What's new
By:
Filters

Pelosi's husband attacked

Firstram said:
They make hurricane rated windows that the inner pane is laminated safety glass. A door would have tempered on the outside, explaining the pile of glass on the ground.
Click to expand...
Replace "hurricane" with "security". Ain't nobody buying hurricane windows in Komifornia.
 
Thatg9659 said:
Would she have survived the thumping?
Click to expand...

Plot twist...... They were both standing there holding the hammer waiting for her to come home so they could get the job done together. The underwear was so they could tag team her dead corps quickly before her life alert monitor sent authorities. :laughing:
 
Has there been a bill introduced to ban hammers yet? :flipoff2:
 
The man accused of attacking Paul Pelosi with a hammer last year told a California jury Tuesday that the former US House speaker's husband "was never my target and I'm sorry he got hurt," US media said.

David DePape entered the Pelosi home in San Francisco at the end of October 2022, a few days before the midterm elections, wielding rope, gloves, duct tape and a small sledge hammer.

DePape, who faces possible life in prison if convicted of assault and kidnapping, detailed his conspiracy beliefs in the courtroom.

He cried several times on the stand as he detailed his view of the world, several US media outlets said.

DePape explained that he listened to right-wing podcasts and believed in conspiracy theories, including that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks were carried out by the US government itself and that a pedophilia network supplies the political elite.

During the attack, DePape is accused of grabbing a hammer and hitting Paul Pelosi, 83, in the head, fracturing his skull.

His initial plan was to target Nancy Pelosi, and on encountering her husband kept asking, "Where's Nancy?"

Paul Pelosi managed to alert the police, and officers captured the assault on body cams.

"I reacted because my plan was basically ruined," DePape said of the alleged attack.

Paul Pelosi "appeared to be genuinely remorseful about the corruption in (Washington) DC," DePape testified, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. "We had a really good rapport... Things were going pretty good until the very last second."

At the time, Democrat Nancy Pelosi was second in line to the presidency and a regular target of far-right conspiracy theories.

DePape, a Canadian citizen, said he hoped to attack others, including a feminist academic whom he accused of turning US schools into "pedophile molestation factories" and destroying children's sense of identity, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

Other personalities the defendant admitted wanting to attack included California Governor Gavin Newsom, President Joe Biden's son Hunter, and actor Tom Hanks.

DePape has pleaded not guilty. His defense admits the assault, but disputes that he specifically intended to attack Nancy Pelosi (or her husband) as a federal official -- a key factor for the prosecution.

In addition to the federal trial, DePape faces a separate trial on state charges for the attack.
 
Obviously, he's not responsible for his actions; the problem is insufficient censorship of right-wing views. Just like mass shooters aren't responsible because society doesn't have strict enough gun laws to keep guns out of their hands. We need more gubmint control to 100% ensure the safety of the chillruns :flipoff2:
 
arse_sidewards said:
None. They just had the ol "you done fucked up and made us look stupid and so if you want to get out of this alive you'll say these things" talk with him.
Click to expand...
Yea maybe, but he could screw up the monolog because he's not an actor. So much easier to just sprinkle some acid on a pop-tart and give him some coaching lessons. Then he'll really believe it, and be eligible for an Oscar.

They have a group of guys down in the basement that do this for a living. It's really no big deal.
 
45acp said:
Yea maybe, but he could screw up the monolog because he's not an actor. So much easier to just sprinkle some acid on a pop-tart and give him some coaching lessons. Then he'll really believe it, and be eligible for an Oscar.

They have a group of guys down in the basement that do this for a living. It's really no big deal.
Click to expand...
Good point. :laughing:
 
45acp said:
Yea maybe, but he could screw up the monolog because he's not an actor. So much easier to just sprinkle some acid on a pop-tart and give him some coaching lessons. Then he'll really believe it, and be eligible for an Oscar.

They have a group of guys down in the basement that do this for a living. It's really no big deal.
Click to expand...

Do we know if we got any testimony from the Wakesha Christmas parade terrorist? Or he was not allowed to talk?
 
Thumping said:
And every democrat will point and say....see, conservatives are a threat to democracy.
Click to expand...
All the more reason that suppressing the Nashville trannyfesto was so important; the narrative is easier to push when the (blatant mountain of) evidence contradicting it is censored.

Imagine if Musk hadn't jail-broken Twatter - the lying fuckers almost had 100% control of all the information going to the NPCs :frown:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh