would confess belief in objective reality...but confused people do confusing things.
“Not a hate crime"