What's new
By:
Filters

Vaccine FAILURE, on every level.

That's what I'm sayin'. It's why they're still riding the eua on all of this when there is a supposedly approved product available.
 
Ebs said:
That's what I'm sayin'. It's why they're still riding the eua on all of this when there is a supposedly approved product available.
Click to expand...
What they tried to do was pass off the current piece of crap vax as a new product by rebranding it. It didn't work.
 
The Saskatchewan Health Authority released data on Covid vaccine adverse reactions in Saskatchewan from January 2020-January 2021 obtained from a Freedom of Information access request. This report is 122 pages long and is highly concerning to Saskatchewan citizens.

Saskatchewan Covid-19 Vaccine Injuries Report

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AhSOiSpHWEqJKiPrvrHE3Jci8PRnJhV9/view?usp=drivesdk
The contents of the data report note that in 285 cases of serious adverse events, additional doses were ordered by physicians! This defies medical ethics and needs to be explained.

Understanding that you will not likely take the time to read through the 122 pages of adverse events to the vaccine, a Canadian physician with training in virology, public health and data analysis reviewed the 122 pages of data and prepared the attached 14 page report.

Covid-19 Vaccine Adverse Reactions Sask Annotated

https://drive.google.com/file/d/12-laIKIR778Qo6-786Z31QarGlla_858/view?usp=drivesdk
 
Never Monday said:
Wait, wasn’t this all new med platform in development for the last 10y...... :rollseyes:
Click to expand...

They have been studying it for a very long time and it’s always been a failure.

Roc Doc and bgaidan nailed it. Trump gave them the pass and they jumped at the opportunity to experiment on the world at large.

Letting a politician get away with a bad choice because you voted for them is stupid.
 
FleshEater said:
They have been studying it for a very long time and it’s always been a failure.

Roc Doc and bgaidan nailed it. Trump gave them the pass and they jumped at the opportunity to experiment on the world at large.

Letting a politician get away with a bad choice because you voted for them is stupid.
Click to expand...
Let’s go a stop further on this train.....

Is the truly “bad” if it’s based on knowingly and admitted, corrupt information at the time it was made?
 
FleshEater said:
They have been studying it for a very long time and it’s always been a failure.

Roc Doc and bgaidan nailed it. Trump gave them the pass and they jumped at the opportunity to experiment on the world at large.

Letting a politician get away with a bad choice because you voted for them is stupid.
Click to expand...
What are science advisers for? Nothing apparently. TRUST THE SCIENCE!:flipoff2:

From the MEME thread:
1661827170151-png.573052
 
Last edited:
MadScientist said:
Very true, however it could have been stopped once the data started popping up instead of continuing to force it down our throats.
Click to expand...

This is the problem with government. Once the door is opened, it’s free to abuse.

Never Monday said:
Let’s go a stop further on this train.....

Is the truly “bad” if it’s based on knowingly and admitted, corrupt information at the time it was made?
Click to expand...

How is it that everyone here had massive skepticism of it when it first came out? Were we privy to more information than a standing president? There were whistleblowers from the very beginning warning about this.

Filthy McChevy said:
What are science advisers for? Nothing apparently. TRUST THE SCIENCE!:flipoff2:

From the MEME thread:
1661827170151-png.573052
Click to expand...

See my comment above. Corrupted advisors who make comments like, “Natural immunity does not exist, you need a vaccine,” are not science advisors. Again, everyone was free to research. Somehow in 21’ and 22’ our bodies no longer made antibodies. :homer:

They have been studying the first SARS out breaks for over 10 years. That information was widely available.




For the record, I voted for Trump twice. I still think it was a terrible decision allowing big pharma free reign with an experimental process just because governors were crippling the country (on purpose), and making the administration look bad.
 
Filthy McChevy said:
I researched it a couple weeks ago and they are claiming it's the same even though the bottles don't say it. So more BS

A lot of different links make the same claim. This one is rich:
"[1] The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness."

...Since the branded and unbranded vials of vaccines are chemically identical, despite being legally distinct.....



You asked, we answered: Are Pfizer's Comirnaty and BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines the same or different?
Click to expand...
I have a friend that is a med sale/distribution. He has flat out said the paperwork he gets to give to the clinics says that if it doesnt have the Comimaty name on it it’s not the same and he was unaware of any that had been released inside the USA.

Remember, once they release the “approved” stuff they would have to get rid of the EUA. Thats dangerous to them on many levels as not o ly would it open up Pharma to massive lawsuits. It also would show that Pharma and Congress were in on the fact that there were multiple alternative treatments thats worked better than the rMNA. But they also misleading the public about the safety and effectiveness of tge vaccine.

I honestly dont see the EUA going away unless its a major red wave in congress or until we have a non progressive POTUS who will get rid of it.
 
Thefishguy77 said:
I have a friend that is a med sale/distribution. He has flat out said the paperwork he gets to give to the clinics says that if it doesnt have the Comimaty name on it it’s not the same and he was unaware of any that had been released inside the USA.

Remember, once they release the “approved” stuff they would have to get rid of the EUA. Thats dangerous to them on many levels as not o ly would it open up Pharma to massive lawsuits. It also would show that Pharma and Congress were in on the fact that there were multiple alternative treatments thats worked better than the rMNA. But they also misleading the public about the safety and effectiveness of tge vaccine.

I honestly dont see the EUA going away unless its a major red wave in congress or until we have a non progressive POTUS who will get rid of it.
Click to expand...

EUA’s will be the new normal
 
Thefishguy77 said:
I have a friend that is a med sale/distribution. He has flat out said the paperwork he gets to give to the clinics says that if it doesnt have the Comimaty name on it it’s not the same and he was unaware of any that had been released inside the USA.

Remember, once they release the “approved” stuff they would have to get rid of the EUA. Thats dangerous to them on many levels as not o ly would it open up Pharma to massive lawsuits. It also would show that Pharma and Congress were in on the fact that there were multiple alternative treatments thats worked better than the rMNA. But they also misleading the public about the safety and effectiveness of tge vaccine.

I honestly dont see the EUA going away unless its a major red wave in congress or until we have a non progressive POTUS who will get rid of it.
Click to expand...
I didn't say I believe them, just that that is the new claim. I have been checking on it since the supposed approval announcement came out. If it came down to take the jab or get fired I'd get fired if I couldn't see the bottle and it didn't say Comirnaty (however it's spelled)
 
Filthy McChevy said:
I didn't say I believe them, just that that is the new claim. I have been checking on it since the supposed approval announcement came out. If it came down to take the jab or get fired I'd get fired if I couldn't see the bottle and it didn't say Comirnaty (however it's spelled)
Click to expand...
I would get fired regardless. The shot doesnt work, never has worked, has a history of severe side effects. And the government has admitted it doesn’t work. Their entire scam has been exposed.
 
Here is what USA today claims:

The authorization changed, but the vaccine didn't. Comirnaty is simply the brand name for Pfizer's shot.

"The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty ... for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older," the FDA wrote in an Aug. 23 press release about the shot's approval.
Once the FDA approves vaccines, companies are permitted to market them under brand names, according to Scott Pauley, a press officer for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Manufacturers may also then advertise their shots.

Because hundreds of millions of Pfizer doses were manufactured before the FDA's full approval, some vials administered now may not have a Comirnaty label. But that doesn't change what's in the shot.

"There has been no change in the formulation of the vaccine since the name change," Pauley told USA TODAY in an email.



As of Oct. 20, more than 104 million Americans had received two doses of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine, according to CDC data. Other independent fact-checking organizations have debunked the claim that the FDA-approved shot isn't available in the U.S.

Our rating: False​

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that Pfizer's FDA-approved coronavirus vaccine is not yet available in the U.S. The agency approved the vaccine for most Americans in August, and more than 104 million people have received two doses. The formulation of Pfizer's shot did not change when it was renamed Comirnaty following full FDA approval.
Click to expand...
 
That USA today article sure dances around the issue.

Because hundreds of millions of Pfizer doses were manufactured before the FDA's full approval, some vials administered now may not have a Comirnaty label. But that doesn't change what's in the shot.

"There has been no change in the formulation of the vaccine since the name change," Pauley told USA TODAY in an email.
Click to expand...

Is Pfizer retroactively liable for the vaccine given under the eua now that it's approved, like they would with the branded shit?

If the answer is no, then fawk the rest, don't tell me they're the same but have different rules.
 
Why does the eua still exist? Why are states of emergency still declared on relation to covid?

Why are we handing over so much power and unquestioned and unrestrained control to the government without even a whimper?

Why'd those hospital ships stay empty?

Why'd Cuomo sentence nursing home residents to death by housing covid positive people in a fucking nursing home?

Why wasn't Cuomo impeached...twice? His actions directly led to stacked bodies.
Not to mention he's everything the woke crowd claims to be against, sexist, mysoginist, racist, classist,etc. He's a greasy, swarthy ass slicked back dago wop politician.

Cancer has a lot higher mortality rate than 3%. Why don't we see and rushed, whizz bang superscience treatments for it?

Why did the states of emergency not require approval by sate legislators after a certain amount of time?

Shall tell public do things to make it feel like an emergency?


Because right now it feels like a fake and gay declaration so pharma companies can get this fake and gay "vaccine" into people despite it causing untold of damage so they can. Get they money and pump up them stock numbers.

Holla fo yo dolla, don't come to me when it turns to tyranny.
 
My wife who works in critical care at the local hospital says she's been seeing a huge uptick in heart condition cases. We're both purebloods, somehow she escaped the bullshit and my job never would have bent over for that.
 
some vials administered now may not have a Comirnaty label. But that doesn't change what's in the shot.
Click to expand...

I would almost guarantee the FDA has policies dictating exactly what must be on a drug's label. This sure seems to side step that policy.
 
So for anybody who is curious this is what was being given as of the date listed. I can't do much digging in charts due to hipaa rules but when I come across info I can share I will.
 

Attachments

  • 20220830_102401.jpg
    20220830_102401.jpg
    962.5 KB · Views: 53
  • 20220830_102335.jpg
    20220830_102335.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 53
yeah they never produced the comirnaty branded vials for widespread distribution

everyone is quick to jump on the 'it is the same science juice in both names so it is approved' soundbite, as if logic has any place in bureaucracy

Which name it is under means a whole lot for legal protections, the EUA is still granting blanket immunity but only under one of the two names they could print on the label. Of course they aren't going to distribute the labels that don't guarantee them legal protections...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh