Still wants to nuzzle my cawk. Im flattered but i dont go that way, try sofried.
And you were still wrong.
Still wants to nuzzle my cawk. Im flattered but i dont go that way, try sofried.
Apparently not. I have had mine slandered by a member so I guess its just no N word and no C word. Game on.Austin, I thought wives and kids were off limits here. Is that not true ?
It's kind of an unwritten rule that members help enforce more than anything. That, at best, is a Jr High School level insult and not something I'd say even qualifies for that.Austin, I thought wives and kids were off limits here. Is that not true ?
Thats more of a Doxxing and is off limitsSeems like a pretty generic and middling insult.
Off limits would be wife's name/address/pictures etc
I'm actually the ex wife that you didn't even know you had.Damn I haven't used ESQ. in years do we know each other in a purely platonic way?
You were the kid who took the "your momma" jokes serious and cried, weren't you?
It's kind of an unwritten rule that members help enforce more than anything. That, at best, is a Jr High School level insult and not something I'd say even qualifies for that.
Sad. Biggaydan is a douchenozzle but at least he took it for the joke it was.Austin, I thought wives and kids were off limits here. Is that not true ?
I was and I admitted it.
And you were still wrong.
Sad. Biggaydan is a douchenozzle but at least he took it for the joke it was.
You should try washing the sand out of your vageen and maybe youd find your sense of humor up there.
Do you want to be visited by the feds? Because that's how you get visited by the feds.You misspelled "Made unalive" with "jailed".
The Supreme Court sent it back down to the lower court who put an injunction in place stopping the law from going into effect until they rule on it. so it is currently paused.
"The Texas law makes illegal entry or re-entry into Texas a state crime, with penalties ranging from 180 days in jail to 20 years in prison. Under it, Texas magistrate judges will be required to order migrants to return to Mexico, with up to 20-year sentences for those who refuse to comply."
Get it on you, Texas.
Supreme Court permits Texas police to arrest people who illegally cross the border as the SB 4 legal clash continues
The ruling allows Texas to start enforcing SB 4 while a lawsuit over its constitutionality remains pending before a federal appeals court.www.texastribune.org
RFederal court rules Texas can keep its floating border barriers in place - The Daily Bo Snerdley
The Fifth Circuit ruled Tuesday that Texas will be able to continue usingits floating barriers in the Rio Grande river in order to deter illegal immigrant crossings. Last June Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the installment of the floating of buoys as he signed a series of border...thedailybs.com
Federal court rules Texas can keep its floating border barriers in place
by Hailey Gomez
The Fifth Circuit ruled Tuesday that Texas will be able to continue using its floating barriers in the Rio Grande river in order to deter illegal immigrant crossings.
Last June Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the installment of the floating line of buoys as he signed a series of border security bills, giving the state $5.1 billion in funding as it continues to be at the epicenter of the border crisis.
“What we’re doing right now, we’re securing the border, at the border,” Abbott said at the time. “What these buoys will allow us to do is to prevent people from even getting to the border.”
By December 2023, a preliminary injunction had been imposed by the Biden administration along with the Department of Justice (DOJ) suing Abbott over the barriers. The New Orleans court, however, has reversed the decision, allowing Texas to once again be able to work along the river.
“We hold that the district court clearly erred in finding that the United States will likely prove that the barrier is in a navigable stretch of the Rio Grande,” Judge Don R. Willett wrote. “We cannot square the district court’s findings and conclusions with over a century’s worth of precedent.”
For nearly a year the barriers have been in a legal battle, and were allowed to continue in January after the full circuit court agreed to review a decision made by a panel of judges, ruling in favor of Biden’s DOJ by 2-1, according to Bloomberg Law. Abbott has maintained that the barriers are a way to prevent migrants from risking their lives in the river, as the state saw record numbers for crossings.
The decision came before the case is set to appear in front of the district court for its planned trial on Aug. 6, Bloomberg Law reported.
(Featured Image Media Credit: Lucas Beck/Unsplash)
WHERE