What's new

Russia Terrorist attack

Kate whatserfuck with cancer and a terrorist attack on 3/22. Skull and cross bones. Biblical shit Genesis verse 3:22

Bones_logo.jpg
ehh.....ok.... LOL
 
Particularly since there's no remotely logical reason for us to want to sponsor an attack like this.
Sure, other than the fact that our Federal government is carrying out the largest money laundering operation in the history of the planet via the country they're at war with and the terrorists supposedly fled to. Or the fact that one of our largest revenue streams in this country is arms sales which requires wars. Or the fact that Russia has been very open to negotiating an end to the war that's been massively unpopular with pretty much everyone but our government and Zelenski and the fact that if this really is tied to Ukraine as Putin is claiming then it probably takes negotiations off the table.

But yeah, we have no reason to sponsor terror attacks in a country we've used as the excuse for all of our bullshit post-WWII and we definitely don't have an extensive history of sponsoring terrorist activity in foreign nations. :homer:
 
Don't ever forget that months after bin laden was killed and all quida (sp) was no longer a boogeyman for MIC
ISIS showed up overnight in a fleet of brand new toyota trucks, wearing matching nikes, with berettas with no serial numbers, meaning they were made for cia or mi6, with a great graphic designer and PowerPoint slides.

It's all bullshit. It's all CIA



@7our_twitter-1044643708.jpeg
0cacde26d4b05f63883c70e9dbcf6911-867698210.jpeg



Mainstream article that says an anti tank missile was sold to the US government, and was in isis hands in 59 days, that's pretty quick
 
No one does this and expects to live, or doesn't take themselves out before captured. Something is off.
Sure they do. The videos of all the Hamas guys that were taken prisoner and interrogated, for instance.
All of them admitted what they, spoke about how much their families would be paid for it, and were alive afterward to be taken in by IDF and interviewed about it.
 
Can't just blow up an apartment building, been done before. Attacking music festivals/concerts is more "in" right now. The shooters were wearing the clothes most likely to rile up support for the war? Right before a draft is likely to happen? You don't say.
 

Putin Is Left With Egg on His Face After ISIS Provides Evidence It Carried Out the Moscow Attack​

By Bonchie | 1:49 PM on March 23, 2024
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.


In the face of rampant skepticism, ISIS has now provided photographic evidence it was behind the massacre at a Moscow concert hall.

The attack occurred on Friday evening, with gunmen entering the Crocus City Hall with AK-style weapons and explosives. Terrifying videos of the ordeal were made public showing people being gunned down in cold blood as others hid behind barriers. Russian FSB forces eventually arrived with the building already in flames.



SEE: Terrorist Attack at Moscow Concert Hall, Fatalities Reported





Within hours ISIS put out a statement of responsibility through its propaganda outlet, Amaq News Agency. That didn't stop speculation from running wild that it was Ukraine, the CIA, Israel, or some combination of the three behind the attack.


READ: ISIS Claims Responsibility for Moscow Attack in Surprise Twist, Skepticism Follows


Apparently, ISIS wasn't a fan of people stealing credit and responded again on Saturday.


If ISIS was not behind the attack, it wouldn't have access to the above photograph, and the details do match up with the pictures of the attackers found at the concert hall. The idea that this was a secret CIA plot carried out in conjunction with the Ukrainians, as Vladimir Putin suggested in his recent remarks, just doesn't make any sense, and it's now flying in the face of hard evidence.






As I wrote in my original write-up on the Moscow terrorist attack, Occam's razor says ISIS is telling the truth here. They've been carrying out mass casualty attacks for months against those they deem to be enemies, with one occurring in Iran in January. ISIS has no love lost for Russia because the two of them have essentially been at war for a decade. The terrorist group is even operating in the Caucasus region, and the attackers were Russian citizens.

In other words, Putin is almost certainly lying by making the baseless claim that the terrorists had a "window" opened for them to enter Ukraine after the attack. Why is that an incredibly stupid assertion? Because Russia controls Eastern Ukraine and is dug in on the northern border, which means the terrorists would be running right into the teeth of Putin's military build-up. Does that sound probable to anyone when they could have simply fled to an EU nation or the Caucasus region where they have allies?

There's no motivation for Ukraine or the United States to be involved in such an attack anyway. If a connection was made to Ukraine, it would only rally support for the war in Ukraine. Further, if the CIA was trying to pull one over on Moscow, they wouldn't have preemptively warned the Russians that an attack was coming.


Here's what all the evidence points to at this moment. Putin got caught with his pants down and doesn't want to admit ISIS got the best of him. The Russian president needs a vast conspiracy involving the West to blame because the truth is too embarrassing.
 

Putin Is Left With Egg on His Face After ISIS Provides Evidence It Carried Out the Moscow Attack​

By Bonchie | 1:49 PM on March 23, 2024
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.


In the face of rampant skepticism, ISIS has now provided photographic evidence it was behind the massacre at a Moscow concert hall.

The attack occurred on Friday evening, with gunmen entering the Crocus City Hall with AK-style weapons and explosives. Terrifying videos of the ordeal were made public showing people being gunned down in cold blood as others hid behind barriers. Russian FSB forces eventually arrived with the building already in flames.



SEE: Terrorist Attack at Moscow Concert Hall, Fatalities Reported





Within hours ISIS put out a statement of responsibility through its propaganda outlet, Amaq News Agency. That didn't stop speculation from running wild that it was Ukraine, the CIA, Israel, or some combination of the three behind the attack.


READ: ISIS Claims Responsibility for Moscow Attack in Surprise Twist, Skepticism Follows


Apparently, ISIS wasn't a fan of people stealing credit and responded again on Saturday.


If ISIS was not behind the attack, it wouldn't have access to the above photograph, and the details do match up with the pictures of the attackers found at the concert hall. The idea that this was a secret CIA plot carried out in conjunction with the Ukrainians, as Vladimir Putin suggested in his recent remarks, just doesn't make any sense, and it's now flying in the face of hard evidence.






As I wrote in my original write-up on the Moscow terrorist attack, Occam's razor says ISIS is telling the truth here. They've been carrying out mass casualty attacks for months against those they deem to be enemies, with one occurring in Iran in January. ISIS has no love lost for Russia because the two of them have essentially been at war for a decade. The terrorist group is even operating in the Caucasus region, and the attackers were Russian citizens.

In other words, Putin is almost certainly lying by making the baseless claim that the terrorists had a "window" opened for them to enter Ukraine after the attack. Why is that an incredibly stupid assertion? Because Russia controls Eastern Ukraine and is dug in on the northern border, which means the terrorists would be running right into the teeth of Putin's military build-up. Does that sound probable to anyone when they could have simply fled to an EU nation or the Caucasus region where they have allies?

There's no motivation for Ukraine or the United States to be involved in such an attack anyway. If a connection was made to Ukraine, it would only rally support for the war in Ukraine. Further, if the CIA was trying to pull one over on Moscow, they wouldn't have preemptively warned the Russians that an attack was coming.


Here's what all the evidence points to at this moment. Putin got caught with his pants down and doesn't want to admit ISIS got the best of him. The Russian president needs a vast conspiracy involving the West to blame because the truth is too embarrassing.
But how do we know this is even facts?
 
Supposed body cam from inside, gore, graphic, 35%, Twitter
Guess the goal wasn't body count if he's taking the time to try and hack off the head of a dead man rather than chasing new targets.
Bunch of sick fucks, as always. No humanity, just savages that deserve no quarter.
 
You know it's not.
They claim because shirts match.
Look at shirts, they don't match.
The end.
So you are saying dont believe anything you might see in and on social media, or on the TV set. Tin foil hat much, no im looking for a body suit.
 
So you are saying dont believe anything you might see in and on social media, or on the TV set. Tin foil hat much, no im looking for a body suit.
I looked at the shirt ISIS posted, and I looked at the shirts of the guys actually caught. I can see they are different shirts.
But yeah, for the most part, you're spot on.
 
The complete group was captured on the Russian border with Ukraine. All of them together, as if they were setup to be captured.
 
Top Back Refresh