Your moral reasoning is flawed and unnecessary. 14th Amendment was for Black Slaves who were brought here without their consent, not Illegal Immigrants who come here because they get Driver's Licenses and SNAP.
You don't have to worry about any of it, literally no one is going to do anything about Illegal Immigration or Replacement Migration.
10:27
https://www.c-span.org/video/?324394...mism-terrorism
How about enforcing the 14th amendment as written.
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The amendment clearly states "any person within it's jurisdiction". That includes illegal immigrants, whether you like it or not.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
In
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, a case involving the rights of Chinese immigrants, the Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's statement, "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," applied to all persons "without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality," and to "an alien, who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population, although alleged to be illegally here." [
Kaoru Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903)]
Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
Citing
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the Court, in the case of
Wong Wing v. United States, further applied the citizenship-blind nature of the Constitution to the 5th and
6th amendments, stating ". . . it must be concluded that all persons within the territory of the United States are entitled to the protection guaranteed by those amendments, and that even aliens shall not be held to answer for a capital or other infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
In
Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law prohibiting enrollment of illegal aliens in public school. In its decision, the Court held, "The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause, which provides that no State shall 'deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.' Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a 'person' in any ordinary sense of that term… . The undocumented status of these children
vel non does not establish a sufficient rational basis for denying them benefits that the State affords other residents."
