What's new
By:
Filters

The Kamala thread.

CarterKraft said:
She's going on Rogan, is that a good idea???
Click to expand...

Probably not. Rogan creates an actual conversation and she's come across terribly in all of those.

Rogan had always said he kinda wants to stay out of political races, etc. for the most part so it's interesting he's going to have her and Trump on. Probably because they're both actively seeking out podcasts to appear on and probably because both have apparently agreed. My hope is that he holds them to the 3-ish hour format of his usual podcasts. Don't let them get away with popping in for an hour. It's hard to hide for three hours of conversation.
 
WaterH said:
So someone else is advising her. It is almost like how they dumped Biden. But they can’t dump her. So what’s the plan. I do agree they can still pull off the cheat, but this will just make it more obvious.
Click to expand...

My thought: they'll only put her on if she has the questions ahead of time. Fox is not above doing that.
 
Thumping said:
Then why are so many younger people screaming liberals?
Click to expand...

east_beast said:
There is no shortage of left leaning online content.
Click to expand...

Texas97 said:
because Reddit, facebook groups, and instagram influencers.

also they have shitty parents.
Click to expand...

CarterKraft said:
tiktok
Click to expand...


[486] said:
faceberg/instantgram
Click to expand...


. . . and don't forget Marxist + whackadoodle indoctrination from the college prof's that taught many of 'Murca's yoots and, more importantly, their college professors and grade school teachers. Call it the payoff of a "train the trainer" program :mad3:

We're seeing the results of multi-generational indoctrination at this point.
It's entrenched and it's fookin' sad :frown:
 
CarterKraft said:
She's going on Rogan, is that a good idea???
Click to expand...

well, she has done a 3 week media blitz and her polling has dropped a solid 5% .

their internal polling must be horrendous because this is a lot of downside with little upside because they know she cant perform for Joe Rogan.

I have no doubts he's going to be fair but its going to get really REALLY uncomfortable for her because she cant just cackle and change the subject.
 
Texas97 said:
well, she has done a 3 week media blitz and her polling has dropped a solid 5% .

their internal polling must be horrendous because this is a lot of downside with little upside because they know she cant perform for Joe Rogan.

I have no doubts he's going to be fair but its going to get really REALLY uncomfortable for her because she cant just cackle and change the subject.
Click to expand...

Yep. Feels like a triple option offense being forced to throw because they're down big. We know we're not good at this but it's our only shot so here we go.
 
Levigarrett76 said:
determined by what, polls?
Click to expand...

just compare the percentage of black votes Trump got in 2020 to that of obama. They are not voting trump 2020 and switching to kamala. if anything more will jump the Democratic ship and go to Trump.
 
Texas97 said:
just compare the percentage of black votes Trump got in 2020 to that of obama. They are not voting trump 2020 and switching to kamala. if anything more will jump the Democratic ship and go to Trump.
Click to expand...
I guess i dont buy any of it after witnessing the last governor's and senator races in ga. Especially the governor, they were running a big fat retarded gap toothed cow and she still nearly won.
 
also:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-d...-win-historic-number-black-hispanic-votersCNN data reporter predicts Trump will win ‘historic’ number of Black and Hispanic votersHarry Enten predicted Trump will put up the best performance with Black voters since Richard Nixon
By Nikolas Lanum Fox News
Published October 14, 2024 1:30pm EDT


CNN data guru warns Trump may beat Harris in key metrics​

CNN data reporter Harry Enten warned on Sunday that former President Trump is predicted to win a "historic" number of Black and Hispanic voters in the November election.
During an appearance on "Inside Politics," Enten revealed the potentially bad news for Democrats and also noted that Republicans are outpacing Democrats in party identification and registration for the first time in almost 40 years.
"At this particular hour, if you believe the polling, Donald Trump’s going to put up the best performance with Black voters since Richard Nixon in the 1960s," Enten said.
placeholder

A New York Times/Siena College poll released on Sunday suggested that Vice President Kamala Harris holds 78% percent of the Black vote. Hillary Clinton won the voting block with 92% in 2016, and President Biden won approximately 90% in 2020.



Enten also told a CNN panel on Sunday that Trump is expected to put up the "best performance" for a Republican when it comes to Hispanic voters since former President George W. Bush in 2004.
"The GOP leads by a point in party identification right now," he said. "The average when the Republican Party loses is the Democrats ahead by 8. When the Republican Party wins, the average party ID advantage for Democrats is 3. Republicans right now, Manu, are doing even better than the average when they win," Enten added.
He noted that the party registration and party ID data "points in a good direction" for Trump.
However, Enten questioned whether Trump’s performance among minority groups could be erased by Harris’ support among college-educated White voters.


"The question ultimately is—is that enough to offset the strength that Kamala Harris has with White voters with a college degree? At this particular moment, she has the strongest margin with them than any Democrat going back since recorded history with polling, I guess since 1948, 1952, wherever you want to put it," he said.
Enten calculated that Harris is winning the demographic by 18 points.
An NBC News survey of registered voters released on Sunday found that voters are virtually evenly split between the two candidates.


When the poll, conducted Oct. 4-8, asked respondents who they would choose, Trump and Harris each earned 48% in a hypothetical one-on-one matchup.
When third-party figures were included in the mix, the overall result was 47% support for Trump versus 46% for Harris.
Click to expand...
 
Levigarrett76 said:
I guess i dont buy any of it after witnessing the last governor's and senator races in ga. Especially the governor, they were running a big fatr etarded gap toothed cow and she still nearly won.
Click to expand...

well, Kemp isnt Trump.


and Georgia had the highest or second highest voter fraud, depending on where Arizona lands on it.
 
Texas97 said:
yes, Kamala will be president. just get used to that.
Click to expand...
this.

Beck interviewed someone recently who explained exactly how the DNC can oust Trump after the election and before inauguration. Apparently it's happened 3 times in history.

Which makes me believe that 01/06/21 was nothing more than preparation for 01/06/25.... ie 4-d chess by the DNC
 
rockota said:
Beck interviewed someone recently who explained exactly how the DNC can oust Trump after the election and before inauguration. Apparently it's happened 3 times in history.
Click to expand...

well share with the class what your read
 
rockota said:
this.

Beck interviewed someone recently who explained exactly how the DNC can oust Trump after the election and before inauguration. Apparently it's happened 3 times in history.

Which makes me believe that 01/06/21 was nothing more than preparation for 01/06/25.... ie 4-d chess by the DNC
Click to expand...

So if Kamala wins, the election was fine. If Trump wins, the Dems pull shady shit to oust Trump. That doesn't sound like 4D chess, that just sounds like the Dems being the fucking snakes that they are.

Here, they've already started telling what they're planing.......


After Screeching About J6 And Democracy For Years, Top Dems Threaten Not To Certify A Trump Election Victory​


Despite continually disparaging anyone who questioned election outcomes, Rep. Jamie Raskin and a few of his colleagues told Axios they can’t say with certainty whether they will certify the results if former President Donald Trump wins the 2024 election.

Raskin told Axios in an interview that he would “obviously accept” the results of the election if it were a “free, fair and honest election.” But he then claimed that he “definitely” does not take for granted that Trump will, as described by Axios, “use free, fair and honest means to secure a victory.”

Raskin also told Axios that Trump “is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process, whether we’re talking about manipulating electoral college counts in Nebraska or manipulating vote count in Georgia or imposing other kinds of impediments.”

For years, Raskin and his fellow Democrats have continually labeled Trump and anyone who questioned the results of the 2020 election a “threat to democracy” and an “insurrectionist,” but Raskin’s comments signal that the whole “denying election results is a threat to democracy” schtick may be falling by the wayside.

Raskin wasn’t alone in his election denialism, with Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., who objected to the 2005 electors for George W. Bush, saying she doesn’t trust Trump and that “we would have to, in any election … make sure that all the rules have been followed.”

House Rules Committee Ranking Member Jim McGovern (who objected to Trump electors in 2017), told Axios Democrats would certify a Trump win “assuming everything goes the way we expect it to.”

“We have to see how it all happens,” McGovern told Axios, adding that he expects Democrats “would” certify the results.

Election denialism is nothing new for Democrats. In fact, their performative Jan. 6 Committee appointed Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson as chairman — but Thompson denied the results of the 2004 election and voted against the Ohio certification of Bush’s win. Raskin himself challenged the certification of Trump’s victory in 2017, arguing that “10 of the 29 electoral votes cast by Florida were cast by electors not lawfully certified because they violated Florida’s prohibition against dual officeholders.”

Despite their own election denialism, Democrats have resorted to lawfare and bullying to force Republicans into relinquishing their right to question problematic election administration.

Attorney General Merrick Garland recently boasted that his office has prosecuted nearly 1,500 Americans for protesting the 2020 election and warned others they will face similar lawfare should they dare question the administration of the upcoming election.

Meanwhile Republicans who question the conduct of questionable election practices are smeared by the propaganda press and their Democrat allies as election “deniers.” It’s a tactic designed to silence legitimate concerns about election administration.

Surely if Democrats have legitimate cause for concern about the integrity of an election they reserve the right to question the administration, but if they were legitimately concerned about “free” and “fair” elections, they’d be sounding the alarm about unsafe election practices right now.

Consider, for example, that the Georgia State Election Board found in May that Fulton County double-scanned more than 3,000 ballots during the 2020 presidential recount. In the wake of finding such insecure election practices, the State Election Board passed a series of rules designed to ensure that ballot counts are accurate before certification. Except Democrats, backed by Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, have sued the board because of the new rules. If Raskin is so deeply concerned about “fair” elections, surely he would defend the state board’s efforts to ensure that all legitimate votes are counted, right?

Wrong. Instead, Raskin smeared the Georgia process while speaking to Axios.

“[Trump] is doing whatever he can to … [manipulate] vote count in Georgia,” Raskin reportedly said.

It’s because Raskin doesn’t actually care about free and fair election practices. He simply cares about denying Trump a potential second term — all the while serving on a committee that sought to have people jailed for doing less than what Raskin tells Axios he might do should Trump win this November.
Click to expand...


The Democrats would burn this entire country to the ground to keep power.

I think they should be hunted into extinction. Then text books can recall the dark times when Democrats walked among us. Maybe stuff a coupe of them to prop up in a museum.
 
gt1guy said:
So if Kamala wins, the election was fine. If Trump wins, the Dems pull shady shit to oust Trump. That doesn't sound like 4D chess, that just sounds like the Dems being the fucking snakes that they are.

Here, they've already started telling what they're planing.......
Click to expand...

They setup the opportunity to not certify the election by accusing 45 and the GOP of doing that in 21... They plan ahead. They are doing what everyone thought 45 was doing... And they have had 4 years of media and other manipulation to set the stage.
 
rockota said:
They setup the opportunity to not certify the election by accusing 45 and the GOP of doing that in 21... They plan ahead. They are doing what everyone thought 45 was doing... And they have had 4 years of media and other manipulation to set the stage.
Click to expand...

If they try, I can see that being very bad for their health. There is going to be a tipping point.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh