What's new
By:
Filters

Replacement Fetterman

Replacement

  • Yes

    Votes: 32 41.6%

  • No

    Votes: 6 7.8%

  • Lizard person

    Votes: 39 50.6%
  • Total voters
    77
I mean, it's very fair to point out Dem delusion on Russiagate and the media's culpability in pushing it. Very fair. But claiming that multiple Trump appointed judges found anything in the multiple election lawsuits filed is Russiagate level stuff.
 
east_beast said:
I mean, it's very fair to point out Dem delusion on Russiagate and the media's culpability in pushing it. Very fair. But claiming that multiple Trump appointed judges found anything in the multiple election lawsuits filed is Russiagate level stuff.
Click to expand...
Again....none of it went to court.
 
Thumping said:
Again....none of it went to court.
Click to expand...

Because they got dismissed for lack of
standing (i.e. lack of evidence) before they even made it to trial. I mean, guys... it's just pure cope. The dude lost. He threw a bunch of legal mud at the wall and not a single bit stuck. The only injustice here is how the media propped up Russiagate and never wholesale dismissed it and mocked it like they did Trump's hissy fit. Both were spoiled brat tantrums and should've been equally laughed at.
 
east_beast said:
Because they got dismissed for lack of
standing (i.e. lack of evidence) before they even made it to trial.
Click to expand...

Yes, judges are impartial, never political
cwm13-gif.627998
- oh, wait:

the conservative atheist said:
www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: DC Judge Orders America's Mayor Rudy Giuliani to Pay $148 Million to Two Former Georgia Election Workers | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

A DC jury has ruled that Rudy Giuliani owes plaintiffs $148 MILLION in Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss’ lawsuit against Giuliani for alleged defamation after he claimed the two women contributed to voter fraud in Georgia’s 2020 election. VERDICT: Jury orders Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 MILLION to...
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...

Giuliani ordered to pay $148M for saying 2 women did the shit that they did to scam the 2020 election count.

Yep, I'll just agree to disagree vis-à-vis your blind faith in blind justice. Let's call it a trust issue on my part :laughing:
 
62 lawsuits across 9 states were filed by or for Trump on the grounds of foul play on the 2020 election. They all failed. Do you really think there was THAT much legal collusion against Trump that not one was successful? 0 for 62?

I mean... c'mon. Something would've stuck somewhere.
 
east_beast said:
62 lawsuits across 9 states were filed by or for Trump on the grounds of foul play on the 2020 election. They all failed. Do you really think there was THAT much legal collusion against Trump that not one was successful? 0 for 62?

I mean... c'mon. Something would've stuck somewhere.
Click to expand...
I dunno, man - when the FBI, the press, social media, academia, senate majority and a decent portion of the judicial system are committed to burying the truth, 62-0 seems achievable. Hell, if Musk hadn't freed Twatter, their coverup might have been airtight by now.

EDIT: creating that J6 distraction to legally persecute their opponents while distracting from (and not looking into at all) the outrageously obvious election fraud examples was pure evil genius.
 
ExWrench said:
I dunno, man - when the FBI, the press, social media, academia, senate majority and a decent portion of the judicial system are committed to burying the truth, 62-0 seems achievable.
Click to expand...
Doubly so if all the key people feel they have plausible deniability for not doing their jobs to the fullest extent and will get their dog is gonna get shot if they go above and beyond at doing their jobs. Besides, even if they do their jobs the appeals court might just take the easy way out.

And this is before you begin to consider the ability the people in the judicial system have to choose which judge gets what case and the ability of politically connected people to affect that.

It's a failure of bureaucracy as well as a failure of democracy.
 
ExWrench said:
I dunno, man - when the FBI, the press, social media, academia, senate majority and a decent portion of the judicial system are committed to burying the truth, 62-0 seems achievable. Hell, if Musk hadn't freed Twatter, their coverup might have been airtight by now.

EDIT: creating that J6 distraction to legally persecute their opponents while distracting from (and not looking into at all) the outrageously obvious election fraud examples was pure evil genius.
Click to expand...

But we're not talking about DC and the mainstream media here. We're talking about dozens of different judges across multiple different jurisdictions with a varying political leanings saying there's nothing here.
 
And let me be clear here, lack of proof and legal standing is not proof no wrongdoing. But dozens of failed lawsuits across 9 states and in front of dozens of different judges is certainly proof of a lack of legal standing in the lawsuits. Voter fraud is never zero and Dems definitely don't have much concern with trying to curb it.
 
east_beast said:
Because they got dismissed for lack of
standing (i.e. lack of evidence) before they even made it to trial.
Click to expand...

If you don't understand that this is entirely incorrect, there's not much hope for the rest of your argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
bgaidan said:
If you don't understand that this is entirely incorrect, there's not much hope for the rest of your argument.
Click to expand...

62 failed lawsuits across 9 states in multiple jurisdiction under dozens of judges with varying political leanings. That's a wrap.

Y'all gotta stop being so partisan while pointing at Democrats for being purely partisan. You're halfway right. Fuck 'em both.
 
east_beast said:
Fact.
Click to expand...
I meant, have you looked into the judges, into their donors, into their lake houses, into their Hillary luncheons.

A machine that could hypothetically steal the leadership of 300 million people could sweep up a few crumbs afterward.

I know, tinfoil. I'm not saying that I know one way or the other, I'm saying that I don't.
 
east_beast said:
62 failed lawsuits across 9 states in multiple jurisdiction under dozens of judges with varying political leanings. That's a wrap.

Y'all gotta stop being so partisan while pointing at Democrats for being purely partisan. You're halfway right. Fuck 'em both.
Click to expand...

Who in the US has standing to file a lawsuit regarding election fraud?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
bgaidan said:
Who in the US has standing to file a lawsuit regarding election fraud?
Click to expand...
This breaks it down pretty well.

www.propublica.org

ProPublica’s Guide to 2020 Election Laws and Lawsuits

Regardless of who wins the presidency, courtroom battles seem almost certain. Here’s a layperson’s look at the states and laws that may determine the outcome.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

You can go through every individual case here:

Major Pending Election Cases | Case Tracker

electioncases.osu.edu electioncases.osu.edu

There's a detailed report of conservative politicians, judges, lawyers, etc. breaking down their own arguments against the lawsuit claims:

lostnotstolen.org

Lost, Not Stolen

The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election
lostnotstolen.org lostnotstolen.org
 
east_beast said:
This breaks it down pretty well.

www.propublica.org

ProPublica’s Guide to 2020 Election Laws and Lawsuits

Regardless of who wins the presidency, courtroom battles seem almost certain. Here’s a layperson’s look at the states and laws that may determine the outcome.
www.propublica.org www.propublica.org

You can go through every individual case here:

Major Pending Election Cases | Case Tracker

electioncases.osu.edu electioncases.osu.edu

There's a detailed report of conservative politicians, judges, lawyers, etc. breaking down their own arguments against the lawsuit claims:

lostnotstolen.org

Lost, Not Stolen

The Conservative Case that Trump Lost and Biden Won the 2020 Presidential Election
lostnotstolen.org lostnotstolen.org
Click to expand...

Can you answer the question in your own words?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMG
Fetterman is pissed :mad3: that the 122 yr old US Steel company in Pittsburgh :usa: was bought by Nippon Steel 🇯🇵 for $15 billion (give or take). He wants to stop the sale... Think he'll pull his weight?
 
east_beast said:
62 lawsuits across 9 states were filed by or for Trump on the grounds of foul play on the 2020 election. They all failed. Do you really think there was THAT much legal collusion against Trump that not one was successful? 0 for 62?

I mean... c'mon. Something would've stuck somewhere.
Click to expand...
30 of them been to the island.
15 have TDS
The rest either don't want their kid ending up in a Jeep accident where the motor and trans wind up across the intersection or were reminded how much their grandchild loves their home room kindergarten teacher whose class in room 8 lets out at 9:13.
 
det107 said:
Fetterman is pissed :mad3: that the 122 yr old US Steel company in Pittsburgh :usa: was bought by Nippon Steel 🇯🇵 for $15 billion (give or take). He wants to stop the sale... Think he'll pull his weight?
Click to expand...
Why? Dumbass chest thumping to appeal to dumbass voters?

The Japanese are great business partners and almost a vassal state so why care if they "own" it?
 
Outahand said:
The rest either don't want their kid ending up in a Jeep accident where the motor and trans wind up across the intersection or were reminded how much their grandchild loves their home room kindergarten teacher whose class in room 8 lets out at 9:13.
Click to expand...
You don't even need to do that. Spend a few million dollars over a few months carpet bombing everyone in their social circle with targeted ads for all the content that covers the evil shit the establishment has done or it's suspected they've done and the judge will probably reach the "correct" conclusion on their own and if they don't the appeals judge will. Perfectly legal.
 
east_beast said:
Because they got dismissed for lack of
standing (i.e. lack of evidence) before they even made it to trial. I mean, guys... it's just pure cope. The dude lost. He threw a bunch of legal mud at the wall and not a single bit stuck. The only injustice here is how the media propped up Russiagate and never wholesale dismissed it and mocked it like they did Trump's hissy fit. Both were spoiled brat tantrums and should've been equally laughed at.
Click to expand...
You really are full of shit. Judges refuse to hear any evidence and to you , well there's nothing to see here, move along.

Did you ever stop to ask yourself why they would refuse to hear anything and throw the excuse out of "not having standing"?

Would you want to be the judge to allowed it to move into court with evidence and take a chance on having to rule the election void? Simply allowing the case to move forward is signing ones own death certificate.

You don't think they would take out a federal judge?
 
east_beast said:
62 lawsuits across 9 states were filed by or for Trump on the grounds of foul play on the 2020 election. They all failed. Do you really think there was THAT much legal collusion against Trump that not one was successful? 0 for 62?

I mean... c'mon. Something would've stuck somewhere.
Click to expand...
yet 2+ years of Russia Gate... All of Hilary's crimes and not even an arrest... FBI spying on American's and not a single person fired. 45 being indicted for stuff that's not even illegal. People in jail for 2+ years for being in DC... Video showing LEO's inviting people into the capital... etc, etc.

Yet people actually as "is there THAT much legal collusion"?

Seems like it.
 
Thumping said:
You really are full of shit. Judges refuse to hear any evidence and to you , well there's nothing to see here, move along.

Did you ever stop to ask yourself why they would refuse to hear anything and throw the excuse out of "not having standing"?

Would you want to be the judge to allowed it to move into court with evidence and take a chance on having to rule the election void? Simply allowing the case to move forward is signing ones own death certificate.

You don't think they would take out a federal judge?
Click to expand...

There were federal judges, state judges, hell all the way to the SCOTUS involved in these decisions. You do realize you're proposing a wide sweeping judicial conspiracy against Donald Trump that crosses multiple levels of the judiciary, multiple states, and state and federal level courts, right? I mean, Occam's Razor and all that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh