What's new

Make your election prediction! Trump in a landslide from me.

I have been seeing Trump swag stands on street corners urban, and rural for over a year. Some of them are quite large. Between home and Folsom, where I usually do my town runs, I have seen several Trump flags out in random locations.

I have seen one Harris swag stand. It was a small card table under a small ez-up in a very “diverse” area of Sacramento.
What were you buying in Oak Park? :laughing:
 
Yesterday and today Kamala’s odds are +165

Trumps are -190.

Again the line doesn't indicate who the books care who wins, and the line is not an indicator of who will win. They're just trying to get betters laying even money on each side so they can take the Vig from the middle. The line is about as reliable as a poll.
 
Ah. The 3AM steal.

1730158280339.png

That's my bet.

I believe that's his prediction. Harris wins EVERY swing state in his opinion.
I disagree, but who knows how the ballots go after they lock out the republican poll watchers and ballot counters.

Correct, except GA.
 
I guess it depends on where you look

1730195994767.png

most national polls are there to shape opinion. and they traditionally under sample conservatives on purpose. the campaigns internal polls show the real story. just watch what they do.

Kamala is down in Pennsylvania and in Michigan, is my guess.


i think she's given up in GA or knows the steal is still in place, similar to AZ.

they are outspending Trump maybe 2-1 and are "tied"? no... i don't believe its actually tied
 
Again the line doesn't indicate who the books care who wins, and the line is not an indicator of who will win. They're just trying to get betters laying even money on each side so they can take the Vig from the middle. The line is about as reliable as a poll.
I hope you don’t think that I thought that it is any real indication. Dude asked about Vegas odds, so I shared them. Unless I misunderstood him.
 
My post disappeared:deleted!!!!! I made the first prediction in this thread, “Trump comes down the gold escalator on Wednesday morning”!!!!!!

It’s fuggin gone!!!!!
:mad3::mad3::mad3:
 
I guess it depends on where you look

1730195994767.png
it certainly does- ABC is one of the high outliers (also bear in mind the polls have overestimated dem performance vs actual results by 5%+ in the last 2 election cycles):
1730208293710.png
 
Last edited:
Like this website showing Trump at .60 and Hyena at .45.

Or any given places in Vegas, other websites, etc.

I want to see what real money is saying about it.

Yesterday and today Kamala’s odds are +165

Trumps are -190.
Today even better
1000030378.jpg

Again the line doesn't indicate who the books care who wins, and the line is not an indicator of who will win. They're just trying to get betters laying even money on each side so they can take the Vig from the middle. The line is about as reliable as a poll.
It is insanely more accurate than a poll, if you read about market efficiency it will explain better than I can.

The balance comes into play with why both sides aren't symmetrical. If it was like a sport with a spread, that's a different story and I'd agree with you

Edit: in 2020 same site had Trumps lead slipping since July, into the election he was +140/Biden-185


They basically called the steal
 
Last edited:
What's bullshit is that CA like most other states is a winner take all college votes, which if you're not on the winning side, your vote essentially counts for nothing. We all know SoCal and Bay Area/Sacramento will vote blue, but all those folks in the Central Coast, SJ Valley, and foothill/mountain communities might as well not even vote with their votes getting pummeled by the big metro centers. :mad3:
disagree...

splitting the electoral college votes dilutes us closer to a "democracy"... which is scary
 
I hope you don’t think that I thought that it is any real indication. Dude asked about Vegas odds, so I shared them. Unless I misunderstood him.
No. I posted that because Yota Downs seemed to think the betting public would be a reliable indicator.
 
disagree...

splitting the electoral college votes dilutes us closer to a "democracy"... which is scary

Of course you do, :laughing:

So you're happy that Californian is giving all it's 54 votes to Harris? There is no evidence that splitting the votes would turn us into a democracy. The common claim, is that the big cities would overrule the rural, but that's already the case for the most part.
 
Former President Donald Trump has taken the lead in a poll in New Hampshire, his first lead in the state since President Joe Biden ended his reelection bid in July.

The latest New Hampshire Journal/Praecones Analytica poll released Sunday night gave Trump 50.2 percent of the vote, a razor-thin lead on Vice President Kamala Harris' 49.8 points.

It surveyed 622 registered voters in New Hampshire between October 24 and 26. Trump's 0.4 point lead falls well within the poll's +/- 5.12 percent weighted margin of error. However, it is still Trump's first lead in the Granite State since pulling one point ahead of Biden in another New Hampshire Journal/Praecones Analytica poll in July, days before Biden dropped out.
 
No progressive(ore even moderate conservative for that matter) believes it happened.
They do, but it's fine because "it's my team".

Here's recent fraud, examples are plentiful. How many aren't caught, and do you think only local elections are rigged?



 
Of course you do, :laughing:

So you're happy that Californian is giving all it's 54 votes to Harris? There is no evidence that splitting the votes would turn us into a democracy. The common claim, is that the big cities would overrule the rural, but that's already the case for the most part.

California has the right to do what they want. I said “closer to a democracy” and give more ammunition for the popular vote and tired vote fans.
 
They do, but it's fine because "it's my team".

Here's recent fraud, examples are plentiful. How many aren't caught, and do you think only local elections are rigged?



They fucked up the local ballot here in Maricopa county already. It was for a school board position and the instructions should have said "Voter for 1", but it was printed as "Vote for 2". :laughing: Doh! They might have to do a special election just for those four candidates if they don't get a clear winner.
 
I consistently hear how stupid the democrats are... and I find some of the evidence compelling.
If the democrats are as stupid as they appear
how could they possibly outwit the republicans and cheat and get away with it?

It would be easy (and logical) to believe 'the democrats are dumb' and the election has not been stolen (ever)
or the democrats are really smart and know how to effectively steal elections (and have.)

But, it is a struggle for them to be both stupid and outwit the otherwise superior republicans.
 
Seems like they are burning ballot boxes in WA and Oregon. Not sure why. No way republicans get anything from those places. Can't see why either side would do that.
 
Seems like they are burning ballot boxes in WA and Oregon. Not sure why. No way republicans get anything from those places. Can't see why either side would do that.
raise awareness. demonstrate it can be done. give ideas to lower performing states who might not think of it. get on the news. try out new explosive devices. Both Washington and Oregon (and to a lesser degree) California have pretty major red blue splits... the secession from WA and OR has been bantered about for 20 years or so.
 
It would be easy (and logical) to believe 'the democrats are dumb' and the election has not been stolen (ever)
or the democrats are really smart and know how to effectively steal elections (and have.)
Devil's advocate here-

Could it be possible that the same people stealing elections are not the same people that are running for them?


I do feel that any truly smart person would run screaming from the presidency in this day and age.
 
Top Back Refresh