What's new
By:
Filters

Make your election prediction! Trump in a landslide from me.

gladman said:
I consistently hear how stupid the democrats are... and I find some of the evidence compelling.
If the democrats are as stupid as they appear
how could they possibly outwit the republicans and cheat and get away with it?

It would be easy (and logical) to believe 'the democrats are dumb' and the election has not been stolen (ever)
or the democrats are really smart and know how to effectively steal elections (and have.)

But, it is a struggle for them to be both stupid and outwit the otherwise superior republicans.
Click to expand...

Well, economically, socially and politically they are stupid.

Doesn't meant they don't know how to cheat because they're lowlife scumbag commies.
 
MuntCuffin said:
They are not stupid.

They know what they are doing.

You don't understand, don't want to see, or comprehend their goals.
Click to expand...

They are stupid, from a logic standpoint. Marxism/communism/socialism/fascism does not work. Nothing to do with who has tried it.

Anyone who wants to mutilate healthy children is stupid.

Anyone who thinks there are more than 2 sexes (not genders) is stupid.

The list is pretty much endless.

I totally understand, see and comprehend their goals.
 
JD Mark said:
They are stupid, from a logic standpoint. Marxism/communism/socialism/fascism does not work. Nothing to do with who has tried it.
Click to expand...
It works if your goal is power and you wish to turn the citizens into destitute brainwashed slaves.

And their actions would be perfectly logical with that end goal.

"You'll own nothing and be happy."


Ya oughta take em serious.
 
IMG_4343.jpeg

I think it’s going to be a nail biter. I don’t know if Nebraska is dividing their electoral votes again this time but if they are or if Maine doesn’t give any of its divided vote to Trump it could easily be 269-269. If this happens it goes to the senate which is evenly split and would likely result in Harris casting the deciding vote as the tiebreaker of the senate for herself.
 
Sandy Johnson said:
Devil's advocate here-

Could it be possible that the same people stealing elections are not the same people that are running for them?


I do feel that any truly smart person would run screaming from the presidency in this day and age.
Click to expand...
could be.

I overheard a conversation today while waiting for someone... the gist of the conversation was that this guy was telling their friend (seemed like friends) that if DJT gets elected the dems won't let him govern and if harris gets elected the repubs won't let her govern... so, he said, it doesn't fucking matter who gets elected.

When I heard that, i thought, I remember when my poli sci prof in college said, 'democracy is messy and when it is working well, it is slow and it takes a long time to accomplish anything.... so, maybe things are as they should be.
 
Can we see the Camel's LSAT score? Can we see her GPA? Any of that kind of stuff?
Or is buried under "diversity"?
 
the conservative atheist said:
If Trump doesn't win on election night it's over. You known damn well a days-long dragged-out count is not going to go GOP.
Click to expand...
I think that’s exactly where this is headed when he wins on election night.

The DNC is going to dust off 4 year’s ago playbook minus the Covid part. Pull moving trucks with boxes of ballots up to the back of polling stations in certain counties in swing states. They’ll know by midnight how many boxes to chuck out of the van at each stop. They’ll call anybody who questions that racist and all the phobes. It won’t matter that those counties will have more votes than registered voters because the MSM will run block on the narrative.
 
the conservative atheist said:
Maybe so, but ultimately the Bushes proved to be deep state elites so this may not be saying much or relevant in this election. W appeared with Obama and Clinton to push the sheep shots.
Click to expand...

Beat me to it...W was the other side of the coin.
 
SanDiegoCJ said:
That doesn't change the fact that your inference is wrong. Your smoke screen doesn't work with me.
Click to expand...

I think I'll base my inference on what has transpired over the past 4 years instead of going back 24 years just to play the contrarian.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Back Refresh